reakci<\/a> Chmel\u00e1r zah\u00e1jil bez serv\u00edtk\u016f. \u201eTak se n\u00e1m ozvala dal\u0161\u00ed nasp\u00eddovan\u00e1 here\u010dka a v rozhovoru pro bulv\u00e1rn\u00ed web se s n\u00e1mi pod\u011blila o svou politologickou anal\u00fdzu, \u017ee je to tu pr\u00fd hor\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e za b\u00fdval\u00e9ho re\u017eimu, \u017ee se \u0159\u00edt\u00edme do diktatury a p\u0159irovnala Fica k Hitlerovi,\u201c napsal.<\/p>\n
\n\tMag\u00e1lov\u00e9 n\u00e1sledn\u011b p\u0159ipomn\u011bl, jak\u00e9 d\u016fsledky by podobn\u00e1 ve\u0159ejn\u00e1 kritika m\u011bla za komunistick\u00e9ho re\u017eimu. \u201eTakhle v\u00e1m to \u0159eknu, pan\u00ed Mag\u00e1lov\u00e1. Kdyby to tu bylo hor\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e za normalizace, u\u017e d\u00e1vno by v\u00e1m zabavili v\u00e1\u0161 hotel, v tom lep\u0161\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b by v\u00e1s za tyto sprost\u00e9 \u0159e\u010di zav\u0159eli za trestn\u00fd \u010din rozvracen\u00ed republiky a v tom hor\u0161\u00edm by v\u00e1s i s T\u00e1\u0148ou Pauhofovou p\u0159i pokusu o p\u0159ekro\u010den\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00edch hranic zast\u0159elili,\u201c uvedl s t\u00edm, \u017ee Mag\u00e1lovou uzn\u00e1v\u00e1 jako dobrou here\u010dku, t\u00edm to v\u0161ak kon\u010d\u00ed.<\/p>\n
\n\tPro\u010d maj\u00ed m\u00edt n\u00e1zory herc\u016f v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed v\u00e1hu?<\/p>\n
\n\tJ\u00e1drem Chmel\u00e1rovy kritiky je p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010den\u00ed, \u017ee popularita ani hereck\u00e9 povol\u00e1n\u00ed z \u010dlov\u011bka ned\u011blaj\u00ed odborn\u00edka na politiku, \u00fastavn\u00ed zm\u011bny nebo fungov\u00e1n\u00ed st\u00e1tu. \u201eM\u011b vlastn\u011b mnohem v\u00edc ne\u017e politizuj\u00edc\u00ed herci p\u0159ekvapuj\u00ed novin\u00e1\u0159i, kte\u0159\u00ed c\u00edt\u00ed pot\u0159ebu d\u011blat s nimi rozhovory o t\u00e9matech, kter\u00fdm zjevn\u011b nerozum\u011bj\u00ed,\u201c poznamenal.<\/p>\n
\n\tS\u00e1m sebe p\u0159irovnal k \u010dlov\u011bku, kter\u00fd se m\u016f\u017ee orientovat v hudb\u011b, v\u00fdtvarn\u00e9m um\u011bn\u00ed \u010di dal\u0161\u00edch oborech, ani\u017e by se vyd\u00e1val za odborn\u00edka. \u201eM\u00e1m docela slu\u0161n\u00fd p\u0159ehled o klasick\u00e9 hudb\u011b, renesan\u010dn\u00edm mal\u00ed\u0159stv\u00ed nebo kosmologii. P\u0159esto m\u011b zat\u00edm nikdo neoslovil, abych \u0159ekl sv\u016fj n\u00e1zor na teorii strun, a pova\u017euji to za p\u0159irozen\u00e9. Nejsem kvalifikovan\u00fd odborn\u00edk na tato t\u00e9mata,\u201c uvedl.<\/p>\n
\n\t\u201eZ jak\u00e9ho d\u016fvodu si v\u0161ak n\u011bkdo mysl\u00ed, \u017ee pohled herc\u016f na zm\u011bnu \u00fastavy \u010di fungov\u00e1n\u00ed ministerstev m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt v n\u011b\u010dem obohacuj\u00edc\u00ed?\u201c polo\u017eil n\u00e1sledn\u011b ot\u00e1zku.<\/p>\n
