{"id":69732,"date":"2026-04-28T23:37:09","date_gmt":"2026-04-28T23:37:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/69732\/"},"modified":"2026-04-28T23:37:09","modified_gmt":"2026-04-28T23:37:09","slug":"na-medialnim-vyboru-chybelo-nekolik-vladnich-poslancu-a-opozice-zacala-uradovat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/69732\/","title":{"rendered":"Na medi\u00e1ln\u00edm v\u00fdboru chyb\u011blo n\u011bkolik vl\u00e1dn\u00edch poslanc\u016f. A opozice za\u010dala \u00fa\u0159adovat"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n\tKauza sah\u00e1 do roku 2020, kdy Rada \u010cT odvolala JUDr. Ji\u0159\u00edho Str\u00e1nsk\u00e9ho a dal\u0161\u00ed \u010dleny sv\u00e9 Dozor\u010d\u00ed komise. Soudy pozd\u011bji rozhodnut\u00ed ozna\u010dily za nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 a Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud n\u00e1sledn\u011b potvrdil, \u017ee \u010cesk\u00e1 televize mus\u00ed Str\u00e1nsk\u00e9mu zaplatit t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 600 tis\u00edc korun s p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161enstv\u00edm.<\/p>\n


\n\tV\u00fdbor pro medi\u00e1ln\u00ed z\u00e1le\u017eitosti jednal v \u00fater\u00fd 28. dubna od 14 hodin v prostor\u00e1ch \u010cesk\u00e9ho rozhlasu na pra\u017esk\u00fdch Vinohradech. Podle pozv\u00e1nky na 8. sch\u016fzi m\u011bl b\u00fdt na programu mimo jin\u00e9 sen\u00e1tn\u00ed n\u00e1vrh \u00fastavn\u00edho z\u00e1kona t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se pravomoci Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho kontroln\u00edho \u00fa\u0159adu, informace o zahrani\u010dn\u00edm vys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9ho rozhlasu, bod r\u016fzn\u00e9 a n\u00e1vrh term\u00ednu dal\u0161\u00ed sch\u016fze.<\/p>\n


\n\t\"\"<\/p>\n


\n\tV\u00fdzva sm\u011brem k radn\u00edm \u010cesk\u00e9 televize v p\u016fvodn\u00edm n\u00e1vrhu po\u0159adu uvedena nebyla. Podle informac\u00ed z jedn\u00e1n\u00ed ji opozice prosadila a\u017e b\u011bhem sch\u016fze, kdy\u017e byla koalice ve v\u00fdboru oslaben\u00e1 nep\u0159\u00edtomnost\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti sv\u00fdch poslanc\u016f.<\/p>\n


\n\tZ jedn\u00e1n\u00ed se konkr\u00e9tn\u011b omluvili t\u0159i koali\u010dn\u00ed poslanci: Martin Kolovratn\u00edk, Robert Str\u017e\u00ednek z ANO a Jaroslav Foldyna z SPD. D\u00edky tomu m\u011bla opozice ve v\u00fdboru v\u011bt\u0161inu a usnesen\u00ed pro\u0161lo na n\u00e1vrh pir\u00e1tsk\u00e9 poslankyn\u011b Andrey Hoffmannov\u00e9.<\/p>\n


\n\tP\u0159edsedou v\u00fdboru pro medi\u00e1ln\u00ed z\u00e1le\u017eitosti je Franti\u0161ek Tal\u00ed\u0159 z KDU-\u010cSL, kter\u00fd se o v\u00edkendu stal tak\u00e9 m\u00edstop\u0159edsedou lidovc\u016f.<\/p>\n


\n\tTen sou\u010dasn\u011b v bod\u011b R\u016fzn\u00e9 usp\u011bl s n\u00e1vrhem usnesen\u00ed, kter\u00e9 vyz\u00fdvalo ministra Klemp\u00ed\u0159e, aby st\u00e1hl n\u00e1vrh z\u00e1kona o ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edch m\u00e9di\u00edch.<\/p>\n

\n\t<\/p>\n


\n\tProti postupu Hoffmannov\u00e9 se b\u011bhem jedn\u00e1n\u00ed ohradil poslanec ANO Tom\u00e1\u0161 Helebrant. Vyzval ji, aby n\u00e1vrh st\u00e1hla, proto\u017ee podle n\u011bj ostatn\u00edm \u010dlen\u016fm v\u00fdboru up\u0159ela mo\u017enost se na debatu p\u0159ipravit. N\u00e1vrh byl toti\u017e za\u0159azen a\u017e do bodu r\u016fzn\u00e9.<\/p>\n


