{"id":22268,"date":"2026-02-27T22:16:14","date_gmt":"2026-02-27T22:16:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/22268\/"},"modified":"2026-02-27T22:16:14","modified_gmt":"2026-02-27T22:16:14","slug":"augmentation-salee-pour-la-taxe-sur-les-residences-secondaires-a-knokke","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/22268\/","title":{"rendered":"Augmentation sal\u00e9e pour la taxe sur les r\u00e9sidences secondaires \u00e0 Knokke"},"content":{"rendered":"

Voici comment Knokke-Heist va continuer \u00e0 se transformer dans les prochaines ann\u00e9es<\/a><\/p>\n

La station baln\u00e9aire justifie cette taxe et son augmentation par une double n\u00e9cessit\u00e9. D’une part, freiner la flamb\u00e9e immobili\u00e8re caus\u00e9e par les r\u00e9sidents secondaires et permettre ainsi aux habitants locaux de pouvoir continuer \u00e0 s’y loger. D’autre part, compenser les frais importants li\u00e9s \u00e0 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 et \u00e0 l’entretien de l’espace public, accentu\u00e9s par cette forte fr\u00e9quentation.<\/p>\n

Plusieurs d\u00e9cisions en justice<\/p>\n

Cette d\u00e9cision intervient quelques semaines apr\u00e8s des arr\u00eats de Cassation qui ont confirm\u00e9 la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 de la strat\u00e9gie fiscale de Knokke-Heist. Au m\u00eame titre que Coxyde, celle-ci avait en effet \u00e9t\u00e9 attaqu\u00e9e en justice par des citoyens et associations qui contestaient le fait que ces communes n’imposaient pas les habitants qui y \u00e9taient domicili\u00e9s \u2013 ceux-ci ne paient pas de centimes additionnels \u00e0 l’imp\u00f4t des personnes physiques \u2013 mais seulement les r\u00e9sidents secondaires.<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation a renvoy\u00e9 le dossier vers la Cour d’appel d’Anvers. Son arr\u00eat est attendu dans environ 18 mois.<\/p>\n

Ces contestations avaient d’abord donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 des d\u00e9cisions en justice en sens divers, en premi\u00e8re instance. Ensuite, la Cour d’appel de Gand avait estim\u00e9 que ces taxes \u00e9taient bel et bien contraires au principe d’\u00e9galit\u00e9 entre r\u00e9sidents et non-r\u00e9sidents.<\/p>\n

Mais un rebondissement de taille est intervenu le 15 janvier dernier : la Cour de Cassation a cass\u00e9 les arr\u00eats rendus pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment par la Cour d’appel de Gand. La plus haute juridiction du pays a en effet accept\u00e9 les justifications des communes attaqu\u00e9es et estim\u00e9 que l’application d’une taxe sur les r\u00e9sidences secondaires en tant que taxe forfaitaire sur le luxe pouvait \u00eatre justifi\u00e9e, ind\u00e9pendamment du revenu du contribuable.<\/p>\n

Surprise : la Cour de Cassation rebat les cartes pour les taxes sur les r\u00e9sidences secondaires \u00e0 Knokke et Coxyde<\/a><\/p>\n

L’affaire n’est \u00e9videmment pas close. La Cour de Cassation a en effet renvoy\u00e9 le dossier devant une autre Cour d’appel, celle d’Anvers, qui devra le r\u00e9examiner. Son arr\u00eat est attendu dans environ 18 mois. Mais entre-temps, la commune de Knokke vient donc de passer \u00e0 l’action et d’augmenter consid\u00e9rablement cette taxe ne frappant que les r\u00e9sidents secondaires\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Voici comment Knokke-Heist va continuer \u00e0 se transformer dans les prochaines ann\u00e9es La station baln\u00e9aire justifie cette taxe…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":22269,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[2],"tags":[1378,2821,868,3046,3047,3048,1381,12,13,18,17,2824,3724,4716,1749,3049,3050,3730,1080,482,2833,2834,3051,1753,628,3053,2837,1535,2839,894,3735,3736,2171,900,3737,3738,3739,3740,3742,3743,3745,3054,3055,3056,2845,3057,2846,2847,2848,2851,2852,906,369,2856,2857,2858,2859,2860,2861,1082,1549],"class_list":["post-22268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-belgique","tag-un","tag-vkalut","tag-868","tag-antwerp","tag-antwerp-fc","tag-antwerpen","tag-anvers","tag-be","tag-be-fr","tag-belgique","tag-belgium","tag-bleu-et-jaune","tag-champion","tag-champions","tag-club","tag-de-ploeg-van-t-stad","tag-deurne","tag-een","tag-foot","tag-football","tag-gillis","tag-gilloise","tag-great","tag-jupiler","tag-jupiler-pro-league","tag-lantwerp","tag-la-vielle-dame","tag-league","tag-les-apaches","tag-match","tag-off","tag-offs","tag-old","tag-play","tag-play-off-1","tag-play-off","tag-play-offs","tag-playoff","tag-playoffs","tag-po","tag-po1","tag-rafc","tag-reds","tag-roodwit","tag-royal","tag-royal-antwerp-football","tag-royale","tag-saint","tag-saint-gilloise","tag-sint","tag-sint-gillis","tag-soccer","tag-sport","tag-union","tag-union-60","tag-union-sg","tag-unionistes","tag-usg","tag-vincent-kalut","tag-voetbal","tag-wedstrijd"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22268\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/be-fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}