{"id":11293,"date":"2026-02-13T01:25:07","date_gmt":"2026-02-13T01:25:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/11293\/"},"modified":"2026-02-13T01:25:07","modified_gmt":"2026-02-13T01:25:07","slug":"global-shipping-industry-stuck-with-green-investments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/11293\/","title":{"rendered":"Global shipping industry stuck with green investments"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Some shipping industry players are shrugging off popular opposition to a global carbon tax on the industry and are forging ahead with billions of dollars in emissions-reducing investments, according to company officials and a Reuters analysis of data.<\/p>\n<p>Europe, Brazil and other nations are demanding that the sector, which is responsible for barely three per cent of the world&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions, go &#8220;green&#8221;. But, in October, the US and Saudi Arabia, the world&#8217;s two largest oil producers, successfully spearheaded efforts to postpone by one year a decision on the International Maritime Organisation&#8217;s proposal of a $380-per-tonne carbon tax.<\/p>\n<p>Some analysts and industry observers initially warned that the absence of such a global framework added complexity to companies&#8217; planning and could cause some to pause their &#8220;green&#8221; investments, but regional regulations and long investment lead times are forcing companies to stay the course, just in case.<\/p>\n<p>Hakan Agnevall &#8211; Chief Executive of Wartsila, told Reuters that a one-year carbon price postponement is unlikely to rattle customers, like his, who generally take a 30-year investment perspective.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not bold to say that regulations will change during those 30 years.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Some shipping industry players are shrugging off popular opposition to a global carbon tax on the industry and&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":11294,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[224],"tags":[2384,8820,8823,71,73,8819,8821,245,2009,1603,8818,8824,62,2002,294,76,8822,8825],"class_list":["post-11293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-maersk","tag-africa","tag-djibouti","tag-environmental-activism","tag-europe","tag-european-union","tag-gabon","tag-international-maritime-organisation","tag-maersk","tag-mena","tag-north-america","tag-oceania","tag-pacific-basin-shipping","tag-saudi-arabia","tag-taxpayer-abuse","tag-united-kingdom","tag-united-states","tag-virtue-signalling","tag-world-shipping-council"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11293"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11293\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}