{"id":28079,"date":"2026-03-18T10:10:18","date_gmt":"2026-03-18T10:10:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/28079\/"},"modified":"2026-03-18T10:10:18","modified_gmt":"2026-03-18T10:10:18","slug":"likvidace-ct-za-spoluprace-obeti-michal-kubal-odmita-roli-hrobare-kritici-mu-neveri","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/28079\/","title":{"rendered":"Likvidace \u010cT za spolupr\u00e1ce ob\u011bti? Michal Kubal odm\u00edt\u00e1 roli hroba\u0159e, kritici mu nev\u011b\u0159\u00ed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Je to pragmatick\u00fd zachr\u00e1nce, kter\u00fd se sna\u017e\u00ed udr\u017eet lo\u010f nad vodou za cenu bolestiv\u00fdch kompromis\u016f, nebo \u201ajednotka pokrytectv\u00ed\u2018, kter\u00e1 jen tichou cestou pln\u00ed p\u0159\u00e1n\u00ed radn\u00edch a\u00a0mocn\u00fdch? Ponory do hloubky p\u0159\u00edb\u011bhu mu\u017ee, kter\u00fd m\u00e1 v\u00a0rukou osud ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed slu\u017eby.<\/p>\n

\u010cesk\u00e1 televize proch\u00e1z\u00ed v\u00a0roce 2026\u00a0jedn\u00edm z\u00a0nejbou\u0159liv\u011bj\u0161\u00edch obdob\u00ed sv\u00e9 modern\u00ed historie. Odchody v\u00fdrazn\u00fdch tv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed, spory o\u00a0dramaturgii po\u0159ad\u016f, politick\u00e9 tlaky ze strany nov\u00e9 vl\u00e1dn\u00ed koalice Andreje Babi\u0161e i\u00a0hrozba likvidace syst\u00e9mu koncesion\u00e1\u0159sk\u00fdch poplatk\u016f, to v\u0161e se kup\u00ed v\u00a0jeden bezprecedentn\u00ed tlak na instituci, kter\u00e1 byla po desetilet\u00ed pova\u017eov\u00e1na za pil\u00ed\u0159 demokratick\u00e9 medi\u00e1ln\u00ed krajiny v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9 republice.<\/p>\n

V sam\u00e9m centru t\u011bchto bou\u0159\u00ed stoj\u00ed mu\u017e, jeho\u017e jm\u00e9no v\u00a0posledn\u00edch m\u011bs\u00edc\u00edch rozd\u011bluje medi\u00e1ln\u00ed sc\u00e9nu, politiky i\u00a0samotn\u00e9 novin\u00e1\u0159e: Michal Kubal<\/a>, \u0161\u00e9fredaktor zpravodajstv\u00ed a\u00a0publicistiky \u010cesk\u00e9 televize. V\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fd report\u00e9r, dek\u00e1dy oce\u0148ovan\u00fd moder\u00e1tor hlavn\u00ed zpravodajsk\u00e9 relace Ud\u00e1losti, a\u00a0nyn\u00ed kontroverzn\u00ed mana\u017eer<\/a>, jemu\u017e jedni vyt\u00fdkaj\u00ed p\u0159\u00edli\u0161nou servilitu<\/a> v\u016f\u010di politick\u00e9 moci a\u00a0jin\u00ed vzd\u00e1vaj\u00ed hold jako posledn\u00edmu str\u00e1\u017eci profesion\u00e1ln\u00ed \u017eurnalistiky.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Je Michal Kubal hroba\u0159em \u010cesk\u00e9 televize<\/a>, jak nazna\u010duj\u00ed jeho nejhlasit\u011bj\u0161\u00ed kritici? Nebo je naopak pragmatick\u00fdm z\u00e1chran\u00e1\u0159em, kter\u00fd se sna\u017e\u00ed udr\u017eet lo\u010f nad vodou v\u00a0podm\u00ednk\u00e1ch, kdy na ni \u00fato\u010d\u00ed vlny ze v\u0161ech stran? Odpov\u011b\u010f na tuto ot\u00e1zku nen\u00ed jednoduch\u00e1, a\u00a0pr\u00e1v\u011b proto stoj\u00ed za to ji hledat poctiv\u011b, s\u00a0p\u0159ihl\u00e9dnut\u00edm ke v\u0161em dostupn\u00fdm fakt\u016fm, v\u00fdrok\u016fm i\u00a0kontextu.<\/p>\n

Aby bylo mo\u017en\u00e9 spravedliv\u011b posoudit Kubalovu roli v\u00a0aktu\u00e1ln\u00ed krizi \u010cT, je t\u0159eba nejprve pochopit, kdo vlastn\u011b Michal Kubal je a\u00a0jak\u00e1 je jeho profesn\u00ed historie.<\/p>\n