\n\tKritiku doplnil tak\u00e9 poslanec ANO Ond\u0159ej Babka, kter\u00fd ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u011b navrhoval, aby v\u00fdbor sch\u016fzi p\u0159eru\u0161il do 14. kv\u011btna, kdy se m\u00e1 znovu sej\u00edt. Koali\u010dn\u00ed poslanci podle n\u011bj svolaj\u00ed dal\u0161\u00ed sch\u016fzi v\u00fdboru a dne\u0161n\u00ed usnesen\u00ed revokuj\u00ed.<\/p>\n


\n\tT\u00e9ma se znovu otev\u0159elo i kv\u016fli volb\u011b \u010dlen\u016f Rady \u010cesk\u00e9 televize. O m\u00edsta v rad\u011b se toti\u017e uch\u00e1zej\u00ed tak\u00e9 n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed b\u00fdval\u00ed radn\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed v minulosti hlasovali pro sporn\u00e9 odvol\u00e1n\u00ed \u010dlen\u016f Dozor\u010d\u00ed komise.<\/p>\n


\n\tJde o Pavla Matochu, tehdej\u0161\u00edho p\u0159edsedu Rady \u010cT, Romana Brad\u00e1\u010de, Ji\u0159\u00edho \u0160l\u00e9gra a Lubo\u0161e Xavera Vesel\u00e9ho. Jejich kandidatura tak do debaty vrac\u00ed ot\u00e1zku, zda maj\u00ed lid\u00e9 spojen\u00ed s rozhodnut\u00edm, kter\u00e9 soudy pozd\u011bji zru\u0161ily jako nez\u00e1konn\u00e9, znovu zasednout v kontroln\u00edm org\u00e1nu ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed televize.<\/p>\n


\n\t\u010ctve\u0159ice zat\u00edm nen\u00ed znovu zvolena. Sn\u011bmovn\u00ed medi\u00e1ln\u00ed v\u00fdbor ji poslal do u\u017e\u0161\u00edho v\u00fdb\u011bru kandid\u00e1t\u016f, kone\u010dn\u00e9 rozhodnut\u00ed ale n\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed cel\u00e9 Poslaneck\u00e9 sn\u011bmovn\u011b.<\/p>\n


\n\tPo \u010d\u00e1sti tehdej\u0161\u00edch radn\u00edch by podle n\u011bkter\u00fdch politik\u016f m\u011bla \u010cesk\u00e1 televize \u0161kodu vym\u00e1hat. V debat\u011b se zmi\u0148uje tak\u00e9 Vladimir Karmaz\u00edn, kter\u00fd pat\u0159il mezi tehdy hlasuj\u00edc\u00ed radn\u00ed. Poslaneck\u00e1 sn\u011bmovna ho v b\u0159eznu zvolila zp\u011bt do Rady \u010cesk\u00e9 televize.<\/p>\n


\n\tMedi\u00e1ln\u00ed v\u00fdbor konstatoval, \u017ee \u010cesk\u00e9 televizi vznikla v souvislosti s odvol\u00e1n\u00edm dozor\u010d\u00ed komise \u0161koda a\u017e \u010dty\u0159i miliony korun. \u010cesk\u00e1 televize za\u010dala podle za p\u0159edchoz\u00edho gener\u00e1ln\u00edho \u0159editele Jana Sou\u010dka po radn\u00edch \u0161kodu vym\u00e1hat prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm p\u0159ed\u017ealobn\u00ed v\u00fdzvy.<\/p>\n


\n\tNejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud odm\u00edtl argumentaci \u010cesk\u00e9 televize<\/p>\n


\n\tPr\u00e1vn\u00ed j\u00e1dro p\u0159\u00edpadu se t\u00fdk\u00e1 odpov\u011bdnosti za nez\u00e1konn\u00e9 odvol\u00e1n\u00ed \u010dlena Dozor\u010d\u00ed komise. Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud v \u0159\u00edjnu 2025 rozhodl<\/a> ve sporu mezi JUDr. Ji\u0159\u00edm Str\u00e1nsk\u00fdm a \u010ceskou televiz\u00ed. Dovol\u00e1n\u00ed ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed televize zam\u00edtl a potvrdil jej\u00ed povinnost vyplatit Str\u00e1nsk\u00e9mu n\u00e1hradu \u0161kody.<\/p>\n


