Belgium
  • Europe
    • FR
    • DE
    • IT
    • ES
    • NL
    • LU
    • LU-fr
    • LU-de
    • CH
    • CH-de
    • CH-fr
    • DK
    • PL
    • UK
  • Belgium
    • Brussels
    • Antwerp
  • Conflicts
  • Climate
  • AI
  • NATO
  • Ukraine
  • Business
  • US
  • Africa
  • Afrique
  • BE-nl
  • BE-fr

Categories

  • Antwerp
  • Belgium
  • Brussels
Belgium
  • Europe
    • FR
    • DE
    • IT
    • ES
    • NL
    • LU
    • LU-fr
    • LU-de
    • CH
    • CH-de
    • CH-fr
    • DK
    • PL
    • UK
  • Belgium
    • Brussels
    • Antwerp
  • Conflicts
  • Climate
  • AI
  • NATO
  • Ukraine
  • Business
  • US
  • Africa
  • Afrique
  • BE-nl
  • BE-fr
Narratives, trade-offs and scenarios to explore the livestock transition in Belgium
BBelgium

Narratives, trade-offs and scenarios to explore the livestock transition in Belgium

  • 2026-02-10

Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P. J., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V. & De Haan, C. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Food Agric. Organ. U. N. FAO https://www.fao.org/3/a0701e/a0701e.pdf (2006).

Gerber, P. J. et al. Tackling Climate Change through Livestock: A Global Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Opportunities. Food Agric. Organ. U. N. FAO https://www.fao.org/3/i3437e/i3437e00.htm (2013).

Erb, K.-H. et al. Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11382 (2016).


Google Scholar
 

Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., Renzulli, P. A., Castellani, V. & Sala, S. Environmental impacts of food consumption in Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 753–765 (2017).


Google Scholar
 

Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).


Google Scholar
 

Jordon, M. W. et al. A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning grassland management, grazing livestock and soil carbon storage. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 291, 20232669 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Kortleve, A. J., Mogollón, J. M., Harwatt, H. & Behrens, P. Over 80% of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy supports emissions-intensive animal products. Nat. Food 1–5 https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00949-4 (2024).

Torpman, O. & Röös, E. Are animals needed for food supply, efficient resource use, and sustainable cropping systems? An argumentation analysis regarding livestock farming. Food Ethics 9, 15 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Antier, C., Riera, A. & Baret, P. A participatory prospective approach fails to ignite a debate on the future of the livestock sector in Belgium. In Proc. 14th European IFSA Symposium 576–589 (2020).

Gasselin, P., Lardon, S., Cerdan, C., Loudiyi, S. & Sautier, D. Coexistence et confrontation des modèles agricoles et alimentaires. (éditions Quae, 2021). https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-3243-7.

Penvern, S. et al. Addressing the diversity of visions of ecologization in research and in support to agroecological transitions. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 47, 1403–1427 (2023).


Google Scholar
 

Freibauer, A. et al. Sustainable food consumption and production in a resource-constrained World. Summary Findings of the EU SCAR Third Foresight Exercise. EuroChoices 10, 38–43 (2011).


Google Scholar
 

Béné, C. et al. When food systems meet sustainability – Current narratives and implications for actions. World Dev. 113, 116–130 (2019).


Google Scholar
 

Jaisli, I. & Brunori, G. Is there a future for livestock in a sustainable food system? Efficiency, sufficiency, and consistency strategies in the food-resource nexus. J. Agric. Food Res. 18, 101496 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Fischer, K., Vico, G., Röcklinsberg, H., Liljenström, H. & Bommarco, R. Progress towards sustainable agriculture hampered by siloed scientific discourses. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01474-9 (2024).

Phalan, B. What have we learned from the land sparing-sharing model? Sustainability 10, 1760 (2018).


Google Scholar
 

Green, R. E., Cornell, S. J., Scharlemann, J. P. W. & Balmford, A. Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307, 550–555 (2005).


