\n\tVadime, jak se V\u00e1m l\u00edb\u00ed v\u00fdsledn\u00fd n\u00e1vrh \u00fapravy financov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 televize a \u010cesk\u00e9ho rozhlasu, v\u010detn\u011b jeho finan\u010dn\u00edho nastaven\u00ed? \u010cT by p\u0159i\u0161la zhruba o miliardu korun a \u010cRo o 350 milion\u016f. To je finan\u010dn\u00ed str\u00e1nka v\u011bci. Je v\u016f\u010di ob\u011bma instituc\u00edm spravedliv\u00e9 zachovat r\u00e1mec, kter\u00fd vymezuje jejich povinnosti, a z\u00e1rove\u0148 jim odebrat v\u00fdraznou \u010d\u00e1st rozpo\u010dtu?<\/p>\n
\n\tP\u0159es t\u0159icet let fungovaly \u010cesk\u00e1 televize a \u010cesk\u00fd rozhlas v pravidlech, kter\u00e1 vznikla po roce 1989. Jen\u017ee sv\u011bt se od t\u00e9 doby zm\u011bnil a medi\u00e1ln\u00ed prost\u0159ed\u00ed je\u0161t\u011b v\u00edc. Zm\u011bnily se technologie, zp\u016fsoby distribuce obsahu i o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed ve\u0159ejnosti od m\u00e9di\u00ed financovan\u00fdch z ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch pen\u011bz. Sou\u010dasn\u00e1 podoba ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edch m\u00e9di\u00ed je nav\u00edc v\u00fdznamnou \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed spole\u010dnosti zpochyb\u0148ov\u00e1na. Sou\u010dasn\u00e1 vl\u00e1dn\u00ed koalice zm\u011bnu financov\u00e1n\u00ed sl\u00edbila p\u0159ed volbami a m\u00e1 ji i v programov\u00e9m prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed. To nen\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 p\u0159ekvapen\u00ed. A jestli mohou \u010cesk\u00e1 televize a \u010cesk\u00fd rozhlas za m\u00e9n\u011b pen\u011bz plnit \u00fakoly, kter\u00e9 jim ukl\u00e1d\u00e1 z\u00e1kon? Mysl\u00edm, \u017ee mohou. Z\u00e1kon toti\u017e neur\u010duje minim\u00e1ln\u00ed ani maxim\u00e1ln\u00ed rozsah vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed. Stanovuje c\u00edle a principy ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 slu\u017eby. Je pak na veden\u00ed obou instituc\u00ed, jak\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem je napln\u00ed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Anketa<\/p>\n
Kter\u00fd \u010dlen vl\u00e1dy by m\u011bl odej\u00edt? M\u00e1te v\u00edce mo\u017enost\u00ed.<\/p>\n
hlasovalo: 2595 lid\u00ed<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\n\tAsi lze uznat, \u017ee vl\u00e1da v\u010detn\u011b ministra Klemp\u00ed\u0159e dala b\u011bhem p\u016flro\u010dn\u00ed debaty o podob\u011b zm\u011bn a zp\u016fsobu jejich proveden\u00ed Milionu chvilek i dal\u0161\u00edm protestuj\u00edc\u00edm dost munice. Jak celou v\u011bc dot\u00e1hnout do konce bez dal\u0161\u00edch chyb a zbyte\u010dn\u00fdch trapas\u016f?<\/p>\n
\n\tBudou demonstrace. Budou obstrukce opozice. Budou st\u00e1vky. Bude i prezidentsk\u00e9 veto. \u010cesk\u00e1 televize a \u010cesk\u00fd rozhlas se staly sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed politick\u00e9ho boje. Mrz\u00ed m\u011b, \u017ee o samotn\u00e1 m\u00e9dia v n\u011bm ve skute\u010dnosti jde jen okrajov\u011b. Mohl tomu ministr Klemp\u00ed\u0159 zabr\u00e1nit? Nemysl\u00edm si. I kdyby vedl rozs\u00e1hlou ve\u0159ejnou debatu, opozice, velk\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st odborn\u00e9 ve\u0159ejnosti ani samotn\u00e1 ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed m\u00e9dia o ni ve skute\u010dnosti nest\u00e1ly. Debata byla velmi rychle zredukov\u00e1na na ot\u00e1zku poplatk\u016f. T\u00edm byla z\u00e1rove\u0148 skute\u010dn\u00e1 debata zablokov\u00e1na.<\/p>\n
