![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/abacus_methodology_promo-1-1024x538.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nDirection of the Country: Steady at Home, Deeply Pessimistic Abroad<\/p>\n
Public opinion about the direction of the country remains closely divided, but stable.<\/p>\n
Today, 41% of Canadians say the country is headed in the right direction, while 43% say it is on the wrong track. This represents little meaningful change from earlier in April and suggests that the shift to majority government has not disrupted underlying sentiment.<\/p>\n
Views of the world remain overwhelmingly negative. Just 11% believe the world is headed in the right direction, compared with 77% who say it is on the wrong track. Perceptions of the United States are similarly pessimistic, with only 13% saying things are going well and 80% saying they are not.<\/p>\n
The defining feature of public opinion persists: Canadians continue to see their own country as relatively stable in contrast to a world marked by uncertainty and volatility. The continuation of this \u201coptimism gap\u201d reinforces a broader environment that tends to benefit incumbents, particularly when they are seen as steady managers in uncertain times.<\/p>\n
Direction of the Country \u2013 Abacus Data Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n
Direction of the Country<\/p>\n
n=2,000 Canadians \u00b7 April 16\u201321, 2026 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n
41%<\/p>\n
Canada Right Direction<\/p>\n
-2<\/p>\n
Net (Right minus Wrong)<\/p>\n
\n Overview
\n Subgroups
\n Methodology\n <\/p>\n
Generally speaking, do you think things are headed in the right direction or are they off on the wrong track?<\/p>\n
43% of Canadians say the country is on the wrong track, while 41% say it is headed in the right direction \u2014 a near-even split with a net of -2.<\/p>\n
Canada<\/p>\n
Right 41%<\/p>\n
Unsure 16%<\/p>\n
Wrong 43%<\/p>\n
The World<\/p>\n
The USA<\/p>\n
\n Right Direction
\n Unsure
\n Wrong Track\n <\/p>\n
Summary Table<\/p>\n
GeographyRight DirectionWrong TrackUnsureNet<\/p>\n
Canada41%43%16%-2
\n The World11%77%12%-66
\n The USA13%80%7%-67<\/p>\n
% saying Canada is headed in the right direction \u2014 by subgroup<\/p>\n
Atlantic Canada (46%) and Ontario (43%) are most optimistic. Alberta is least optimistic at 32%. Liberal 2025 voters are far more optimistic (61%) than Conservative voters (23%).<\/p>\n
Region<\/p>\n
Gender<\/p>\n
Age<\/p>\n
Household Income<\/p>\n
Community Type<\/p>\n
2025 Federal Vote<\/p>\n
Methodology<\/p>\n
The survey was conducted with 2,000 Canadians from April 16 to 21, 2026.<\/p>\n
A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the PureSpectrum platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.<\/p>\n
The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.<\/p>\n
The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada\u2019s population. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.<\/p>\n
All research conducted by Abacus Data is based on responses from real human participants recruited through verified, double opt-in panel partners. No synthetic, simulated, or AI-generated responses are used at any stage. All research complies with CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements.<\/p>\n
This survey was paid for by Abacus Data.<\/p>\n
Abacus Data \u00b7 Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 April 2026 W2 \u00b7 n=2,000 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n
abacusdata.ca<\/p>\n
Issue Agenda: Cost of Living Dominates, Structure Unchanged<\/p>\n
The issue landscape remains familiar, with affordability continuing to dominate.<\/p>\n
Two-thirds (66%) of Canadians cite the rising cost of living as a top issue, followed by the economy (41%) and healthcare (38%). Concerns about Donald Trump and his administration (34%) and housing affordability (32%) round out the next tier.<\/p>\n
What stands out is not change, but consistency. The same set of issues continues to define the political agenda.<\/p>\n
