![](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/praha-kbely-vrazda.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nEgrt se se seniorkou znal, byla to sousedka jeho matky v\u00a0pra\u017esk\u00fdch Kbel\u00edch. Ob\u017ealovan\u00fd za po\u0161kozenou n\u011bjakou dobu doch\u00e1zel, pom\u00e1hal j\u00ed, chodil j\u00ed nakupovat a\u00a0tr\u00e1vil s\u00a0n\u00ed \u010das. \u017dena se k\u00a0n\u011bmu upnula, podle sv\u011bdk\u016f cht\u011bla, aby j\u00ed \u0159\u00edkal \u201ebabi\u010dko\u201c. Egrt j\u00ed to ov\u0161em opl\u00e1cel t\u00edm, \u017ee z\u00a0\u017eeny tahal pen\u00edze. Ty v\u011bt\u0161inou utr\u00e1cel za s\u00e1zen\u00ed. \u017den\u011b se podle d\u016fkaz\u016f tak\u00e9 v\u00a0minulosti z\u00a0bytu pen\u00edze ztratily.<\/p>\n
Pak p\u0159i\u0161lo 29.\u00a0z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed lo\u0148sk\u00e9ho roku, kdy z\u00a0nezn\u00e1m\u00fdch d\u016fvod\u016f Egrt na devades\u00e1tiletou \u017eenu za\u00fato\u010dil no\u017eem. Zasadil j\u00ed celkem 16\u00a0ran kuchy\u0148sk\u00fdm no\u017eem s\u00a0osmn\u00e1cticentimetrovou \u010depel\u00ed. Mu\u017e bodal po\u0161kozenou do hlavy, obli\u010deje, krku \u010di rukou. \u017dena se sna\u017eila aktivn\u011b br\u00e1nit, ale marn\u011b. Po n\u011bkolika des\u00edtk\u00e1ch vte\u0159in zem\u0159ela.<\/p>\n
Egrta policie b\u011bhem chv\u00edle vyp\u00e1trala a\u00a0zadr\u017eela. Mu\u017e na policii ani u\u00a0hlavn\u00edho l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed k\u00a0\u010dinu nevypov\u00eddal. Policist\u016fm se sv\u011b\u0159il, \u017ee se l\u00e9\u010dil se schizofreni\u00ed, ale l\u00e9ky p\u0159estal u\u017e\u00edvat. Kv\u016fli schizofrenii m\u011bl p\u0159iznan\u00fd invalidn\u00ed d\u016fchod, nepracoval a\u00a0\u017eil u\u00a0rodi\u010d\u016f.<\/p>\n
Pr\u00e1v\u011b jeho psychick\u00fd stav se stal st\u0159edobodem jeho odvol\u00e1n\u00ed. Znalkyn\u011b z\u00a0oboru psychologie a\u00a0psychiatrie u\u00a0hlavn\u00edho l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed zpochybnily diagn\u00f3zu schizofrenie. U\u00a0Egrta sice nalezly defekt osobnosti, p\u0159\u00edznaky, kter\u00e9 jin\u00e9 l\u00e9ka\u0159e vedly k\u00a0diagn\u00f3ze, ale podle nich lze vysv\u011btlit anom\u00e1liemi a\u00a0tak\u00e9 u\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00edm drog a\u00a0alkoholu. Podle znalky\u0148 Egrt patrn\u011b jednal ve zlobn\u00e9m afektu, ze zi\u0161tn\u00e9ho motivu.<\/p>\n
Podle obhajoby ale nebyly odstran\u011bny z\u00e1sadn\u00ed pochybnosti ve vztahu k\u00a0Egrtov\u011b psychick\u00e9mu stavu, a\u00a0tedy i\u00a0k ot\u00e1zce jeho p\u0159\u00ed\u010detnosti. Egrtova obh\u00e1jkyn\u011b proto navrhovala dubnov\u00fd verdikt m\u011bstsk\u00e9ho soudu zru\u0161it a\u00a0vr\u00e1tit k\u00a0nov\u00e9mu projedn\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0revizn\u00edmu znaleck\u00e9mu posudku.<\/p>\n
Vrchn\u00ed soud to zam\u00edtl mimo jin\u00e9 s\u00a0t\u00edm, \u017ee obhajoba argumentovala posudkem z\u00a0jin\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, podle kter\u00e9ho Egrt trp\u00ed paranoidn\u00ed schizofreni\u00ed, co\u017e se mohlo odrazit na jeho p\u0159\u00ed\u010detnosti. Soud to nicm\u00e9n\u011b odm\u00edtl s\u00a0t\u00edm, \u017ee i\u00a0p\u0159edvolan\u00e9 znalkyn\u011b z\u00a0oboru du\u0161ezpytn\u00fdch v\u011bd na sv\u00fdch z\u00e1v\u011brech trvaj\u00ed, obh\u00e1jily si je a\u00a0s n\u00e1mitkami obhajoby se vypo\u0159\u00e1daly.<\/p>\n