Kubal pat\u0159\u00ed k\u00a0nejzku\u0161en\u011bj\u0161\u00edm aktivn\u00edm novin\u00e1\u0159\u016fm v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9 republice. Str\u00e1vil roky jako v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fd zpravodaj v\u00a0nejnebezpe\u010dn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch z\u00f3n\u00e1ch sv\u011bta, reportoval z\u00a0Ir\u00e1ku, Afgh\u00e1nist\u00e1nu i\u00a0z \u0159ady jin\u00fdch konfliktn\u00edch oblast\u00ed. Jeho novin\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e1 erudice a\u00a0odvaha v\u00a0ter\u00e9nu jsou nezpochybniteln\u00e9 a\u00a0v redakci \u010cT ho mnoz\u00ed kolegov\u00e9 pro tyto kvality dlouhodob\u011b respektuj\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Do funkce \u0161\u00e9fredaktora zpravodajstv\u00ed byl Kubal jmenov\u00e1n po n\u00e1stupu gener\u00e1ln\u00edho \u0159editele Jana Sou\u010dka<\/a>. Jeho jmenov\u00e1n\u00ed bylo tehdy prezentov\u00e1no mimo jin\u00e9 jako snaha udr\u017eet na obrazovce zku\u0161en\u00e9 a\u00a0div\u00e1cky obl\u00edben\u00e9 tv\u00e1\u0159e, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e Kubal byl v\u00fdslovn\u011b po\u017e\u00e1d\u00e1n, aby i\u00a0p\u0159es mana\u017eerskou roli pokra\u010doval v\u00a0moderov\u00e1n\u00ed hlavn\u00ed zpravodajsk\u00e9 relace Ud\u00e1losti. Tato situace, kdy \u0161\u00e9fredaktor z\u00e1rove\u0148 moderuje hlavn\u00ed vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed, je p\u0159inejmen\u0161\u00edm nestandardn\u00ed a\u00a0v modern\u00edch m\u00e9di\u00edch p\u0159edstavuje sp\u00ed\u0161e v\u00fdjimku ne\u017e pravidlo.<\/p>\n

Kubal s\u00e1m tuto kumulaci funkc\u00ed h\u00e1j\u00ed s\u00a0odkazem na snahu zachovat kontinuitu a\u00a0d\u016fv\u011bryhodnost zpravodajstv\u00ed v\u00a0turbulentn\u00ed dob\u011b. Kritici v\u00a0n\u00ed v\u0161ak vid\u00ed struktur\u00e1ln\u00ed probl\u00e9m, jen\u017e znemo\u017e\u0148uje objektivn\u00ed v\u00fdkon mana\u017eersk\u00e9 role.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Aby bylo mo\u017en\u00e9 posoudit Kubalovu roli, je nutn\u00e9 zmapovat s\u00e9rii odchod\u016f, kter\u00e1 v\u00a0posledn\u00edch dvou letech ot\u0159\u00e1sla zpravodajstv\u00edm<\/a> \u010cT a\u00a0kter\u00e1 je dnes kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fdm bodem cel\u00e9 debaty.<\/p>\n

Nora Fridrichov\u00e1 a\u00a0konec 168\u00a0hodin<\/p>\n

Zru\u0161en\u00ed po\u0159adu 168\u00a0hodin po osmn\u00e1cti letech vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed bylo jednou z\u00a0nejkontroverzn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch<\/a> medi\u00e1ln\u00edch ud\u00e1lost\u00ed ned\u00e1vn\u00e9 doby. Investigativn\u00ed a\u00a0publicistick\u00fd po\u0159ad, kter\u00fd si za l\u00e9ta sv\u00e9 existence vybudoval silnou div\u00e1ckou z\u00e1kladnu a\u00a0opakovan\u011b p\u0159in\u00e1\u0161el t\u00e9mata ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho z\u00e1jmu, byl ukon\u010den zp\u016fsobem, kter\u00fd vyvolal ostrou kritiku.<\/p>\n

Kubal svoji roli p\u0159i ru\u0161en\u00ed 168\u00a0hodin odm\u00edt\u00e1 interpretovat jako politicky motivovanou. Sv\u016fj postup popisuje jako mana\u017eersk\u00e9 rozhodnut\u00ed o\u00a0programov\u00e9m form\u00e1tu. Fridrichov\u00e1 a\u00a0jej\u00ed p\u0159\u00edznivci v\u0161ak toto vysv\u011btlen\u00ed nep\u0159ij\u00edmaj\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Jakub \u017delezn\u00fd a\u00a0odstaven\u00ed od Ud\u00e1lost\u00ed<\/p>\n

Dal\u0161\u00edm symbolick\u00fdm momentem bylo odstaven\u00ed moder\u00e1tora Jakuba \u017delezn\u00e9ho<\/a> z\u00a0hlavn\u00ed zpravodajsk\u00e9 relace Ud\u00e1losti. \u017delezn\u00fd, jen\u017e je dnes redaktorem po\u0159adu Historie.cs na kan\u00e1lu \u010cT24, se k\u00a0cel\u00e9 situaci vyjad\u0159uje opatrn\u011b, ale p\u0159ece. V\u00a0reakci na Matochovo p\u0159izn\u00e1n\u00ed o\u00a0vlivu na person\u00e1lie \u010cT napsal na s\u00edti X, \u017ee se \u201ezd\u011bsil\u201c a\u00a0varoval, \u017ee za\u010dne kl\u00e1st mnohem v\u00edce ot\u00e1zek.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