Google Scholar
 

Finch, T. et al. Bird conservation and the land sharing-sparing continuum in farmland-dominated landscapes of lowland England. Conserv. Biol. 33, 1045–1055 (2019).


Google Scholar
 

Finch, T., Green, R. E., Massimino, D., Peach, W. J. & Balmford, A. Optimising nature conservation outcomes for a given region-wide level of food production. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 985–994 (2020).


Google Scholar
 

Karlsson, J. O., Parodi, A., Van Zanten, H. H. E., Hansson, P.-A. & Röös, E. Halting European Union soybean feed imports favours ruminants over pigs and poultry. Nat. Food 2, 38–46 (2020).


Google Scholar
 

Jennings, S. & Schweizer, L. Risky Business: The Risk of Corruption and Forrest Loss in Belgium’s Imports of Commodities. (3keel for ‘WWF Belgium, 2019).

Van Zanten, H. et al. Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption. Global Change Biol. 24, 4185-4194 (2018).

van Selm, B. et al. Circularity in animal production requires a change in the EAT-Lancet diet in Europe. Nat. Food 3, 66–73 (2022).


Google Scholar
 

Frehner, A. et al. The compatibility of circularity and national dietary recommendations for animal products in five European countries: a modelling analysis on nutritional feasibility, climate impact, and land use. Lancet Planet. Health 6, e475–e483 (2022).


Google Scholar
 

Brunori, G. et al. Has transformation of food systems reached an impasse? Considerations on the role of agri-food research. Agric. Food Econ. 12, s40100-024-00308–8 (2024).

Kueffer, C., Schneider, F. & Wiesmann, U. Addressing sustainability challenges with a broader concept of systems, target, and transformation knowledge. GAIA – Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 28, 386–388 (2019).


Google Scholar
 

Levidow, L., Birch, K. & Papaioannou, T. Divergent paradigms of European agro-food innovation: the knowledge-based bio-economy (KBBE) as an R&D agenda. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 38, 94–125 (2012).


Google Scholar
 

Levidow, L. & Papaioannou, T. Policy-driven, narrative-based evidence gathering: UK priorities for decarbonisation through biomass. Sci. Public Policy 43, 46–61 (2016).


Google Scholar
 

Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S. & Wiesmann, U. Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol. Econ. 60, 119–128 (2006).


Google Scholar
 

Duru, M., Therond, O. & Fares, M. Designing agroecological transitions: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 1237–1257 (2015).


Google Scholar
 

Dendoncker, N. et al. How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions? Ecol. Soc. 23, art12 (2018).


Google Scholar
 

Gaupp, F. et al. Food system development pathways for healthy, nature-positive and inclusive food systems. Nat. Food 2, 928–934 (2021).


Google Scholar
 

Prost, L. et al. Key research challenges to supporting farm transitions to agroecology in advanced economies. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 43, 11 (2023).


Google Scholar
 

Meynard, J.-M. et al. Unravelling the step-by-step process for farming system design to support agroecological transition. Eur. J. Agron. 150, 126948 (2023).


Google Scholar
 

Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N. & Avelino, F. Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 42, 599–626 (2017).


Google Scholar
 

Loorbach, D. Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23, 161–183 (2010).


Google Scholar
 

Gupta, B., Zurek, M., Woodhill, J. & Ingram, J. S. I. Advancing the next-generation of global food system scenarios: a critical review of existing narratives. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 9, 1620374 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Riera, A., Duluins, O., Antier, C. & Baret, P. V. Which types of quantitative foresight scenarios to frame the future of food systems? A review. Agric. Syst. 225, 104270 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Borman, G. D. et al. Putting food systems thinking into practice: Integrating agricultural sectors into a multi-level analytical framework. Glob. Food Secur. 32, 100591 (2022).


Google Scholar
 

Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E. & Ahn, T. K. The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol. Econ. 32, 217-239 (2000).

