{"id":42053,"date":"2026-04-01T08:58:09","date_gmt":"2026-04-01T08:58:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/42053\/"},"modified":"2026-04-01T08:58:09","modified_gmt":"2026-04-01T08:58:09","slug":"ratifikaci-smlouvy-s-vatikanem-nyni-nelze-dokoncit-rozhodl-ustavni-soud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/42053\/","title":{"rendered":"Ratifikaci smlouvy s\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem nyn\u00ed nelze dokon\u010dit, rozhodl \u00dastavn\u00ed soud"},"content":{"rendered":"

Problematick\u00fdmi body smlouvy s\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem jsou podle \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu zpov\u011bdn\u00ed tajemstv\u00ed a\u00a0p\u0159\u00edstup k\u00a0c\u00edrkevn\u00edm archiv\u016fm. Oba \u010dl\u00e1nky jsou v\u00a0rozporu s\u00a0neutralitou st\u00e1tu a\u00a0z\u00e1kazem diskriminace, konstatoval soud. Ve zbytku je smlouva v\u00a0po\u0159\u00e1dku.<\/p>\n

Smlouvu v\u00a0\u0159\u00edjnu 2024\u00a0podepsali tehdej\u0161\u00ed premi\u00e9r Petr Fiala (ODS) a\u00a0st\u00e1tn\u00ed sekret\u00e1\u0159 Svat\u00e9ho stolce kardin\u00e1l Pietro Parolin, pot\u00e9 ji odsouhlasila Poslaneck\u00e1 sn\u011bmovna a\u00a0Sen\u00e1t. Prezident ji zat\u00edm k\u00a0podpisu nedostal, na jej\u00ed adresu nicm\u00e9n\u011b vyj\u00e1d\u0159il pochybnosti. Takzvan\u00fd konkord\u00e1t (mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed smlouvu uzav\u0159enou mezi Svat\u00fdm stolcem a\u00a0jin\u00fdm st\u00e1tem) podle Hradu naru\u0161uje v\u00fdchoz\u00ed \u00fastavn\u00ed principy \u010ceska jako svrchovan\u00e9ho, sekul\u00e1rn\u00edho a\u00a0republik\u00e1nsk\u00e9ho st\u00e1tu.<\/p>\n

N\u00e1vrh na posouzen\u00ed smlouvy pak podala loni v\u00a0b\u0159eznu skupina sen\u00e1tor\u016f v\u00a0\u010dele s\u00a0V\u00e1clavem L\u00e1skou (SEN 21) a\u00a0Ad\u00e9lou Sucharda \u0160\u00edpovou (d\u0159\u00edve Pir\u00e1ti) s\u00a0advok\u00e1tem Pavlem Uhlem. Pouk\u00e1zali na nevyv\u00e1\u017eenost smlouvy v\u00a0neprosp\u011bch \u010ceska. \u201eSmlouva, kter\u00e1 obsahuje z\u00e1vazky jen jedn\u00e9 strany v\u016f\u010di druh\u00e9, a\u00a0obr\u00e1cen\u011b nikoli, vlastn\u011b ani nen\u00ed smlouvou,\u201c uvedl tehdy L\u00e1ska.<\/p>\n

N\u00e1vrh smlouvy podle sen\u00e1tor\u016f p\u0159edstavuje rozpor s\u00a0principem svrchovanosti, principem rovnosti a\u00a0z\u00e1kazem vazby st\u00e1tu na v\u00fdlu\u010dnou ideologii nebo na n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9 vyzn\u00e1n\u00ed. Vyst\u00e1v\u00e1 pr\u00fd ot\u00e1zka, zda smlouva nezv\u00fdhod\u0148uje katol\u00edky oproti \u010dlen\u016fm jin\u00fdch c\u00edrkv\u00ed. <\/p>\n

To ale nen\u00ed podle Cyrila Svobody, exdiplomata a\u00a0zast\u00e1nce smlouvy s\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem, pravda. \u201ePlat\u00ed potom princip p\u0159im\u011b\u0159enosti a\u00a0ten \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee to, co se p\u0159izn\u00e1v\u00e1 katolick\u00e9 c\u00edrkvi, se mus\u00ed p\u0159iznat i\u00a0v\u0161em ostatn\u00edm registrovan\u00fdm c\u00edrkv\u00edm ve vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm stupni registrace. Tedy z\u00edsk\u00e1 to nap\u0159\u00edklad i\u00a0\u010ceskobratrsk\u00e1 c\u00edrkev evangelick\u00e1, bude m\u00edt stejnou garanci,\u201c poznamenal pro redakci.<\/p>\n