Top Issues \u2013 Abacus Data Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n
Top Priorities for the Federal Government<\/p>\n
n=2,000 Canadians \u00b7 April 16\u201321, 2026 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n
\n View wave:
\n April 22, 2026
\n January 14, 2026\n <\/p>\n
\n Chart
\n Methodology\n <\/p>\n
What are the 3 most important issues facing Canada today? Please select 3 issues. \u2014 April 22, 2026<\/p>\n
The rising cost of living leads at 66%, up 6 points from January 2026. Donald Trump and his administration remains at 34% (\u22121). Change badges show movement vs January 2026.<\/p>\n
Top Priorities \u2014 April 22, 2026<\/p>\n
The rising cost of living<\/p>\n
Donald Trump and his administration<\/p>\n
Housing affordability and accessibility<\/p>\n
Job security and unemployment<\/p>\n
Climate change and the environment<\/p>\n
The rise of artificial intelligence<\/p>\n
The threat posed by China and Russia<\/p>\n
Indigenous reconciliation<\/p>\n
\n \u226560% (top priority)
\n 28\u201359%
\n <28%
\n \u25b2 Up vs Jan
\n \u25bc Down vs Jan\n <\/p>\n
Which of the following do you think should be the top priorities for the federal government right now? Please select up to three. \u2014 January 14, 2026<\/p>\n
The rising cost of living led at 60% in January 2026. Job security (18%), Crime (16%), and Climate (15%) were higher than in April. Change badges show movement vs April 2026.<\/p>\n
Top Priorities \u2014 January 14, 2026<\/p>\n
The rising cost of living<\/p>\n
Donald Trump and his administration<\/p>\n
Housing affordability and accessibility<\/p>\n
Job security and unemployment<\/p>\n
Climate change and the environment<\/p>\n
The threat posed by China and Russia<\/p>\n
Indigenous reconciliation<\/p>\n
Chinese election interference<\/p>\n
\n \u226560% (top priority)
\n 28\u201359%
\n <28%
\n \u25b2 Up vs Apr
\n \u25bc Down vs Apr\n <\/p>\n
Methodology<\/p>\n
The survey was conducted with 2,000 Canadians from April 16 to 21, 2026.<\/p>\n
A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the PureSpectrum platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.<\/p>\n
The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.<\/p>\n
The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada\u2019s population. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.<\/p>\n
All research conducted by Abacus Data is based on responses from real human participants recruited through verified, double opt-in panel partners. No synthetic, simulated, or AI-generated responses are used at any stage. All research complies with CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements.<\/p>\n
This survey was paid for by Abacus Data.<\/p>\n
Abacus Data \u00b7 Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 April 2026 W2 \u00b7 n=2,000 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n
abacusdata.ca<\/p>\n
Government Approval: Stable and Solidly Positive<\/p>\n
Approval of the federal government remains in clearly positive territory.<\/p>\n
Currently, 54% of Canadians approve of the job the Carney government is doing, compared with 29% who disapprove. These numbers are broadly unchanged and continue to reflect a durable base of support.<\/p>\n
Carney Government Approval \u2013 Abacus Data Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n
Carney Government Approval<\/p>\n
n=2,000 Canadians \u00b7 April 16\u201321, 2026 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n
54%<\/p>\n
Approve<\/p>\n
NC vs Mar 2026<\/p>\n
29%<\/p>\n
Disapprove<\/p>\n
-1 vs Mar 2026<\/p>\n
\n Overview
\n Trend
\n Methodology\n <\/p>\n
Overall, do you approve or disapprove of the job the federal government led by Mark Carney is doing?<\/p>\n
54% of Canadians approve of the Carney government\u2019s job performance \u2014 unchanged from March 2026. Disapproval sits at 29%, down 1 point. Net approval: +25.<\/p>\n
Approval Gauge<\/p>\n
Approve 54%<\/p>\n
Neither 17%<\/p>\n
Disapprove 29%<\/p>\n
Net Approval: +25<\/p>\n