\n\tHerc\u016fm pr\u00e1vo vyjad\u0159ovat se k politice neup\u00edr\u00e1. Odm\u00edt\u00e1 v\u0161ak, aby politick\u00e1 prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed pron\u00e1\u0161eli p\u0159\u00edmo b\u011bhem divadeln\u00edch p\u0159edstaven\u00ed nebo aby m\u00e9dia jejich n\u00e1zor\u016fm automaticky p\u0159ikl\u00e1dala v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed v\u00e1hu. \u201eToto pr\u00e1vo jim nikdo nikdy nevzal. Oni jen demagogicky p\u0159ekroutili nesouhlas velk\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti slovensk\u00e9 spole\u010dnosti s t\u00edm, aby politizovali divadeln\u00ed p\u0159edstaven\u00ed \u010dten\u00edm sv\u00fdch ideologick\u00fdch prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed,\u201c napsal.<\/p>\n
\n\tN\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed um\u011blci pak n\u00e1sledn\u00fd \u00fabytek div\u00e1k\u016f vysv\u011btlovali ekonomick\u00fdmi probl\u00e9my m\u00edsto toho, aby p\u0159ipustili, \u017ee lidem m\u016f\u017ee vadit pr\u00e1v\u011b politizace programu. \u201e\u010clov\u011bk by \u0159ekl, \u017ee z n\u00e1s d\u011blaj\u00ed hlup\u00e1ky, ale hlup\u00e1ky z n\u00e1s ud\u011blat nikdy nedok\u00e1\u017eou,\u201c vzk\u00e1zal Chmel\u00e1r.<\/p>\n
\n\tKram\u00e1r a Polni\u0161ov\u00e1? \u201eOby\u010dejn\u00ed zaprodan\u00ed klauni\u201c<\/p>\n
\n\tJeho kritika se neomezila pouze na Mag\u00e1lovou. Vymezil se tak\u00e9 proti herc\u016fm Maro\u0161i Kram\u00e1rovi a Pet\u0159e Polni\u0161ov\u00e9, kte\u0159\u00ed podle jeho slov odm\u00edtaj\u00ed p\u0159edstavu, \u017ee by byli pouze bavi\u010di. \u201eNa t\u00e9to estr\u00e1d\u011b n\u00edzk\u00fdch pud\u016f m\u011b fascinuje je\u0161t\u011b jedna v\u011bc. Kdy\u017e se Maro\u0161 Kram\u00e1r nebo Petra Polni\u0161ov\u00e1 ohrazuj\u00ed proti tomu, \u017ee p\u0159ece nejsou jen pro z\u00e1bavu. A na co jste? Jste oby\u010dejn\u00ed zaprodan\u00ed klauni,\u201c vzk\u00e1zal publicista.<\/p>\n
\n\tJejich profesn\u00ed \u00farove\u0148 hodnotil mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b tvrd\u011b: \u201eDramatickou postavu ani nedok\u00e1\u017eete zahr\u00e1t, \u017eiv\u00edte se jako bavi\u010di nebo plytc\u00ed komedianti. V podstat\u011b zneva\u017eujete hereckou profesi, kter\u00e1 je poctiv\u00fdm \u0159emeslem, ale pr\u00e1v\u011b to v\u00e1m nesta\u010d\u00ed.\u201c<\/p>\n
\n\tJako protip\u0159\u00edklad uvedl star\u0161\u00ed generaci slovensk\u00fdch herc\u016f, kter\u00e1 si vybudovala respekt p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm n\u00e1ro\u010dnou profesion\u00e1ln\u00ed prac\u00ed. Vzpomn\u011bl Ladislava Chud\u00edka, Karola Machatu \u010di \u0160tefana Kvietika a dodal, \u017ee pr\u00e1v\u011b takov\u00e9 osobnosti byly legendami nikoli jen proto, \u017ee byly zn\u00e1m\u00e9, ale proto\u017ee svou profesi braly v\u00e1\u017en\u011b a tvrd\u011b na sob\u011b pracovaly.<\/p>\n