<\/a>P\u0159e kv\u016fli zpov\u011bdn\u00edmu tajemstv\u00ed<\/p>\n

V\u00fdtky se t\u00fdkaly p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm institutu zpov\u011bdn\u00edho tajemstv\u00ed v\u00a0souvislosti s\u00a0\u00fa\u010dinn\u00fdm vy\u0161et\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00edm. Smlouva po\u010d\u00edtala s\u00a0t\u00edm, \u017ee se obdobn\u011b vztahuje na pastora\u010dn\u00ed pracovn\u00edky. Nap\u0159\u00edklad ob\u011bti zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00a0c\u00edrkvi u\u017e n\u011bkolikr\u00e1t vyj\u00e1d\u0159ily obavu, aby nebylo vyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1no ke kryt\u00ed t\u011bchto \u010din\u016f.<\/p>\n

Podle smlouvy \u201e\u010cesk\u00e1 republika uzn\u00e1v\u00e1 zpov\u011bdn\u00ed tajemstv\u00ed\u201c, a\u00a0to bez dal\u0161\u00edho up\u0159esn\u011bn\u00ed. \u00dastavn\u00ed soud dnes uvedl, \u017ee smlouva poskytuje katolick\u00e9 c\u00edrkvi privilegovanou a\u00a0bezv\u00fdjime\u010dnou ochranu zpov\u011bdn\u00edho tajemstv\u00ed, zat\u00edmco u\u00a0jin\u00fdch c\u00edrkv\u00ed je ochrana obdobn\u00fdch pr\u00e1v limitovan\u00e1, stejn\u011b jako v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b advok\u00e1tn\u00ed ml\u010denlivosti.<\/p>\n

\u201eKn\u011bz tajemstv\u00ed nikdy nevyzrad\u00ed\u201c<\/p>\n

\u201eSmysl zpov\u011bdi je v\u00a0tom, \u017ee ten, kdo se zpov\u00edd\u00e1 mus\u00ed m\u00edt jistotu, \u017ee to kn\u011bz na n\u011bj nevyzrad\u00ed. C\u00edrkev to takto m\u00e1 2026\u00a0let a\u00a0v\u00ed, \u017ee \u010dlov\u011bk pot\u0159ebuje rozh\u0159e\u0161en\u00ed. To dostane ve chv\u00edli, kdy dojde k\u00a0vyzn\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0u\u017e v\u00ed, \u017ee se t\u00edm nebude nikdy nikdo zab\u00fdvat . To je smysl sv\u00e1tosti,\u201c vysv\u011btlil Svoboda. Proto c\u00edrkev podle n\u011bj jasn\u011b \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee kn\u011bz nesm\u00ed zpov\u011bdn\u00ed tajemstv\u00ed nikdy vyzradit. \u201eI kdyby v\u00a0z\u00e1kon\u011b bylo cokoli. C\u00edrkev by naru\u0161ila jeden z\u00a0pil\u00ed\u0159\u016f toho, pro\u010d vlastn\u011b existuje,\u201c dodal.<\/p>\n

Dal\u0161\u00ed sporn\u00fd bod smlouvy \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee c\u00edrkevn\u00ed pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 osoby daj\u00ed k\u00a0dispozici badatel\u016fm sv\u00e9 kulturn\u00ed d\u011bdictv\u00ed, ov\u0161em za podm\u00ednek, kter\u00e9 si samy stanov\u00ed. Dost\u00e1vaj\u00ed tak siln\u00fd n\u00e1stroj, jak sv\u00e9 dokumenty \u010di archiv\u00e1lie nezp\u0159\u00edstupnit, uvedl soud.<\/p>\n

\u010cesko je sekul\u00e1rn\u00ed st\u00e1t, potvrdil soud<\/p>\n

Soudci se smlouvou s\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem zab\u00fdvali d\u00e9le ne\u017e rok, n\u00e1lez se nerodil snadno. P\u016fvodn\u00edho soudce zpravodaje Milana Hulm\u00e1ka nahradil Zden\u011bk K\u00fchn. P\u0159edseda soudu Josef Baxa u\u017e d\u0159\u00edve uvedl, \u017ee jde o\u00a0mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b komplikovanou problematiku.<\/p>\n

Soudce zpravodaj K\u00fchn rovn\u011b\u017e zd\u016fraznil, \u017ee \u010cesko je sekul\u00e1rn\u00edm st\u00e1tem nikoli n\u00e1hodou, ale jako v\u00fdsledek historick\u00e9 zku\u0161enosti. St\u00e1t je podle n\u011bho zalo\u017een\u00fd na demokratick\u00fdch hodnot\u00e1ch a\u00a0nesm\u00ed se v\u00e1zat ani na ideologie ani na n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed. <\/p>\n

