{"id":77525,"date":"2026-06-17T21:38:14","date_gmt":"2026-06-17T21:38:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/77525\/"},"modified":"2026-06-17T21:38:14","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T21:38:14","slug":"trumps-justice-department-urges-court-to-throw-out-pollution-lawsuit-against-elon-musks-company-national","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/77525\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump\u2019s Justice Department urges court to throw out pollution lawsuit against Elon Musk\u2019s company | National"},"content":{"rendered":"

(CNN) \u2014 In a highly unusual move, the US Justice Department has urged a federal court to throw out a lawsuit against Elon Musk\u2019s company xAI for its use of polluting gas turbines<\/a> \u2014 sparking concerns the government is trying to undermine the ability of individuals or communities to sue polluters.<\/p>\n

In April, NAACP sued xAi and its subsidiary MZX Tech under the Clean Air Act, claiming the company was operating dozens of gas turbines without air permits<\/a> or pollution controls in Southaven, Mississippi to power its \u201cColossus 2\u201d data center in Memphis, Tennessee.<\/p>\n

The methane gas turbines, located near homes and schools, are known to produce a cocktail of toxic pollutants. These include nitrogen oxides, a key component of ozone pollution \u2014 also called smog \u2014 which can cause asthma attacks and chest pain and, in the longer-term, has been linked to decreased lung function and premature death<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Justice Department has asked the court to dismiss the suit, citing national security considerations. In a memo<\/a> published Tuesday, it said the data center trains and develops AI models that are \u201ccritical\u201d to the economy and to defense and that the lawsuit threatens American energy and innovation.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Department of Justice will not sit idly by while private organizations use environmental laws to undermine our national security,\u201d said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of the Environment and Natural Resources Division.<\/p>\n

The move has sparked concerns among environmental law experts. \u201cIt\u2019s highly unusual,\u201d said Michael Gerrard, an environmental law professor at Columbia Law School. \u201cThey\u2019re not disputing the allegations in the lawsuit; instead, they\u2019re making a very unusual claim that citizen suits are unconstitutional,\u201d he told CNN.<\/p>\n

The future legal ramifications could be much broader than this case, Gerrard added, effectively taking away an important route for people to fight against pollution in their neighborhoods.<\/p>\n

The Clean Air Act allows individuals and environmental groups to sue polluters in so-called citizen lawsuits. \u201cCitizen suits are a bedrock insurance policy for communities to hold polluters accountable for decisions that cause them harm,\u201d said Abre\u2019 Conner, the NAACP\u2019s director of environmental and climate justice.<\/p>\n

In its memo, the Justice Department argued it has power under the act to intervene in these suits. \u201cUltimate responsibility for enforcing federal law belongs to the Executive Branch, not private interest groups,\u201d said Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward.<\/p>\n

Yet this marks the \u201cfirst time\u201d the US has intervened in a citizen suit against a private defendant arguing it be dismissed, Erika Kranz, a senior staff attorney at Harvard Law School, wrote in an analysis<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Colossus 2, xAI\u2019s huge data center in Memphis, powers xAI\u2019s chatbot Grok, which the company promotes as an \u201canti-woke\u201d version of OpenAI\u2019s ChatGPT and has previously been under fire for loose guardrails, including allowing users to create Nazi Mickey Mouse<\/a> images.<\/p>\n

The Justice Department said in its court filings<\/a> that Grok provides vital support for military operations, including in the war against Iran, allowing \u201cUS forces to deploy over 2,000 munitions to 2,000 distinct targets within 96 hours.\u201d<\/p>\n

But there has been considerable local pushback against data center pollution, as well as water and energy use. The attempt to strike down the lawsuit is \u201cunconscionable,\u201d said Tennessee State Rep. Justin J. Pearson, a Democrat, who lives a few miles from xAI\u2019s data center. \u201cThe DOJ seeks to remove any recourse Americans have to protect themselves from harm,\u201d he told CNN.<\/p>\n

NAACP\u2019s lawsuit seeks daily fines of around $124,000 for xAI\u2019s alleged pollution infringements and an injunction to stop the turbines operating until permits are secured. xAI did not respond to a request for comment but has previously said it does not need permits for turbines that are temporary.<\/p>\n

This Justice Department intervention comes after SpaceX, xAI\u2019s parent company, went public last week<\/a> in Wall Street\u2019s largest IPO, which made Musk the planet\u2019s first trillionaire.<\/p>\n

The government\u2019s intervention is \u201cnot about national security,\u201d said Laura Thoms, director of enforcement for Earthjustice, a nonprofit public interest organization which represents the NAACP in the case. \u201cIt\u2019s a desperate attempt to protect wealthy tech companies from obeying the laws meant to protect people from pollution \u2014 turning our communities into sacrifice zones so companies can build and profit from data centers quicker,\u201d said Thoms, who until last August was assistant chief for environmental enforcement at the Justice Department.<\/p>\n

New data centers are springing up across the US as part of Trump\u2019s quest for global AI dominance. While they promise jobs and benefits to communities, Americans are increasingly wary and movements to block new data centers<\/a> are spreading.<\/p>\n

This case could be relevant to lots of people if it sets a wider precedent, said Columbia\u2019s Gerrard. If xAI\u2019s data center is able to power itself through mobile turbines, he said, \u201cthat\u2019s going to be replicated in many other places, and these mobile turbines are horribly polluting and will have a very negative health effect.\u201d<\/p>\n

The-CNN-Wire<\/p>\n

\u2122 & \u00a9 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"(CNN) \u2014 In a highly unusual move, the US Justice Department has urged a federal court to throw…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":77526,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[140,42374,16033,42375,11854,2899],"class_list":["post-77525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-xai","tag-elon-musk","tag-environmentalism","tag-litigation","tag-pollution-allegations","tag-us-department-of-justice","tag-xai"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77525\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/77526"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}