5-Point Breakdown<\/p>\n
Full Breakdown Table<\/p>\n
Response%Net Group<\/p>\n
Strongly approve19%Approve 54%
\n Mostly approve35%
\n Neither approve nor disapprove17%Neither 17%
\n Mostly disapprove13%Disapprove 29%
\n Strongly disapprove16%<\/p>\n
Approval Tracker \u2014 Feb 2025 to Apr 2026 (29 waves)<\/p>\n
Approval has risen sharply from 27% in Feb 2025 to 54% in Apr 2026, while disapproval has fallen from 56% to 29%. The gap between approve and disapprove has shifted from -29 to +25.<\/p>\n
\n Approve
\n Disapprove\n <\/p>\n
All Waves Data Table<\/p>\n
WaveApproveDisapproveNet<\/p>\n
Feb 11-2527%56%-29
\n Feb 25-2528%56%-28
\n Mar 12-2534%50%-16
\n Mar 20-2539%25%+14
\n Mar 25-2541%25%+16
\n Apr 8-2549%24%+25
\n May 21-2550%24%+26
\n Jun 5-2553%23%+30
\n Jun 19-2552%25%+27
\n Jul 2-2552%25%+27
\n Jul 15-2552%27%+25
\n Aug 7-2550%27%+23
\n Aug 20-2549%30%+19
\n Sep 2-2548%30%+18
\n Sep 17-2550%30%+20
\n Oct 1-2546%31%+15
\n Oct 15-2548%32%+16
\n Oct 29-2547%34%+13
\n Nov 6-2544%34%+10
\n Nov 27-2548%32%+16
\n Dec 10-2547%35%+12
\n Jan 14-2647%34%+13
\n Jan 27-2654%31%+23
\n Feb 10-2652%29%+23
\n Feb 24-2652%30%+22
\n Mar 11-2656%28%+28
\n Mar 25-2654%30%+24
\n Apr 8-2654%30%+24
\n Apr 22-2654%29%+25<\/p>\n
Methodology<\/p>\n
The survey was conducted with 2,000 Canadians from April 16 to 21, 2026.<\/p>\n
A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the PureSpectrum platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.<\/p>\n
The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.<\/p>\n
The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada\u2019s population. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.<\/p>\n
All research conducted by Abacus Data is based on responses from real human participants recruited through verified, double opt-in panel partners. No synthetic, simulated, or AI-generated responses are used at any stage. All research complies with CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements.<\/p>\n
This survey was paid for by Abacus Data.<\/p>\n
Abacus Data \u00b7 Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 April 2026 W2 \u00b7 n=2,000 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n
abacusdata.ca<\/p>\n
Importantly, the transition to a majority government has not produced any measurable decline in approval. Combined with our previous release showing that nearly half of Canadians are satisfied with a Liberal majority<\/a>, almost double the proportion who are dissatisfied, this suggests the public is, at minimum, comfortable with the outcome.<\/p>\n Rather than triggering concern about concentrated power, the majority appears to have reinforced perceptions of stability and direction.<\/p>\n Leader Impressions: Carney\u2019s Advantage Endures<\/p>\n Prime Minister Mark Carney continues to enjoy strong personal ratings.<\/p>\n He holds a net favourability of +22, with 51% of Canadians expressing a positive impression and 29% a negative one. These numbers are consistent with recent waves and indicate that his personal brand remains a central pillar of Liberal strength.<\/p>\n By contrast, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre remains in negative territory, with a net impression of -7 (37% positive, 44% negative) while NDP leader Avi Lewis is further behind at -11. <\/p>\n Leader Impressions \u2013 Abacus Data Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n Party Leader Impressions<\/p>\n n=2,000 Canadians \u00b7 April 16\u201321, 2026 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n \n Current Wave Do you have a positive or negative impression of each leader? \u2014 April 22, 2026<\/p>\n \n Carney leads with Net +22 (51% positive \/ 29% negative). Poilievre is at Net \u22127 (37% positive \/ 44% negative). Avi Lewis is at Net \u221211 (15% positive \/ 26% negative), with 24% saying they don\u2019t know enough to say.