\n\tChmel\u00e1r se zastavil u v\u00fdroku, kter\u00fdm Mag\u00e1lov\u00e1 ozna\u010dila ministryni kultury Martinu \u0160imkovi\u010dovou za \u201eoby\u010dejnou nulu\u201c. I kdy\u017e s\u00e1m mezi jej\u00ed p\u0159\u00edznivce nepat\u0159\u00ed, zp\u016fsob vyjad\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed here\u010dky ozna\u010dil za nekulturn\u00ed. \u201eSkute\u010dn\u011b m\u011b zarazilo, kdy\u017e se Kamila Mag\u00e1lov\u00e1 vyj\u00e1d\u0159ila o sou\u010dasn\u00e9 ministryni kultury a\u017e s tragikomick\u00fdm v\u00fdrazem tv\u00e1\u0159e arogantn\u00ed malom\u011b\u0161\u0165a\u010dky, \u017ee je to \u201aoby\u010dejn\u00e1 nula\u2018,\u201c napsal.<\/p>\n
\n\tP\u0159esto polo\u017eil ot\u00e1zku, zda je podobn\u00fd slovn\u00edk slu\u010diteln\u00fd s tvrzen\u00edm herc\u016f, \u017ee pr\u00e1v\u011b oni maj\u00ed p\u0159edstavovat kultivovanou \u010d\u00e1st spole\u010dnosti. \u201eAle \u0159ekn\u011bte mi, co je tohle za vyjad\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed? Kdo jin\u00fd by m\u011bl zvl\u00e1dnout kulturn\u00ed chov\u00e1n\u00ed, kdy\u017e ne herci?\u201c ptal se.<\/p>\n
\n\tV t\u00e9 souvislosti popsal koncert Mari\u00e1na \u010cekovsk\u00e9ho, Henryho T\u00f3tha a Ond\u0159eje Brzobohat\u00e9ho jako p\u0159\u00edklad toho, jak m\u016f\u017ee um\u011bn\u00ed spojovat lidi bez ohledu na jejich politick\u00e9 postoje. \u201eHerci \u010dasto obhajuj\u00ed sv\u00e9 ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 anga\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed fr\u00e1z\u00ed, \u017ee um\u011bn\u00ed spojuje. J\u00e1 jsem v\u010dera za\u017eil koncert, p\u0159i n\u011bm\u017e katarze smyla v\u0161echny hranice,\u201c uvedl.<\/p>\n
\n\t\u201eAno, toto dok\u00e1\u017ee hudba, toto bylo um\u011bn\u00ed a spojilo v\u0161echny, kte\u0159\u00ed tam byli,\u201c konstatoval. Oproti tomu Mag\u00e1lov\u00e9 vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed o ml\u010den\u00ed a barik\u00e1d\u00e1ch spole\u010dnost nespojuje, n\u00fdbr\u017e d\u00e1le polarizuje, m\u00edn\u00ed Chmel\u00e1r.<\/p>\n
\n\tV jedn\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti sv\u00e9ho p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku p\u0159e\u0161el od politick\u00e9 polemiky k osobn\u00edmu hodnocen\u00ed Mag\u00e1lov\u00e9. Jej\u00ed ostr\u00e9 ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 vystupov\u00e1n\u00ed spojil s rodinnou trag\u00e9di\u00ed a smrt\u00ed jej\u00edho syna. \u201eN\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed lid\u00e9 ji br\u00e1n\u00ed t\u00edm, \u017ee chud\u011brka smutn\u00ed za mrtv\u00fdm synem. Ubezpe\u010duji v\u00e1s, \u017ee takto se nechov\u00e1 truchl\u00edc\u00ed matka, ale velmi, velmi zl\u00e1 \u017eena,\u201c poznamenal.<\/p>\n
