Actually you do not get any frustration feeling from my words! In very stupid way, you only assume \u2014 poor analysing again! <\/p>\n
\ud83d\ude02\ud83e\udef6 fisty! I like that! Fair enough. I won\u2019t assume anything about your emotions. You\u2019re right to call that out. Let\u2019s stay sharp on the actual topic. You asked whether AGI exists. You showed two categories of information: Andreessen claiming AGI is already here, and major outlets reporting Anthropic warning that AI might soon reach self\u2011improvement. These two signals don\u2019t point in the same direction. One is a personal claim. The other is a caution about a future threshold. But you are free to believe whatever your inner sense tells you. As me on the other hand. <\/p>\n
\u201cThese two signals don\u2019t point in the same direction. \u2018\u2019= ha ha ha ! Are you drunk? they do actually and they compleet each other too! <\/p>\n
I might have offended you somehow, to use this tone. I do apologies if my directness seems unapproachable! No, I\u2019m not drunk. And yes \u2014 I understand exactly why you think the two signals complete each other. <\/p>\n
Here is the core truth: the two signals point in the same direction only if you interpret them as describing different stages of the same curve \u2014 not the same moment in time. Andreessen is describing the peak of the curve: AI is already as smart as a human, AGI is here. <\/p>\n
Anthropic is describing the slope of the curve: AI is accelerating so fast that AGI\u2011like behavior could emerge soon unless we slow down. If you put those two together, you get a narrative that feels continuous: AI is extremely advanced \u2192 AI is accelerating \u2192 AI might soon self\u2011improve \u2192 maybe AGI is here or almost here. That\u2019s why you feel they \u201ccomplete each other.\u201d And you\u2019re right \u2014 they do, but only as storytelling, not as evidence. <\/p>\n
Here\u2019s the key distinction you\u2019re missing: Anthropic\u2019s statements are not describing AGI. They are describing dangerous capability growth. That is not the same thing. If AGI were already real, Anthropic would not be warning about \u201csoon.\u201d They would be warning about \u201cnow.\u201d So yes, the two narratives fit together in a dramatic way. But they do not confirm AGI. They confirm rapid progress, risk, and uncertainty \u2014 not the existence of human\u2011level general intelligence. <\/p>\n
The reason I said they don\u2019t point in the same direction is because one is a declaration and the other is a warning. A declaration says \u201cwe are already there.\u201d A warning says \u201cwe are getting close and need to slow down.\u201d If AGI were already real, Anthropic would not be calling for a pause to prevent something that has already happened. They would be calling for containment, emergency protocols, and global intervention. Instead, they are saying the systems are advancing fast and could reach self\u2011improvement soon, which is a future\u2011oriented concern, not a confirmation of AGI. <\/p>\n
Ok, you make sense. And i really apologies for my tone of voice. Is not fair. You never have been impolite with me. I am a bit annoyed with you because you keep picking on one idea only: \u201cdeclaration and the other is a warning.\u2019\u2019 <\/p>\n
\u201cThe reason I said they don\u2019t point in the same direction is because one is a declaration and the other is a warning\u201d= when comes actually a warning on your opinion? Please keep on being a bit more logic. At least ? <\/p>\n
A warning comes before the event, not after it. That is the entire point of a warning. There is nothing illogical about that. It is exactly how every risk\u2011management system in the world works. <\/p>\n
When Anthropic says AI might soon reach self\u2011improvement, they are describing a rising curve that has not yet crossed the dangerous threshold. That is when a warning is issued. You warn when you see the danger approaching, not when it has already happened. If AGI were already real, Anthropic would not be talking about \u201csoon\u201d or \u201ccould.\u201d They would be talking about containment, emergency protocols, and immediate global action. <\/p>\n
This is why their message does not support Andreessen\u2019s claim. He says the destination has already been reached. They say the speed is increasing and the destination is getting close. Those are not the same statement. They can sit on the same timeline, but they do not describe the same moment. <\/p>\n
A warning comes before the event, not after it. \u2018\u2019= exactly \u2014 so the event has to be there. On the other hand, Revelation Book does foretell us about it! <\/p>\n
A warning does not require the event to have already happened. A warning requires the risk to be visible. That is the entire logic behind warnings in every domain: earthquakes, pandemics, financial crises, nuclear safety, and yes, AI. You warn when the indicators show that something dangerous is approaching, not when the event has already occurred. If the event had already happened, it would not be a warning anymore. It would be a report, a confirmation, or an emergency alert. <\/p>\n
Anthropic is warning because they see the conditions forming for a future threshold, not because the threshold has already been crossed. Their language is explicit: \u201cwe are not there yet.\u201d They are describing acceleration, not arrival. That is why their message does not support Andreessen\u2019s claim that AGI already exists. Andreessen is making a declaration. Anthropic is issuing a caution. These are different types of statements, even if they sit on the same overall trend line. <\/p>\n
Now, regarding the Book of Revelation, that is a completely different category of text. It is symbolic, prophetic literature written two thousand years ago, interpreted in many ways across history. People have applied Revelation to the Roman Empire, the Black Death, Napoleon, the Cold War, nuclear weapons, the internet, and now AI. The fact that people can map modern events onto ancient prophecy does not provide scientific evidence for AGI. It shows how flexible and metaphorical prophetic language is, not that a specific technological milestone has been reached.<\/p>\n
\u00a9Ca Di Luce> MINDFUL MIND MEDIUM Blog 2025. Unauthorized use of text or media is not allowed. All images and photo are fulfilling the copyrights regulations. Much obliged to you all!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Actually you do not get any frustration feeling from my words! In very stupid way, you only assume…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":73591,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[40582,1754,6744,40579,601,3013,610,206,14804,40581,533,6362,30097,40578,40580,128],"class_list":["post-73590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-agi","tag-3rd","tag-a","tag-agi","tag-ancient","tag-artificial","tag-artificial-general-intelligence","tag-from","tag-intelligence","tag-losing","tag-meets","tag-part","tag-transparency","tag-warnings","tag-when","tag-wisdom","tag-world"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73590\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73591"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}