Gasselin, P., Lardon, S., Cerdan, C., Loudiyi, S. & Sautier, D. Ambivalences des modèles et défi de la gouvernance territoriale de la coexistence. in Coexistence et confrontation des modèles agricoles et alimentaires. Un nouveau paradigme du développement territorial? 225–238 (Editions Quae, Versailles, 2021).

de Olde, E., Konefal, J. & Hatanaka, M. The role of farming by metrics in transforming food systems sustainably. Npj Sustain. Agric. 3 1-5 (2025).

Dernat, S., Etienne, R., Hostiou, N., Pailleux, J.-Y. & Rigolot, C. Ex-post consequences of participatory foresight processes in agriculture. How to help dairy farmers to face outcomes of collective decisions planning? Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6, 776959 (2022).


Google Scholar
 

Statistics Belgium. Meat Supply Balance in Belgium (2010-2023). https://statbel.fgov.be/en/themes/agriculture-fishery/supply-balance-sheets-meat (2024).

BCZ-CBL. Annual Report – Reporting Year 2023 (BCZ-CBL, 2024).

Agentschap Landbouw en Zeevisserij. Landbouwcijfers. www.vlaanderen.be/landbouwcijfers (2024).

Direction de l’analyse économique agricole. Etat de l’Agriculture Wallonne. https://etat-agriculture.wallonie.be/ (2024).

Statistics Belgium. Agricultural Figures 2023. https://statbel.fgov.be/en/themes/agriculture-fishery/farm-and-horticultural-holdings (2024).

Papangelou, A. & Mathijs, E. Assessing agro-food system circularity using nutrient flows and budgets. J. Environ. Manag. 288, 112383 (2021).


Google Scholar
 

Leip, A. et al. Halving nitrogen waste in the European Union food systems requires both dietary shifts and farm level actions. Glob. Food Secur. 35, 100648 (2022).


Google Scholar
 

De Pue, D. & Buysse, J. Safeguarding Natura 2000 habitats from nitrogen deposition by tackling ammonia emissions from livestock facilities. Environ. Sci. Policy 111, 74–82 (2020).


Google Scholar
 

Riera, A., Duluins, O., Schuster, M. & Baret, P. V. Accounting for diversity while assessing sustainability: insights from the Walloon bovine sectors. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 43, 30 (2023).


Google Scholar
 

Battheu-Noirfalise, C. et al. Classifying and explaining Walloon dairy farms in terms of sustainable food security using a multiple criteria decision making method. Agric. Syst. 221, 104112 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Peeters, A. Importance, evolution, environmental impact and future challenges of grasslands and grassland-based systems in Europe. Grassl. Sci. 55, 113–125 (2009).


Google Scholar
 

Lebacq, T., Baret, P. V. & Stilmant, D. Role of input self-sufficiency in the economic and environmental sustainability of specialised dairy farms. Animal 9, 544–552 (2015).


Google Scholar
 

Reinsch, T. et al. Toward specialized or integrated systems in Northwest Europe: on-farm eco-efficiency of dairy farming in Germany. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5, 614348 (2021).


Google Scholar
 

Duluins, O., Riera, A., Schuster, M., Baret, P. V. & Van den Broeck, G. Economic implications of a protein transition: evidence from Walloon beef and dairy farms. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6, 803872 (2022).


Google Scholar
 

Dénos, C. et al. Contribution of ultra-processed food and animal-plant protein intake ratio to the environmental impact of Belgian diets. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 51, 584–598 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Riera, A., Antier, C. & Baret, P. Study on Livestock scenarios for Belgium in 2050. UCLouvain – Sytra https://sytra.be/publication/scenarios-livestock-belgium/ (2019).

Honnay, O., Avermaete, T., Govers, G. & Keulemans, W. Een slimme zonering van landgebruik verzoent landbouwproductie, biodiversiteit en klimaat. Natuurfocus 20, 157–165 (2021).


Google Scholar
 

Muller, A. et al. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nat. Commun. 8, 1290 (2017).


Google Scholar
 

Smith, L. G., Kirk, G. J. D., Jones, P. J. & Williams, A. G. The greenhouse gas impacts of converting food production in England and Wales to organic methods. Nat. Commun. 10, 4641 (2019).


