{"id":23547,"date":"2026-04-28T20:26:09","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T20:26:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/23547\/"},"modified":"2026-04-28T20:26:09","modified_gmt":"2026-04-28T20:26:09","slug":"canadas-new-government-has-no-interest-in-arresting-our-economic-decline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/23547\/","title":{"rendered":"Canada\u2019s \u2018New Government\u2019 has no interest in arresting our economic decline"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a style=\"display:block\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/resizer\/v2\/NXWBTEBBPBEWNPAED2U63RLNFY.JPG?auth=b29ccec248d949bda98dcfc36e006a7e225e6d5181ff975d1f5c4a840f8a1b6a&amp;width=600&amp;height=400&amp;quality=80&amp;smart=true\" aria-haspopup=\"true\" data-photo-viewer-index=\"0\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Open this photo in gallery:<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"figcap-text\">Prime Minister Mark Carney and Minister of Finance Francois-Philippe Champagne make their way to the House of Commons before the tabling of the spring economic update on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday.Justin Tang\/The Canadian Press<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">If you have been wondering what meaning to attach to that irritating phrase the Carney Liberals use to describe themselves, \u201cCanada\u2019s New Government\u201d \u2013 which was irritating enough when it was first employed, under Stephen Harper, when it was actually a new government \u2013 wonder no longer. As this Spring Economic Update makes abundantly clear, it means nothing whatever. Or next to nothing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">Well, I suppose it depends on whether you are looking at things in static or dynamic terms. So whereas the Trudeau government did all sorts of things that steadily made matters worse, fiscally and economically speaking, the all-new Carney government will do almost nothing to make them better. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">This is, remember, the Carney government\u2019s second crack at it. The first, last fall\u2019s budget, was extravagantly hyped beforehand, but delivered very little. Tuesday\u2019s update, by contrast, came with next to no advance hype, and delivered very little. So the government is at least managing expectations better than it was. But in substance it amounts to more of the same. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text mv-16 l-inset text-pb-8\" data-sophi-feature=\"interstitial\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/politics\/article-spring-economic-update-francois-philippe-champagne-mark-carney-april\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Spring economic update: Ottawa announces $6-billion to boost skilled trades, smaller deficit projection of $66.9-billion<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">The basic issues in front of the government are, not coincidentally, also unchanged. They are 1) the deteriorating state of the country\u2019s finances, and 2) the snail-like pace of economic growth, a problem that has been growing steadily worse for decades. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">On the deficit and debt situation, things are if anything worse than before. The Trudeau government ran through a series of fiscal \u201cguardrails,\u201d later changed to \u201canchors,\u201d each one more forgiving than the last. Balanced budgets, of course, are but a fond memory. So is the \u201cdeclining debt-to-GDP ratio\u201d that replaced them. Ditto for \u201cdeficits smaller than one per cent of GDP.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">The Carney government set even less exacting targets for itself. Now it\u2019s a steadily declining deficit-to-GDP ratio, plus that mumbo-jumbo about achieving \u201cday-to-day operating balance\u201d (a concept nowhere defined), eventually, while continuing to borrow for capital spending (also undefined), more or less indefinitely.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">But the deficit for fiscal 2026, at 2.1 per cent of GDP, was higher, proportionately, than it was in fiscal 2025, and is projected to remain at similarly elevated levels this year and next. What\u2019s the fastest-growing government program? Interest on the debt, projected to cost, four years out, more than $80-billion, or 13 cents of every tax dollar. Four years ago it was just 6 cents.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">The new government, like the old, cannot even be bothered to present the current figures in a meaningful fashion. The federal government\u2019s net debt is now in excess of 40 per cent of GDP, and rising. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">The provinces\u2019 net debts, collectively, are north of 30 per cent. The combined federal-provincial debt, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/cdhowe.org\/publication\/fiscal-fantasy-believe-it-or-not-fiscal-reality-hasnt-gone-away\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/cdhowe.org\/publication\/fiscal-fantasy-believe-it-or-not-fiscal-reality-hasnt-gone-away\/\" target=\"_blank\">recent report<\/a> from the C.D. Howe Institute, is at about 75 per cent of GDP today, on its way to 82 per cent by fiscal 2029. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text mv-16 l-inset text-pb-8\" data-sophi-feature=\"interstitial\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theglobeandmail.com\/politics\/article-spring-economic-update-francois-philippe-champagne-mark-carney-april\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Highlights from the spring economic update, including CPP contribution cuts and new sports funding<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">On what basis, then, does the government continue to insist that Canada\u2019s all-government net debt-to-GDP ratio is at just (checks notes) 10.2 per cent? By subtracting the assets held by the Canada Pension Plan and Quebec Pension Plan, funds that appear on neither the federal nor the provincial governments\u2019 balance sheets \u2013 and, more important, are not available to either to pay off their debts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">The picture is even bleaker on the growth side. Yes, things could be worse. The tariff shock is wearing off. Inflation is contained. Interest rates are falling. But the government\u2019s own long-term projection is for growth averaging 1.7 per cent after inflation. That\u2019s a third as fast as we grew in the 1950s and 1960s. It\u2019s half as fast as in the 1970s and 1980s.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">That\u2019s a major contributor to high deficits. But high deficits also hurt growth, crowding out productive private investment. So do high tax rates and unnecessary regulation \u2013 especially the kind that protects cozy industrial oligopolies from competition, such as those that now stifle the telecoms, financial services and airline industries.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">What, then, does \u201cCanada\u2019s New Government\u201d propose to do about these? Sweeping, pro-investment tax reforms? Radical steps to open protected sectors to competition? No and no. It\u2019s more of the same incremental noodling and state-directed wheel-spinning that got us here. Complacency on taxes, \u201csector strategies\u201d for every industry under the sun, etc. etc. etc.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">A \u201cwhole of government competition plan\u201d sounds promising, until you discover that it\u2019s just more hedge-trimming: a watery promise to \u201climit to the extent possible the potential negative impacts on competition that can, often inadvertently, stem from government policies.\u201d I say, how frightfully stimulating.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">Oh, and there\u2019s the Canada Strong Fund, advertised as \u201cCanada\u2019s first sovereign wealth fund,\u201d about which more on another occasion.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-article-body__text text-pr-5\">There\u2019s no use being disappointed. By this stage, we should all be managing our own expectations. Canada\u2019s New Government is no more interested in arresting our economic decline than Canada\u2019s Old Government.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Open this photo in gallery: Prime Minister Mark Carney and Minister of Finance Francois-Philippe Champagne make their way&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":23548,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3679,17,3118,3680,3119],"class_list":{"0":"post-23547","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-canada","8":"tag-andrew-coyne","9":"tag-canada","10":"tag-column","11":"tag-coyne","12":"tag-opinion"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23547\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/canada\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}