{"id":90963,"date":"2026-09-08T08:49:21","date_gmt":"2026-09-08T08:49:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/90963\/"},"modified":"2026-09-08T08:49:21","modified_gmt":"2026-09-08T08:49:21","slug":"battle-erupts-over-victorias-work-from-home-right-as-lawyers-find-proposed-laws-are-unconstitutional","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/90963\/","title":{"rendered":"Battle erupts over Victoria\u2019s work from home right as lawyers find proposed laws are unconstitutional"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Victoria\u2019s landmark work from home laws have been labelled a \u201cscam\u201d by the outspoken leader of the Libertarian Party, after leading constitutional lawyers warned the proposed laws are likely to be struck down by the High Court.<\/p>\n<p>New independent legal advice given to The Property Council has raised questions over the constitutional validity of the government\u2019s work from home bill. The lawyers found the bill, which has already passed the lower house, is likely unconstitutional and would be ineffective if it passed parliament.<\/p>\n<p>Be the first to know when news breaks. <a class=\"body-link\" href=\"https:\/\/onelink.to\/wpmth9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Download our new app<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Victorian upper house and Libertarian MP David Limbrick told news.com.au he thinks the proposed work from home laws, which would give workers the right to work from home two days a week, are a \u201cscam\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"poster-img\" src=\"https:\/\/content.api.news\/v3\/images\/bin\/5ca6cbdf203e419d340ff9451c0ecaf1\" data-sctrack=\"op-poster-img\" alt=\"Mum\u2019s huge WFH win puts bosses on notice\" fetchpriority=\"high\"\/><\/p>\n<p>MORE: <a class=\"body-link\" href=\"https:\/\/au.seek.com\/career-advice\/article\/the-best-work-from-home-jobs-in-australia?tracking=DAC-NES-NWS-newscorp_hpt-40150&amp;utm_medium=display&amp;utm_source=newscorp&amp;utm_campaign=newscorp_hpt\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"au.seek.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Best WFH jobs in Australia revealed<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u201cVery good lawyers tell us they are unconstitutional and won\u2019t survive a High Court challenge,\u201d Mr Limbrick said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI have called it Comm Games 2.0, because it is another promise the Government can\u2019t keep, and it will end up costing Victorians many millions of dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Victorian government controversially walked away from its hosting commitments of the 2026 Commonwealth Games in 2023 due to projected cost blowouts.<\/p>\n<p>The government spent $589 million of taxpayers\u2019 funds on sunk costs and legal compensation, including about $194 million to Glasgow organisers where the games ended up being held.<\/p>\n<p>MORE: <a class=\"body-link\" href=\"https:\/\/au.seek.com\/career-advice\/article\/5-traits-you-need-to-work-effectively-from-home?tracking=DAC-NES-NWS-newscorp_hpt-40150&amp;utm_medium=display&amp;utm_source=newscorp&amp;utm_campaign=newscorp_hpt\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"au.seek.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">5 ways to make working from home better<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In a video posted to his social media, Mr Limbrick claimed the proposed work from home laws were another example of a government \u201cscam\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou got scammed, basically, they promised something that they couldn\u2019t deliver. And now they\u2019re doing it again,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Limbrick said protecting the right to work from home had worked for the Labor Party against former Coalition leader Peter Dutton in the federal election, where he eventually abandoned an unpopular plan to restrict work from home for public sector employees.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNow the Liberal Party in Victoria are too timid to oppose it. Neither Party cares about the cost,\u201d Mr Limbrick said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf the Government thinks this will survive a court challenge, they need to publish the advice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Coalition has said it supports working from home and will not oppose the bill, but proposed amendments to the laws.