V\u00e1clav Moravec a\u00a0jeho dramatick\u00fd odchod<\/p>\n

Asi nejviditeln\u011bj\u0161\u00edm a\u00a0medi\u00e1ln\u011b nejsledovan\u011bj\u0161\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpadem byl odchod V\u00e1clava Moravce, moder\u00e1tora ned\u011bln\u00ed diskusn\u00ed relace Ot\u00e1zky V\u00e1clava Moravce, kter\u00e1 pat\u0159\u00ed (pat\u0159ila) k\u00a0nejsledovan\u011bj\u0161\u00edm politick\u00fdm po\u0159ad\u016fm \u010desk\u00e9 televizn\u00ed sc\u00e9ny.<\/p>\n

Cel\u00fd spor se soust\u0159edil na zd\u00e1nliv\u011b jednoduchou ot\u00e1zku: pro\u010d nebyl do po\u0159adu OVM od roku 2017\u00a0pozv\u00e1n p\u0159edseda SPD Tomio Okamura<\/a>? Kubal, veden\u00ed \u010cT i\u00a0etick\u00fd panel televize dosp\u011bli ke shodn\u00e9mu z\u00e1v\u011bru, \u017ee dlouhodob\u00e1 absence p\u0159edsedy parlamentn\u00ed strany a\u00a0vrcholn\u00e9ho \u00fastavn\u00edho \u010dinitele v\u00a0hlavn\u00edm diskusn\u00edm po\u0159adu ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed televize je z\u00a0hlediska Kodexu \u010cT neobhajiteln\u00e1.<\/p>\n

Moravec naopak tvrdil, \u017ee neexistuje z\u00e1konn\u00e1 povinnost zv\u00e1t konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed politiky do konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch po\u0159ad\u016f, a\u00a0ozna\u010dil celou kauzu za pokus o\u00a0politick\u00e9 \u201a\u010d\u00e1rkov\u00e1n\u00ed\u2018\u00a0\u2013 mechanick\u00e9 vyva\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed politick\u00e9ho spektra, kter\u00e9 podle n\u011bj ni\u010d\u00ed kvalitu ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u017eurnalistiky.<\/p>\n

Kubal p\u0159iznal, \u017ee situaci nezvl\u00e1dl ide\u00e1ln\u011b. \u201eMo\u017en\u00e1 jsem to rozhodnut\u00ed mohl ud\u011blat d\u0159\u00edve,\u201c p\u0159ipustil v\u00a0rozhovoru pro Den\u00edk N<\/a>. Zp\u016fsob Moravcova odchodu, ozn\u00e1men\u00ed v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9m p\u0159enosu na z\u00e1v\u011br po\u0159adu bez p\u0159edchoz\u00ed informace veden\u00ed \u010cT v\u0161ak ozna\u010dil za \u201ejeden obrovsk\u00fd v\u00fdtrysk ega\u201c <\/a>a \u201eobrovsk\u00e9 po\u0161pin\u011bn\u00ed pr\u00e1ce stovek lid\u00ed\u201c, kte\u0159\u00ed v\u00a0redakci z\u016fst\u00e1vaj\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Radn\u00ed \u010cT a\u00a0skand\u00e1ln\u00ed p\u0159izn\u00e1n\u00ed<\/p>\n

Pozoruhodn\u00fdm momentem, kter\u00fd celou debatu o\u00a0Kubalov\u011b roli eskaloval na novou \u00farove\u0148, bylo ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 p\u0159izn\u00e1n\u00ed radn\u00edho Pavla Matochy. Ten se na soci\u00e1ln\u00edch s\u00edt\u00edch otev\u0159en\u011b pochlubil<\/a> sv\u00fdmi z\u00e1sluhami za odchod Nory Fridrichov\u00e9, Marka Wollnera a\u00a0Jakuba \u017delezn\u00e9ho z\u00a0kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fdch pozic v\u00a0\u010cT, a\u00a0nav\u00edc dodal, \u017ee se aktu\u00e1ln\u011b \u201e\u0159e\u0161\u00ed V\u00e1clav Moravec\u201c.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Tato slova vyvolala pobou\u0159en\u00ed nap\u0159\u00ed\u010d medi\u00e1ln\u00ed sc\u00e9nou. Pravomoci \u010dlen\u016f Rady \u010cT jsou z\u00e1konem jasn\u011b definov\u00e1ny a\u00a0person\u00e1ln\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed ani dramaturgie po\u0159ad\u016f do nich nepat\u0159\u00ed. Matocha sv\u00fdm p\u0159izn\u00e1n\u00edm de facto odhalil, \u017ee Rada \u010cT p\u0159ekra\u010duje z\u00e1konem stanoven\u00e9 kompetence (toto konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed o\u00a0p\u0159ekra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed z\u00e1konem stanoven\u00fdch kompetenc\u00ed zazn\u011blo v\u00a0prosinci 2025\u00a0v\u00a0ofici\u00e1ln\u00ed reakci veden\u00ed zpravodajstv\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 televize) na v\u00fdroky radn\u00edho Pavla Matochy, kter\u00fd zasahuje do vnit\u0159n\u00ed autonomie ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed instituce.<\/p>\n

