{"id":16216,"date":"2026-04-17T16:32:24","date_gmt":"2026-04-17T16:32:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/16216\/"},"modified":"2026-04-17T16:32:24","modified_gmt":"2026-04-17T16:32:24","slug":"rachel-reeves-just-seized-control-of-your-pension-gambling-with-it-personal-finance-finance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/16216\/","title":{"rendered":"Rachel Reeves just seized control of your pension \u2013 gambling with it | Personal Finance | Finance"},"content":{"rendered":"

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been circling our retirement savings for months. She wants the power to direct where our workplace pensions are invested, for her own ends. Instead of allowing schemes to invest anywhere in the world to get maximum possible returns for members, she wants to dictate which products they can put our money into. That opens the door to funding Labour\u2019s pet political and environmental projects, such as Ed Miliband’s net zero charge<\/a>, rather than prioritising building your wealth. Worse, she’s itching to chance it on risky private markets. She’s making a desperate \u00a350billion gamble to generate growth<\/a>, using your money. If it goes wrong, millions of pensioners could get end up poor as a resu<\/p>\n

Money in defined contribution workplace pensions is currently spread across shares, bonds, property and other assets, building for the future while paying existing members. Trillions of pounds are invested this way, with scheme trustees responsible for making strategic decisions over where to invest. Now Reeves wants to override those powers to get her hands on a chunk of it<\/a>. Her plan is to steer pension money into UK projects, private markets and infrastructure in a bid to boost the economy. And she\u2019s almost there.<\/p>\n

Under the so-called Mansion House Accord, major pension providers including Aviva, Legal & General and M&G agreed to put at least 10% of workplace default funds into private market assets by 2030, with at least half in the UK. That was meant to be voluntary. But Reeves wanted more control, so Labour inserted a clause in the Pensions Schemes Bill giving ministers a \u201creserve power\u201d to force schemes to comply if they fall short.<\/p>\n

Trustees, whose legal duty is to act in savers\u2019 best interests, suddenly face being told how to invest by Westminster. The House of Lords, which Sir Keir Starmer has previously pledged to abolish<\/a>, spotted the danger and rejected the clause, warning it handed ministers sweeping powers with few limits. Pension industry figures lined up against it too, warning it will take investment decisions out of the hands of trustees and investment experts, and into the hands of politicians. Yet despite growing alarm, Labour pushed it through the Commons yesterday.<\/p>\n

MPs handed ministers controversial “reserve powers” to direct schemes into private markets. The Government insists it will apply to just 10% of assets, with 5% in the UK. Ministers insist the reserve powers are only a “backstop”, to ensure all pension providers comply with the Mansion House Accords.<\/p>\n

However, Tory shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride blasted it as a political takeover of private assets, calling it an \u201ceconomic bailout\u201d that lets Rachel Reeves<\/a> tap pension savings to fix her own problems. Stride said: “Your savings should be invested in your best interests, not to fund the pet projects of Rachel Reeves.” He\u2019s not the only one worried.<\/p>\n

Pensions campaigner Baroness Ros Altmann warned the plans hand future ministers wide powers to steer billions into politically favoured assets, even if managers decide that\u2019s not in members\u2019 best interests. \u201cThere is no reason to believe the Government knows better than professional managers how to invest members\u2019 money,” she said.<\/p>\n

Pension savings belong to workers, not the Treasury. Yet Labour has talked about unlocking up to \u00a3400billion for UK investment. That\u2019s a vast sum, and once ministers have the power, the temptation to use it will grow. Private markets can offer higher returns, but they\u2019re harder to value, less transparent and can turn quickly. Parts of the sector are already struggling, as firms are stuck with assets they’re struggling to sell. They’d love our pension schemes to bail them out of a mess of their own making.<\/p>\n

Reeves is taking money that\u2019s not hers to spend. If trustees are pushed into political decisions rather than financial ones, the long-term damage could be severe, and pensioners will pay the price. The House of Lords wil continue the fight but if it fails, the fate of your pension could end up in the Chancellor\u2019s hands. This would allow Rachel Reeves to do to your pension what she’s done to the UK economy. A frightening thought.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been circling our retirement savings for months. She wants the power to direct where…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":16217,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[4356,1246,2642,7626,182,5,7625,6],"class_list":{"0":"post-16216","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-uk","8":"tag-investing","9":"tag-pension","10":"tag-pension-schemes-bill","11":"tag-private-market-assets","12":"tag-rachel-reeves","13":"tag-uk","14":"tag-uk-investment","15":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@UnitedKingdom\/116421010655716924","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16216"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16216\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16217"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/britain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}