{"id":69274,"date":"2026-04-28T14:46:14","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T14:46:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/69274\/"},"modified":"2026-04-28T14:46:14","modified_gmt":"2026-04-28T14:46:14","slug":"pravnici-otocili-posudek-agrofert-kvuli-tomu-nemusi-vracet-miliardy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/69274\/","title":{"rendered":"Pr\u00e1vn\u00edci oto\u010dili posudek. Agrofert kv\u016fli tomu nemus\u00ed vracet miliardy"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dva posudky, stejn\u00fd zadavatel\u00a0\u2013 St\u00e1tn\u00ed zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd interven\u010dn\u00ed fond (SZIF)\u00a0\u2013, stejn\u00fd zhotovitel\u00a0\u2013 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 Portos. Dokonce, jak ukazuje p\u00e1tr\u00e1n\u00ed Seznam Zpr\u00e1v, i\u00a0stejn\u00fd n\u00e1zev a\u00a0zad\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n

A p\u0159ece\u00a0\u2013 s\u00a0rozestupem osmi\u00a0m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f\u00a0\u2013 dosp\u011bli auto\u0159i k\u00a0opa\u010dn\u00e9mu z\u00e1v\u011bru. <\/p>\n

Za vl\u00e1dy Petra Fialy (ODS) pr\u00e1vn\u00edci z\u00a0Portosu konstatovali, \u017ee zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond fakticky vyplatil miliardov\u00fd bal\u00edk takzvan\u00fdch n\u00e1rokov\u00fdch dotac\u00ed Agrofertu v\u00a0kolizi se z\u00e1konem, a\u00a0nyn\u00ed v\u00a0\u00e9\u0159e premi\u00e9ra Andreje Babi\u0161e (ANO) dosp\u011bli naopak k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee na tento typ dotac\u00ed se z\u00e1kon nevztahoval. <\/p>\n

Krom\u011b v\u00fdsledku je mezi posudky je\u0161t\u011b dal\u0161\u00ed rozd\u00edl: Zat\u00edmco ten prvn\u00ed zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond dodnes taj\u00ed,<\/a> druh\u00fd naopak minul\u00fd t\u00fdden zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond zve\u0159ejnil<\/a>, aby t\u00edm podlo\u017eil rozhodnut\u00ed, \u017ee miliardy vyplacen\u00e9 za p\u0159edchoz\u00ed Babi\u0161ovy vl\u00e1dy v\u00a0n\u00e1rokov\u00fdch dotac\u00edch po Agrofertu vym\u00e1hat nebude. <\/p>\n

Stejn\u00e9 zad\u00e1n\u00ed, opa\u010dn\u00fd z\u00e1v\u011br<\/p>\n

A\u010dkoli o\u00a0p\u016fvodn\u00edm posudku i\u00a0Ministerstvo zem\u011bd\u011blstv\u00ed tvrdilo, \u017ee jej nem\u00e1, a\u00a0Andrej Babi\u0161 prohla\u0161oval, \u017ee neexistuje, Seznam Zpr\u00e1vy jej z\u00edskaly. Jeho z\u00e1v\u011bry stoj\u00ed na s\u00e9rii pravomocn\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed soud\u016f, na kter\u00e1 u\u017e loni\u00a0report\u00e9\u0159i upozornili<\/a>. A\u00a0nijak nep\u0159ipou\u0161t\u00ed jin\u00fd v\u00fdklad, ne\u017e \u017ee z\u00e1kon zakazuj\u00edc\u00ed st\u0159et z\u00e1jm\u016f dopad\u00e1 i\u00a0na n\u00e1rokov\u00e9 dotace.<\/p>\n

\u201eZ od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed nevypl\u00fdv\u00e1 nic, z\u00a0\u010deho by bylo mo\u017en\u00e9 d\u016fvodn\u011b dovozovat, \u017ee by se ustanoven\u00ed z\u00e1kona o\u00a0st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f nem\u011blo vztahovat na poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1rokov\u00fdch dotac\u00ed,\u201c p\u00ed\u0161e se v\u00a0t\u00e9to anal\u00fdze.<\/p>\n