Kubal na Matochova slova reagoval na s\u00edti X odm\u00edtav\u011b. Zd\u016fraznil, \u017ee pravomoci radn\u00edch jsou d\u00e1ny z\u00e1konem, a\u00a0p\u0159ipojil spole\u010dn\u00e9 prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed, kter\u00e9 d\u0159\u00edve vydal s\u00a0\u0159editelem zpravodajstv\u00ed Mrzenou jako reakci na tehdej\u0161\u00edho gener\u00e1ln\u00edho \u0159editele Sou\u010dka. V\u00a0tomto prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed oba mu\u017ei d\u016frazn\u011b odm\u00edtali spojen\u00ed s\u00a0jak\u00fdmikoli n\u00e1znaky pokus\u016f o\u00a0vyd\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed \u010di obchodov\u00e1n\u00ed se jm\u00e9ny \u010dlen\u016f redakce nebo jednotliv\u00fdmi po\u0159ady.<\/p>\n

Toto Kubalovo prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed v\u0161ak paradoxn\u011b spustilo novou vlnu kritiky\u00a0\u2013 tentokr\u00e1t zam\u011b\u0159enou p\u0159\u00edmo na jeho osobu.<\/p>\n

Kdy vymezen\u00ed p\u0159estane b\u00fdt v\u011brohodn\u00e9? Fridrichov\u00e1, K\u00fchn i\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed kritici upozornili na z\u00e1sadn\u00ed probl\u00e9m Kubalova postoje: vymezovat se v\u016f\u010di Matochovu zasahov\u00e1n\u00ed je t\u011b\u017eko v\u011brohodn\u00e9 v\u00a0situaci, kdy v\u00fdsledky Kubalov\u00fdch mana\u017eersk\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed<\/a> odpov\u00eddaj\u00ed p\u0159esn\u011b tomu, o\u00a0co Matocha a\u00a0spol. podle vlastn\u00edch slov usilovali.<\/p>\n

Jin\u00fdmi slovy: pokud Kubal tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee se nikdy nesetkal s\u00a0pokusy o\u00a0vyd\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed nebo obchodov\u00e1n\u00ed se jm\u00e9ny moder\u00e1tor\u016f, ale p\u0159itom jsou Fridrichov\u00e1 pry\u010d, \u017delezn\u00fd odstaven\u00fd od Ud\u00e1lost\u00ed a\u00a0Moravec dotla\u010den k\u00a0odchodu\u00a0\u2013 co to vlastn\u011b znamen\u00e1? Bu\u010f Kubal v\u011bdom\u011b l\u017ee, nebo jsou v\u00fdsledky shodn\u00e9 s\u00a0Matochov\u00fdmi p\u0159\u00e1n\u00edmi pouhou n\u00e1hodou, nebo\u00a0\u2013 a\u00a0to je t\u0159et\u00ed a\u00a0mo\u017en\u00e1 nejpravd\u011bpodobn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed varianta\u00a0\u2013 doch\u00e1zelo k\u00a0neform\u00e1ln\u00edm tlak\u016fm a\u00a0domluv\u00e1m, kter\u00e9 nikdo nikde explicitn\u011b nepojmenoval jako \u201avyd\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed\u2018, ale jejich\u017e praktick\u00fd efekt byl t\u00fd\u017e.<\/p>\n

B\u00fdval\u00fd p\u0159edseda Rady \u010cT Ren\u00e9 K\u00fchn v\u00a0t\u00e9to souvislosti ozna\u010dil Kubala za \u201enovou tuzemskou jednotku pokrytectv\u00ed\u201c<\/a>. Jeho v\u00fdtka m\u00ed\u0159\u00ed p\u0159esn\u011b na tento bod: Kubal se vymezuje v\u016f\u010di nemysliteln\u00fdm praktik\u00e1m, ale p\u0159ehl\u00ed\u017e\u00ed, \u017ee jeho nejbli\u017e\u0161\u00ed spolupracovn\u00edk\u00a0\u2013 \u0159editel zpravodajstv\u00ed Petr Mrzena je Matochov\u00fdm spojencem. K\u00fchn se pt\u00e1: M\u016f\u017ee \u0161\u00e9fredaktor zpravodajstv\u00ed v\u011brohodn\u011b odm\u00edtat zasahov\u00e1n\u00ed zven\u010d\u00ed do person\u00e1ln\u00edch ot\u00e1zek, pokud jeho p\u0159\u00edm\u00fd nad\u0159\u00edzen\u00fd v\u00a0t\u011bchto z\u00e1le\u017eitostech s\u00a0doty\u010dn\u00fdmi radn\u00edmi kooperuje?<\/p>\n

Dozor nad OVM: P\u0159ekro\u010den\u00ed hranice, nebo nutn\u00e1 korekce?<\/p>\n