O souladu mezin\u00e1rodn\u00edch smluv s\u00a0\u00fastavn\u00edm po\u0159\u00e1dkem rozhoduje \u00daS v\u00fdjime\u010dn\u011b, v\u00a0minulosti vedl dv\u011b podobn\u00e1 \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, ob\u011b se t\u00fdkala Lisabonsk\u00e9 smlouvy o\u00a0EU. Tehdy rozhodl, \u017ee smlouva, kter\u00e1 reformovala unijn\u00ed instituce a\u00a0rozhodovac\u00ed mechanismy, je v\u00a0souladu s\u00a0\u00fastavn\u00edm po\u0159\u00e1dkem a\u00a0jej\u00ed ratifikaci lze dokon\u010dit.<\/p>\n

Promarn\u011bn\u00e1 p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost, zn\u00ed z\u00a0ODS <\/p>\n

B\u00fdval\u00fd premi\u00e9r Petr Fiala (ODS), jeho\u017e vl\u00e1da a\u00a0strana smlouvu velmi prosazovala, respektuje rozhodnut\u00ed \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu. \u201eJe to ale \u0161koda, st\u00e1lo to velk\u00e9 \u00fasil\u00ed a\u00a0cel\u00e9 t\u00fdmy pr\u00e1vn\u00edk\u016f a\u00a0diplomat\u016f pracovaly na tom, aby smlouva dob\u0159e slou\u017eila \u010desk\u00e9 spole\u010dnosti,\u201c uvedl Fiala pro \u010cTK. <\/p>\n

L\u00edtost vyj\u00e1d\u0159il i\u00a0p\u0159edseda poslaneck\u00e9ho klubu ODS Marek Benda. \u201eJe mi l\u00edto, \u017ee \u00dastavn\u00ed soud p\u0159istoupil na p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 pozitivisticky v\u00fdklad \u00dastavy v\u00a0rozporu s\u00a0celosv\u011btov\u011b uzn\u00e1vanou tradic\u00ed, na kterou odkazuje preambule \u00dastavy. V\u00a0zemi svat\u00e9ho Jana Nepomuck\u00e9ho je tento v\u00fdklad opravdu hluboce ahistorick\u00fd,\u201c sd\u011blil Seznam Zpr\u00e1v\u00e1m. Jedn\u00e1 se podle n\u011bho o\u00a0velmi ne\u0161\u0165astn\u011b promarn\u011bnou p\u0159\u00edle\u017eitost m\u00edt po dlouh\u00fdch letech upraven\u00e9 vztahy se Svat\u00fdm Stolcem. \u201eNic jin\u00e9ho ne\u017e respektovat toto rozhodnut\u00ed mi ov\u0161em nezb\u00fdv\u00e1,\u201c uzav\u0159el. <\/p>\n

\u0160\u00e9f lidovc\u016f Marek V\u00fdborn\u00fd pro redakci uvedl, \u017ee n\u00e1lez \u00fastavn\u00edho soudu jeho strana respektuje, a\u010dkoli lituje, \u017ee snaha o\u00a0nastolen\u00ed d\u016fstojn\u00e9ho vztahu vz\u00e1jemn\u00e9ho respektu mezi t\u011bmito dv\u011bma subjekty nenajde napln\u011bn\u00ed. \u201eJsme si jisti, \u017ee tento n\u00e1lez neohroz\u00ed dobrou spolupr\u00e1ci mezi st\u00e1tem a\u00a0c\u00edrkvemi zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b v\u00a0oblasti zdravotnictv\u00ed, soci\u00e1ln\u00edch slu\u017eeb, p\u00e9\u010de o\u00a0kulturn\u00ed d\u011bdictv\u00ed a\u00a0\u0161kolstv\u00ed. Stejn\u011b tak neznamen\u00e1 ani omezen\u00ed garance n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9 svobody,\u201c \u0159ekl V\u00fdborn\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Neo\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1, \u017ee se v\u00a0p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u00edch letech ot\u00e1zka smluvn\u00edho vztahu \u010cR a\u00a0Svat\u00e9ho stolce vy\u0159e\u0161\u00ed. \u201eAle ale jako KDU-\u010cSL jsme k\u00a0dispozici podpo\u0159it takov\u00e1 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed. Spole\u010dn\u00fd z\u00e1jem \u010cR a\u00a0Svat\u00e9ho stolce na prosazov\u00e1n\u00ed hodnot jako je lidsk\u00e1 d\u016fstojnost, spravedlnost \u010di m\u00edr zcela jist\u011b trvaj\u00ed i\u00a0nad\u00e1le,\u201c dodal. <\/p>\n