Google Scholar
 

Barbieri, P. et al. Global option space for organic agriculture is delimited by nitrogen availability. Nat. Food 2, 363–372 (2021).


Google Scholar
 

Borghino, N., Wissinger, L., Erb, K.-H., Le Mouël, C. & Nesme, T. Organic farming expansion and food security: a review of foresight modeling studies. Glob. Food Secur. 41, 100765 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D. & Dedieu, B. Farming Systems Research: an approach to inquiry. in Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic 3–31 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2012).

Kazanski, C. E. et al. Context is key to understand and improve livestock production systems. Glob. Food Secur. 45, 100840 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Röös, E. et al. Greedy or needy? Land use and climate impacts of food in 2050 under different livestock futures. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 1–12 (2017).


Google Scholar
 

Röös, E. et al. Agroecological practices in combination with healthy diets can help meet EU food system policy targets. Sci. Total Environ. 847, 157612 (2022).


Google Scholar
 

Desmarez, T., Bindelle, J. & Dumont, B. Towards sustainable diets and farming systems through land use optimisation. npj Sustain. Agric. 3, 49 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Billen, G. et al. Reshaping the European agro-food system and closing its nitrogen cycle: the potential of combining dietary change, agroecology, and circularity. One Earth 4, 839–850 (2021).


Google Scholar
 

Saujot, M. & Waisman, H. Mieux représenter les modes de vie dans les prospectives énergie-climat. IDDRI Étude 2, 42 (2020).


Google Scholar
 

Rubens, K. et al. EI-MEET: Monitoring Eiwitinname En -Aankopen in Vlaanderen 2024. Green Deal Eiwitshift Op Ons Bord. (Departement Omgeving, Vlaamse overheid, 2025).

Auclair, O., Eustachio Colombo, P., Milner, J. & Burgos, S. A. Partial substitutions of animal with plant protein foods in Canadian diets have synergies and trade-offs among nutrition, health and climate outcomes. Nat. Food 5, 148–157 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Mahon, N., Crute, I., Di Bonito, M., Simmons, E. A. & Islam, M. M. Towards a broad-based and holistic framework of Sustainable Intensification indicators. Land Use Policy 77, 576–597 (2018).


Google Scholar
 

Mahon, Crute, N., Simmons, I., Islam, E. & Md, M. Sustainable intensification – “oxymoron” or “third-way”? A systematic review. Ecol. Indic. 74, 73–97 (2017).


Google Scholar
 

Herzon, I. et al. Both downsizing and improvements to livestock systems are needed to stay within planetary boundaries. Nat. Food 5, 642–645 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Guthman, J., Butler, M., Martin, S. J., Mather, C. & Biltekoff, C. In the name of protein. Nat. Food 3, 391–393 (2022).


Google Scholar
 

Baudish, I. et al. Power & protein—closing the ‘justice gap’ for food system transformation. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 084058 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Zimmermann, B. et al. Mineral-ecological cropping systems—a new approach to improve ecosystem services by farming without chemical synthetic plant protection. Agronomy 11, 1710 (2021).


Google Scholar
 

Mora, O., Berne, J.-A., Drouet, J.-L., Le Mouël, C. & Meunier, C. Foresight: European Chemical Pesticide-Free Agriculture in 2050 (INRAE, 2023).

Bartlett, H. et al. Trade-offs in the externalities of pig production are not inevitable. Nat. Food 5, 312–322 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Karlsson, L., Keeling, L. & Röös, E. What is a better chicken? Exploring trade-offs between animal welfare and greenhouse gas emissions in higher-welfare broiler systems. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 55, 203–216 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Hashemi, F., Mogensen, L., Van Der Werf, H. M. G., Cederberg, C. & Knudsen, M. T. Organic food has lower environmental impacts per area unit and similar climate impacts per mass unit compared to conventional. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 1-18 (2024).

Lebacq, T., Baret, P. V. & Stilmant, D. Sustainability indicators for livestock farming. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33, 311–327 (2013).