\n\tStr\u00e1nsk\u00fd se po zru\u0161en\u00ed sv\u00e9ho odvol\u00e1n\u00ed dom\u00e1hal n\u00e1hrady u\u0161l\u00e9ho zisku, tedy odm\u011bn, kter\u00e9 by za v\u00fdkon funkce obdr\u017eel, kdyby nebyl nez\u00e1konn\u011b odvol\u00e1n. Soudy ni\u017e\u0161\u00edch stup\u0148\u016f mu vyhov\u011bly a ulo\u017eily \u010cesk\u00e9 televizi zaplatit \u010d\u00e1stku 598 129 korun s \u00faroky z prodlen\u00ed.<\/p>\n


\n\t\u010cesk\u00e1 televize v dovol\u00e1n\u00ed nam\u00edtala, \u017ee za \u0161kodu by m\u011bl odpov\u00eddat st\u00e1t. Tvrdila, \u017ee Rada \u010cesk\u00e9 televize je org\u00e1nem st\u00e1tu a jej\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed bylo v\u00fdkonem st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy.<\/p>\n


\n\tNejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud ale tuto argumentaci odm\u00edtl. Dosp\u011bl k z\u00e1v\u011bru, \u017ee Rada \u010cT je org\u00e1nem \u010cesk\u00e9 televize, nikoli org\u00e1nem st\u00e1tu. Podle soudu slou\u017e\u00ed k uplat\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed pr\u00e1va ve\u0159ejnosti na kontrolu a je sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed vnit\u0159n\u00ed organizace \u010cesk\u00e9 televize, p\u0159esto\u017ee jej\u00ed \u010dleny vol\u00ed a odvol\u00e1v\u00e1 Parlament.<\/p>\n


\n\tPole Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu nebylo odvol\u00e1n\u00ed \u010dlena Dozor\u010d\u00ed komise v\u00fdkonem st\u00e1tn\u00ed spr\u00e1vy. Spadalo do kategorie takzvan\u00e9 ostatn\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 spr\u00e1vy, kterou vykon\u00e1v\u00e1 sama \u010cesk\u00e1 televize jako nez\u00e1visl\u00e1 ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00ed instituce.<\/p>\n


\n\tOdpov\u011bdnost za \u0161kodu zp\u016fsobenou takov\u00fdm rozhodnut\u00edm proto podle soudu nenese st\u00e1t, ale p\u0159\u00edmo \u010cesk\u00e1 televize podle ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho z\u00e1kon\u00edku. Rozhodnut\u00ed je pravomocn\u00e9 a televize m\u00e1 vedle samotn\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1stky uhradit tak\u00e9 n\u00e1klady \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed ve v\u0161ech stupn\u00edch.<\/p>\n


\n\tNa tento pr\u00e1vn\u00ed z\u00e1v\u011br nyn\u00ed navazuje zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e1 v\u00fdzva sn\u011bmovn\u00edho medi\u00e1ln\u00edho v\u00fdboru. Ten chce, aby \u0161kodu, kter\u00e1 \u010cesk\u00e9 televizi vznikla, uhradili b\u00fdval\u00ed i sou\u010dasn\u00ed radn\u00ed spojen\u00ed s tehdej\u0161\u00edm rozhodnut\u00edm.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Psali jsme:<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Zdroje:<\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.nsoud.cz\/pro-verejnost-a-media\/tiskove-zpravy\/detail\/nejvyssi-soud-potvrdil-odpovednost-ceske-televize-za-nezakonne-odvolani-clena-dozorci-komise<\/p>\n

L\u00edbil se V\u00e1m tento \u010dl\u00e1nek?<\/p>\n

Nez\u00e1vislost na\u0161\u00ed redakce m\u016f\u017eete podpo\u0159it pen\u011b\u017eit\u00fdm darem v jak\u00e9koliv v\u00fd\u0161i bankovn\u00edm p\u0159evodem na \u00fa\u010det:<\/p>\n

131-981500247\/0100<\/p>\n

QR k\u00f3d obsahuje \u00fadaje k platb\u011b, v\u00fd\u0161i \u010d\u00e1stky si ur\u010dete sami.<\/p>\n

\"QR<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Kauza sah\u00e1 do roku 2020, kdy Rada \u010cT odvolala JUDr. Ji\u0159\u00edho Str\u00e1nsk\u00e9ho a dal\u0161\u00ed \u010dleny sv\u00e9 Dozor\u010d\u00ed…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":69733,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[43,42,41,40,23225,23224,7503,1771],"class_list":{"0":"post-69732","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-cesko","8":"tag-ceska-republika","9":"tag-cesko","10":"tag-czech-republic","11":"tag-czechia","12":"tag-dozori-rada","13":"tag-medialni-vybor","14":"tag-ps","15":"tag-rada-ct"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@cz\/116484967515160828","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69732"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69732\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/69733"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}