\n\tVy s\u00e1m upozor\u0148ujete, \u017ee se nevede skute\u010dn\u00e1 debata o tom, co v\u0161echno m\u00e1 vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed \u010cT a \u010cRo obsahovat, a ob\u011b m\u00e9dia se sp\u00ed\u0161e sna\u017e\u00ed zakonzervovat sou\u010dasn\u00fd stav. M\u016f\u017ee zru\u0161en\u00ed koncesion\u00e1\u0159sk\u00fdch poplatk\u016f a p\u0159echod na st\u00e1tn\u00ed financov\u00e1n\u00ed tento stav prolomit, i za cenu obvin\u011bn\u00ed, \u017ee dal\u0161\u00ed sni\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed rozpo\u010dtu p\u0159edstavuje snahu zejm\u00e9na \u010ceskou televizi \u201evyhladov\u011bt\u201c?<\/p>\n
\n\tPokud m\u00e9dia ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 slu\u017eby ze st\u00e1tn\u00edho rozpo\u010dtu dostanou osm miliard korun a z\u00e1rove\u0148 maj\u00ed dal\u0161\u00ed vlastn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edjmy, pak nejde o vyhladov\u011bn\u00ed. Nav\u00edc si ob\u011b instituce samy rozhoduj\u00ed o tom, jak budou z\u00e1konem stanovenou ve\u0159ejnou slu\u017ebu napl\u0148ovat.<\/p>\n
\n\tNed\u00e1vno m\u011b napadlo, \u017ee n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed \u010de\u0161t\u00ed liber\u00e1ln\u00ed um\u011blci se chovaj\u00ed, jako by ne\u0161lo jen o n\u011bkolik televizn\u00edch stanic, ale jako by byl pod Kav\u010d\u00edmi horami ukryt\u00fd obrovsk\u00fd sejf pln\u00fd zlata, o kter\u00fd se boj\u00ed. Co je podle V\u00e1s skute\u010dn\u00fdm d\u016fvodem tak siln\u00e9ho emocion\u00e1ln\u00edho vyp\u011bt\u00ed, s jak\u00fdm mobilizuj\u00ed opozi\u010dn\u00ed voli\u010de?<\/p>\n
\n\tVe skute\u010dnosti se nevede spor o \u010ceskou televizi ani o \u010cesk\u00fd rozhlas. Vede se spor o v\u00fdsledky voleb. Kdyby \u0161lo opravdu o obsah ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 slu\u017eby, sly\u0161eli bychom debatu o region\u00e1ln\u00edm vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed, vzd\u011bl\u00e1vac\u00edch po\u0159adech, d\u011btsk\u00e9 tvorb\u011b nebo t\u0159eba o Symfonick\u00e9m orchestru \u010cesk\u00e9ho rozhlasu. Nic takov\u00e9ho ale nesly\u0161\u00edme. Sly\u0161\u00edme debatu o poplatc\u00edch. To je podstatn\u00fd rozd\u00edl.<\/p>\n
\n\tD\u00e1 se za sou\u010dasn\u00e9ho stavu v\u016fbec na n\u011b\u010dem dohodnout alespo\u0148 s \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed opozice? Liber\u00e1ln\u00ed strany v\u011bd\u00ed, \u017ee moment\u00e1ln\u011b je \u010cT jejich, \u010dili pojedou r\u00e9toriku ve stylu \u201ekdy\u017e se zru\u0161\u00ed poplatky, na Zemi spadne meteorit\u201c.<\/p>\n
\n\tHodn\u011b bude z\u00e1le\u017eet na tom, jak se k cel\u00e9 v\u011bci postav\u00ed samotn\u00e1 ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed m\u00e9dia. Mohou p\u0159ij\u00edt s pl\u00e1nem, jak budou za nov\u00fdch podm\u00ednek fungovat hospod\u00e1rn\u011bji. Mohou ve\u0159ejnosti vysv\u011btlit, co cht\u011bj\u00ed zachovat, co zm\u011bnit a jak budou plnit sv\u016fj z\u00e1konn\u00fd \u00fakol. Nebo se mohou postavit na barik\u00e1dy vedle opozice a prezidenta. V tom p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b se spor zm\u011bn\u00ed v \u010dist\u011b politick\u00fd konflikt a prostor pro jakoukoli dohodu bude minim\u00e1ln\u00ed.<\/p>\n
\n\tL\u00edb\u00ed se mi va\u0161e p\u0159edstava, \u017ee by se \u010d\u00e1st prost\u0159edk\u016f ur\u010den\u00fdch pro \u010ceskou televizi rozd\u011blovala formou sout\u011b\u017ee mezi nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 projekty filma\u0159\u016f, dokumentarist\u016f a dal\u0161\u00edch tv\u016frc\u016f. Ostatn\u011b i dnes jim \u010cT zad\u00e1v\u00e1 zna\u010dn\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed pr\u00e1ce. Jen\u017ee \u201eti spr\u00e1vn\u00ed\u201c v\u011bd\u00ed, jak se k t\u011bmto pen\u011bz\u016fm dostat. Vy byste jim nyn\u00ed tuto cestu zkomplikoval t\u00edm, \u017ee by se o prost\u0159edky neuch\u00e1zeli prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm sv\u00fdch kontakt\u016f v \u010cT, ale nap\u0159\u00edklad u N\u00e1rodn\u00edho audiovizu\u00e1ln\u00edho fondu?<\/p>\n