Google Scholar
 

Teeuwen, A. S., Meyer, M. A., Dou, Y. & Nelson, A. A systematic review of the impact of food security governance measures as simulated in modelling studies. Nat. Food 3, 619–630 (2022).


Google Scholar
 

Poux, X. & Aubert, P.-M. An Agroecological Europe in 2050: Multifunctional Agriculture for Healthy Eating. Findings from the Ten Years For Agroecology (TYFA) Modelling Exercice (2018).

Schiavo, M., Le Mouël, C., Poux, X. & Aubert, P.-M. An Agroecological Europe by 2050: What Impact on Land Use, Trade and Global Food Security? (IDDRI, 2021).

Moallemi, E. et al. Models of future food systems should address transformation complexity and uncertainty. Nat. Food https://doi.org/10.31223/X5WB19 (2025).

Kaljonen, M. et al. Deliberating justice in food systems transformation pathways: a transdisciplinary approach applied in Finland. Environ. Res. Food Syst. https://doi.org/10.1088/2976-601X/ae1dfa (2025).

Newell, R., Dring, C., King, L. & Hemphill, M. Food system scenarios in uncertain futures: a case study on long-term local food system planning in Revelstoke Canada. Agriculture 15, 611 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Duygan, M., Binder, C. R., Meylan, G. & Fischer, M. Carving the transformation pathways to sustainable futures: a novel analytical framework for backcasting in sustainability transitions. Sustain. Futur. 9, 100553 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Karlsson, J. O. et al. CIBUSmod 25.09: a spatially disaggregated biophysical agri-food systems model for studying national-level demand- and production-side intervention scenarios. Geosci. Model Dev. 18, 8589–8611 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Loiseau, E. et al. Territorial Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): What exactly is it about? A proposal towards using a common terminology and a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 176, 474–485 (2018).


Google Scholar
 

Seghezzo, L. The five dimensions of sustainability. Environ. Polit. 18, 539–556 (2009).


Google Scholar
 

Income consulting – AK2C. Pertes et Gaspillages Alimentaires: L’état Des Lieux et Leur Gestion Par Étapes de La Chaîne Alimentaire (Income Consulting – AK2C’ for ‘ADEME, 2016).

Hou, Y. et al. Feed use and nitrogen excretion of livestock in EU-27. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 218, 232–244 (2016).


Google Scholar
 

Chaudhary, A. & Brooks, T. M. Land use intensity-specific global characterization factors to assess product biodiversity footprints. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 5094–5104 (2018).


Google Scholar
 

Conseil Supérieur de la Santé. Recommandations Alimentaires Pour La Population Belge Adulte (Conseil Supérieur de la Santé’, 2019).

CELINE-IRCEL. et al. Belgium’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2023) – National Inventory Document Submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/NID_2024_101224.pdf (2025).

CELINE-IRCEL. et al. Belgium’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2021) – National Inventory Report Submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/NID_2024_101224.pdf (2023).

Vrints, G. & Deuninck, J. Technische En Economische Resultaten van de Varkenshouderij Op Basis van Het Landbouwmonitoringsnetwerk. Boekjaren 2011-2013. (Departement Landbouw en Visserij, 2014).

Vrints, G. & Deuninck, J. Rentabiliteits- En Kostprijsanalyse Vleesvee (Departement Landbouw en Visserij, 2015).

Van der Straeten, B. Rentabiliteits- En Kostprijsanalyse Melkvee Op Basis van Het Landbouwmonitoringsnetwerk. Boekjaren 2007-2012 (Departement Landbouw en Visserij, 2015).

Petel, T., Antier, C. & Baret, P. Etat des lieux et scénarios à horizon 2050 de la filière lait en Région wallonne. UCLouvain – Sytra https://sytra.be/fr/publication/filiere-lait-wallonie/ (2018)

IPCC. Contribution of Working Group III to Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – Chapter 11: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014).

  • Tags:
  • Agriculture
  • Belgium
  • Development studies
  • Environment
  • Environmental social sciences
  • general
Belgium
www.europesays.com