\n <\/p>\n Leader Impressions \u2014 April 22, 2026<\/p>\n Net impression (% Positive minus % Negative) tracked across all waves \u2014 Jan 2025 to Apr 2026<\/p>\n \n Carney\u2019s net favourability has held above +20 since January 2026, reaching a high of +25 in March 2026. Poilievre\u2019s net has ranged from \u221213 to +2, ending at \u22127 in the latest wave.\n <\/p>\n Net Favourability Trend<\/p>\n Full Data Table<\/p>\n WavePoilievre NetCarney Net Methodology<\/p>\n The survey was conducted with 2,000 Canadians from April 16 to 21, 2026.<\/p>\n A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the PureSpectrum platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.<\/p>\n The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.<\/p>\n The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada\u2019s population. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.<\/p>\n All research conducted by Abacus Data is based on responses from real human participants recruited through verified, double opt-in panel partners. No synthetic, simulated, or AI-generated responses are used at any stage. All research complies with CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements.<\/p>\n This survey was paid for by Abacus Data.<\/p>\n Abacus Data \u00b7 Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 April 2026 W2 \u00b7 n=2,000 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n abacusdata.ca<\/p>\n The gap between the two leaders remains a defining feature of the political landscape. Carney\u2019s broader appeal continues to anchor the Liberal coalition, while Poilievre\u2019s support remains more constrained.<\/p>\n Vote Intention: Liberal Lead Widens as Majority Takes Hold<\/p>\n If an election were held today, the Liberals would receive 45% of the vote among decided voters, compared with 36% for the Conservatives.<\/p>\n This represents a 9-point Liberal lead, up from 6 points earlier in April. The Conservatives have slipped two points, while the Liberals have edged up slightly.<\/p>\n The NDP remains at 8%, while the Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois stands at 7%.<\/p>\n Among those certain to vote, the Liberal advantage grows further, with the party at 47% compared with 36% for the Conservatives.<\/p>\n Regionally, the Liberal coalition remains highly efficient: 48% in B.C., 50% in Ontario, 43% in Quebec and 58% in Atlantic Canada.<\/p>\n The Conservatives continue to dominate in Alberta (60%) and lead in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (47%), but these strengths are not sufficient to offset Liberal advantages elsewhere.<\/p>\n Demographically, the Liberals lead among older Canadians (54% among those 60+), are well ahead among Gen Z but trail slightly with Millennials. They hold a slight edge among both men and women.<\/p>\n Federal Vote Intention \u2013 Abacus Data Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 Apr 2026 W2<\/p>\n Federal Vote Intention<\/p>\n n=2,000 Canadians \u00b7 April 16\u201321, 2026 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n \n Overall If an election was held today, which national political party would you vote for? \u2014 Undecided removed<\/p>\n \n Liberals lead at 45%, up 1 point from April 9. Conservatives are at 36%, down 2 points. NDP holds at 8%, Bloc at 7%, Green at 2%, PPC and Other at 1% each.\n <\/p>\n April 22, 2026 \u2014 All Canadians<\/p>\n Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois<\/p>\n 7%<\/p>\n \u25b2 +1<\/p>\n Wave-over-Wave Comparison<\/p>\n If an election was held today, which national political party would you vote for? \u2014 Those certain to vote, undecided removed<\/p>\n \n Among those certain to vote, the Liberal lead widens to 47% (+2 turnout boost), while Conservative support holds at 36%. NDP and Bloc each sit at 7%.\n <\/p>\n April 22, 2026 \u2014 Certain to Vote<\/p>\n Vote Share & Turnout Effect<\/p>\n PartyVote ShareTurnout Boost \/ SuppressionLiberal47%+2Conservative36%NCNDP7%-1Green1%-1Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois7%NCPeople\u2019s1%NCOther1%NC<\/p>\n Federal vote intention by region \u2014 Undecided removed<\/p>\n \n Liberals lead in every region except Alberta (CPC 60%) and SK\/MB (CPC 47%). The Liberal advantage is strongest in Atlantic Canada (58%) and Ontario (50%). Bloc support is concentrated in Quebec at 30%.