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Sold a lemon\u2019: Legal advice finds WFH laws likely unconstitutional<\/p>\n<p>Legal advice given to The Property Council found the bill was likely to be found inconsistent with the federal Fair Work Act if it was legislated and would be rendered invalid under section 109 of the Constitution. <\/p>\n<p>The section states that federal law overrides state law when the two are inconsistent, with the state law invalid to the extent of the inconsistency.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn our view, the WFH Bill is inconsistent with the Fair Work Act, and will therefore be inoperative if it is enacted,\u201d lawyers Nick Wood SC and Leigh Howard advised the Property Council.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere would be no question of whether or not part of the WFH Bill is able to be preserved; the entire scheme that is established by the WFH Bill would be inoperative.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The lawyers also raised multiple areas of constitutional concern with the bill, including that it would create a potentially unfair, two-tiered system for workers.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Victorian Parliament\u2019s artificial attempt to avoid inconsistency with the Fair Work Act by locating the right within the Equal Opportunity Act will not save it,\u201d the lawyers said in their advice.<\/p>\n<p>Property Council Victorian executive director Cath Evans said it was critical the government released any legal advice it had received on the validity of the bill.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOn the basis of the legal advice we have received, the Victorian public is being sold a very costly lemon,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBusinesses need certainty, not another layer of regulation that will end up before the High Court and with a high probability of being struck down.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Labor promises to pass WFH laws this week<\/p>\n<p>Victoria\u2019s new Premier Ben Carroll has pushed back the start of the proposed work from home laws to July 1, 2027.<\/p>\n<p>The laws, which were first flagged by former premier Jacinta Allan last year, were originally supposed to come into effect on September 1.<\/p>\n<p>The government estimates workers could save up to $5,000 a year by taking full advantage of the policy.<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, Mr Carroll said the laws would pass through the state\u2019s upper house this week.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWork from home works, that\u2019s the message I\u2019ve heard loud and clear,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut these laws need to work for business, too. Because the reality is if it\u2019s not practical for employers, the laws won\u2019t last.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019ve made some sensible amendments to these laws to make them practical and affordable for businesses, while preserving the rights of workers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Premier said work from home would attract the \u201cbest talent\u201d to Victoria and get women back into the workforce.<\/p>\n<p>A Victorian government spokesperson told news.com.au the government was focused on getting the balance right.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWork from home works for families \u2014 it supports parents getting back into work, it supports productivity, and it\u2019s here to stay,\u201d the spokesperson said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut, we\u2019ve also been clear we would listen to business about where commonsense adjustments may be needed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re focused on getting the balance right for business and working people. We have met with business groups and we will continue to work through sensible changes to the legislation.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Read related topics:<a class=\"topic_tag\" href=\"https:\/\/www.news.com.au\/topics\/melbourne\" data-tgev-container=\"story-topic-links\" data-tgev-label=\"Melbourne\" data-tgev-order=\"1\" data-tgev-metric=\"npv\" data-tgev=\"event10\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Melbourne<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Victoria\u2019s landmark work from home laws have been labelled a \u201cscam\u201d by the outspoken leader of the