{"id":84763,"date":"2026-06-24T17:27:12","date_gmt":"2026-06-24T17:27:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/84763\/"},"modified":"2026-06-24T17:27:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-24T17:27:12","slug":"facilitating-structure-based-drug-discovery-with-an-artificial-intelligence-driven-virtual-screening-platform","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/84763\/","title":{"rendered":"Facilitating structure-based drug discovery with an artificial intelligence-driven virtual screening platform"},"content":{"rendered":"

Berdigaliyev, N. & Aljofan, M. An overview of drug discovery and development. Future Med. Chem. 12, 939\u2013947 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hughes, J. P., Rees, S., Kalindjian, S. B. & Philpott, K. L. Principles of early drug discovery. Br. J. Pharmacol. 162, 1239\u20131249 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jones, A. & Clifford, L. Drug discovery alliances. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 807\u2013808 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhu, T. et al. Hit identification and optimization in virtual screening: practical recommendations based on a critical literature analysis. J. Med. Chem. 56, 6560\u20136572 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bleicher, K. H., Bohm, H. J., Muller, K. & Alanine, A. I. Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 369\u2013378 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Inglese, J. et al. High-throughput screening assays for the identification of chemical probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 466\u2013479 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bajorath, J. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 882\u2013894 (2002).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schneider, G. Virtual screening: an endless staircase? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 273\u2013276 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lyu, J., Irwin, J. J. & Shoichet, B. K. Modeling the expansion of virtual screening libraries. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 712\u2013718 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Deane, C. & Mokaya, M. A virtual drug-screening approach to conquer huge chemical libraries. Nature 601, 322\u2013323 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shoichet, B. K. Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature 432, 862\u2013865 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ripphausen, P., Nisius, B. & Bajorath, J. State-of-the-art in ligand-based virtual screening. Drug Discov. Today 16, 372\u2013376 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lionta, E., Spyrou, G., Vassilatis, D. K. & Cournia, Z. Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: principles, applications and recent advances. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 14, 1923\u20131938 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lyne, P. D. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discov. Today 7, 1047\u20131055 (2002).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583\u2013589 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493\u2013500 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Burley, S. K. et al. RCSB Protein Data Bank (RCSB.org): delivery of experimentally-determined PDB structures alongside one million computed structure models of proteins from artificial intelligence\/machine learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D488\u2013D508 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gu, S. et al. Evaluation of AlphaFold2 structures for hit identification across multiple scenarios. J. Chem. Inf. Model 64, 3630\u20133639 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shen, C. et al. Boosting protein\u2013ligand binding pose prediction and virtual screening based on residue-atom distance likelihood potential and graph transformer. J. Med. Chem. 65, 10691\u201310706 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, X. et al. Efficient and accurate large library ligand docking with KarmaDock. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 789\u2013804 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cai, H. et al. CarsiDock: a deep learning paradigm for accurate protein\u2013ligand docking and screening based on large-scale pre-training. Chem. Sci. 15, 1449\u20131471 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gu, S. et al. Benchmarking AI-powered docking methods from the perspective of virtual screening. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 509\u2013520 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Corso, G., St\u00e4rk, H., Jing, B., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. Diffdock: diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2023).<\/p>\n

Li, Y., Li, L., Wang, S. & Tang, X. EQUIBIND: a geometric deep learning-based protein\u2013ligand binding prediction method. Drug Discov. Ther 17, 363\u2013364 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lu, W. et al. TANKBind: trigonometry-aware neural networks for drug-protein binding structure prediction. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 7236\u20137249 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Friesner, R. A. et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 47, 1739\u20131749 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, Z. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein\u2013ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 12964\u201312975 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ruiz-Carmona, S. et al. rDock: a fast, versatile and open source program for docking ligands to proteins and nucleic acids. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003571 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jain, A. N. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. J. Med. Chem. 46, 499\u2013511 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Xia, S., Chen, E. & Zhang, Y. Integrated molecular modeling and machine learning for drug design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 7478\u20137495 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D668\u2013D672 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chi, X. et al. Discovery and characterization of novel FAK inhibitors for breast cancer therapy via hybrid virtual screening, biological evaluation and molecular dynamics simulations. Bioorg. Chem. 159, 108400 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Passaro, S. et al. Boltz-2: towards accurate and efficient binding affinity prediction. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.06.14.659707<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Team, B. A. A. S. et al. Protenix\u2014advancing structure prediction through a comprehensive AlphaFold3 reproduction. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.01.08.631967<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Bauer, M. R., Ibrahim, T. M., Vogel, S. M. & Boeckler, F. M. Evaluation and optimization of virtual screening workflows with DEKOIS 2.0\u2014a public library of challenging docking benchmark sets. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53, 1447\u20131462 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, L. et al. Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening. PLoS ONE 14, e0220113 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chatterjee, A. et al. Improving the generalizability of protein\u2013ligand binding predictions with AI-Bind. Nat. Commun. 14, 1989 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mohammad, T., Mathur, Y. & Hassan, M. I. InstaDock: a single-click graphical user interface for molecular docking-based virtual high-throughput screening. Brief. Bioinform. 22, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bib\/bbaa279<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n