\n <\/p>\n Vote Intention by Region<\/p>\n SubgroupLiberalConservativeNDPGreenBloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9coisPeople\u2019sOtherBC48%34%12%2%0%4%0%AB26%60%10%1%0%1%1%SK\/MB40%47%10%2%0%1%0%ON50%38%8%3%0%1%1%QC43%19%4%2%30%0%1%ATL58%33%8%1%0%0%0%<\/p>\n Federal vote intention by age group \u2014 Undecided removed<\/p>\n \n Liberal support is highest among seniors 60+ (54%) and lowest among 30\u201344 year-olds (37%), where Conservatives lead at 43%. NDP support is strongest among 18\u201329 year-olds (15%).\n <\/p>\n Vote Intention by Age Group<\/p>\n SubgroupLiberalConservativeNDPGreenBloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9coisPeople\u2019sOther18\u20132942%28%15%5%6%2%1%30\u20134437%43%9%2%7%1%1%45\u20135944%39%8%2%5%2%1%60+54%32%3%1%8%2%0%<\/p>\n Federal vote intention by gender \u2014 Undecided removed<\/p>\n \n Liberals lead among both men (44%) and women (47%). The Conservative advantage is slightly higher among men (37% vs. 34%). NDP support is notably higher among women (10% vs. 6%).\n <\/p>\n Vote Intention by Gender<\/p>\n SubgroupLiberalConservativeNDPGreenBloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9coisPeople\u2019sOtherMale44%37%6%2%9%2%1%Female47%34%10%3%4%1%1%<\/p>\n Federal vote intention by educational attainment \u2014 Undecided removed<\/p>\n \n University-educated Canadians back the Liberals most strongly at 52%, while Conservative support is highest among those with high school or less (42% LPC vs. 37% CPC). College-educated voters are most evenly split (41% LPC, 38% CPC).\n <\/p>\n Vote Intention by Education<\/p>\n SubgroupLiberalConservativeNDPGreenBloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9coisPeople\u2019sOtherHS or less42%37%5%4%9%2%1%College\/Trade41%38%10%2%7%1%1%University+52%32%9%1%4%1%1%<\/p>\n Methodology<\/p>\n The survey was conducted with 2,000 Canadians from April 16 to 21, 2026.<\/p>\n A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the PureSpectrum platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels, blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source.<\/p>\n The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.<\/p>\n The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada\u2019s population. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.<\/p>\n All research conducted by Abacus Data is based on responses from real human participants recruited through verified, double opt-in panel partners. No synthetic, simulated, or AI-generated responses are used at any stage. All research complies with CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements.<\/p>\n This survey was paid for by Abacus Data.<\/p>\n Abacus Data \u00b7 Canada Political Tracker \u00b7 April 2026 W2 \u00b7 n=2,000 \u00b7 MoE \u00b12.2%<\/p>\n abacusdata.ca<\/p>\n The Upshot<\/p>\n According to Abacus Data CEO David Coletto:<\/p>\n \u201cThe latest numbers suggest that the Liberals\u2019 transition to a majority government has been absorbed by the public with little resistance and may even be reinforcing their advantage.<\/p>\n We see no evidence of a backlash. Approval remains stable, the Prime Minister\u2019s personal ratings are strong, and the party has widened its lead in vote intention. Combined with earlier findings that Canadians are more satisfied than dissatisfied with a Liberal majority, the results point to a level of comfort with the current direction.<\/p>\n At the same time, the broader opinion environment remains remarkably steady. Canadians are still divided on the direction of the country, deeply pessimistic about the world, and focused on a familiar set of issues led by affordability.