\n\tM\u00e1te pravdu. Ale tato varianta dnes nen\u00ed na stole. Nep\u0159ijdou s n\u00ed politici. Nep\u0159ijde s n\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e1 televize ani \u010cesk\u00fd rozhlas. Nep\u0159ijdou s n\u00ed ani komer\u010dn\u00ed m\u00e9dia. Zm\u011bnily by se toti\u017e dosavadn\u00ed pravidla hry. Dnes existuje syst\u00e9m, kter\u00fd v\u0161ichni akt\u00e9\u0159i znaj\u00ed. Producent v\u00ed, za k\u00fdm j\u00edt. Tv\u016frce v\u00ed, komu projekt nab\u00eddnout. \u010cesk\u00e1 televize v\u00ed, podle \u010deho se m\u00e1 rozhodnout. A politici v\u011bd\u00ed, \u017ee pokud tuto debatu otev\u0159ou, vstoup\u00ed na minov\u00e9 pole. Grantov\u00fd syst\u00e9m by znamenal, \u017ee by se o \u010d\u00e1st ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch prost\u0159edk\u016f sout\u011b\u017eilo otev\u0159en\u011b. Nejen \u010cesk\u00e1 televize, ale i soukrom\u00ed producenti, region\u00e1ln\u00ed m\u00e9dia, dokumentarist\u00e9 nebo nov\u00e9 digit\u00e1ln\u00ed projekty. N\u011bkdo by z\u00edskal v\u00edce. N\u011bkdo m\u00e9n\u011b. N\u011bkdo nic. A hlavn\u011b by se otev\u0159ela ot\u00e1zka, zda m\u00e1 ve\u0159ejnou slu\u017ebu zaji\u0161\u0165ovat jedna instituce, nebo v\u00edce subjekt\u016f. To je debata, kterou dnes nechce v\u00e9st prakticky nikdo.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Anketa<\/p>\n
Prosp\u011blo prezidentstv\u00ed Donalda Trumpa sv\u011btu?<\/p>\n
hlasovalo: 3654 lid\u00ed<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\n\tObjevuj\u00ed se srovn\u00e1n\u00ed efektivity vynakl\u00e1dan\u00fdch prost\u0159edk\u016f mezi \u010ceskou televiz\u00ed a jin\u00fdmi evropsk\u00fdmi ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edmi m\u00e9dii, stejn\u011b jako s jej\u00ed \u010deskou komer\u010dn\u00ed konkurenc\u00ed. Jak z t\u011bchto srovn\u00e1n\u00ed podle V\u00e1s \u010cesk\u00e1 televize vych\u00e1z\u00ed?<\/p>\n
\n\tZ hlediska financov\u00e1n\u00ed jsme n\u011bkde uprost\u0159ed evropsk\u00e9ho pole. Jen\u017ee podobn\u00e1 srovn\u00e1n\u00ed jsou velmi problematick\u00e1. Ka\u017ed\u00e1 zem\u011b pou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 jin\u00fd model financov\u00e1n\u00ed. N\u011bkde dominuj\u00ed poplatky, jinde st\u00e1tn\u00ed rozpo\u010det, jinde granty nebo r\u016fzn\u00e9 kombinace t\u011bchto n\u00e1stroj\u016f. Nav\u00edc v \u010desk\u00e9m prost\u0159ed\u00ed podobn\u00e9 ukazatele nikdy p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 nefungovaly. V\u017edy by se na\u0161el argument, pro\u010d pot\u0159ebujeme d\u00e1t v\u00edce prost\u0159edk\u016f pr\u00e1v\u011b my. Kv\u016fli demokracii, kv\u016fli dezinformac\u00edm. Neexistuje n\u011bjak\u00e9 jednoduch\u00e9 evropsk\u00e9 \u010d\u00edslo, podle kter\u00e9ho lze spr\u00e1vnou v\u00fd\u0161i financov\u00e1n\u00ed ur\u010dit.<\/p>\n
\n\tDruh\u00fdm velk\u00fdm t\u00e9matem \u010cesk\u00e9 televize je zpravodajstv\u00ed a publicistika. Byly o tom pops\u00e1ny cel\u00e9 stohy pap\u00edru. Vl\u00e1da opakuje, \u017ee do obsahu vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed zasahovat nem\u016f\u017ee. Vyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 v\u0161ak Poslaneck\u00e1 sn\u011bmovna dostate\u010dn\u011b n\u00e1stroje ke kontrole Rady \u010cT a Rady \u010cRo? Mohou tyto rady \u00fa\u010dinn\u011bji dohl\u00ed\u017eet na skute\u010dnou vyv\u00e1\u017eenost vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed?<\/p>\n
