{"id":180867,"date":"2026-08-15T22:18:18","date_gmt":"2026-08-15T22:18:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/180867\/"},"modified":"2026-08-15T22:18:18","modified_gmt":"2026-08-15T22:18:18","slug":"nesmyslny-senat-ale-kvuli-gerlochovi-stoji-za-to-volit-mini-ustavni-pravnik-kuba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/180867\/","title":{"rendered":"Nesmysln\u00fd Sen\u00e1t. Ale kv\u016fli Gerlochovi stoj\u00ed za to volit, m\u00edn\u00ed \u00fastavn\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edk Kuba"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tKoncem druh\u00e9ho a t\u0159et\u00edho \u0159\u00edjnov\u00e9ho t\u00fddne se budou konat volby do jedn\u00e9 t\u0159etiny Sen\u00e1tu, \u010dili do jeho 27 k\u0159esel. Ten za t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 \u010dtvrt miliardy ro\u010dn\u011b zaji\u0161\u0165uje \u010dinnost 81 sen\u00e1tor\u016f. Volen\u00fdch na \u0161est let. V posledn\u00edch letech \u010dinila volebn\u00ed \u00fa\u010dast do Sen\u00e1tu v\u00a01. kole cca 40 %, ve druh\u00e9m cca 18 %, zat\u00edmco do Sn\u011bmovny cca 65 %. Ke zvolen\u00ed sen\u00e1torem posta\u010dilo ve 2. kole cca 15 000 hlas\u016f; v minulosti n\u011bkomu na severn\u00ed Morav\u011b sta\u010dilo jen asi 5 000 hlas\u016f. Do Sn\u011bmovny je to v pr\u016fm\u011bru cca 28 000 hlas\u016f. Zd\u016fraz\u0148uji, tyto \u00fadaje jsou jen orienta\u010dn\u00ed. Ale i tak sv\u011bd\u010d\u00ed o rozd\u00edlu ve funkci t\u011bchto instituc\u00ed z pohledu ob\u010dana. Av\u0161ak jakou funkci m\u00e1 plnit dvoukomorov\u00fd parlament podle \u00fastavn\u00edho pr\u00e1va?<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\t\u010ceskoslovensko bylo v letech 1968 a\u017e 1992 federac\u00ed dvou n\u00e1rodn\u00edch st\u00e1t\u016f, 10 mil. \u010cech\u016f a 5 mil. Slov\u00e1k\u016f. \u00dastavn\u00ed z\u00e1kon o \u010ds. federaci \u010d. 143\/1968 proto zavedl v \u010dl. 102\/1 \u010ceskou n\u00e1rodn\u00ed radu coby \u010desk\u00fd parlament a v \u010dl. 102\/2 Slovenskou n\u00e1rodn\u00ed radu. V jejich kompetenci bylo vyd\u00e1vat z\u00e1kony s p\u016fsobnost\u00ed na \u00fazem\u00ed sv\u00e9ho n\u00e1rodn\u00edho st\u00e1tu (\u010dl. 102\/3).<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\t\u010cNR ani SNR ale nemohly p\u0159ij\u00edmat z\u00e1kony \u010ceskoslovenska coby slo\u017een\u00e9ho st\u00e1tu. Federativn\u00ed \u010cSSR zase nemohla b\u00fdt jak\u00fdmsi t\u0159et\u00edm st\u00e1tem nad \u010di vedle \u010cSR a SSR. A tak v\u016fle jeho feder\u00e1ln\u00edho parlamentu musela p\u0159i tvorb\u011b z\u00e1kon\u016f federace nal\u00e9zt a odr\u00e1\u017eet shodnou v\u016fli obou n\u00e1rod\u016f.<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tByl proto p\u0159ijat mechanismus typick\u00fd pro slo\u017een\u00e9 st\u00e1ty. Z hlediska \u00fastavn\u011bpr\u00e1vn\u00ed v\u011bdy je to \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed srovnateln\u00e9 s \u0159e\u0161en\u00edm nap\u0159. nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho z\u00e1konod\u00e1rn\u00e9ho org\u00e1nu U.S. federace \u010dili jeho dvoukomorov\u00e9ho Kongresu. Jeho Sn\u011bmovna reprezentant\u016f m\u00e1 435 \u010dlen\u016f zastupuj\u00edc\u00edch jednotliv\u00e9 st\u00e1ty podle po\u010dtu jejich obyvatel. Tak\u017ee nejpo\u010detn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed Kalifornie m\u00e1 v\u00a0n\u00ed 52 z\u00e1stupc\u016f, zat\u00edmco nejm\u00e9n\u011b po\u010detn\u00fd Vermont (a stejn\u011b tak dal\u0161\u00edch p\u011bt st\u00e1t\u016f) m\u00e1 jednoho z\u00e1stupce.