{"id":80917,"date":"2026-08-26T18:24:26","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T18:24:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/80917\/"},"modified":"2026-08-26T18:24:26","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T18:24:26","slug":"hidden-superannuation-change-to-hit-workers-and-retirees-new-and-unexpected-tax","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/80917\/","title":{"rendered":"Hidden superannuation change to hit workers and retirees: ‘New and unexpected tax’"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The nation’s superannuation industry<\/a> was largely spared from the overhaul to the capital gains tax<\/a>. But a detail embedded in the complex new rules coming into effect from next year means Australians are facing paying more tax on certain assets inside their super account<\/a>. <\/p>\n

That’s the warning from the Financial Services Council (FSC) which has called out the government over its commitment that superannuation would be largely unaffected by the CGT changes. But a quirk in the legislation has undone that promise. <\/p>\n

The Council says its analysis has identified at least $372 billion of super assets potentially exposed to higher rates of tax, “with a conservative estimate of more than $55 million a year in additional tax paid by Australians”. <\/p>\n

RELATED <\/p>\n

The reason relates to new rules restricting how managed investment trusts can offset capital gains and losses. <\/p>\n

“The same investment could face different tax outcomes depending on whether it is held directly or through a managed investment trust,” the FSC said, labelling it “a new and unexpected tax” on the retirement of Australians. <\/p>\n

Under the existing law, a superannuation fund can apply its capital losses first against capital gains that are not eligible for the CGT discount, which preserves as much of the fund’s one-third CGT discount as possible. <\/p>\n

Under the new laws drafted, assets held directly by a super fund can continue to do so, however if the same assets are held in a managed investment scheme like a trust it must apply the new regime’s capital loss ordering rules<\/a> before passing the remaining gains to the super fund, ultimately increasing the tax paid by impacted members. <\/p>\n

\"Money<\/a> The super industry is calling for the government to fix the issue. \u00b7 Getty <\/p>\n

Colonial First State Superannuation chief executive<\/a> Kelly Power said the revelation shows super funds were not left unscathed by the changes and urged the government to make amendments to remove the sneaky tax hit. <\/p>\n

“Super members should not be worse off because of how their \u00adinvestments are structured. A targeted adjustment is needed to ensure members receive the same tax outcome whether assets are held directly or through a managed investment vehicle,” she told The Australian<\/a>, which confirmed that Treasury will enforce the rule. <\/p>\n

‘Australians paying more tax through a technical back door’ <\/p>\n

The exact impact remains unclear, the FSC noted, and it will depend on the mix of gains and losses and a fund’s existing tax position, but the central concern is the unequal treatment, or arbitrary distortion, created by the new rules. <\/p>\n

It could see members taxed at an effective tax rate of about 15 per cent on certain assets, as opposed to the effective 10 per cent discount rate inside super<\/a>, it said. <\/p>\n

The impact is expected to be felt most heavily by Aussies in smaller funds and SMSFs, which have less capacity to hold assets directly. <\/p>\n

“Unless corrected, the rules could drive money out of pooled managed funds, fragment investment structures and increase costs across the superannuation system, with members ultimately footing the bill,” CEO of the Financial Services Council Blake Briggs said. <\/p>\n

“This is not just a technical tax issue. On budget night, the government explicitly stated that superannuation funds would be unaffected by the changes. The final design must deliver on that promise, rather than leave some Australians paying more tax through a technical back door.” <\/p>\n

\"Financial<\/a> Financial Services Council CEO Blake Briggs described the situation as ‘a technical flaw’ in the legislation. \u00b7 FSC <\/p>\n

In June, when Labor’s legislation for the new CGT regime was released, critics noted the impact of an entirely new stipulation<\/a> that means investors will no longer have freedom in how they choose to offset their capital loses against their gains. Instead they will be forced to exhaust their older capital gains first before newer ones that will be more exposed to the new punitive capital gains tax treatment. <\/p>\n

Noel Whittaker AM, one of Australia’s most renowned financial authors, said the detail in the legislation was “designed to quietly inflate investor tax bills” and described it as “a rort”. <\/p>\n

Get the latest Yahoo Finance news – follow us on Facebook<\/a>, LinkedIn<\/a> and Instagram<\/a>. <\/p>\n