{"id":88179,"date":"2026-06-27T16:56:22","date_gmt":"2026-06-27T16:56:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/88179\/"},"modified":"2026-06-27T16:56:22","modified_gmt":"2026-06-27T16:56:22","slug":"scoop-powerful-anthropic-model-fable-5-on-track-to-return-soon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/88179\/","title":{"rendered":"Scoop: Powerful Anthropic model, Fable 5, on track to return soon"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Trump administration is close to allowing Anthropic to restore access to its powerful Fable 5 model, which has been offline for 15 days because of security fears<\/a> by the government, a source close to the situation tells Axios.<\/p>\n

Insiders expect the administration’s limits on Fable 5 could be lifted as soon as this coming week, the source said.<\/p>\n

A second source said conversations are expected to continue over the weekend, and Anthropic expects to restore Fable access soon.<\/p>\n

Why it matters: For developers and even non-technical early adopters, Fable 5’s blackout was unprecedented and deeply jarring \u2014 a top-tier model, already in users’ hands, pulled offline due to government intervention.<\/p>\n

The big picture: The progress toward liberating Fable 5 marks a thaw in a bitter four-month standoff between the administration and Anthropic.<\/p>\n

In another sign of de-escalation, the Commerce Department on Friday allowed Anthropic to restore access to Mythos 5, the company’s strongest cybersecurity model<\/a>, for a limited number of trusted users. Mythos 5 has guardrails to deter its use in cyberattacks or biological terror, and has never been freely available.<\/p>\n

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a Friday afternoon letter to Anthropic, first reported by Semafor<\/a>, that the company “has worked with the U.S. government to address risks associated with” Mythos 5 and Fable 5. “These efforts,” he continued, “have yielded significant progress. In addition, Anthropic has committed to work with the U.S. government on protocols and standards and releases.”<\/p>\n

Fable 5’s return is being eagerly awaited by users, who quickly fell in love with the model’s deep thinking<\/a> and quick, sophisticated coding. Developers were wowed by the leap in capability. Every new model, especially open-source ones, is being measured against Fable 5.<\/p>\n

The Pentagon and National Security Agency still have to give Fable 5 the green light, so the outcome remains unpredictable. But other government agencies have determined Fable 5 can safely return to the wild.<\/p>\n

Behind the scenes: I’m told that both Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have helped defuse the fight between the administration and Anthropic.<\/p>\n

Anthropic “has worked positively with the government,” one administration source told Axios. That’s quite a change from the furious statement<\/a> by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth designating Anthropic a “Supply-Chain Risk to National Security,” after he and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei couldn’t agree on how the Pentagon can use Claude.<\/p>\n

Zoom in: Anthropic had billed it as the most capable model ever released to the public. The “Vibe Check” newsletter from Every<\/a>, a media and software company, called it<\/a> “the best coding model in the world” before it was pulled, just three days after launch.<\/p>\n

In early testing highlighted by Anthropic<\/a>, the payments company Stripe used Fable 5 to overhaul a 50-million-line codebase in a single day \u2014 a job that would have taken its engineers more than two months by hand.<\/p>\n

When access vanished on June 12, developers found automated work frozen mid-task, and companies raced to swap in rivals, including cheaper Chinese models.<\/p>\n

The intrigue: Anthropic originally made Fable 5 available at no extra cost on several paid Claude subscription plans through June 22, giving users a short window to test its power before access vanished.<\/p>\n

It’s not yet clear whether Anthropic subscribers will get back the free run of Fable they were promised \u2014 or whether it returns locked behind additional fees or identity checks.<\/p>\n

What we’re watching: Both Anthropic and OpenAI are pushing the administration to codify a process for reviewing new models, as envisioned by President Trump in a June 2 executive order<\/a> that set up a framework for voluntary government vetting<\/a> of the most powerful new AI models.<\/p>\n

The companies don’t like the current case-by-case approach.<\/p>\n

When Anthropic suspended access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 back on June 12, the company called for<\/a> “a statutory process that is transparent, fair, clear, and grounded in technical facts,” and said the administration’s decision to restrict those two models “does not adhere to those principles.”<\/p>\n

When OpenAI was allowed to begin a limited preview<\/a> of GPT\u20115.6<\/a> on Friday, the company said in a blog post<\/a>: “We don’t believe this kind of government access process should become the long-term default. It keeps the best tools from users, developers, enterprises, cyber defenders, and global partners who need them.”<\/p>\n

Axios’ Sam Sabin contributed reporting.<\/p>\n

Go deeper<\/a>: Commerce Department greenlights limited return of Anthropic’s Mythos.<\/p>\n

AI is moving fast. Axios AI+ keeps you ahead. Sign up free at Axios.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Trump administration is close to allowing Anthropic to restore access to its powerful Fable 5 model, which…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":88180,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[1446,53,6411,38159],"class_list":["post-88179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-anthropic","tag-administration","tag-anthropic","tag-anthropic-ceo","tag-fable"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88179","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88179"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88179\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/88180"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}