\u00a0 Aby v\u0161ak Kalifornie p\u0159i hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed permanentn\u011b \u201enev\u00e1lcovala men\u0161\u00ed a malink\u00e9\u201c, uplat\u0148uje se v rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed Kongresu z\u00e1kaz majorizace. Co\u017e je \u00fastavn\u00ed princip ochra\u0148uj\u00edc\u00ed men\u0161inu p\u0159ed p\u0159ehlasov\u00e1n\u00edm v\u011bt\u0161inou, a tud\u00ed\u017e zaji\u0161\u0165uj\u00edc\u00ed rovnopr\u00e1vnost pro v\u0161echny.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<\/p>\n<p>    Anketa<\/p>\n<p>P\u0159isp\u011bli jste n\u011bkter\u00e9 ze sb\u00edrek na zbran\u011b pro Ukrajinu?<\/p>\n<p>hlasovalo: 9273 lid\u00ed<\/p>\n<p>Proto z\u00e1konod\u00e1rn\u00fd Kongres USA tvo\u0159\u00ed je\u0161t\u011b dal\u0161\u00ed komora, Sen\u00e1t. \u010c\u00edt\u00e1 po dvou z\u00e1stupc\u00edch ka\u017ed\u00e9ho z 50 \u010dlensk\u00fdch st\u00e1t\u016f U.S. federace. M\u00e1 tud\u00ed\u017e celkem 100 \u010dlen\u016f.<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tA tak kdy\u017e se v Kongresu projedn\u00e1v\u00e1 z\u00e1kon, startuje se to ve Sn\u011bmovn\u011b (jej\u00ed analogie se v \u010ds. federaci naz\u00fdvala Sn\u011bmovnou lidu\u00a0a a\u017e do roku 1990 m\u011bla 200 poslanc\u016f). Z n\u00ed pak putuje do Sen\u00e1tu (jeho\u017e analogie se v\u00a0\u010ds. federaci naz\u00fdvala Sn\u011bmovnou n\u00e1rod\u016f, m\u011bla 150 poslanc\u016f), dokonce s \u0161anc\u00ed v n\u011bm p\u0159ehlasovat po\u010detn\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161inu z doln\u00ed komory.<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tDvoukomorov\u00fd parlament tud\u00ed\u017e p\u0159edstavuje institucionalizovan\u00fd \u00fastavn\u00ed mechanismus spojen\u00fd s uplatn\u011bn\u00edm z\u00e1kazu majorizace, a to ve slo\u017een\u00fdch st\u00e1tn\u00edch \u00fatvarech. Bu\u010f z n\u011bkolika st\u00e1t\u016f jako nap\u0159. v USA, \u010di v Rusk\u00e9 federaci, \u010di z region\u016f jako nap\u0159. ve Francii, anebo ze spolkov\u00fdch zem\u00ed jako v N\u011bmecku, etc. <\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tNa okraj dod\u00e1v\u00e1m, \u017ee Evropsk\u00fd parlament nen\u00ed zalo\u017een na aprobaci z\u00e1kazu majorizace, tak\u017ee hlasy nejpo\u010detn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch n\u00e1rod\u016f, jako jsou N\u011bmecko \u010di Francie, v n\u011bm permanentn\u011b p\u0159evy\u0161uj\u00ed hlasy men\u0161\u00edch a nejmen\u0161\u00edch n\u00e1rod\u016f. Konstatuji, \u017ee pr\u00e1v\u011b toto je onen kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fd \u201edeficit demokracie EP\u201c, o kter\u00e9m v\u0161ichni kritici t\u00e9to instituce r\u00e1di hovo\u0159\u00ed, ani\u017e by tu\u0161ili n\u011bco o \u201ez\u00e1kazu majorizace\u201c.\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tKdy\u017e to shrnu &#8211; \u010cSSR se coby slo\u017een\u00fd st\u00e1t \u2013 federace \u2013 neobe\u0161la bez dvoukomorov\u00e9ho parlamentu. Av\u0161ak po jeho z\u00e1niku se \u010cR a SR staly unit\u00e1rn\u00edmi st\u00e1ty. V nich\u017e m\u00edt dvoukomorov\u00fd parlament postr\u00e1d\u00e1 smysl. Logicky proto m\u00e1 Slovensko jednokomorovou N\u00e1rodn\u00ed radu se 150 poslanci.