{"id":104279,"date":"2026-06-26T04:52:22","date_gmt":"2026-06-26T04:52:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/104279\/"},"modified":"2026-06-26T04:52:22","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T04:52:22","slug":"montreal-driver-not-guilty-for-holding-cellphone-while-on-the-road-city-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/104279\/","title":{"rendered":"Montreal driver not guilty for holding cellphone while on the road | City News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A motorist heading to the March\u00e9 Central power mall was recently found not guilty by Montreal Municipal Court Judge Denis Gallant of exercising a function of his cellphone while at the wheel of his vehicle on Nov. 16, 2024.<\/p>\n<p>The City of Montreal pointed out that a Constable Gagnon, stationed at Cr\u00e9mazie and L&#8217;Acadie and watching for illegal cellphone use by drivers, clearly saw driver Pierre Tessier holding his cellphone and looking at it while on the road.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Tessier countered that he was stuck in a major traffic jam in the area because of construction work and was basically stopped. The driver added that all he was doing was connecting his cellphone to his vehicle&#8217;s console &#8220;to activate the CarPlay system and use the GPS.&#8221; The motorist pointed out that the exit leading to March\u00e9 Central was blocked and he needed GPS to find an alternative route.<\/p>\n<p>The motorist added that his vehicle, a 2021 Mercedes, &#8220;required a physical cable connection to use CarPlay, unlike newer models that allow for a wireless connection&#8221; and that the connection process &#8220;required the use of both hands.&#8221; Basically, the defendant said he was not using the cellphone, but &#8220;performing a technical operation for navigation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Tessier provided the court with photographs taken after the traffic stop showing the heavy traffic as well as his vehicle&#8217;s entertainment system, and a record to prove he was not speaking on the phone at the time of the stop. The judge found Tessier&#8217;s testimony to be &#8220;honest and reliable, and supported by convincing documentary and photographic evidence.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The judge ultimately found that Tessier did not violate the Highway Code in relation to cellphone use while driving. Judge Gallant pointed out that while part of the law &#8220;provides that a driver holding a device is presumed to be using it,&#8221; this can be rebutted. The judge pointed to a case saying that not every brief hand contact with a phone &#8220;necessarily constitutes an illegal use, particularly when the purpose is to avoid future distractions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The judge said the main question is whether it is prohibited for a driver to plug a wire from a cellphone to a navigation program while stuck in standstill traffic.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In this case, the defendant acted with a specific purpose \u2014 to make his driving safer by transferring his navigation to the vehicle&#8217;s integrated screen via CarPlay,&#8221; the judge ruled. &#8220;This action falls within the spirit of the exceptions provided for in the Highway Safety Code, which allows the use of an integrated screen for navigation&#8230; The vehicle was stopped in a traffic jam due to construction work and the defendant did not use any communication functions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Judge Gallant found that Tessier &#8220;successfully raised a reasonable doubt by demonstrating that his brief interaction did not constitute the distracting use targeted by the law.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A motorist heading to the March\u00e9 Central power mall was recently found not guilty by Montreal Municipal Court&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":104280,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[37410,37409,10360,19151,37407,37412,23248,37413,31635,3952,7778,3406,37411,37406,50,36173,37414,37408,19152,638,25016,8002,37415,37405,8409,252,2176,18172,5699],"class_list":["post-104279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-montreal","tag-acquittal","tag-carplay","tag-court","tag-court-system-of-canada","tag-defendant","tag-distraction","tag-driving","tag-information","tag-judge","tag-justice","tag-land-transport","tag-law","tag-mobile-device","tag-mobile-phone","tag-montreal","tag-motor-vehicle","tag-navigation","tag-photograph","tag-public-law","tag-road","tag-road-safety","tag-safety","tag-superior-court","tag-telephone","tag-testimony","tag-traffic","tag-transport","tag-vehicle","tag-vehicles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104279\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/104280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}