{"id":4225,"date":"2026-04-13T15:24:19","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T15:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/4225\/"},"modified":"2026-04-13T15:24:19","modified_gmt":"2026-04-13T15:24:19","slug":"why-some-workers-embrace-ai-while-others-wont-use-it-gallup-poll","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/4225\/","title":{"rendered":"Why some workers embrace AI while others won’t use it: Gallup poll"},"content":{"rendered":"

By MATT O\u2019BRIEN and LINLEY SANDERS<\/p>\n

More American workers are experimenting with artificial intelligence<\/a> in their jobs, but skepticism is still widespread.<\/p>\n

New Gallup polling<\/a> finds that while more employees are using AI frequently in their work, there\u2019s been an uptick in alarm<\/a> that new technologies will replace their jobs. Many workers who are not using AI say they prefer to work without it, have ethical oppositions to the technology or worry about data privacy.<\/p>\n

The poll, conducted in February, points to a divergence in how AI is reshaping American workplaces<\/a>. Some find it to be a gamechanger for productivity and efficiency, while others are concerned about its potentially negative impacts.<\/p>\n

Social worker Scott Segal said he regularly uses AI to find information that will help connect his elderly and vulnerable patients to health care resources in northern Virginia. While he knows that the human connection and care he brings to that work is important, he also believes that AI could soon replace him.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m planning ahead,\u201d said Segal, 53. \u201cI think everyone who works in a replaceable field or trade should be planning ahead.\u201d<\/p>\n

Most workers using AI report productivity boosts<\/p>\n

Roughly 3 in 10 employees are frequent users of AI in their jobs, meaning they use it daily or a few times a week. About 2 in 10 are infrequent users, using AI tools at work a few times a month or a few times a year.<\/p>\n

The Gallup poll found that about 4 in 10 workers say their organization has adopted AI tools or technology<\/a> to improve organizational practices. About two-thirds of those workers say AI has had an \u201cextremely\u201d or \u201csomewhat\u201d positive impact on their individual productivity and efficiency at work.<\/p>\n

Workers using AI in management roles are more likely to say the technology has been at least \u201csomewhat\u201d positive for their productivity, compared with individual contributors. About 7 in 10 leaders using AI at least a few times a year say AI has made them more efficient at work, compared with just over half of individual contributors.<\/p>\n

Labor and employment attorney Elizabeth Bloch of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, said she uses ChatGPT to help \u201cdraft letters or emails in a diplomatic way because it\u2019s a very adversarial profession and sometimes you get heated.\u201d<\/p>\n

AI tools appear to have a greater benefit for workers in managerial, health care and technology roles than in service jobs. About 6 in 10 employees in those fields who are using AI say it\u2019s boosted their productivity at least \u201csomewhat,\u201d compared with 45% of those using it in service jobs.<\/p>\n

Why some employees don\u2019t use AI<\/p>\n

Even when companies make AI tools available, there\u2019s no guarantee employees will adopt them. About half of U.S. employees use AI only once a year or not at all, according to the Gallup study.<\/p>\n

Bloch said she\u2019s tried using AI for legal research but finds it is prone to hallucinations, or making up false information, even when using AI tools custom-built for legal work. She\u2019s worried other lawyers who were already bad at finding and citing relevant case law are \u201cgoing to be bad at using AI, because you\u2019re not using the right prompts,\u201d leading judges to sanction them for false citations<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Among workers who have AI tools available at their company and don\u2019t use them, 46% say it\u2019s because they prefer to keep doing their work the way they do it now. About 4 in 10 non-users who have AI available to them report that they are ethically opposed to AI, are concerned about data privacy or don\u2019t believe AI can be helpful for the work they do.<\/p>\n

About one-quarter of these non-users who have AI tools available say they have used AI at work and don\u2019t find it helpful, while about 2 in 10 say they do not feel prepared to use AI effectively.<\/p>\n

Thuy Pisone, a contract administrator in Maryland for a company that works with the federal government, said she uses AI weekly for mundane tasks but has avoided it for things she already can do just fine.<\/p>\n

\u201cI have heard from my colleagues that we could use AI to put together our PowerPoint slides,\u201d Pisone said. \u201cI\u2019m a little biased in that, well, I could put my own PowerPoints together. I don\u2019t need help because it took me time to hone up my skill.\u201d<\/p>\n

More workers are concerned about new technology taking jobs<\/p>\n

While this was less of a reason for forgoing AI at work, the poll also found U.S. workers are increasingly concerned about being driven out of a job by new technologies.<\/p>\n

About 2 in 10 \u2014 18% \u2014 of U.S. workers say it is \u201cvery\u201d or \u201csomewhat\u201d likely that their current job will be eliminated within the next five years because of new technology, automation, robots or AI. That\u2019s up from 15% in 2025. People working at companies that have adopted AI are even more likely to be concerned that their job will be eliminated: 23% call this at least \u201csomewhat\u201d likely in the next few years.<\/p>\n

A Fox News poll conducted in March found that about 6 in 10 registered voters believe AI will eliminate more jobs than it creates over the next five years. Only about 1 in 10 expect it will create more positions, and about one-third say it\u2019s too soon to say. About 7 in 10 employed voters say they are \u201cnot very\u201d or \u201cnot at all\u201d concerned their current job could be eliminated by AI.<\/p>\n

Segal, the social worker in Virginia, said his alternative plan if AI replaces him is to start a new \u201chealth care chaperone service\u201d that physically escorts patients from one appointment to another, especially when they\u2019ve been sedated and don\u2019t have family or others to pick them up.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think that\u2019s something that will be replaced for another maybe 10 or 15 years, until robots are embodied with AI,\u201d Segal said. \u201cI do believe that AI is going to displace most people\u2019s employment functions and I question what people will do for livelihood at that point.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the meantime, he\u2019s been asking AI chatbots to help him strategize on saving for his retirement.<\/p>\n

Gallup\u2019s quarterly workforce surveys were conducted with a random sample of adults age 18 and older who work full time and part time for organizations in the United States and are members of Gallup\u2019s probability-based Gallup Panel. The most recent survey of 23,717 employed U.S. adults was conducted Feb. 4-19, 2026. The margin of sampling error for all respondents is plus or minus 0.9 percentage points.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"By MATT O\u2019BRIEN and LINLEY SANDERS More American workers are experimenting with artificial intelligence in their jobs, but…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4226,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,3968,3969,25,1550],"class_list":{"0":"post-4225","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-ai","8":"tag-ai","9":"tag-ai-workers","10":"tag-ai-workplaces","11":"tag-artificial-intelligence","12":"tag-gallup-poll"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4225\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4226"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}