Workers at the Cenovus Christina Lake oilsands facility southeast of Fort McMurray, Alta., April, 2024.AMBER BRACKEN/The Canadian Press
Canada’s energy policies are too focused on climate and have made resource development and investment in the country uncompetitive with the rest of the world, says the head of Calgary-based oil sands giant Cenovus Energy Inc. CVE-T
Jon McKenzie, the company’s chief executive, took the unusual step of carving close to four minutes out of his prepared remarks to analysts during a Wednesday morning earnings call to bemoan the state of Canada’s regulatory and investment environment.
Asked about Mr. McKenzie’s criticisms of federal policy at an unrelated press conference Wednesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Canada’s oil production is at a record high, driven largely by the oil sands.
Mr. McKenzie made his comments as Ottawa and Alberta discuss options for a pipeline to the West Coast, stemming from the energy agreement the two governments signed in November.
Part of the memorandum of understanding involves the province increasing its carbon price to $130 a tonne. But negotiations are being stymied by disagreement over the speed at which Alberta must hike the price from its current $95 a tonne.
Alberta pushing for longer roadmap on carbon pricing as part of pipeline deal
Mr. McKenzie said while having an MOU is all good and well, the very notion of a carbon price drives investment away from the Canadian oil sands sector.
Filling a potential new million-barrel-a-day pipeline to the West Coast will take significant production growth in the oil sands. But crucial investment to propel that growth has been hindered by federal policies and a “myopic dialogue” that has been “focused on the climate agenda and climate policy,” Mr. McKenzie said.
As a result, no greenfield oil sands projects have been approved or built since 2013, he said. Instead, Canadian policies have “ceded high-paying jobs, taxes and royalties to countries like Russia, Iran, Iraq and the United States,” he said, while failing to reduce the global demand for oil.
“We need a set of policies that are consistent with investment. We need a set of policies that recognize that we as Canadians compete for capital, and we have to compete in a different way.”
On Wednesday, Mr. Carney said one of the selling points for Canadian oil is that it’s from a low-risk jurisdiction and is relatively low cost, but the sector is also one of the most significant sources of national greenhouse-gas emissions.
Reducing those emissions will make Canadian crude even more attractive, he said, particularly to the Asian markets that Alberta and oil companies are eyeing to increase exports.
“From direct conversations with a series of governments across Asia, that’s what they’re looking for in the medium term. That’s why the Government of Canada is working with the Government of Alberta in order to produce a comprehensive approach through our MOU,” Mr. Carney said.
“We’re making good progress on that. It’s going to make the oil sands more competitive and it’s going to make Canada more competitive as part of a much bigger energy transition that’s happening.”
Suncor rides a wave of demand for made-in-Canada jet fuel
Alberta views the $130-a-tonne carbon price as a massive concession it made to pave the way for a new pipeline to the West Coast. It believes that imposing it over a short time frame is unrealistic and would price Alberta oil out of the global market.
The energy crisis stemming from the war in Iran has caused oil and gas prices to shoot far beyond January forecasts, boosting producers’ books around the world. Cenovus reported $1.6-billion in earnings in the first three months of this year, up 68 per cent from the fourth quarter of 2025 and 82 per cent higher than the first three months of 2025.
Mr. McKenzie said Cenovus views the current disruption to global energy trade as “short term in nature,” and is unlikely to increase its capital spending as a result. Instead, it will focus on debt repayment.
While Canada’s fossil-fuel sector and the International Energy Agency have urged Mr. Carney to accelerate development of energy infrastructure, environmental groups disagree.
Companies that argue that the war presents an opportunity to expand Canada’s oil and gas exports, including to new Asian markets, “are making a consequential miscalculation,” six climate policy groups and think tanks wrote in a letter to the Prime Minister this week.
The signatories – including the Pembina Institute, Clean Energy Canada and Environmental Defence – also said that implementing the $130 price in Alberta in short order is crucial to “unlock a high-growth, low-carbon economy across Western Canada.”
A recent analysis from the Climate Institute found that industrial carbon pricing has remarkably low costs for industrial facilities and minimal impact on their competitiveness.
The current carbon-price burden on a barrel of oil is “pennies,” said Dave Sawyer, the group’s principal economist. Even when the price rises to $130 a tonne, as outlined in the the MOU, the math works out to oil companies paying around 50 cents a barrel – the equivalent of a Timbit.
The notion that the oil sands would be uncompetitive in the face of a higher carbon price, then, is “patently false,” he said in an interview.
“It is not reflected in the compliance data of the Government of Alberta. It is not reflected in the government’s revenue projections about [carbon price] payments. It doesn’t hold up.”
With a report from Nicolas Van Praet