![\"Karin](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/663834120_highres.jpg\")
<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Swiss Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter is taking action against a post made by an X user and created by Grok. <\/p>\n
Keystone \/ Til Buergy <\/p>\n
Switzerland’s finance minister, Karin Keller-Sutter, has lodged a formal complaint over online abuse linked to the Grok AI chatbot. It is a bold signal against digital abuse and marks a clear break from the US understanding of free speech.\n<\/p>\n
Listen to the article <\/p>\n
Listening the article <\/p>\n
Toggle language selector <\/p>\n
English (US) <\/p>\n
English (British) <\/p>\n
Generated with artificial intelligence. <\/p>\n
This content was published on <\/p>\n
April 17, 2026 – 09:00\n<\/p>\n
Elon Musk\u2019s artificial intelligence model Grok has courted controversy in recent months. The model, which at one point called itself \u201cMechaHitlerExternal link<\/a>\u201d, has been found to readily generate insulting posts. For a period in early 2026, it also created thousands of sexualised deepfake imagesExternal link<\/a> of women and children per hour, prompting the US magazine The NationExternal link<\/a> to dub it \u201cpedo chatbot\u201d. The European Union has since launched a wide-reaching investigationExternal link<\/a> into Grok over the deepfakes.<\/p>\n Now Switzerland\u2019s finance minister is taking legal action against the model over written sexualised vilification. On March 10, a Swiss pensioner asked Grok in vulgar and sexualised terms to \u201croast\u201d Keller-Sutter. He then shared the AI-generated post on X (former Twitter), which has since been deleted.<\/p>\n Women most affected by digital abuse<\/p>\n Women are particularly affected by online abuse. Simone Eymann of the Public Discourse Foundation explained that the consequences of this abuse, ranging from sleep disorders to anxiety attacks, are well documented. \u201cAt the same time, victims of digital abuse sometimes withdraw from public life, which has clear implications for our democracy,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Politically engaged women are more exposed to online public abuse than men. In Germany, nearly one in four women affected by this has considered ending their professional engagement as a result, a study by the Technical University of Munich and HateAidExternal link<\/a> has found.<\/p>\n Eymann welcomed Keller-Sutter\u2019s legal action. \u201cWhen public figures speak up rather than remain silent, they send an important signal \u2013 that digital abuse must be taken seriously,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n With her complaint, the minister is sending a clear signal against digital abuse. At the same time, when a member of government takes legal action over insults, it also raises questions about freedom of speech and expression.<\/p>\n More <\/p>\n Are you concerned about how social media is affecting democracy? <\/p>\n The early optimism around social media has largely been replaced by troubling warning signs.\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n View the discussion What kind of statements must politicians tolerate?<\/p>\n Jordi Calvet-Bademunt is a senior research fellow at The Future of Free SpeechExternal link<\/a>, a think tank at Vanderbilt University in the United States that studies freedom of expression. In the US, Calvet-Bademunt explained, \u201coffensive speech directed at politicians receives greater legal protection\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cWhether the specific content at issue in this case qualifies for protection under Swiss law will depend on the particulars of the message,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The think tank advocates a broad interpretation of freedom of expression. Calvet-Bademunt said free speech \u201cdoes not only protect speech that is inoffensive,\u201d but also \u201coffensive, shocking or disturbing\u201d statements. This protection is particularly important for political speech, he added, \u201cincluding speech about politicians\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cThis does not mean that society must endorse or condone every form of protected speech, but shielding controversial expression is fundamental to the health of our democracies,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The researcher views Keller-Sutter\u2019s legal complaint as \u201cpart of a broader trend in democracies\u201d where scepticism towards AI is leading politicians to call for tighter regulations.<\/p>\n \u201cIndia confronted Google when its AI model suggested that some experts considered Prime Minister Modi\u2019s policies to be \u2018fascist\u2019,\u201d he said. \u201cTurkey partially blocked access to Grok after the AI chatbot generated responses insulting President Erdogan, Atat\u00fcrk, and religious values.