Jedn\u00edm z\u00a0nejkontroverzn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch Kubalov\u00fdch krok\u016f bylo jeho osobn\u00ed zapojen\u00ed do porad po\u0159adu Ot\u00e1zky V\u00e1clava Moravce. Gener\u00e1ln\u00ed \u0159editel Hynek Chud\u00e1rek<\/a> na jedn\u00e1n\u00ed Rady \u010cT ozn\u00e1mil, \u017ee Kubal se osobn\u011b \u00fa\u010dastn\u00ed pravideln\u00fdch porad OVM, aby m\u011bl nad po\u0159adem \u201adozor a\u00a0kontrolu\u2018<\/a>. Term\u00edn pro \u201an\u00e1pravu\u2018 v\u00a0ot\u00e1zce zvan\u00ed Okamury byl stanoven do konce \u00fanora 2026.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Vedouc\u00ed dramaturgyn\u011b OVM Hana And\u011blov\u00e1<\/a> na toto ozn\u00e1men\u00ed reagovala s\u00a0p\u0159ekvapen\u00edm a\u00a0znepokojen\u00edm. Uvedla, \u017ee se o\u00a0kontrole a\u00a0dozoru dozv\u011bd\u011bla poprv\u00e9 v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9m p\u0159enosu z\u00a0jedn\u00e1n\u00ed Rady, a\u00a0ozna\u010dila tento postup za poru\u0161en\u00ed standard\u016f \u010cT ze strany managementu.<\/p>\n

Kubal s\u00e1m tuto situaci h\u00e1jil s\u00a0odkazem na z\u00e1sadu, \u017ee za obsah zpravodajstv\u00ed odpov\u00edd\u00e1 \u0161\u00e9fredaktor. Je to form\u00e1ln\u011b spr\u00e1vn\u00fd argument, \u0161\u00e9fredaktor skute\u010dn\u011b nese editorskou odpov\u011bdnost za to, co jde do vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed. Ot\u00e1zkou v\u0161ak z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1 kontext: \u00fa\u010dastnil by se Kubal porad OVM i\u00a0za jin\u00fdch okolnost\u00ed, nebo jde o\u00a0p\u0159\u00edmou reakci na tlak Rady \u010cT?<\/p>\n

Pro zast\u00e1nce tohoto kroku byla Kubalova p\u0159\u00edtomnost na porad\u00e1ch projevem odpov\u011bdn\u00e9ho v\u00fdkonu mana\u017eersk\u00e9 funkce. Pro kritiky je to naopak zaveden\u00ed de facto politick\u00e9ho dohledu nad redak\u010dn\u011b autonomn\u00edm po\u0159adem, a\u00a0to pr\u00e1v\u011b v\u00a0situaci, kdy Rada \u010cT tento dozor otev\u0159en\u011b po\u017eadovala.<\/p>\n

Financov\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0obrana \u010cT: Kde Kubal skute\u010dn\u011b bojuje<\/p>\n

Bylo by nespravedliv\u00e9 a\u00a0nepoctiv\u00e9 redukovat Michala Kubala pouze na postavu, kter\u00e1 pasivn\u011b p\u0159ihl\u00ed\u017e\u00ed demont\u00e1\u017ei zpravodajstv\u00ed \u010cT nebo ji dokonce aktivn\u011b napom\u00e1h\u00e1. V\u00a0ot\u00e1zce ohro\u017een\u00ed financov\u00e1n\u00ed ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edch m\u00e9di\u00ed toti\u017e vystupuje v\u00fdrazn\u011b a\u00a0bez obalu.<\/p>\n

V lednu 2026, pouh\u00e9 dny pot\u00e9, co se koali\u010dn\u00ed rada vl\u00e1dy Andreje Babi\u0161e shodla na z\u00e1m\u011bru zru\u0161it syst\u00e9m koncesion\u00e1\u0159sk\u00fdch poplatk\u016f a\u00a0financovat \u010cT a\u00a0\u010cesk\u00fd rozhlas p\u0159\u00edmo ze st\u00e1tn\u00edho rozpo\u010dtu, vystoupil Kubal v\u00a0podcastu Marie Bastlov\u00e9 Medi\u00e1ln\u00ed cirkus<\/a> s\u00a0varov\u00e1n\u00edm, kter\u00e9 nelze p\u0159ehl\u00e9dnout.<\/p>\n

\u201eJsme v\u00a0nejslo\u017eit\u011bj\u0161\u00edm obdob\u00ed, jak\u00e9 za 30\u00a0let v\u00a0televizi pamatuji,\u201c prohl\u00e1sil. Nep\u0159\u00edmo odk\u00e1zal na p\u0159\u00edklad Slovenska, kde zm\u011bna syst\u00e9mu financov\u00e1n\u00ed vedla k\u00a0faktick\u00e9mu zest\u00e1tn\u011bn\u00ed m\u00e9di\u00ed <\/a>a\u00a0omezen\u00ed kritick\u00e9 \u017eurnalistiky, a\u00a0nevylou\u010dil ani mo\u017enost st\u00e1vky, podobn\u011b jako p\u0159i televizn\u00ed krizi v\u00a0roce 2000.<\/p>\n

