{"id":104466,"date":"2026-07-17T05:37:10","date_gmt":"2026-07-17T05:37:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/104466\/"},"modified":"2026-07-17T05:37:10","modified_gmt":"2026-07-17T05:37:10","slug":"oecd-body-says-ubs-still-failing-to-address-human-rights-risks-within-passive-holdings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/104466\/","title":{"rendered":"OECD body says UBS still failing to address human rights risks within passive holdings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Swiss lender UBS has failed to fully meet recommendations for closely monitoring potential business conduct risks within its passive holdings, according to an OECD investigative body. <\/p>\n<p>In November, the Swiss National Contact Point <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thebanker.com\/content\/ba064b3d-c2b6-4572-b867-c539c4430cb9\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">urged UBS<\/a> to \u201ctake further steps\u201d to align its passive investment practices with the body\u2019s responsible business conduct guidelines following a complaint over its holdings in two US private prisons.<\/p>\n<p>However, only one of its three recommendations was fully met, the government body concluded in a follow-up statement published last week, with the Swiss NCP encouraging UBS to address the \u201coutstanding aspects\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The Swiss NCP is a government body that investigates potential breaches of OECD guidelines.<\/p>\n<p>Although the bank had taken \u201cmeaningful steps\u201d in engaging with index providers to \u201creinforce\u201d its expectations with respect to human rights in passive index funds, the NCP said the lender had not taken a \u201cproactive or leading role\u201d in initiating or advancing discussions with other banks or investors. <\/p>\n<p>The Swiss NCP had also recommended UBS include its passive investments within its overall risk screening for business conduct risks. UBS argued that contractual obligations to clients made that difficult and that index providers decided what companies to include in their indices. <\/p>\n<p>However, the NCP said where human rights risks relating to companies are identified in an index fund, \u201cdirect engagement\u201d with those firms could still be considered. Not doing so meant its previous recommendation had only been \u201cpartially addressed\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The NCP\u2019s findings stem from an initial complaint filed by non-profits \u2014 BankTrack, Coalition for Immigrant Freedom and Worth Rises \u2014 against UBS and other lenders, including Barclays, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thebanker.com\/content\/588a15bd-954b-44df-9bf4-9b162e11bc04\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">HSBC<\/a> and the Swiss National Bank, regarding investments in private prison companies CoreCivic and GEO Group.<\/p>\n<p>The non-profits alleged the two prison firms committed human rights violations and abuses against migrants and others, including forced labour, the withdrawal of food and water, and the suspension of visitation rights.<\/p>\n<p>Expressing disappointment with the Swiss NCP\u2019s final statement, Bianca Tylek, executive director at Worth Rises, said it is hard to have faith in the OECD\u2019s formal complaints process when there is \u201clittle recourse\u201d for violations of its business ethics guidelines.<\/p>\n<p>While the NCP \u201creaffirmed\u201d that passive holdings should be part of a bank\u2019s human rights due diligence, Tylek said in an emailed statement that UBS has \u201cdone nothing\u201d to resolve its initial complaint.<\/p>\n<p>Ryan Brightwell, human rights campaign lead at BankTrack, said the case highlighted the urgent need for \u201cstrong regulation\u201d for human rights due diligence that fully includes banks and investments.<\/p>\n<p>UBS was contacted for comment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Swiss lender UBS has failed to fully meet recommendations for closely monitoring potential business conduct risks within its&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":104467,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[129],"tags":[1023,223],"class_list":["post-104466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ubs","tag-sustainability","tag-ubs"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ch\/116933705528869261","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104466\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/104467"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}