{"id":101456,"date":"2026-08-11T17:27:19","date_gmt":"2026-08-11T17:27:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/101456\/"},"modified":"2026-08-11T17:27:19","modified_gmt":"2026-08-11T17:27:19","slug":"cambridge-vice-chancellor-found-liable-for-silencing-whistleblower","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/101456\/","title":{"rendered":"Cambridge Vice-Chancellor found liable for silencing whistleblower"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>University of Cambridge Vice-Chancellor Deborah Prentice breached whistleblowing protections, according to the <a href=\"https:\/\/21percent.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/3307960.2023-others-Reserved-Judgment-1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">judgment<\/a> of an employment tribunal this week.<\/p>\n<p>Wyn Evans, a professor of astrophysics at Cambridge, had <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/education\/2026\/jun\/15\/university-of-cambridge-accused-of-tolerating-misogyny-and-bullying-in-tribunal\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">brought<\/a> a legal case against the University for tolerating misogynistic bullying, also accusing bosses of retaliating against whistleblowers. Prentice was named in Evans\u2019s case, and was cross-examined by the tribunal over her role in handling accusations of bullying.<\/p>\n<p>The unanimous judgment, published yesterday, found that the Vice-Chancellor was responsible for \u201cmishandling\u201d Evans\u2019s grievances. It also stated that Prentice oversaw \u201ca pattern of complaints being ignored or dismissed without examination\u201d. According to the tribunal, \u201cthere was a shared desire to close down whistleblowing complaints which might be damaging to Cambridge University and the Institute of Astronomy.\u201d The University\u2019s handling of the matter was described as \u201cproblematic and deeply unsatisfactory\u201d, while the evidence Prentice presented during her cross-examination was also deemed \u201cunsatisfactory\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Evans, who last year <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/education\/2025\/apr\/12\/cambridge-university-accused-of-bullying-cover-up-as-internal-survey-revealed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">ran<\/a> to be the University\u2019s chancellor on an anti-bullying platform, alleged that one female academic had been \u201chounded\u201d out of her job, while others had been left \u201cfrightened\u201d by \u201caggressive professors\u201d. In a written submission to the tribunal, one of the female staff members concerned compared her treatment to \u201cpsychological torture\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday\u2019s judgment concluded that Evans \u201cwas subjected to detriments\u201d for his efforts to highlight discrimination. It added that allegations against him by his department head Richard McMahon were \u201csubjected to a prolonged nearly two-year investigation by the University\u201d despite there being \u201cno evidence to support them\u201d. Evans sought separate legal proceedings against McMahon, with a 2023 issues judgment finding that the department head had defamed him. In defending the defamation claim, McMahon received funding from the University of Cambridge\u2019s insurance policy.<\/p>\n<p>During the hearings, Prentice defended the rejection of one of Evans\u2019s grievances by the University on the grounds that she had undertaken a full review of the relevant papers. The tribunal found this claim \u201chighly unlikely given the volume of material going back very many years and the time and effort that would have taken for anyone, let alone someone in Professor Prentice\u2019s very senior position\u201d. It also concluded that a letter drafted in response to Evans\u2019s claims under the Vice-Chancellor\u2019s name had been \u201cwritten solely\u201d by then-University Registrary Emma Rampton, and that \u201cProfessor Prentice had very little to do with it, save for putting her name to it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Prentice was appointed as Cambridge Vice-Chancellor in September 2022, taking up her role the following summer. She previously served as provost of Princeton University, where she had taught since 1988, and received <a href=\"https:\/\/unherd.com\/newsroom\/meet-cambridges-lockdown-loving-new-vice-chancellor\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">criticism<\/a> for pandemic-era policies which were considered overly authoritarian. This Evans tribunal judgment follows weeks of scrutiny over the appointment and work of <a href=\"https:\/\/unherd.com\/2026\/07\/jason-arday-cambridges-dei-darling\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Jason Arday<\/a>, the former Cambridge professor accused of multiple counts of plagiarism and academic misrepresentation. Speaking ahead of this week\u2019s decision, Evans said he had \u201clost all faith in the basic integrity of senior people at my university\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"University of Cambridge Vice-Chancellor Deborah Prentice breached whistleblowing protections, according to the judgment of an employment tribunal this&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":101457,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[4],"tags":[1794,42691,9755,41830,5,474,6,1470,2177],"class_list":["post-101456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-uk","tag-cambridge","tag-deborah-prentice","tag-discrimination","tag-jason-arday","tag-uk","tag-uncategorized","tag-united-kingdom","tag-universities","tag-university-of-cambridge"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@UnitedKingdom\/117078054758327497","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101456\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/101457"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}