Toto vystoupen\u00ed bylo pozoruhodn\u00e9 z\u00a0v\u00edce d\u016fvod\u016f. Kubal byl v\u00a0tu chv\u00edli fakticky prvn\u00edm \u010dlenem \u0161ir\u0161\u00edho managementu \u010cT, kter\u00fd vstoupil do ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 debaty o\u00a0ohro\u017een\u00ed nez\u00e1vislosti televize. Gener\u00e1ln\u00ed \u0159editel Hynek Chud\u00e1rek v\u00a0t\u00e9 dob\u011b ml\u010del a\u00a0na politick\u00e9 pl\u00e1ny ve\u0159ejn\u011b nereagoval\u00a0\u2013 na rozd\u00edl od sv\u00e9ho prot\u011bj\u0161ku v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9m rozhlase.<\/p>\n

Dv\u011b televizn\u00ed krize, jedna instituce<\/p>\n

Srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00a0televizn\u00ed kriz\u00ed<\/a> roku 2000\u00a0se v\u00a0cel\u00e9 debat\u011b objevuje opakovan\u011b a\u00a0nen\u00ed n\u00e1hodn\u00e9. Tehdej\u0161\u00ed krize, kdy redakce \u010cT obsadila Kav\u010d\u00ed hory a\u00a0odm\u00edtla p\u0159ijmout politicky anga\u017eovan\u00e9ho gener\u00e1ln\u00edho \u0159editele Ji\u0159\u00edho Hoda\u010de, byla p\u0159\u00edm\u00fdm d\u016fsledkem snahy politick\u00e9 moci ovl\u00e1dnout ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed televizi zevnit\u0159. Tehdej\u0161\u00ed vzpoura novin\u00e1\u0159\u016f byla jedn\u00edm z\u00a0nejsiln\u011bj\u0161\u00edch moment\u016f \u010desk\u00e9 ob\u010dansk\u00e9 spole\u010dnosti po roce 1989.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Dnes \u010del\u00ed \u010cT jin\u00fdm, ale sv\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem z\u00e1ke\u0159n\u011bj\u0161\u00edm tlak\u016fm. Dne\u0161n\u00ed demont\u00e1\u017e neprob\u00edh\u00e1 v\u00a0podob\u011b dramatick\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9 akce, odvol\u00e1n\u00ed gener\u00e1ln\u00edho \u0159editele a\u00a0jmenov\u00e1n\u00ed loaj\u00e1ln\u00edho n\u00e1hradn\u00edka. Prob\u00edh\u00e1 postupn\u011b, v\u00a0podob\u011b drobn\u00fdch person\u00e1ln\u00edch krok\u016f, zru\u0161en\u00ed jednotliv\u00fdch po\u0159ad\u016f, tich\u00fdch dohodnut\u00ed na porad\u00e1ch, zm\u011bn dramaturgie. Tento postup je mnohem obt\u00ed\u017en\u011bji uchopiteln\u00fd a\u00a0mnohem h\u016f\u0159e se proti n\u011bmu bojuje, proto\u017ee ka\u017ed\u00fd jednotliv\u00fd krok lze h\u00e1jit jako legitimn\u00ed mana\u017eersk\u00e9 rozhodnut\u00ed.<\/p>\n

A pr\u00e1v\u011b v\u00a0tomto bod\u011b le\u017e\u00ed j\u00e1dro sporu o\u00a0Michala Kubala. Nen\u00ed ot\u00e1zka, zda je \u0161\u00e9fredaktor zpravodajstv\u00ed schopn\u00fd novin\u00e1\u0159. Je j\u00edm nepochybn\u011b. Ot\u00e1zka zn\u00ed: Je v\u016fbec v\u00a0syst\u00e9mu, kter\u00fd funguje na principu pomal\u00e9, nen\u00e1padn\u00e9 normalizace, v\u016fbec mo\u017en\u00e9 b\u00fdt sou\u010dasn\u011b v\u011brohodn\u00fdm obr\u00e1ncem nez\u00e1vislosti a\u00a0efektivn\u00edm mana\u017eerem, kter\u00fd udr\u017euje funk\u010dn\u00ed vztahy s\u00a0veden\u00edm televize a\u00a0s Radou \u010cT?<\/p>\n

Kumulace funkc\u00ed: Kritika kumulace Kubalov\u00fdch funkc\u00ed\u00a0\u2013 \u0161\u00e9fredaktor a\u00a0z\u00e1rove\u0148 moder\u00e1tor hlavn\u00ed zpravodajsk\u00e9 relace\u00a0\u2013 nen\u00ed jen akademick\u00e1. M\u00e1 praktick\u00e9 d\u016fsledky pro d\u016fv\u011bryhodnost jeho rozhodnut\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Anketa<\/p>\n

Co je pro v\u00e1s v tuto chv\u00edli nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00edm symbolem ohro\u017een\u00ed nez\u00e1vislosti \u010cesk\u00e9 televize?<\/p>\n

