Why did you write this book?<\/p>\n
Part of what makes portfolio management really hard is that your life is going to change a lot over the course of time horizons. The goal of the book is to identify a lot of different styles and strategies that investors will confront over time, and help them understand all of this, so that they can then break these things down and understand how a certain style or strategy might fit that. So that they can find their own perfect portfolio. That\u2019s the main thrust of the book: There isn\u2019t really a perfect portfolio. There\u2019s only a perfect portfolio for you, and that\u2019s the portfolio that is suitable for you, that matches your financial goals and needs.<\/p>\n
Why are you the right person to write about this?<\/p>\n
I was originally a Merrill Lynch financial adviser. I worked on a big team there. I\u2019ve been independent now for probably about 20 years. And my firm manages about $200 million in assets. We have a number of our own publicly listed ETFs. I wouldn\u2019t say even my professional credentials are the main reason anyone should believe me. I would say that I have spent an absurdly huge amount of time obsessing over this particular topic because, for my own profession, I have tried to refine this into something really clean, that I can utilize for people, and help them implement something that is low fee, simple, but also sophisticated enough.<\/p>\n
How complex is too complex?<\/p>\n
You can take a diversified portfolio and you can make it so diverse that you actually end up making it worse by layering different strategies and styles, and making it so sophisticated that you\u2019re actually doing something that\u2019s counterproductive, especially from a management perspective. That\u2019s the one thing that I\u2019ve certainly discovered over the course of my career \u2014 I try to simplify things in large part because I\u2019ve found that if you make something too complex, it just becomes too hard to manage over time. You\u2019ll bungle it.<\/p>\n
![\""Your](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/YPP.png\")
\u201cYour Perfect Portfolio: The ultimate guide to using the world\u2019s most powerful investment strategies,\u201d by Encinitas author Cullen Roche. (Cullen Roche)<\/p>\n
It can (also) end up getting very expensive, because when you start layering things where you have, for instance, hedge fund style strategies and funds that are mimicking private equity, or if you\u2019re going into private equity-type instruments or venture capital, the fees on all these things are much higher. So you can start embedding a lot of extra costs, a lot of tax inefficiencies. You (could) also end up with a lot of accounts in different places, and it\u2019s a lot to manage. It almost ends up, for a lot of people, feeling like a full-time job.<\/p>\n
When should someone outsource their investing strategy versus DIYing it?\u00a0<\/p>\n
I\u2019m a huge advocate of DIY because, and I emphasize this in the book, fees add up to a lot of money in the long run. \u2026 I\u2019m pretty critical of AUM (asset under management) fees. A lot of people talk about how the S&P 500 might generate 10% a year. The reality is that \u2014 gosh, if you\u2019re paying an adviser 1% a year \u2014 back that out, then back out inflation, then back out taxes. That number might be 4% or so after all of that. That\u2019s the number you can then actually go out and spend for retirement. That 1% sounds low, but 1% of 10% or 1% of 4% is actually a really, really big number. And that adds up to a very, very big number in the long run.<\/p>\n
Obviously, as a financial adviser, I\u2019m biased, because I\u2019ve seen the real value that financial advisers can add. There\u2019s always this debate about: what is the level where a financial adviser becomes potentially counterproductive? I think it depends on the level of service they\u2019re providing. \u2026 One thing I\u2019m very critical of: financial advisers that basically only do portfolio management. I think that good financial advisory should go well beyond that. It should go into budgeting and through retirement planning, helping people understand: How am I taking my distributions over time? How am I planning my portfolio so that my assets are achieving certain goals across different time horizons, whether that\u2019s college planning or retirement planning, or whether it\u2019s just day-to-day living.<\/p>\n
How important is it to scrutinize 401(k) fees?<\/p>\n
A lot of people won\u2019t realize that there are advisers to these plans, and they\u2019re getting paid in ways that are not always very transparent. A lot of 401(k) plans are loaded to the gills with super-high-fee mutual funds. Even mutual funds that are 0.5% or more in fees per year, these days, that\u2019s a very, very high fee. \u2026 So I would say that is maybe the most important place actually to be really mindful of advisory fees. You should be paying very, very low fees in a 401(k), and especially conscientious of it because you\u2019re going to be paying that fee for 20, 30, 40 years. The compounding effect inside of that thing is going to be gigantic.<\/p>\n
There is no one perfect portfolio, so you include a few options that target retirement. What is key to consider about that stage?<\/p>\n
I did emphasize a number of retirement planning strategies in the book because I have found in the course of my career that retirement is the biggest hurdle behaviorally, for almost everybody. \u2026 (Your professional) income is all of a sudden just one day going to disappear. And you have to start living off of the nest egg that you\u2019ve built. And that\u2019s just a big behavioral adjustment for everybody. Some people go through it really easily. Some people really struggle with it. Building your portfolio in a way to make that transition easier is really important.<\/p>\n
What would you say to people who are looking at today\u2019s markets and feeling uneasy \u2014 or revved up?<\/p>\n
I think this moment in history is one of the most challenging environments to think through, because there\u2019s just a lot of political weirdness. There\u2019s the geopolitical stuff that\u2019s all going on. The valuations in the United States are very, very high, by any metric. \u2026 I think for a lot of people, you could be caught up in pockets of this, where I think you have to be very careful about chasing performance. Don\u2019t chase the shiny object that everybody is talking about, necessarily. I think that in an environment like right now, where the geopolitics are really weird and the valuations are really high, it means that things can go a lot of different directions. And the potential that there\u2019s going to be much higher volatility in an environment like this is much higher than it is on average. I think people have to be much more diversified and skeptical of everything in general, because we don\u2019t know how the AI boom is going to play out. We don\u2019t know how geopolitical events are going to play out. We don\u2019t know whether the United States is going to continue to outperform foreign markets like they have over the course of the last 10 years. I think the argument for really broad diversification, not being greedy, being consistent, is more valuable than ever right now.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Cullen Roche, the founder of Discipline Funds, has managed money for more than 20 years. As he modeled…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7614,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[124],"tags":[114,5997,5998,5999,134,1116],"class_list":["post-7613","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-roche","tag-business","tag-encinitas-advocate","tag-encinitas-advocate-news","tag-latest-headlines","tag-roche","tag-top-stories-sdut"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7613","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7613"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7613\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}