\u201d<\/p>\n Turkey is not considered a liberal democracy by international standards. Calvet-Bademunt also points to Poland, an EU member state where Prime Minister Donald Tusk has pushed back against posts generated by GrokExternal link<\/a>.<\/p>\n Vance\u2019s speech in Munich on free speech in Europe<\/p>\n What makes X stand out is that apart from numerous bots, authorities and politicians are still using the platform. When Keller-Sutter held the rotating Swiss presidency in 2025, she also communicated via X.<\/p>\n As president, she caused a stir when she hailed JD Vance\u2019s speech at the Munich Security Conference in early 2025 as a \u201cplea for direct democracy\u201d.<\/p>\n In his speech, Vance used several examples to argue that, in his view, free speech in Europe was faring poorly. Among these examples were police operations in Germany \u201cagainst citizens\u201d accused of posting \u201canti-feminist comments online\u201d. Shortly afterwards, Keller-Sutter clarified her praise of Vance\u2019s speechExternal link<\/a>.<\/p>\n SWI swissinfo.ch <\/p>\n Earlier this month, a ministry spokesperson told the German-language newspaper NZZ am SonntagExternal link<\/a> that she had only praised part of Vance\u2019s speech. Vulgar insults, the spokesperson said, did not fall under freedom of expression and \u201care a punishable crime in Switzerland\u201d. He added that hate against women must be combated.<\/p>\n Is Switzerland facing a conflict with the US?<\/p>\n The NZZ am Sonntag headline suggests that Keller-Sutter\u2019s legal action also has a geopolitical dimension: \u201cAn open conflict with the US is now on the horizon,\u201d the paper stated. The complaint was filed against unknown persons, her spokesperson told Swissinfo, adding that it was now up to the public prosecutor\u2019s office to decide whether to pursue the pensioner who wrote the prompt, or others.<\/p>\n Swiss authorities must also determine what responsibility Grok\u2019s operator, Elon Musk\u2019s X, bears. X Switzerland GmbH has so far not commented on the legal action, while a request by Swissinfo also went unanswered.<\/p>\n US President Donald Trump\u2019s administration often pushes back hard against European regulation of US tech companies. It has even gone as far as imposing sanctions on officials who play a key role in regulating AI and social media in the EU. The Swiss government could therefore face a conflict.<\/p>\n Free speech in Trump\u2019s America <\/p>\n Calvet-Bademunt also views the US administration as part of the wider negative global trend in freedom of expression. One example he cites is the \u201csustained pressure from President Trump\u2019s administration\u201d on the AI operator Anthropic, whose chatbot is seen as too \u201cwoke\u201d.<\/p>\n The US has long taken a different approach to free speech than Europe, but this now seems to be crumbling among the public.<\/p>\n Only 61% in the US say that insulting the flag should be allowed<\/p>\n According to the Future of Free Speech Index 2025, support among Americans for unrestricted free speech is waning. In 2024, around 60% of them were of the opinion that freedom of expression should cover statements insulting minorities, which is about five percentage points lower than in 2021. At the same time, 61% think that freedom of expression should include insults to the US flag, down 10 percentage points since 2021.<\/p>\n The index also shows that in the US, most people distinguish between human insults and AI-generated insults. Only a minority believe that AI models should be able to generate content that offends their religion or the US flag. One in five support AI deepfakes of politicians.<\/p>\n Keller-Sutter\u2019s move against Grok is likely to find support in Switzerland. A recent survey by the gfs.bern research institute shows that large tech firms have a poor reputation. Nine in 10 people in Switzerland see them as purely profit-driven, while 84% are concerned about \u201ctoo much political influence from their countries of origin\u201d.<\/p>\n \n More<\/p>\n More <\/p>\n Digital Democracy\n <\/p>\n Swiss public mistrusts Google, TikTok and Meta <\/p>\n This content was published on <\/p>\n Mar 31, 2026 <\/p>\n Nine out of ten people in Switzerland consider these companies to be purely profit-orientated, according to a survey. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Read more: Swiss public mistrusts Google, TikTok and Meta Only a few distribute hate speech online<\/p>\n
\n <\/a><\/p>\n![\"graphic\"](\"https:\/\/www.swissinfo.ch\/content\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/13\/2026\/04\/free_speech-eng.svg?ver=30d73fd7\")
<\/p>\n![\"Google](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/233281295_highres.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
![\"graphic\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/hate_speech_illustration.png\")
<\/p>\n