{"id":171323,"date":"2026-08-17T18:44:15","date_gmt":"2026-08-17T18:44:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/171323\/"},"modified":"2026-08-17T18:44:15","modified_gmt":"2026-08-17T18:44:15","slug":"canada-faces-new-tariffs-mexico-consolidates-its-usmca-advantage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/171323\/","title":{"rendered":"Canada Faces New Tariffs; Mexico Consolidates Its USMCA Advantage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">Washington will impose 50% tariffs on nearly US$20 billion in Canadian goods starting this week, invoking a rarely used Depression-era statute and stripping USMCA-compliant products of their usual protection. The move deepens Canada&#8217;s exclusion from the ongoing USMCA review talks, where Mexico has instead grown its share of the US import market by avoiding retaliation and aligning trade policy with Washington&#8217;s priorities. For companies with North American supply chains, the episode signals that USMCA compliance no longer guarantees exemption from unilateral US tariff action.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">Canada is entering a new phase of trade friction with the United States this week: starting Aug. 19, Washington will apply duties of up to 50% on a wide range of Canadian goods, a move business groups warn could cost jobs and one that further complicates the review of North America&#8217;s trade pact, just as Mexico positions itself as the White House&#8217;s preferred regional partner.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">A Tariff Rooted in a 1930 Law<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">President Donald Trump invoked Section 338 of the Depression-era Tariff Act of 1930, a provision almost never used before, to justify the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.eleconomista.com.mx\/empresas\/canada-prepara-aranceles-50-eu-posiciones-negociadores-siguen-alejadas-20260817-828653.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">new levy, which targets trading partners deemed to discriminate against US products.<\/a> The measure will hit Canadian wine, furniture, dairy, cement, apparel, fishing rods and hockey equipment, among other goods.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">According to US Census Bureau figures, the new tariff would affect close to US$20 billion in Canadian merchandise, roughly 5.2% of the $383 billion Washington imported from its northern neighbor in 2025. Unlike previous rounds of tariffs, this one will strike even goods that meet USMCA rules of origin, a shift that strips away much of the protection the trilateral pact had offered Canadian exporters until now.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">Canadian minister responsible for US trade relations Dominic LeBlanc and chief trade negotiator Janice Charette stayed in Washington over the weekend trying to narrow the gap before the deadline. Still, LeBlanc told an advisory committee that both sides remain far from a draft agreement despite frequent meetings. Prime Minister Mark Carney has maintained that his government has put forward comprehensive proposals to resolve the trade disputes, and has argued that Trump&#8217;s earlier tariffs violated the USMCA.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">Canada Increasingly Sidelined From the USMCA Review<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">The hardened stance toward Ottawa is not happening in isolation: it comes as the United States and Mexico move ahead with bilateral rounds of the USMCA review without Canada at the table. According to<a href=\"https:\/\/mexicobusiness.news\/trade-and-investment\/news\/mexico-urges-canada-join-usmca-talks\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\u00a0Mexico Business News<\/a>, Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard has publicly urged Canada to join those negotiations, stressing that both countries share an interest in preserving tariff-free access to the US market, even as Ottawa remains largely absent from the working sessions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">That divergence shows up in the numbers as well. An analysis by<a href=\"https:\/\/mexicobusiness.news\/trade-and-investment\/news\/usmca-trade-split-mexico-rises-canada-declines-2025\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\u00a0Mexico Business News<\/a> found that between January and November 2025, US purchases from Mexico grew 6% year-on-year to US$492.5 billion, while imports from Canada fell 7% to US$351.2 billion, even though Mexican exporters faced a higher effective tariff rate, between 3.8% and 4.7%, versus Canada&#8217;s 1.8% to 3.7%, per Penn-Wharton Budget Model estimates. The gap is largely explained by Mexico&#8217;s avoidance of direct retaliation against Washington and its cooperative posture, including aligning its export controls and imposing tariffs on Chinese goods, while Canada has responded with retaliatory measures on US autos, steel, aluminum and liquor, plus provincial alcohol restrictions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">The Risk That No Country Stays Exempt<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">Even so, the new tariff on Canada sends a warning to the whole region: the USMCA review underway does not, on its own, guarantee shelter from Washington&#8217;s tariff decisions.<a href=\"https:\/\/mexicobusiness.news\/trade-and-investment\/news\/usmca-under-permanent-review-strategy-mexico-needs-press\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\u00a0Mexico Business News<\/a> notes that Washington had already announced 50% tariffs on a large share of Canadian imports, with exemptions for energy, potash, fish and critical minerals, a precedent showing that compliance with the trilateral pact is no longer sufficient protection against unilateral action. For Mexico, the bigger risk is not the immediate cost of tariffs, but the cumulative effect of uncertainty on investment decisions by companies running regional supply chains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">Auto Sector Adds Another Layer of Pressure<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">The tariff dispute unfolds alongside a separate irritant that touches all three USMCA partners: the growing footprint of Chinese automakers in the region. US officials have signaled they want Canada and Mexico to erect similar barriers against non-regional vehicles, parts, steel and aluminum as a condition for any lasting trade understanding. Business groups on both sides of the border have pushed back on the broader uncertainty, with a coalition of US industry associations urging Washington to preserve the USMCA&#8217;s three-country structure, its tariff-free access and its enforcement mechanisms, arguing that predictabilitym not new tariff roundsm is what allows manufacturers to plan investment across North America.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" dir=\"ltr\">With the new deadline looming and no draft agreement in sight, the episode confirms a pattern that has defined the trilateral relationship through 2026: the United States is hardening its stance toward Canada while deepening its bilateral dialogue with Mexico. For companies operating across all three countries, the question is no longer just how much the next tariff will cost, but how stable the USMCA framework itself will remain as a guarantee of preferential access to the US market.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Washington will impose 50% tariffs on nearly US$20 billion in Canadian goods starting this week, invoking a rarely&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":171324,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[17,7185,15532,111,8509,45579,399,54682,15812,6882,2042],"class_list":["post-171323","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-canada","tag-canada","tag-dominic-leblanc","tag-marcelo-ebrard","tag-mark-carney","tag-retaliatory-tariffs","tag-section-338","tag-supply-chains","tag-tariff-act-1930","tag-trade-investment","tag-us-tariffs","tag-usmca"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171323","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=171323"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/171323\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/171324"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=171323"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=171323"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=171323"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}