Svat\u00fd stolec ve smlouv\u011b s\u00a0\u010cR zaru\u010doval, \u017ee hranice arcidiec\u00e9z\u00ed a\u00a0diec\u00e9z\u00ed budou respektovat \u010desk\u00e9 st\u00e1tn\u00ed hranice. \u010cesko garantuje svobodu my\u0161len\u00ed, sv\u011bdom\u00ed a\u00a0n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9ho vyzn\u00e1n\u00ed, pr\u00e1vo odm\u00edtnout vojenskou slu\u017ebu z\u00a0d\u016fvodu sv\u011bdom\u00ed nebo n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9ho vyzn\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0pr\u00e1vo p\u0159ij\u00edmat duchovn\u00ed a\u00a0pastora\u010dn\u00ed p\u00e9\u010di v\u00a0soci\u00e1ln\u00edch \u010di zdravotn\u00edch za\u0159\u00edzen\u00edch, arm\u00e1d\u011b i\u00a0v\u011bznic\u00edch.<\/p>\n

<\/a>Jak se vyv\u00edjely vztahy se Svat\u00fdm stolcem<\/p>\n

By\u0165 jsou vztahy mezi \u010ceskem a\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem zdrav\u00e9 a\u00a0funk\u010dn\u00ed, skvrny se objevily i\u00a0v minulosti. \u010ceskoslovensk\u00e1 prvn\u00ed republika, ostr\u00e1 proti tradici rakousk\u00e9ho klerikalismu, se s\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem \u00a0dohodla na stru\u010dn\u00e9 \u00famluv\u011b a\u017e v\u00a0roce 1928.\u00a0Takzvan\u00fd modus vivendi, kter\u00fd nikdy nenahradila definitivn\u00ed mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed smlouva, platil de facto a\u017e do roku 1950.\u00a0Tehdy komunistick\u00fd re\u017eim po zah\u00e1jen\u00ed proces\u016f s\u00a0vysok\u00fdmi c\u00edrkevn\u00edmi p\u0159edstaviteli vyhostil pape\u017esk\u00e9ho nuncia a\u00a0p\u0159eru\u0161il s\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem\u00a0diplomatick\u00e9 styky.<\/p>\n

Po p\u00e1du komunismu pak \u010ceskoslovensko a\u00a0Vatik\u00e1n\u00a0obnovily diplomatick\u00e9 styky v\u00a0roce 1990\u00a0na \u00farovni velvyslanectv\u00ed, respektive apo\u0161tolsk\u00e9 nunciatury, a\u00a0do Prahy se po \u010dty\u0159iceti letech vr\u00e1til apo\u0161tolsk\u00fd nuncius.<\/p>\n

Parlament se smlouvou s\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem zab\u00fdval u\u017e v\u00a0roce 2003\u00a0a\u00a0tehdy ji neschv\u00e1lil s\u00a0od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00edm, \u017ee smlouva byla nev\u00fdhodn\u00e1 a\u00a0naru\u0161ovala rovnopr\u00e1vnost c\u00edrkv\u00ed. Zpov\u011bdn\u00ed tajemstv\u00ed v\u00a0tehdej\u0161\u00edm n\u00e1vrhu smlouvy nebylo.<\/p>\n

Obdobnou smlouvu s\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem m\u00e1 p\u0159es \u0161edes\u00e1t st\u00e1t\u016f, v\u010detn\u011b 25\u00a0evropsk\u00fdch.<\/p>\n

\u010cl\u00e1nek jsme roz\u0161\u00ed\u0159ili v\u00a0cel\u00e9m rozsahu.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Problematick\u00fdmi body smlouvy s\u00a0Vatik\u00e1nem jsou podle \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu zpov\u011bdn\u00ed tajemstv\u00ed a\u00a0p\u0159\u00edstup k\u00a0c\u00edrkevn\u00edm archiv\u016fm. Oba \u010dl\u00e1nky jsou v\u00a0rozporu s\u00a0neutralitou…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":42054,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[17,21,16,7915,18,19,22,1067,1928,20],"class_list":{"0":"post-42053","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-zpravy","8":"tag-headlines","9":"tag-hlavni-udalosti","10":"tag-news","11":"tag-smlouva","12":"tag-top-news","13":"tag-top-stories","14":"tag-udalosti-dne","15":"tag-ustavni-soud","16":"tag-vatikan","17":"tag-zpravy"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@cz\/116328628576896913","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42053"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42053\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42054"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}