v\u0161echna rozhodnut\u00ed odvolac\u00ed instance zru\u0161il<\/a>. St\u00ed\u017enost usp\u011bla i d\u00edky tomu, \u017ee advok\u00e1t obvin\u011bn\u00e9 Jan B\u0159ezina m\u011bl fotokopie spisu a odhalil t\u00edm z\u00e1m\u011bnu ob\u00e1lky.<\/p>\nKdy konkr\u00e9tn\u011b jste do spisu nahl\u00ed\u017eel?<\/p>\n
Ofotil jsem si cel\u00fd spis pot\u00e9, co jsem p\u0159evzal usnesen\u00ed v rozporu s protokolem. Tot\u00e9\u017e jsem u\u010dinil po vyd\u00e1n\u00ed \u201eopravn\u00e9ho\u201c usnesen\u00ed. Soudce poru\u0161uj\u00edc\u00ed z\u00e1kon si byl natolik jist\u00fd, \u017ee se ani neobt\u011b\u017eoval novou ob\u00e1lku p\u0159ipodobnit t\u00e9 p\u016fvodn\u00ed.<\/p>\n
V \u010dem se li\u0161ila?<\/p>\n
Zjevn\u00e9 je nap\u0159\u00edklad natr\u017een\u00ed protokolu, ke kter\u00e9mu byla p\u016fvodn\u00ed ob\u00e1lka p\u0159i\u0161ita. D\u00e1le ta p\u016fvodn\u00ed byla v m\u00edst\u011b zape\u010det\u011bn\u00ed ora\u017eena jedn\u00edm raz\u00edtkem, zat\u00edmco nov\u00e1 ob\u00e1lka dv\u011bma, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 z nich nen\u00ed na m\u00edst\u011b toho p\u016fvodn\u00edho. A i p\u016fvodn\u00ed raz\u00edtko m\u011blo jin\u00e9 o\u010d\u00edslov\u00e1n\u00ed ne\u017e ty n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed. Ob\u00e1lky byly ru\u010dn\u011b popsan\u00e9, v p\u00edsmu byly znateln\u00e9 rozd\u00edly.<\/p>\n
Jako obh\u00e1jce maj\u00edc\u00ed osobn\u00ed zku\u0161enost s bezpo\u010dtem krimin\u00e1ln\u00edk\u016f mohu \u0159\u00edct, \u017ee se jednalo o velice amat\u00e9rsk\u00fd pokus o zameten\u00ed stop po poru\u0161en\u00ed z\u00e1kona.<\/p>\n
Setkal jste se u\u017e v minulosti s n\u011b\u010d\u00edm takov\u00fdm?<\/p>\n
Za celou svou kari\u00e9ru ani vzd\u00e1len\u011b zat\u00edm ne, a douf\u00e1m, \u017ee ji\u017e ani nesetk\u00e1m. Tento p\u0159\u00edpad je velkou ostudou cel\u00e9 \u010desk\u00e9 justice. Nejen soudce, kter\u00fd si ze soudn\u00edho spisu ud\u011blal trhac\u00ed kalend\u00e1\u0159, ale i veden\u00ed M\u011bstsk\u00e9ho soudu v\u00a0Praze. To se naprosto okat\u011b sna\u017eilo celou v\u011bc zam\u00e9st pod koberec. <\/p>\n
Jak veden\u00ed soudu na podn\u011bt reagovalo?<\/p>\n
Rozpor mezi protokolem a usnesen\u00edm od\u016fvodnilo tak, \u017ee v r\u00e1mci p\u0159\u00edpravy neve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho zased\u00e1n\u00ed soudce zpravodaj Alexander Sotol\u00e1\u0159 vyhotovil koncept rozhodnut\u00ed a ten rozeslal ostatn\u00edm \u010dlen\u016fm sen\u00e1tu. Ji\u017e sama skute\u010dnost, \u017ee m\u00e1 soudce rozhodnut\u00ed p\u0159ipraven\u00e9 je\u0161t\u011b p\u0159ed zah\u00e1jen\u00edm jedn\u00e1n\u00ed, ba toto rozhodnut\u00ed rozes\u00edl\u00e1 zb\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00edm soudc\u016fm ke schv\u00e1len\u00ed, je \u0161okuj\u00edc\u00ed. Z\u00a0vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed soudu pak tak\u00e9 vypl\u00fdv\u00e1, \u017ee soudci toto pochyben\u00ed svalili na protokoluj\u00edc\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ednici, kdy\u017e uvedli, \u017ee tato z\u00a0nepochopiteln\u00fdch d\u016fvod\u016f zaprotokolovala opak vyhl\u00e1\u0161en\u00e9ho rozhodnut\u00ed.<\/p>\n
P\u0159ijde v\u00e1m to uv\u011b\u0159iteln\u00e9?<\/p>\n
Pokl\u00e1d\u00e1m to za \u00fa\u010delov\u00e9 vysv\u011btlen\u00ed. Nedok\u00e1\u017eu si p\u0159edstavit, co by zku\u0161enou protokoluj\u00edc\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ednici vedlo k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee by se takto citeln\u011b upsala. Logi\u010dt\u011bj\u0161\u00ed se mi jev\u00ed ta varianta, \u017ee si soudce zru\u0161uj\u00edc\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed skute\u010dn\u011b p\u0159edem p\u0159ipravil, nicm\u00e9n\u011b p\u0159i neve\u0159ejn\u00e9m zased\u00e1n\u00ed sen\u00e1t n\u00e1sledn\u011b rozhodl opa\u010dn\u011b. A tak to bylo i spr\u00e1vn\u011b zaprotokolov\u00e1no. Soudce nicm\u00e9n\u011b tuto zm\u011bnu opomn\u011bl propsat do p\u0159edp\u0159ipraven\u00e9ho rozhodnut\u00ed, co\u017e vedlo k\u00a0onomu rozporu. Jedn\u00e1 se ale o mou ni\u010d\u00edm nepodlo\u017eenou domn\u011bnku, kter\u00e1 je v\u0161ak rozhodn\u011b logi\u010dt\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e ofici\u00e1ln\u00ed verze soudu.<\/p>\n