<\/p>\n For the Conservatives, the challenge remains structural. They continue to hold advantages on issues like immigration and crime, but those strengths are not translating into broader momentum. Meanwhile, the Liberals are benefiting from a wider coalition of support and a leader with consistently positive impressions.<\/p>\n What stands out most is how little disruption the move to majority government has caused in public opinion.<\/p>\n Instead of changing the trajectory, it appears to have reinforced it.\u201d<\/p>\n Methodology<\/p>\n The survey was conducted with 2,000 Canadian adults from April 16 to 22, 2026. A random sample of panelists were invited to complete the survey from a set of partner panels based on the PureSpectrum platform. These partners are typically double opt-in survey panels blended to manage out potential skews in the data from a single source .<\/p>\n The margin of error for a comparable probability-based random sample of the same size is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.<\/p>\n The data were weighted according to census data to ensure that the sample matched Canada\u2019s population according to census data. Totals may not add up to 100 due to rounding.<\/p>\n All research conducted by Abacus Data is based on responses from real human participants recruited through verified, double opt-in panel partners. No synthetic, simulated, or AI-generated responses are used at any stage. All research complies with CRIC Public Opinion Research Standards and Disclosure Requirements.<\/p>\n This survey was paid for by Abacus Data.<\/p>\n About Abacus Data<\/p>\n We are\u00a0Canada\u2019s most sought-after, influential, and impactful polling and market research firm. We are hired by many of North America\u2019s most respected and influential brands and organizations.<\/p>\n We use the latest technology, sound science, and deep experience to generate top-flight research-based advice to our clients. We offer global research capacity with a strong focus on customer service, attention to detail, and exceptional value.<\/p>\n And we are growing throughout all parts of Canada and the United States and have capacity for new clients who want high quality research insights with enlightened hospitality.<\/p>\n Our record speaks for itself:\u00a0we were one of the most accurate pollsters conducting research during the 2025 Canadian election following up on our outstanding record in the 2021, 2019, 2015, and 2011 federal elections.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\n Net Trend
\n Methodology\n <\/p>\n
\n Jan 27-250+13
\nFeb 11-25-4+15
\nFeb 25-250+10
\nMar 20-25-7+12
\nMar 25-25-5+11
\nMar 27-25-8+11
\nApr 3-25-3+15
\nApr 8-25-6+19
\nApr 10-25-5+20
\nApr 15-25-3+13
\nApr 21-25-7+13
\nApr 27-25-3+12
\nMay 5-25+2+17
\nMay 21-25-2+20
\nJun 5-25-5+24
\nJun 19-250+19
\nJuly 2-25-4+22
\nJuly 15-25-4+21
\nAug 7-25+1+19
\nAug 20-25-2+17
\nSept 2-25-3+14
\nSept 17-25-1+18
\nOct 1-25-2+14
\nOct 15-25-3+15
\nOct 29-25-3+14
\nNov 6-25-7+12
\nNov 27-25-3+14
\nDec 10-25-5+10
\nJan 14-26-13+13
\nJan 16-26-13+23
\nJan 27-26-6+22
\nFeb 24-26-7+20
\nMar 11-26-8+25
\nMar 25-26-4+21
\nApr 8-26-6+22
\nApr 22-26-7+22<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\n Likely Voters
\n Region
\n Age
\n Gender
\n Education
\n Methodology\n <\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-62-1024x576.png\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/poll-decoded-card-1024x764.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/corner-1024x572.jpg\")
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"April 26, 2026 This latest wave of research captures the first snapshot of public opinion following the Liberals\u2019…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":20269,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[17,114,162,111,1214,10197],"class_list":["post-20268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-canada","tag-canada","tag-canadian-politics","tag-donald-trump","tag-mark-carney","tag-pierre-poilievre","tag-polls"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20268\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}