\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tZato tv\u016frci \u00fastavy \u010cR v unit\u00e1rn\u00edm \u010cesku zavedli dvoukomorov\u00fd parlament. Ani\u017e by v jej\u00edm textu byl k nalezen\u00ed funk\u010dn\u00ed p\u0159\u00ednos existence druh\u00e9 komory. Alespo\u0148 k tomu, co je pro z\u00e1konod\u00e1rn\u00fd sbor z\u00e1sadn\u00ed \u2013 k legislativn\u00edmu procesu. Jako \u201ekontroln\u00ed \u00fatvar\u201c kvality z\u00e1kon\u016f p\u0159ijat\u00fdch Sn\u011bmovnou nep\u0159ich\u00e1zel v \u00favahu, nebo\u0165 vzhledem k posl\u00e1n\u00ed \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu by to bylo duplicitn\u00ed\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\t\u00dastava nabyla \u00fa\u010dinnosti od 1.1. 1993 a a\u017e do roku 1996 se v\u00e1halo, zda \u201enaplnit Sen\u00e1t\u201c, nebo ho z \u00fastavy vypustit. Nakonec zv\u00edt\u011bzil existen\u010dn\u00ed z\u00e1jem o \u0161est let trvaj\u00edc\u00ed mand\u00e1t sen\u00e1tora. Podot\u00fdk\u00e1m, \u017ee jsem poznal mezi sen\u00e1tory i \u00factyhodn\u00e9 osobnosti, jako byl t\u0159eba Jaroslav Kubera. A to, kdy\u017e jsem 17 z\u00a0nich, v\u010d. jeho, zastupoval p\u0159ed \u00dastavn\u00edm soudem v \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed o souladu Lisabonsk\u00e9 smlouvy s \u010desk\u00fdm \u00fastavn\u00edm po\u0159\u00e1dkem.<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tNicm\u00e9n\u011b o nadbyte\u010dnosti Sen\u00e1tu v legislativn\u00edm procesu hovo\u0159\u00ed za v\u0161e \u010dl. 46\/3 \u00da \u010cR, \u201eJestli\u017ee se Sen\u00e1t nevyj\u00e1d\u0159\u00ed (rozum\u011bj: k textu z\u00e1kona, kter\u00fd mu po jeho schv\u00e1len\u00ed poslala Sn\u011bmovna) ve lh\u016ft\u011b podle odst. 1 (\u201e\u2026do 30 dn\u016f od jeho postoupen\u00ed\u201c) plat\u00ed, \u017ee je n\u00e1vrh z\u00e1kona p\u0159ijat.\u201c Co\u017e hypoteticky d\u00e1v\u00e1 mo\u017enost, aby sen\u00e1to\u0159i coby z\u00e1konod\u00e1rci po cel\u00fdch \u0161est let sv\u00e9ho mand\u00e1tu nemuseli v r\u00e1mci legislativn\u00edho procesu z\u00e1kony jim postoupen\u00e9 ani \u010d\u00edst\u2026 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tTv\u016frci \u00dastavy \u010cR se k zaveden\u00ed Sen\u00e1tu inspirovali \u00dastavou \u010cSR z roku 1920, kter\u00e1\u00a0 v\u00a0 \u00a7 6\/1 stanovila, \u017ee \u201eN\u00e1rodn\u00ed shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed se skl\u00e1d\u00e1 ze Sn\u011bmovny (300 \u010dlen\u016f) a Sen\u00e1tu (150 \u010dlen\u016f na 8 let).\u201c Tato \u00fastava zavedla mj. \u00dastavn\u00ed soud, kter\u00fd vlastn\u011b nikdy nerozhodoval. Kv\u016fli rozpak\u016fm jej\u00edch samotn\u00fdch tv\u016frc\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed si uv\u011bdomili, \u017ee znamen\u00e1 z\u00e1sah do suverenity Parlamentu.\u00a0 Bohu\u017eel lze hovo\u0159it i o tom, \u017ee nem\u011bli \u201e\u0161\u0165astnou ruku\u201c ani se Sen\u00e1tem. Nebo\u0165 byl sice z\u0159\u00edzen, ale jeho praktick\u00fd v\u00fdznam unikal. Ob\u010das se tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed v\u011bkov\u00e1 hranice 45+ let sen\u00e1tor\u016f m\u011bla b\u00fdt korektivem zalo\u017een\u00fdm na ment\u00e1ln\u00ed zralosti proti un\u00e1hlen\u00e9mu rozhodnut\u00ed poslanc\u016f (30+ let). Co\u017e je \u00fasm\u011bvn\u00e9 u\u017e jen proto, \u017ee mezi poslanci bylo nem\u00e1lo mnohem star\u0161\u00edch osob ne\u017e v Sen\u00e1tu.