Mo, Q., Xu, Z., Yan, H., Chen, P. & Lu, Y. VSTH: a user-friendly web server for structure-based virtual screening on Tianhe-2. Bioinformatics https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bioinformatics\/btac740<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Gan, J. H. et al. DrugRep: an automatic virtual screening server for drug repurposing. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 44, 888\u2013896 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Guedes, I. A. et al. DockThor-VS: a free platform for receptor-ligand virtual screening. J. Mol. Biol. 436, 168548 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhou, G. et al. An artificial intelligence accelerated virtual screening platform for drug discovery. Nat. Commun. 15, 7761 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gao, B. et al. DrugCLIP: contrastive protein-molecule representation learning for virtual screening. Adv Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 44595\u201344614 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Buttenschoen, M., Morris, G. M. & Deane, C. M. PoseBusters: AI-based docking methods fail to generate physically valid poses or generalise to novel sequences. Chem. Sci. 15, 3130\u20133139 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Masters, M. R., Mahmoud, A. H. & Lill, M. A. Investigating whether deep learning models for co-folding learn the physics of protein\u2013ligand interactions. Nat. Commun. 16, 8854 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Y. et al. Decoding the limits of deep learning in molecular docking for drug discovery. Chem. Sci. 16, 17374\u201317390 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Landrum, G. et al. RDKit: open-source cheminformatics. GitHub and SourceForge https:\/\/www.rdkit.org\/<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Tran-Nguyen, V. K., Jacquemard, C. & Rognan, D. LIT-PCBA: an unbiased data set for machine learning and virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 4263\u20134273 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sastry, G. M., Adzhigirey, M., Day, T., Annabhimoju, R. & Sherman, W. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 27, 221\u2013234 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gu, S. The Docker image for \u2018CVSP-AIE: a comprehensive virtual screening platform with artificial intelligence engine\u2019. Zenodo https:\/\/zenodo.org\/records\/18073542<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Gu, S. Code for \u2018Facilitating structure-based drug discovery with an artificial intelligence driven virtual screening platform\u2019. Zenodo https:\/\/zenodo.org\/records\/19448262<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n

Chen, L. et al. TransformerCPI: improving compound-protein interaction prediction by sequence-based deep learning with self-attention mechanism and label reversal experiments. Bioinformatics 36, 4406\u20134414 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Eberhardt, J., Santos-Martins, D., Tillack, A. F. & Forli, S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: new docking methods, expanded force field, and python bindings. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 3891\u20133898 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Verdonk, M. L., Cole, J. C., Hartshorn, M. J., Murray, C. W. & Taylor, R. D. Improved protein\u2013ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins 52, 609\u2013623 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Santos-Martins, D. et al. Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and gradient-based local search. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 1060\u20131073 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fey, M. & Lenssen, J. E. Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch Geometric. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1903.02428<\/a> (2019).<\/p>\n

Paszke, A. et al. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (eds Wallach, H. M. et al.) 8026\u20138037 (ACM, 2019).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Berdigaliyev, N. & Aljofan, M. An overview of drug discovery and development. Future Med. Chem. 12, 939\u2013947 (2020).…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":84764,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[24,45681,25,2570,39002,45683,617,11183,45682,44731,136,45679,45680],"class_list":["post-84763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ai","tag-ai","tag-analytical-chemistry","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-biological-techniques","tag-cheminformatics","tag-computational-biology-bioinformatics","tag-general","tag-life-sciences","tag-microarrays","tag-organic-chemistry","tag-software","tag-virtual-drug-screening","tag-virtual-screening"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84763\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/84764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}