![\"Rio](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1770919169_333_8b5ad851d6420c3aea5d9374b9ae1617.jpeg\")
Rio Tinto, Glencore end merger talks over price dispute Proactive uses images sourced from Shutterstock <\/p>\n Rio Tinto, Glencore end merger talks over price dispute Proactive uses images sourced from Shutterstock <\/p>\n
Rio Tinto Ltd (LSE:RIO, ASX:RIO, OTC:RTNTF)<\/a> and Glencore PLC (LSE:GLEN)<\/a> said on Thursday they have ended merger discussions after failing to agree on terms, marking the collapse of what could have been one of the mining sector\u2019s most high-profile deals.<\/p>\n Rio Tinto said it is no longer considering a merger with Glencore, citing an inability to reach a deal it believes would deliver value to shareholders.<\/p>\n Under the UK Takeover Code, Rio must now wait at least six months before making a firm offer for Glencore, and it cannot participate in competing or joint offers unless a third party announces a formal bid or Glencore\u2019s board consents.<\/p>\n Glencore\u2019s board highlighted concerns over governance, noting that Rio retaining the roles of chairman and CEO in a merged entity would \u201csignificantly\u201d undervalue Glencore\u2019s contribution, making the deal unsuitable for Glencore shareholders.<\/p>\n The announcement sparked a sharp selloff in Glencore shares, which fell more than 10% in London initially, while Rio\u2019s shares were largely steady.<\/p>\n Analysts at Jefferies said that while large-scale mergers in mining are challenging due to cultural, regulatory, and geopolitical factors, the strategic logic for a Rio-Glencore combination had been clear. Jefferies noted that Glencore\u2019s insistence on a significant stake and control over the combined company was a key stumbling block.<\/p>\n \u201cPrice and governance disagreements were at the heart of the breakdown,\u201d Jefferies wrote. \u201cWhile a future re-engagement is possible, our base case is that Rio will focus on its standalone strategy.\u201d<\/p>\n Following the failed talks, Rio Tinto is expected to refocus on its internal priorities, including $650 million of annualized productivity gains targeted by the end of the first quarter of 2026 and an opportunistic cash release of $5-10 billion from existing assets. The company also plans to maintain dividend payouts of 40-60% and continue reducing net debt, which stood at $14.6 billion in the first half of 2025.<\/p>\n Glencore, meanwhile, could explore alternative strategies to unlock shareholder value, including potential demergers in its coal business, new M&A opportunities, or expansion of its copper portfolio.<\/p>\n Analysts said copper production remains a key focus for both companies, with Rio aiming to increase output from around 850,000 tonnes in 2026 to 1 million tonnes by 2028 and 1.6 million tonnes by 2035. Glencore has projects that could meet these targets, but execution will be critical.<\/p>\n Jefferies reiterated a \u201cBuy\u201d rating on Glencore following the share price decline, while maintaining a \u201cHold\u201d on Rio Tinto.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Rio Tinto, Glencore end merger talks over price dispute Proactive uses images sourced from Shutterstock Rio Tinto Ltd…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3141,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[123],"tags":[132,1910,1778,2412,1084],"class_list":{"0":"post-3140","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-glencore","8":"tag-glencore","9":"tag-merger-discussions","10":"tag-merger-talks","11":"tag-rio","12":"tag-rio-tinto"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3140"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3140\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3141"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}