\u2022\tPerson\u00e1ln\u00ed \u010distky: Odchody v\u00fdrazn\u00fdch a kritick\u00fdch tv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed (Moravec, Fridrichov\u00e1, \u017delezn\u00fd).<\/p>\n

\u2022\tFinan\u010dn\u00ed tlak: Snaha politik\u016f zru\u0161it poplatky a napojit \u010cT na st\u00e1tn\u00ed rozpo\u010det.<\/p>\n

\u2022\tZ\u00e1sahy Rady \u010cT: P\u0159ekra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed kompetenc\u00ed radn\u00edch a jejich vliv na dramaturgii.<\/p>\n

\u2022\tVnit\u0159n\u00ed rozkol: Ztr\u00e1ta jednoty v redakci a vz\u00e1jemn\u00e9 obvi\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed novin\u00e1\u0159\u016f.<\/p>\n

Celkem
\n\t\t\t\thlasovalo
\n\t\t\t\t1661
\n\t\t\t\t\u010dten\u00e1\u0159\u016f.<\/p>\n

Moder\u00e1tor hlavn\u00ed zpravodajsk\u00e9 relace je ze sv\u00e9 podstaty tv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed instituce. Je t\u00edm, koho div\u00e1ci ka\u017ed\u00fd ve\u010der vid\u00ed a\u00a0komu d\u016fv\u011b\u0159uj\u00ed jako pr\u016fvodci nejd\u016fle\u017eit\u011bj\u0161\u00edmi ud\u00e1lostmi dne. \u0160\u00e9fredaktor je naopak mana\u017eer, kter\u00fd rozhoduje o\u00a0obsahu zpravodajstv\u00ed, o\u00a0tom, jak\u00e1 t\u00e9mata dostanou prostor a\u00a0jak\u00e1 ne, o\u00a0dramaturgii po\u0159ad\u016f a\u00a0o lidech, kte\u0159\u00ed v\u00a0redakci pracuj\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Tyto dv\u011b role jsou do ur\u010dit\u00e9 m\u00edry v\u00a0p\u0159irozen\u00e9m konfliktu. \u0160\u00e9fredaktor, kter\u00fd je z\u00e1rove\u0148 moder\u00e1torem, je v\u00a0nep\u0159\u00edjemn\u00e9 situaci, kdy jeho vlastn\u00ed mana\u017eersk\u00e1 rozhodnut\u00ed ovliv\u0148uj\u00ed jeho vlastn\u00ed viditelnost na obrazovce. Je vlastn\u011b sv\u00fdm vlastn\u00edm \u0161\u00e9fem\u00a0\u2013 a\u00a0to je situace, kter\u00e1 v\u00a0seri\u00f3zn\u00edm medi\u00e1ln\u00edm prost\u0159ed\u00ed neb\u00fdv\u00e1 pova\u017eov\u00e1na za ide\u00e1ln\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Kubal tuto kritiku opakovan\u011b odm\u00edt\u00e1. Argumentuje, \u017ee jeho p\u0159\u00edtomnost na obrazovce slou\u017e\u00ed jako garance stability a\u00a0d\u016fv\u011bryhodnosti v\u00a0turbulentn\u00ed dob\u011b. Je to argument, kter\u00fd m\u00e1 svoji logiku, kdy v\u00a0krizov\u00e9 situaci m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt p\u0159\u00edtomnost zku\u0161en\u00e9 a\u00a0div\u00e1cky obl\u00edben\u00e9 tv\u00e1\u0159e skute\u010dn\u011b stabiliza\u010dn\u00edm faktorem. Ale je to argument, kter\u00fd z\u00e1rove\u0148 slou\u017e\u00ed jeho vlastn\u00edm z\u00e1jm\u016fm, co\u017e ho pon\u011bkud relativizuje.<\/p>\n

Je Michal Kubal hroba\u0159 \u010cT?<\/p>\n

P\u0159istupme kone\u010dn\u011b k\u00a0\u00fast\u0159edn\u00ed ot\u00e1zce tohoto \u010dl\u00e1nku. Je Michal Kubal hroba\u0159em \u010cesk\u00e9 televize? Jednozna\u010dn\u00e1 odpov\u011b\u010f zn\u00ed: ne\u00a0\u2013 ale s\u00a0d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdmi v\u00fdhradami. Michal Kubal nen\u00ed hroba\u0159em \u010cT v\u00a0tom smyslu, \u017ee by v\u011bdom\u011b a\u00a0z\u00e1m\u011brn\u011b usiloval o\u00a0destrukci ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed televize. Jeho kari\u00e9rn\u00ed profil, jeho novin\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e1 minulost i\u00a0jeho ve\u0159ejn\u00e1 vystoupen\u00ed v\u00a0obhajob\u011b nez\u00e1visl\u00e9ho financov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010cT nazna\u010duj\u00ed, \u017ee jde o\u00a0\u010dlov\u011bka, kter\u00fd ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u017eurnalistiku pova\u017euje za hodnotu, kterou stoj\u00ed za to br\u00e1nit.<\/p>\n