\u201eZa nerespektov\u00e1n\u00ed postupu p\u0159edepsan\u00e9ho trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00e1dem p\u0159i nakl\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed s ob\u00e1lkou protokolu o hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed ze dne 23. 10. 2024 (\u2026) byl posti\u017een dne 24. 3. 2025, dosud k\u00e1rn\u011b bez\u00fahonn\u00fd p\u0159edseda sen\u00e1tu JUDr. Richard Petr\u00e1sek, v\u00fdtkou. Pod\u00edl JUDr. Sotol\u00e1\u0159e na tomto pochyben\u00ed nebyl zji\u0161t\u011bn.\u201c<\/p>\n
Kate\u0159ina Eli\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1, mluv\u010d\u00ed M\u011bstsk\u00e9ho soudu v Praze<\/p>\n
Obr\u00e1tili jste se i na st\u00e1tn\u00ed zastupitelstv\u00ed, s jak\u00fdm v\u00fdsledkem? <\/p>\n
Pra\u017esk\u00e9 st\u00e1tn\u00ed zastupitelstv\u00ed se odm\u00edtlo na\u0161\u00edm trestn\u00edm ozn\u00e1men\u00edm na podez\u0159en\u00ed ze sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00ed trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu zneu\u017eit\u00ed pravomoci \u00fa\u0159edn\u00ed osoby ze strany soudce zab\u00fdvat. V\u011bc tak p\u0159edstavuje bezprecedentn\u00ed v\u00fdsm\u011bch pr\u00e1vu a z\u00e1konu ze strany justice.<\/p>\n
To ponech\u00e1m na rozhodnut\u00ed klientky. Dle m\u00e9ho osobn\u00edho n\u00e1zoru jsou pochybnosti o nezaujatosti a nestrannosti soudc\u016f Sotol\u00e1\u0159e a Petr\u00e1ska tak zjevn\u00e9, \u017ee by v\u00a0d\u016fsledku profesn\u00ed cti soudce m\u011bli podjatost vyhl\u00e1sit i bez n\u00e1mitky obvin\u011bn\u00e9. Na druhou stranu vzhledem k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud s\u00e1m spr\u00e1vn\u011b uvedl, \u017ee v\u00a0nov\u00e9m rozhodnut\u00ed ji\u017e nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt rozhodnuto v\u00a0neprosp\u011bch obvin\u011bn\u00e9, je mo\u017en\u00e1 na m\u00edst\u011b nechat soudce vyp\u00edt kalich ho\u0159kosti a\u017e do dna.<\/p>\n
Co \u0159\u00edk\u00e1te na to, \u017ee soudce Sotol\u00e1\u0159 u\u017e v minulosti \u010delil kv\u016fli nez\u00e1konn\u00e9mu zach\u00e1zen\u00ed se spisem k\u00e1rn\u00e9mu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed? <\/p>\n
Vypov\u00edd\u00e1 to o tom, \u017ee dan\u00e9mu soudci manipulace se spisem nejsou ciz\u00ed. To ve spojen\u00ed s\u00a0t\u00edm, \u017ee doktor Sotol\u00e1\u0159 byl v\u00a0t\u00e9to v\u011bci soudcem zpravodajem a m\u011bl ji\u017e p\u0159ed jedn\u00e1n\u00edm rozhodnut\u00ed p\u0159ipraveno, posiluje podez\u0159en\u00ed o pochyben\u00ed na jeho stran\u011b. Toto pochyben\u00ed ale zp\u011btn\u011b p\u0159ezkoumat nelze, proto\u017ee manipulaci s\u00a0ob\u00e1lkou vzal na sebe doktor Petr\u00e1sek. Faktem z\u016fst\u00e1v\u00e1, \u017ee pokud by se u doktora Sotol\u00e1\u0159e po jeho p\u0159edchoz\u00edm k\u00e1rn\u00e9m potrest\u00e1n\u00ed potvrdila op\u011btovn\u00e1 nez\u00e1konn\u00e1 manipulace se spisem, re\u00e1ln\u011b by mu hrozil postih v\u00a0podob\u011b odvol\u00e1n\u00ed z\u00a0funkce soudce.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u00dasp\u011b\u0161n\u00e1 st\u00ed\u017enost ministra spravedlnosti Jeron\u00fdma Tejce k Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edmu soudu odkryla pom\u011bry na trestn\u00edm \u00faseku pra\u017esk\u00e9ho m\u011bstsk\u00e9ho soudu. V…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":43130,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[43,42,41,40,13535,1488,3091,16019,16020,1967,16820,16821,1118],"class_list":{"0":"post-43129","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-cesko","8":"tag-ceska-republika","9":"tag-cesko","10":"tag-czech-republic","11":"tag-czechia","12":"tag-manipulace","13":"tag-mestsky-soud-v-praze","14":"tag-nejvyssi-soud","15":"tag-obalka","16":"tag-protokol-o-hlasovani","17":"tag-rozhovor","18":"tag-sotolar","19":"tag-spis","20":"tag-trestni-rizeni"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@cz\/116332690476751006","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43129"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43129\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/43130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}