\n\tSou\u010dasn\u011b p\u0159ipustil, \u017ee jej\u00ed osobn\u00ed trag\u00e9die v n\u011bm vyvol\u00e1v\u00e1 soucit, ale dodal: \u201eTento zp\u016fsob vyrovn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed se s n\u00ed je slep\u00e1 uli\u010dka: Fico za jej\u00ed ne\u0161t\u011bst\u00ed nem\u016f\u017ee,\u201c zd\u016fraznil.<\/p>\n
\n\tHerci a odkaz listopadu 1989<\/p>\n
\n\tV z\u00e1v\u011bru se Chmel\u00e1r vr\u00e1til k roli herc\u016f b\u011bhem sametov\u00e9 revoluce. Odm\u00edtl, \u017ee by jim jejich anga\u017em\u00e1 v listopadu 1989 poskytovalo trval\u00e9 opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00ed vyjad\u0159ovat se s vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed autoritou ke v\u0161em politick\u00fdm ot\u00e1zk\u00e1m. \u201eHerci n\u00e1s \u010dasto citov\u011b vyd\u00edraj\u00ed t\u00edm, \u017ee jejich domn\u011bl\u00fd n\u00e1rok mluvit do v\u0161eho pr\u00fd vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 z toho, \u017ee oni b\u011bhem sametov\u00e9 revoluce nesli jako prvn\u00ed k\u016f\u017ei na trh,\u201c napsal.<\/p>\n
\n\t\u201eByli to herci, kte\u0159\u00ed odm\u00edtli n\u00e1rodn\u011bemancipa\u010dn\u00ed z\u00e1pas a faktick\u00e9 dokon\u010den\u00ed demokratick\u00e9 revoluce v podob\u011b st\u00e1tn\u00ed nez\u00e1vislosti Slovensk\u00e9 republiky,\u201c doplnil a \u010d\u00e1st herc\u016f n\u00e1sledn\u011b obvinil z podpory neoliber\u00e1ln\u00edch ekonomick\u00fdch reforem a z toho, \u017ee se a\u017e na v\u00fdjimky nikdy v\u00fdrazn\u011b nepostavili proti v\u00e1lk\u00e1m.<\/p>\n
\n\t\u201eNe, herci u\u017e d\u00e1vno nejsou sv\u011bdom\u00edm tohoto n\u00e1roda. Nejsou v\u00fdjime\u010dn\u00ed, nejsou privilegovan\u00ed a jejich pohled na koali\u010dn\u00ed krizi by n\u00e1s nem\u011bl zaj\u00edmat v\u00edc ne\u017e pohled jadern\u00fdch fyzik\u016f na opozi\u010dn\u00ed spolupr\u00e1ci,\u201c uzav\u0159el Eduard Chmel\u00e1r.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Psali jsme:<\/p>\n
Tento \u010dl\u00e1nek p\u0159\u00edmo v textu aktivn\u011b odkazuje na tyto zdroje:<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.facebook.com<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.mediaklik.sk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Ani na Slovensku nejsou protivl\u00e1dn\u011b nalad\u011bn\u00ed um\u011blci automaticky popul\u00e1rn\u00ed. Zn\u00e1m\u00e9 hereck\u00e9 osobnosti vystupuj\u00ed proti kabinetu Roberta Fica,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":167621,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[14],"tags":[28050,79,452,900,41310,45,1921,80],"class_list":["post-167620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-zabava","tag-chmelar","tag-entertainment","tag-facebook","tag-herci","tag-magalova","tag-slovensko","tag-umelci","tag-zabava"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@cz\/117035198483506626","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167620\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/167621"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}