\u201eJin\u00fdmi slovy\u00a0\u2013 p\u0159edm\u011btn\u00e1 ustanoven\u00ed spr\u00e1vn\u00edch soud\u016f neposkytuj\u00ed argumenta\u010dn\u00ed z\u00e1klad k\u00a0u\u010din\u011bn\u00ed z\u00e1v\u011bru, \u017ee ustanoven\u00ed se na poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1rokov\u00fdch dotac\u00ed nevztahuje. Je tedy t\u0159eba v\u00a0sou\u010dasnosti vych\u00e1zet z\u00a0p\u0159edpokladu, \u017ee ustanoven\u00ed dopad\u00e1 na poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1rokov\u00fdch i\u00a0nen\u00e1rokov\u00fdch dotac\u00ed zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9ho fondu,\u201c uvedli jednozna\u010dn\u011b experti z\u00a0Portosu.<\/p>\n

Z\u00e1kon proti st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f zakazuje v\u0161echny dotace\u010cesk\u00fd z\u00e1kon proti st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f mezi typy dotac\u00ed ned\u011bl\u00e1 rozd\u00edly. Firm\u00e1m \u010dlen\u016f vl\u00e1dy zakazuje pob\u00edrat dotace zcela obecn\u011b.Zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond pod veden\u00edm nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00edho ministra zem\u011bd\u011blstv\u00ed Martina \u0160ebesty\u00e1na (za SPD) p\u0159ed lety miliardy Agrofertu vyplatil s od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00edm, \u017ee se na n\u011bj z\u00e1kon o st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f v\u016fbec nevztahuje. Rozsudky M\u011bstsk\u00e9ho soudu v\u00a0Praze i\u00a0Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho spr\u00e1vn\u00edho soudu pak ale konstatovaly, \u017ee z\u00e1kon o\u00a0st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f naopak zcela jasn\u011b na zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond dopad\u00e1. To potvrdil i \u00dastavn\u00ed soud.Soudy ov\u0161em dostaly mo\u017enost rozhodnout jen v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpadech takzvan\u00fdch nen\u00e1rokov\u00fdch dotac\u00ed, tedy t\u011bch, kter\u00e9 Agrofert z\u00edskal na konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed projekty. Audit Evropsk\u00e9 komise, kter\u00fd zkoumal st\u0159et z\u00e1jm\u016f Andreje Babi\u0161e (vedl vl\u00e1du v letech 2017\u20132021), se zam\u011b\u0159il jen na tyto dotace. Po tlaku EU je tak zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond za\u010dal vym\u00e1hat zp\u011bt a\u00a0holding se to n\u00e1sledn\u011b sna\u017eil u\u00a0soudu zvr\u00e1tit. P\u0159\u00edmo v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpadech\u00a0n\u00e1rokov\u00fdch dotac\u00ed, kter\u00e9 st\u00e1t vypl\u00e1c\u00ed v\u0161em, co obd\u011bl\u00e1vaj\u00ed p\u016fdu \u010di chovaj\u00ed dobytek, soudci dodnes rozhodnout nemohli, proto\u017ee je v\u016fbec nedostali na st\u016fl. Nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed fondu pen\u00edze nevym\u00e1hat znamen\u00e1, \u017ee soudci o n\u00e1rokov\u00fdch dotac\u00edch ani rozhodovat nebudou.<\/p>\n

Ministr zem\u011bd\u011blstv\u00ed Fialovy vl\u00e1dy Marek V\u00fdborn\u00fd (KDU-\u010cSL) pak pr\u00e1v\u011b touto anal\u00fdzou podlo\u017eil dva dny p\u0159ed volbami ozn\u00e1men\u00ed, \u017ee se za\u010dalo vym\u00e1hat po Agrofertu zhruba sedm\u00a0miliard korun vyplacen\u00fdch neopr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u011b na dotac\u00edch, z\u00a0toho zhruba \u010dty\u0159i\u00a0miliardy podle V\u00fdborn\u00e9ho tvo\u0159\u00ed n\u00e1rokov\u00e9 dotace.<\/p>\n

Portos: Aplikovali jsme dal\u0161\u00ed metody<\/p>\n

Jak se ale uk\u00e1zalo po volb\u00e1ch a\u00a0Babi\u0161ov\u011b n\u00e1vratu k\u00a0moci, zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond neza\u010dal vym\u00e1hat ani korunu. S\u00a0t\u00edm, \u017ee p\u016fvodn\u00ed anal\u00fdza nesta\u010d\u00ed. <\/p>\n

