\n\tBy Josh Wingrove, Alicia Diaz and Thomas Seal<\/p>\n
\n\t\u00a0
\n\tUS-Canada trade talks fell apart at the last minute, with fresh 50% tariffs on billions of dollars of Canadian goods taking effect and Prime Minister Mark Carney promising to retaliate.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tThe US tariffs kicked in Saturday on hundreds of items the US buys from Canada, such as plywood, liquor, electrical equipment and hockey gear, totaling around $20 billion. Carney said he suspended talks and that his government would match those duties \u201cdollar for dollar to protect our workers and businesses.\u201d US officials are pledging to present President Donald Trump with options to escalate if he does.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0
\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tThe two sides blamed each other for the collapse. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the Canadian negotiators made 11th-hour demands that upended a draft deal worked out over days of negotiations.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\t\u201cDespite the US offer to Canada to receive the best treatment of any major exporter to our market, new demands and walk-backs of other commitments by Canada have upended the careful balance reached in the past days,\u201d Greer said in a statement.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tCarney, meanwhile, argued that it was the US that had changed its position, saying \u201clast-minute changes in the US proposed terms were unfair, uneconomic, and called into question the reliability of any deal.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tIt wasn\u2019t immediately clear what US sectors Carney will target in his retaliation, nor how quickly the US would take any additional steps in turn, but the late-hour posturing signaled the potential for a spiraling trade fight between the two economies.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tA US official, speaking on condition of anonymity late Friday, said there were no new talks scheduled. The administration will provide Trump options to level out the playing field if Canada retaliates, the official said.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tThe failure to reach an accord dials up the tension between two longtime allies that conducted almost $900 billion of trade in goods and services last year. In addition to tariffs, Trump has publicly mused about making Canada a US state, referred to its prime ministers as \u201cgovernor\u201d and claimed the country couldn\u2019t survive without the US.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tIt underscored how Trump appeared to get ahead of himself on Tuesday night, when he announced less than two hours before the tariffs were originally set to go into effect that the two sides had a deal. Canadian officials later said important elements still needed to be worked out.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tThe two sides had been discussing a deal that included lowering tariffs on certain Canadian steel and aluminum to 25%, cutting duties on Canadian autos to 15% and eliminating a 10% lumber tariff. The US official said talks ended when Canada sought additional concessions in a couple of those areas, but declined to say which.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tBut the draft agreement was not without its critics. The US steel and aluminum industry balked at the measures that would have weakened their standing, for instance. Carney faced blowback in Canada, too, for concessions he was prepared to make that would have, in effect, codified tariffs that Canada has long declared illegal, albeit at a lower level.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tThe trade fight raises a fresh challenge for Trump, who is facing slumping polls and a prolonged conflict with Iran as he barrels toward midterm elections in November. A scrap with Canada \u2014 one of the top sources of US imports \u2014 threatens to fuel voters\u2019 concerns with high prices and further cloud the path for the Federal Reserve as the administration looks to tame the bond market and bring down borrowing costs.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tIn his statement late Friday, Greer confirmed the deal would have reduced tariffs on automobiles, steel, aluminum and lumber, and see the two countries cooperate on export controls, digital trade and certain joint tariffs that he didn\u2019t specify.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\tThey would have also launched formal negotiations to renew the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which Trump negotiated in his first term but declined to renew earlier this year, sending the pact into a decade of rolling reviews.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tIn exchange, Canada was prepared to remove retaliatory measures implemented last year after Trump launched the trade war, though the full scope of its potential concessions hasn\u2019t been made public. The White House had been seeking the elimination of Canada\u2019s counter-tariffs on American-made vehicles and an end to the ban on the retail sale of US alcoholic beverages in most provinces.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\t\u201cWhile I\u2019m hoping more will come out on what happened and where we go from here, this is deeply troubling for thousands of small Canadian exporters,\u201d said Dan Kelly, head of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tThe new 50% tariffs are being imposed under a never-before-used provision of the Tariff Act of 1930 that gives the president the power to put duties on countries deemed to discriminate against US commerce.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tBut the new levies won\u2019t apply to the most important natural resources the US imports from Canada, such as oil, potash and critical minerals. Canada is the US\u2019s most important foreign supplier of crude oil and petroleum products \u2014 more than 4 million barrels a day.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tPublic opinion polls in Canada show broad support for fighting back against Trump\u2019s tariffs, and officials in Ottawa have been studying a series of options, according to people familiar with the matter.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tIn a call with provincial premiers earlier this week, Carney said his government was prepared to retaliate with dollar-for-dollar tariffs if needed \u2014 but that he was pleased with the framework deal and relieved he didn\u2019t have to take that step, which he said could be very damaging, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\t\u201cThe prime minister has my full support for a strong response \u2014 tariff for tariff, dollar for dollar,\u201d Doug Ford, the premier of the province of Ontario, where Canada\u2019s auto sector is based, said in a social media post early Saturday.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tCarney earlier appeared to rule out curbing the supply of important natural resources to the US. \u201cBeing a reliable supplier is important,\u201d he told reporters in late July, shortly after the Trump administration first threatened the 50% tariffs.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tCanada will also soon announce \u201cadditional measures to support Canadian workers and businesses,\u201d Carney said, without elaborating.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n\tUniversity of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe estimated if these tariffs remain in place, Canada could lose almost 90,000 jobs. The export hit impact is most sharply felt in machinery and electronics, plastics and rubber, furniture, wood, paper, and chemicals and cosmetics, he added. BC, Ontario, and Quebec would be the worst hit provinces, he said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
By Josh Wingrove, Alicia Diaz and Thomas Seal
\u00a0
US-Canada trade talks fell apart at the…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":178100,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[98],"tags":[46032,56399,4435,56402,6000,45581,56400,2561,7492,111,45889,47896,46679,56401,29864,45640,2042],"class_list":["post-178099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-mark-carney","tag-50-tariffs","tag-canada-retaliation","tag-canada-tariffs","tag-canada-trade-policy","tag-canada-us-trade-relations","tag-canadian-goods","tag-canadian-retaliatory-tariffs","tag-donald-trump-tariffs","tag-jamieson-greer","tag-mark-carney","tag-us-canada-tariffs","tag-us-canada-trade-talks","tag-us-tariffs-on-canada","tag-us-trade-policy","tag-us-trade-representative","tag-us-canada-trade-war","tag-usmca"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=178099"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178099\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/178100"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=178099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=178099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=178099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}