Libertarian&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":90964,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[157520,146086,157515,68066,157483,79924,157528,5859,38039,157498,157476,41445,157479,157494,146088,157532,157540,157480,157514,157502,84243,157536,45833,36956,37834,157495,157499,40917,157487,157521,22,23,21,9711,157538,157527,323,29113,28745,130648,157522,157526,52431,43148,45424,11310,157501,68052,157506,48271,157510,2547,126482,157482,43632,52,157539,90152,83195,157533,157516,157543,157507,32258,156,38447,37678,157497,157512,39337,157518,72824,157489,157509,37045,57807,157484,157519,73684,157504,152,50271,157535,157496,69399,157486,3121,157491,157542,64922,157513,16460,1392,157481,157478,75742,157477,45184,157529,55223,48513,57704,10264,58607,157505,38710,157537,157534,37160,151267,39125,157500,42282,38842,23380,53321,157530,37012,56607,157525,66915,157493,9754,157523,42072,47030,157517,157488,55871,59616,83202,48951,41551,73691,37679,37964,157485,40571,157490,46716,157524,49527,117913,157508,157511,59884,38964,157531,50954,157503,157541,157492,68,45275,83172,17331,19850],"class_list":["post-90963","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-australia","tag-s-artificial-attempt","tag-s-cbd-office","tag-s-landmark-work","tag-s-new-premier-ben-carroll","tag-s-upper-house","tag-s-work","tag-589-million","tag-5859","tag-38039","tag-2027-the-laws","tag-5-ways","tag-41445","tag-a-scam-a-sydney-mother-of-two","tag-a-court-challenge","tag-a-fair-work-dispute","tag-a-government-scam","tag-a-high-court-challenge","tag-a-high-probability","tag-a-lemon","tag-a-potentially-unfair","tag-a-scam","tag-a-very-costly-lemon","tag-a-video","tag-a-week","tag-a-year","tag-about-194-million","tag-an-unpopular-plan","tag-another-example","tag-another-promise","tag-any-legal-advice","tag-au","tag-australia","tag-austrlia","tag-battle","tag-best-wfh-jobs","tag-bombshell-legal-advice","tag-business","tag-businesses","tag-care","tag-certainty","tag-comm-games-2-0","tag-constitutional-concern","tag-dollars","tag-effect","tag-employers","tag-federal-law","tag-former-coalition-leader-peter-dutton","tag-former-premier-jacinta-allan","tag-full-advantage","tag-funds","tag-glasgow-organisers","tag-government","tag-her-company","tag-her-special-needs-daughter-more","tag-his-social-media","tag-home","tag-home-betterin","tag-home-bill","tag-home-laws","tag-home-right","tag-home-works","tag-inconsistency","tag-its-hosting-commitments","tag-july-1","tag-labor","tag-last-year","tag-lawyers","tag-lawyers-nick-wood-sc-and-leigh-howard","tag-leading-constitutional-lawyers","tag-legal-advice","tag-legal-compensation","tag-libertarian-mp-david-limbrick","tag-limbrick","tag-many-millions","tag-monday","tag-mr-carroll","tag-mr-limbrick","tag-multiple-areas","tag-neither-party","tag-new-independent-legal-advice","tag-news","tag-no-question","tag-not-another-layer","tag-our-new-appvictorian-upper-house","tag-our-view","tag-parliament-be","tag-part","tag-projected-cost-blowouts-the-government","tag-proposed-amendments","tag-proposed-laws","tag-public-sector-employees","tag-questions","tag-regulation","tag-section-109","tag-september-1-the","tag-state-law","tag-sunk-costs","tag-taxpayers","tag-the-2026-commonwealth-games","tag-the-advice","tag-the-basis","tag-the-bill","tag-the-coalition","tag-the-constitution","tag-the-constitutional-validity","tag-the-cost","tag-the-entire-scheme","tag-the-equal-opportunity-act","tag-the-extent","tag-the-fair-work-act","tag-the-federal-election","tag-the-federal-fair-work-act","tag-the-first","tag-the-games","tag-the-government","tag-the-high-court","tag-the-inconsistency","tag-the-labor-party","tag-the-laws","tag-the-laws-sold","tag-the-lawyers","tag-the-legal-advice","tag-the-liberal-party","tag-the-libertarian-party","tag-the-lower-house","tag-the-message","tag-the-outspoken-leader","tag-the-policy-on","tag-the-property-council","tag-the-proposed-laws","tag-the-proposed-work","tag-the-reality","tag-the-right","tag-the-section","tag-the-start","tag-the-state","tag-the-state-law","tag-the-two","tag-the-validity","tag-the-victorian-government","tag-the-victorian-labor-government","tag-the-victorian-parliament","tag-the-victorian-public","tag-the-wfh-bill","tag-their-advice-property-council-victorian-executive-director-cath-evans","tag-these-laws","tag-this-week","tag-this-weekvictoria","tag-two-days","tag-two-tiered-system","tag-unconstitutionallegal-advice","tag-very-good-lawyers","tag-victoria","tag-victorians","tag-wfh-laws","tag-work","tag-workers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90963","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90963"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90963\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/90964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90963"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90963"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/australia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90963"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}