A\u00a0nyn\u00ed SZIF p\u0159i\u0161el s\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed anal\u00fdzou Portosu, v\u00a0n\u00ed\u017e se p\u00ed\u0161e, \u017ee ta prvn\u00ed byla m\u00e1lo komplexn\u00ed, proto\u017ee \u201ena pokyn klienta\u201c pro posouzen\u00ed problematiky zvolila jen jednu nedostate\u010dnou metodu\u00a0\u2013 jazykov\u00fd v\u00fdklad z\u00e1kona. <\/p>\n

O\u00a0takov\u00e9m pokynu zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00e9ho fondu jako zadavatele se ale v\u00a0zad\u00e1n\u00ed prvn\u00ed anal\u00fdzy nic nep\u00ed\u0161e. \u201eSZIF se obr\u00e1til na spole\u010dnost Portos s\u00a0\u017e\u00e1dost\u00ed o\u00a0posouzen\u00ed pou\u017eitelnosti ustanoven\u00ed z\u00e1kona o\u00a0st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f na poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1rokov\u00fdch dotac\u00ed,\u201c uv\u00e1d\u00ed listina bez toho, \u017ee by snad zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond cht\u011bl posuzov\u00e1n\u00ed n\u011bjak metodologicky omezit. <\/p>\n

V\u00a0cel\u00e9m dal\u0161\u00edm textu nav\u00edc nen\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 varov\u00e1n\u00ed, \u017ee by jeho z\u00e1v\u011bry st\u00e1ly na nedostate\u010dn\u011b \u0161irok\u00e9m posouzen\u00ed, ne\u0161lo je tak aplikovat a\u00a0bylo t\u0159eba n\u011bjak\u00e9 dal\u0161\u00ed analyzov\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n

\u201eNapsali zcela jednozna\u010dn\u011b, \u017ee na z\u00e1klad\u011b rozsudk\u016f soud\u016f je t\u0159eba vym\u00e1hat,\u201c \u0159ekl report\u00e9r\u016fm o\u00a0prvn\u00edm posudku exministr V\u00fdborn\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 s\u00a0vazbou na Babi\u0161eSpoluzakladatel advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e Portos (d\u0159\u00edve C\u00edsa\u0159, \u010ce\u0161ka, Smutn\u00fd) Pavel Smutn\u00fd m\u011bl dlouhodob\u011b velmi bl\u00edzko k\u00a0Andreji Babi\u0161ovi<\/a>.Kancel\u00e1\u0159 C\u00edsa\u0159, \u010ce\u0161ka, Smutn\u00fd za p\u0159edchoz\u00ed vl\u00e1dy ANO z\u00edsk\u00e1vala pr\u00e1vn\u00ed zak\u00e1zky za des\u00edtky milion\u016f od instituc\u00ed ovl\u00e1dan\u00fdch ANO. Smutn\u00fd souvislost odm\u00edtal.Stejn\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 je podeps\u00e1na pod s\u00e9ri\u00ed posudk\u016f pro dal\u0161\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 instituce, kter\u00e9 v minulosti tvrdily, \u017ee st\u0159et z\u00e1jm\u016f Andreje Babi\u0161e nen\u00ed probl\u00e9m a st\u00e1t Agrofertu ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 miliardy m\u016f\u017ee vypl\u00e1cet. \u0160lo i o st\u00e1tn\u00ed firmu \u010cepro, Lesy \u010cR nebo Podp\u016frn\u00fd a garan\u010dn\u00ed rolnick\u00fd a lesnick\u00fd fond (PGRLF).<\/p>\n

P\u0159esto nyn\u00ed advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 Portos, s\u00a0n\u00ed\u017e v\u00a0lednu zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond uzav\u0159el novou r\u00e1mcovou smlouvu na osm\u00a0milion\u016f, nasadila dal\u0161\u00ed metody.<\/p>\n

Nap\u0159\u00edklad \u201ehistorickou metodou\u201c zkoumala t\u0159eba to, co si mysleli p\u0159edkladatel\u00e9 z\u00e1kona o\u00a0st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f. Do\u0161la k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee sice poslanci schv\u00e1lili z\u00e1kaz v\u0161ech dotac\u00ed pro firmy \u010dlen\u016f vl\u00e1dy, ale pr\u00fd cht\u011bli zak\u00e1zat jen ty nen\u00e1rokov\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed anal\u00fdza Portosu ov\u0161em v\u011bnovala str\u00e1nku a\u00a0p\u016fl tomu, aby zd\u016fvodnila, pro\u010d \u010dl\u00e1nek Seznam Zpr\u00e1v nen\u00ed relevantn\u00ed a\u00a0Falt\u00fdnkovo prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed ve Sn\u011bmovn\u011b nen\u00ed d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9. <\/p>\n