Video – MICHAL KUBAL: Odchod V\u00e1clava Moravce byl v\u00fdtrysk ega a\u00a0po\u0161pin\u011bn\u00ed pr\u00e1ce stovek lid\u00ed:<\/p>\n

Ztr\u00e1ta Nory Fridrichov\u00e9 a\u00a0zru\u0161en\u00ed 168\u00a0hodin znamen\u00e1, \u017ee \u010cT p\u0159i\u0161la o\u00a0jeden ze sv\u00fdch osv\u011bd\u010den\u00fdch investigativn\u00edch form\u00e1t\u016f. Odchod V\u00e1clava Moravce znamen\u00e1, \u017ee \u010cT p\u0159i\u0161la o\u00a0svou nejv\u00fdrazn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed tv\u00e1\u0159 politick\u00e9 publicistiky. Odstaven\u00ed Jakuba \u017delezn\u00e9ho od hlavn\u00ed zpravodajsk\u00e9 relace, by\u0165 do\u010dasn\u00e9, vyslalo jasn\u00fd sign\u00e1l dovnit\u0159 i\u00a0ven: kari\u00e9rn\u00ed perspektivy v\u00a0\u010cT z\u00e1visej\u00ed nejen na novin\u00e1\u0159sk\u00fdch kvalit\u00e1ch, ale i\u00a0na ochot\u011b p\u0159izp\u016fsobit se aktu\u00e1ln\u00edmu politick\u00e9mu klimatu.<\/p>\n

Ka\u017edou z\u00a0t\u011bchto zm\u011bn lze od\u016fvodnit samostatn\u011b. Dohromady tvo\u0159\u00ed obraz transformace, kter\u00e1 je t\u00edm z\u00e1ke\u0159n\u011bj\u0161\u00ed, \u010d\u00edm m\u00e9n\u011b je dramatick\u00e1<\/p>\n

Michal Kubal je v\u00a0jist\u00e9m smyslu zrcadlem doby, v\u00a0n\u00ed\u017e \u017eijeme. Je symbolem dilematu, p\u0159ed n\u00edm\u017e stoj\u00ed ka\u017ed\u00fd odpov\u011bdn\u00fd mana\u017eer v\u00a0instituci pod politick\u00fdm tlakem: jak daleko lze j\u00edt v\u00a0kompromisech ve jm\u00e9nu zachov\u00e1n\u00ed instituce, ani\u017e by se instituce prom\u011bnila v\u00a0n\u011bco, co u\u017e nestoj\u00ed za zachov\u00e1n\u00ed?<\/p>\n

Do\u010detli jste a\u017e sem? Podpo\u0159te autora libovolnou \u010d\u00e1stkou.<\/p>\n

Tato ot\u00e1zka nem\u00e1 jednoduchou odpov\u011b\u010f. A\u00a0pr\u00e1v\u011b proto ji nelze zodpov\u011bd\u011bt pouh\u00fdm ozna\u010den\u00edm Kubala za hroba\u0159e nebo za zachr\u00e1nce. Pravda le\u017e\u00ed, jako obvykle, v\u00a0mnohem komplikovan\u011bj\u0161\u00edm prostoru. Co je ale jist\u00e9: debata o\u00a0jeho roli nen\u00ed jen debatou o\u00a0jednom \u010dlov\u011bku. Je debatou o\u00a0tom, jakou \u010ceskou televizi chceme m\u00edt. Zda chceme televizi, kter\u00e1 je form\u00e1ln\u011b vyv\u00e1\u017een\u00e1 a\u00a0politicky m\u00e9n\u011b zraniteln\u00e1, ale za cenu ztr\u00e1ty investigativn\u00ed odvahy. Nebo televizi, kter\u00e1 je ost\u0159ej\u0161\u00ed a\u00a0neboj\u00e1cn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed, ale kter\u00e1 t\u00edm d\u00e1v\u00e1 sv\u00fdm kritik\u016fm argumenty pro snahu o\u00a0jej\u00ed finan\u010dn\u00ed a\u00a0politickou likvidaci.<\/p>\n

Tato debata je v\u00a0\u010desk\u00e9m ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m prostoru teprve na za\u010d\u00e1tku. A\u00a0Michal Kubal\u00a0\u2013 a\u0165 chce, nebo ne\u00a0\u2013 je jej\u00edm hlavn\u00edm protagonistou.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Je to pragmatick\u00fd zachr\u00e1nce, kter\u00fd se sna\u017e\u00ed udr\u017eet lo\u010f nad vodou za cenu bolestiv\u00fdch kompromis\u016f, nebo \u201ajednotka pokrytectv\u00ed\u2018,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":28080,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[48,79,12398,2337,1771,12651,3297,80],"class_list":{"0":"post-28079","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-zabava","8":"tag-ceska-televize-ct","9":"tag-entertainment","10":"tag-michal-kubal","11":"tag-nora-fridrichova","12":"tag-rada-ct","13":"tag-udalosti","14":"tag-vaclav-moravec","15":"tag-zabava"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@cz\/116249639429374609","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28079"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28079\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28080"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}