{"id":91246,"date":"2026-06-24T14:36:18","date_gmt":"2026-06-24T14:36:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/91246\/"},"modified":"2026-06-24T14:36:18","modified_gmt":"2026-06-24T14:36:18","slug":"palantir-took-a-swiss-courtroom-loss-and-a-european-credibility-hit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/91246\/","title":{"rendered":"Palantir Took a Swiss Courtroom Loss and a European Credibility Hit"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Palantir Palantir Took a Swiss Courtroom Loss and a European Credibility Hit – Moby THE GIST <\/p>\n

Our analysts just identified a stock with the potential to be the next Nvidia. Tell us how you invest and we’ll show you why it’s our #1 pick. Tap here.<\/a><\/p>\n

Palantir took another credibility hit in Zurich after the city\u2019s commercial court allowed only one of 23 counter-statements filed by the U.S. data analytics company to be published.<\/p>\n

The loss, about SFr9,000 ($11,000), is pocket change compared to the stock\u2019s slide. Since its all-time high of $207 last November, shares are down nearly 45%, wiping roughly $210 billion from its market cap.<\/p>\n

The Swiss effectively telling CEO Alex Karp and Chairman Peter Thiel to take their rebuttals to X and elsewhere is unusual for a company that, for the past couple of years, seemed to do whatever it wanted. It\u2019s one of many signs its pull in Europe and beyond may be waning.<\/p>\n

WHAT HAPPENED <\/p>\n

In December, the digital magazine Republik published two articles arguing that Palantir\u2019s relationship with Switzerland would be risky for the neutral state.<\/p>\n

The first focused on the geopolitical and strategic risks of the Swiss government adopting Palantir\u2019s tech, especially how it would handle its data given how closely Palantir is tied to the U.S. Defense Department. President Trump has not been particularly friendly with the Swiss lately, recently raising tariffs on the country after stating he \u201cdidn\u2019t really like the way she (Karin Keller-Sutter, President of the Swiss Confederation in 2025) talked to us,\u201d describing her as \u201cvery aggressive.\u201d<\/p>\n

The second piece appears to have been the one that set Karp and co. off, revealing how Swiss government agencies had repeatedly rejected Palantir\u2019s software.<\/p>\n

Together, the articles were a one-two punch. Heise Online, a German technology and digital-news site, defines the saga as \u201cseven years of largely unsuccessful acquisition efforts by Palantir with Swiss federal authorities.\u201d Palantir responded by suing the publication in an effort to force it to print 23 specific “counter-statements” (rebuttals) alongside the two articles. The company lost in court, leaving only one counter-statement to run.<\/p>\n

One stock. Nvidia-level potential. 30M+ investors trust Moby to find it first. Get the pick. Tap here.<\/a><\/p>\n

To save face, Palantir, in an effort to \u201cclarify the facts,\u201d \u201cdispel misunderstandings,\u201d and \u201censure that decision-makers and the public are informed,\u201d posted the 23 counter-statements in a Medium blog post titled \u201cCorrection: How the online magazine Republik distorted a government report on Palantir.\u201d It did something similar when Alex Karp\u2019s manifesto, The Technological Republic, was published, writing out 22 points outlining tech\u2019s role in national defense.<\/p>\n

WHY IT MATTERS <\/p>\n

The loss and subsequent wave of bad press hit Palantir exactly where it feared most.<\/p>\n

The company has been bleeding public-sector credibility across the European Union and the United Kingdom for months. If Zurich isn’t interested, Brussels and London are watching. In some cases, they\u2019re acting on it, replacing Palantir with companies like the French ChapsVision, which competes with Palantir in key areas. France ditched Palantir altogether on the basis of \u201cstrategic dependency,\u201d Defense Minister S\u00e9bastien Lecornu said on June 16, adding that he hopes to build \u201creal strategic autonomy.\u201d Germany is on board too, partnering with the country\u2019s domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. London\u2019s mayor blocked a proposed Metropolitan Police contract for Palantir in May, a potential 50 million-pound loss, according to Reuters, citing \u201cvalue-for-money\u201d and those pesky \u201cethical concerns.\u201d<\/p>\n

That leaves Palantir with one country it can rely on to keep those government contracts rolling: the United States. On Monday, the federal government announced the company will be used for the U.S. military\u2019s \u201cNext Generation Command and Control common data layer baseline,\u201d or NGC2. Built on Foundry and Anduril\u2019s Lattice as the \u201ctactical data layer,\u201d Palantir will do what it does best: serve as the backend for the entire military enterprise.<\/p>\n

WHAT\u2019S NEXT <\/p>\n

On its face, this looks like yet another win for the company, but in light of the E.U. and U.K. viewing Palantir as a liability rather than a necessity, we are starting to view the U.S. military as ever more existentially important to the company \u2014 if not an outright crutch. Worse, what happens if the Democrats get back into office and suddenly revoke all those military contracts? What then?<\/p>\n

One person who\u2019s been shockingly quiet through PLTR\u2019s nearly 45% drop is Michael Burry. He built a block of long-dated puts on the stock for June 17, 2027, with a strike price of 50, and December 19, 2026, with a strike price of 100, per his Substack post back in April. He\u2019s not in the money yet, but given how the stock is moving, Burry is close.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Palantir Took a Swiss Courtroom Loss and a European Credibility Hit – Moby THE GIST Our analysts just…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":91247,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[4],"tags":[45958,7802,1373,41,906,17],"class_list":["post-91246","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-switzerland","tag-alex-karp","tag-palantir","tag-president-trump","tag-swiss","tag-swiss-government","tag-switzerland"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@ch\/116805592171468437","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91246","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91246"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91246\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/91247"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91246"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91246"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/ch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91246"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}