Pr\u00e1vn\u00ed experti: \u00fa\u010delov\u00e1 anal\u00fdza<\/p>\n

Seznam Zpr\u00e1vy nechaly druhou anal\u00fdzu posoudit pr\u00e1vn\u00edm t\u00fdmem protikorup\u010dn\u00ed organizace Transparency International (TI), kter\u00e1 se st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f Andreje Babi\u0161e dlouhodob\u011b v\u011bnuje. <\/p>\n

\u201eJedn\u00e1 se o\u00a0zjevn\u011b \u00fa\u010delov\u00fd text, kter\u00fd do m\u00edsty objektivn\u00ed anal\u00fdzy p\u0159in\u00e1\u0161\u00ed vlastn\u00ed, ni\u010d\u00edm nepodlo\u017een\u00e9 z\u00e1v\u011bry sm\u011b\u0159uj\u00edc\u00ed k\u00a0mo\u017enosti dotace po spole\u010dnostech z\u00a0holdingu Agrofert nevym\u00e1hat. Nam\u00edsto detailn\u00edho rozboru relevantn\u00edch rozhodnut\u00ed se vrac\u00ed k\u00a0obecn\u00fdm princip\u016fm, kter\u00e9 zcela \u00fa\u010delov\u011b oh\u00fdb\u00e1 ve prosp\u011bch \u017eadatel\u016f o\u00a0dotace, a\u00a0t\u00edm p\u00e1dem na \u00fakor st\u00e1tn\u00edho rozpo\u010dtu a\u00a0da\u0148ov\u00fdch poplatn\u00edk\u016f,\u201c uvedl za TI pr\u00e1vn\u00edk Kry\u0161tof Dole\u017eal.<\/p>\n

Stejn\u00fd argument jako bleskov\u00e1 anal\u00fdza z\u00a0pera souputn\u00edka ministra<\/p>\n

Nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed anal\u00fdza Portosu je pak v\u00a0konfliktu nejen s\u00a0p\u016fvodn\u00edm rozborem stejn\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e, ale i\u00a0s t\u00edm, pod \u010d\u00edm je\u00a0\u2013 z\u00a0doby, kdy byl \u0159editelem SZIF\u00a0\u2013 podeps\u00e1n nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ministr zem\u011bd\u011blstv\u00ed Martin \u0160ebesty\u00e1n.<\/p>\n

V anal\u00fdze pro vl\u00e1du Petra Fialy z\u00a0roku 2022\u00a0se toti\u017e rovn\u011b\u017e hovo\u0159\u00ed o\u00a0tom, \u017ee pakli\u017ee fond p\u0159ipust\u00ed, \u017ee se na n\u011bj z\u00e1kon o\u00a0st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f vztahuje, bude to m\u00edt jasn\u00fd dopad na v\u0161echny jeho dotace.<\/p>\n

Foto: AK Portos<\/p>\n

Z\u00e1v\u011br druh\u00e9 anal\u00fdzy advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e Portos.<\/p>\n

A kdy\u017e \u0160ebesty\u00e1na na za\u010d\u00e1tku roku 2023\u00a0ve funkci \u0159editele fondu nahradil jeho nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed \u0161\u00e9f Petr Dlouh\u00fd, v\u00a0rozhovoru pro Seznam Zpr\u00e1vy Agrofert varoval<\/a>, \u017ee pokud se bude soudit o\u00a0stamiliony, jejich\u017e vr\u00e1cen\u00ed \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1 Evropsk\u00e1 unie, otev\u0159e to Pando\u0159inu sk\u0159\u00ed\u0148ku, proto\u017ee soudy v\u00a0rozsudc\u00edch mohou konstatovat, \u017ee se mus\u00ed vr\u00e1tit v\u0161echny dotace.<\/p>\n

Opozi\u010dn\u00ed Pir\u00e1ti u\u017e kv\u016fli nevym\u00e1h\u00e1n\u00ed miliardov\u00fdch dotac\u00ed podali trestn\u00ed ozn\u00e1men\u00ed. A\u00a0v jeho roz\u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed c\u00edl\u00ed i\u00a0na posudek Portosu.<\/p>\n

