\u00dastavn\u00ed soud rozhodl v\u00a0letit\u00e9m sporu o\u00a0p\u0159im\u011b\u0159enou cenu za akcie n\u011bkdej\u0161\u00edho \u010cesk\u00e9ho Telecomu. Telef\u00f3nica z\u00edskala v\u00a0roce 2005\u00a0majoritu v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9m Telecomu a\u00a0zb\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00edm akcion\u00e1\u0159\u016fm u\u010dinila \u010dasov\u011b omezenou nab\u00eddku p\u0159evzet\u00ed s\u00a0cenou 456\u00a0korun za akcii, co\u017e bylo o\u00a0n\u011bco v\u00edc ne\u017e takzvan\u00fd v\u00e1\u017een\u00fd pr\u016fm\u011br z\u00a0obchodov\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00a0p\u0159ede\u0161l\u00fdch \u0161esti m\u011bs\u00edc\u00edch. St\u00e1tu ov\u0161em Telef\u00f3nica p\u0159i n\u00e1kupu v\u011bt\u0161inov\u00e9ho pod\u00edlu zaplatila p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b 502\u00a0korun za akcii.<\/p>\n
Kypersk\u00e9 firmy Lexburg Enterprises Limited a\u00a0Venten Management Limited spojovan\u00e9 s\u00a0Tyka\u010dem proto spole\u010dnost Telef\u00f3nica za\u017ealovaly kv\u016fli n\u00edzko stanoven\u00e9 cen\u011b. Po\u017eadovaly doplatit rozd\u00edl mezi cenami plus \u00faroky. Postupn\u011b padla \u0159ada protikladn\u00fdch rozsudk\u016f, nakonec justice rozhodla ve prosp\u011bch Lexburgu a\u00a0Ventenu. Kv\u016fli \u00farok\u016fm a\u00a0dal\u0161\u00edmu p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161enstv\u00ed \u017e\u00e1daj\u00ed Tyka\u010dovy firmy po Telef\u00f3nice mnohem v\u00edce pen\u011bz, ne\u017e kolik \u010dinil p\u016fvodn\u00ed n\u00e1rok. Zpravodajsk\u00fd web iDnes letos v\u00a0dubnu informoval, \u017ee jde dohromady o\u00a02,46\u00a0miliardy korun.<\/p>\n
Telef\u00f3nica ale nyn\u00ed s\u00a0\u00fastavn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enost\u00ed proti verdiktu, podle kter\u00e9ho mus\u00ed zaplatit zhruba 849\u00a0milion\u016f korun plus \u00faroky kypersk\u00fdm firm\u00e1m, neusp\u011bla.<\/p>\n
V \u00fastavn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enosti Telef\u00f3nica kritizovala hlavn\u011b postup Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu, kter\u00fd sice nejprve odlo\u017eil vykonatelnost napaden\u00e9ho rozhodnut\u00ed, ale nakonec dovol\u00e1n\u00ed odm\u00edtl pro nep\u0159\u00edpustnost\u00a0\u2013 podle spole\u010dnosti Telef\u00f3nica bez n\u00e1le\u017eit\u00e9ho od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00ed. \u00dastavn\u00ed soudci nena\u0161li d\u016fvod k\u00a0z\u00e1sahu. \u201eStru\u010dnost od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00ed proti\u00fastavnost bez dal\u0161\u00edho nezakl\u00e1d\u00e1. Z\u00a0\u00fastavn\u011bpr\u00e1vn\u00edho hlediska tak napaden\u00e9 usnesen\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu obstoj\u00ed,\u201c stoj\u00ed v\u00a0rozhodnut\u00ed \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu.<\/p>\n
Telef\u00f3nica d\u00e1le zpochyb\u0148ovala postup p\u0159i stanoven\u00ed revizn\u00edho znalce. Obecn\u011b kritizovala tak\u00e9 skute\u010dnost, \u017ee soudy zp\u011btn\u011b pop\u0159ely pravidla, podle nich\u017e se p\u0159ed v\u00edce ne\u017e 20\u00a0lety stanovovala cena p\u0159i privatizaci \u010cesk\u00e9ho Telecomu.<\/p>\n
Telef\u00f3nica se v\u00a0mezi\u010dase z\u00a0\u010desk\u00e9ho trhu st\u00e1hla. Telekomunika\u010dn\u00ed spole\u010dnost O2\u00a0Czech Republic nyn\u00ed ovl\u00e1d\u00e1 skupina PPF.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u00dastavn\u00ed soud rozhodl v\u00a0letit\u00e9m sporu o\u00a0p\u0159im\u011b\u0159enou cenu za akcie n\u011bkdej\u0161\u00edho \u010cesk\u00e9ho Telecomu. Telef\u00f3nica z\u00edskala v\u00a0roce 2005\u00a0majoritu v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9m Telecomu…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":184639,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[10],"tags":[17,21,16,2652,622,258,6870,18,19,22,20],"class_list":["post-184638","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-zpravy","tag-headlines","tag-hlavni-udalosti","tag-news","tag-pavel-tykac","tag-ppf-group","tag-soud","tag-telefonica","tag-top-news","tag-top-stories","tag-udalosti-dne","tag-zpravy"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@cz\/117121753153388747","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184638","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184638"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184638\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/184639"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}