\n\tPoslaneck\u00e1 sn\u011bmovna rady nekontroluje. Pouze je vol\u00ed. M\u00e1 vybrat kvalitn\u00ed kandid\u00e1ty podle sv\u00e9ho nejlep\u0161\u00edho v\u011bdom\u00ed a sv\u011bdom\u00ed. Jakmile jsou jednou zvoleni, st\u00e1vaj\u00ed se nez\u00e1visl\u00fdmi. Jejich \u00fakolem je postupovat podle z\u00e1kona, nikoli podle p\u0159\u00e1n\u00ed politick\u00fdch stran. Pokud z\u00e1kon poru\u0161\u00ed, m\u016f\u017ee je Poslaneck\u00e1 sn\u011bmovna odvolat. T\u00edm ale jej\u00ed role kon\u010d\u00ed.<\/p>\n
\n\tJste \u010dlenem Rady pro rozhlasov\u00e9 a televizn\u00ed vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed, kter\u00e1 \u0159e\u0161\u00ed konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enosti a pochyben\u00ed. N\u011bkolikr\u00e1t jste dali za pravdu st\u011b\u017eovatel\u016fm na po\u0159ady Nory Fridrichov\u00e9 \u010di dal\u0161\u00edch novin\u00e1\u0159\u016f ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edch m\u00e9di\u00ed. Jak\u00e9 jsou podle v\u00e1s nej\u010dast\u011bj\u0161\u00ed probl\u00e9my, kter\u00e9 se v t\u00e9to oblasti opakuj\u00ed?<\/p>\n
\n\tSt\u00ed\u017enost\u00ed na vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 televize a \u010cesk\u00e9ho rozhlasu chod\u00ed jednozna\u010dn\u011b nejv\u00edce ze v\u0161ech m\u00e9di\u00ed. My ale neposuzujeme, zda se n\u00e1m obsah l\u00edb\u00ed nebo nel\u00edb\u00ed. Posuzujeme pouze to, zda do\u0161lo k poru\u0161en\u00ed z\u00e1kona. Ka\u017ed\u00e9 na\u0161e rozhodnut\u00ed je p\u0159ezkoumateln\u00e9 soudem. Pokud porovn\u00e1me po\u010det st\u00ed\u017enost\u00ed s po\u010dtem skute\u010dn\u00fdch pochyben\u00ed, jde o velmi mal\u00fd zlomek p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f. Ne \u017ee by podle m\u00e9ho n\u00e1zoru bylo v\u017edy v\u0161e v po\u0159\u00e1dku. Jen\u017ee rada mus\u00ed rozhodovat podle z\u00e1kona a existuj\u00edc\u00ed judikatury. Sp\u00ed\u0161e ne\u017e o objektivit\u011b \u010di vyv\u00e1\u017eenosti to vypov\u00edd\u00e1 o n\u011b\u010dem jin\u00e9m. \u010cesk\u00fd regula\u010dn\u00ed r\u00e1mec je v oblasti obsahu mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b liber\u00e1ln\u00ed. A to pova\u017euji za spr\u00e1vn\u00e9.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Psali jsme:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Vadime, jak se V\u00e1m l\u00edb\u00ed v\u00fdsledn\u00fd n\u00e1vrh \u00fapravy financov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 televize a \u010cesk\u00e9ho rozhlasu, v\u010detn\u011b jeho finan\u010dn\u00edho…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":121937,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[10],"tags":[3577,1812,17,21,1814,16,3221,3576,18,19,22,20],"class_list":["post-121936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-zpravy","tag-cro","tag-ct","tag-headlines","tag-hlavni-udalosti","tag-klempir","tag-news","tag-petrov","tag-poplatky","tag-top-news","tag-top-stories","tag-udalosti-dne","tag-zpravy"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@cz\/116771267681398855","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121936","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=121936"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121936\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/121937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=121936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=121936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=121936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}