\u201eZem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond a\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ady sleduj\u00ed z\u00e1jmy Agrofertu a\u00a0premi\u00e9ra Babi\u0161e, a\u00a0nikoli b\u011b\u017en\u00fdch lid\u00ed. Analytick\u00fd t\u00fdm Pir\u00e1t\u016f proto odeslal vrchn\u00edmu st\u00e1tn\u00edmu zastupitelstv\u00ed i\u00a0evropsk\u00e9mu \u017ealobci aktualizovan\u00e9 podklady s\u00a0podrobn\u00fdm rozborem zmanipulovan\u00fdch posudk\u016f, kter\u00e9 pop\u00edraj\u00ed dokonce i\u00a0existuj\u00edc\u00ed pravomocn\u00e9 rozsudky v\u00a0ot\u00e1zce st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016f,\u201c uvedla poslankyn\u011b Olga Richterov\u00e1.<\/p>\n

Je\u0161t\u011b jeden posudek. Ale utajen\u00fd<\/p>\n

Rozhodnut\u00ed nevym\u00e1hat dotace po Agrofertu stav\u00ed Portos je\u0161t\u011b na dal\u0161\u00edm posudku\u00a0\u2013 od advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e Pelik\u00e1n, Krofta, Kohoutek. Smlouvu na n\u011bj podepsal jednatel a\u00a0politick\u00fd lobbista Mat\u011bj V\u00e1cha. Tento posudek v\u0161ak fond dosud nezve\u0159ejnil. Argumentuje t\u00edm, \u017ee k\u00a0tomu pot\u0159ebuje souhlas advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159e. Ta za pr\u00e1ci dostala z\u00a0ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch pen\u011bz 700\u00a0tis\u00edc korun.<\/p>\n

Nov\u00fd z\u00e1v\u011br, kter\u00fd samotn\u00e1 anal\u00fdza Portosu u\u010dinila na 28\u00a0str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch, nehovo\u0159\u00ed o\u00a0tom, \u017ee by byl stoprocentn\u00ed. Portos pracuje s\u00a0formulac\u00ed, \u017ee \u201ev\u00fdklad nasv\u011bd\u010duje tomu\u201c, \u017ee z\u00e1kaz se vztahuje jen na nen\u00e1rokov\u00e9 dotace. S\u00a0jistotou by to mohly rozhodnout jen soudy. K\u00a0t\u011bm ale rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed nedoputuje. To by se stalo jen v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b, \u017ee by zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd fond naopak za\u010dal dotace vym\u00e1hat a\u00a0Agrofert by se u\u00a0soudu br\u00e1nil.<\/p>\n

\u201eSZIF proto nep\u0159istoup\u00ed ke zp\u011btn\u00e9mu vym\u00e1h\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1rokov\u00fdch evropsk\u00fdch dotac\u00ed poskytnut\u00fdch v\u00a0letech 2017\u20132021,\u201c nehodl\u00e1 to ale u\u010dinit.<\/p>\n

Investigativn\u00ed s\u00e9rie o\u00a0Babi\u0161ov\u011b st\u0159etu z\u00e1jm\u016fFoto: Michal Turek, Seznam Zpr\u00e1vy<\/p>\n

Andrej Babi\u0161 a\u00a0jeho st\u0159et z\u00e1jm\u016f.<\/p>\n

Co skr\u00fdv\u00e1 statut Babi\u0161ova fondu:<\/p>\n

Jak st\u00e1t (ne)vym\u00e1h\u00e1 dotace po Agrofertu:<\/p>\n

Kdo (ne)\u0159e\u0161\u00ed st\u0159et Andreje Babi\u0161e:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Dva posudky, stejn\u00fd zadavatel\u00a0\u2013 St\u00e1tn\u00ed zem\u011bd\u011blsk\u00fd interven\u010dn\u00ed fond (SZIF)\u00a0\u2013, stejn\u00fd zhotovitel\u00a0\u2013 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed kancel\u00e1\u0159 Portos. Dokonce, jak ukazuje p\u00e1tr\u00e1n\u00ed…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":62046,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[1892,266,17,21,551,16,1920,18,19,22,20],"class_list":{"0":"post-69274","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-zpravy","8":"tag-agrofert","9":"tag-andrej-babis","10":"tag-headlines","11":"tag-hlavni-udalosti","12":"tag-ministerstvo-zemedelstvi-mze","13":"tag-news","14":"tag-stret-zajmu","15":"tag-top-news","16":"tag-top-stories","17":"tag-udalosti-dne","18":"tag-zpravy"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@cz\/116482879565657545","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69274\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/62046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}