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tNicm\u00e9n\u011b \u00dastava z r. 1920 jim umo\u017e\u0148ovala Sen\u00e1tem vr\u00e1cen\u00fd z\u00e1kon snadno znovu potvrdit. Tento mechanismus byl p\u0159evzat do \u00dastavy \u010cR, tak\u017ee stejn\u011b jako tehdy z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 Sen\u00e1t pouze nadbyte\u010dn\u00fdm retard\u00e9rem, zdr\u017euj\u00edc\u00edm p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed z\u00e1kon\u016f. \u010casto z ideologick\u00fdch n\u00e1mitek, kter\u00e9 jsou up\u0159ednost\u0148ov\u00e1ny proti v\u011bcn\u00fdm aspekt\u016fm. Nebo\u0165 v n\u011bm t\u0159eba i \u010dty\u0159i roky zasedaj\u00ed \u201eosobnosti\u201c ze stran, kter\u00e9 ve volb\u00e1ch do Sn\u011bmovny propadly. Pr\u00e1v\u011b toto \u201epolitick\u00e9 zpo\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed\u201c sen\u00e1tor\u016f proti poslanc\u016fm m\u00e1 n\u011bkdy negativn\u00ed dopad i na v\u00fdb\u011br soudc\u016f \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu.<\/p>\n<p>&#13;<br \/>\n\tZ uveden\u00e9ho je z\u0159ejmou nadbyte\u010dnost Sen\u00e1tu. Novelizovan\u00e1 \u00fastava, po jej\u00edm\u017e p\u0159ijet\u00ed dlouhodob\u011b vol\u00e1m, by m\u011bla zav\u00e9st jednokomorov\u00fd parlament. Proto jsem s pot\u011b\u0161en\u00edm p\u0159ijal, \u017ee \u00fastavn\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edk prof. Ale\u0161 Gerloch ohl\u00e1sil kandidaturu do Sen\u00e1tu s c\u00edlem v\u00a0n\u011bm mj. \u201eotev\u0159\u00edt rozpravu o siln\u00fdch a slab\u0161\u00edch str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch na\u0161\u00ed \u00fastavn\u00ed \u00fapravy\u201c.\u00a0 Co\u017e konvenuje s moj\u00ed p\u0159edstavou, o n\u00ed\u017e jsem s n\u00edm mnohokr\u00e1t diskutoval. Pokud by se do Sen\u00e1tu usilovali dostat lid\u00e9 s\u00a0podobn\u00fdm c\u00edlem jako kolega Gerloch, stoj\u00ed za to j\u00edt k\u00a0\u0159\u00edjnov\u00fdm volb\u00e1m.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"&#13; Koncem druh\u00e9ho a t\u0159et\u00edho \u0159\u00edjnov\u00e9ho t\u00fddne se budou konat volby do jedn\u00e9 t\u0159etiny Sen\u00e1tu, \u010dili do jeho&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":180868,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[11],"tags":[43140,1202,2137,960,54,42950,53,52],"class_list":["post-180867","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-svet","tag-gerloch","tag-kuba","tag-legislativa","tag-senat","tag-svet","tag-volby-do-senatu","tag-world","tag-world-news"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@cz\/117101848509319278","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180867","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180867"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180867\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/180868"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180867"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180867"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180867"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}