{"id":67388,"date":"2026-04-24T02:56:36","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T02:56:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/67388\/"},"modified":"2026-04-24T02:56:36","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T02:56:36","slug":"ct-ag-again-seeks-to-get-wind-farm-back-on-track-after-trump-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/67388\/","title":{"rendered":"CT AG again seeks to get wind farm back on track after Trump order"},"content":{"rendered":"

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong<\/a> asked a federal judge on Monday to block the Trump administration\u2019s latest efforts to scuttle work on the nearly completed Revolution Wind farm off the coast of Rhode Island.<\/p>\n

The project was one of five offshore wind farms that were under development until the Department of Interior ordered work halted<\/a> last month due to national security concerns. It\u2019s the second time that the Trump administration had shut down work on Revolution Wind, a 704-megawatt project that is due to begin producing power for the New England electric grid by the end of this year.<\/p>\n

On Friday, Revolution Wind\u2019s developers \u2014 a collaboration between Skyborn Renewables and the Danish energy company \u00d8rsted \u2014 filed a request for a immediate injunction<\/a> against the stop-work order within an ongoing lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.<\/p>\n

A hearing on the developers\u2019 request has been scheduled for Monday, Jan. 12, in front of U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth.<\/p>\n

Both Tong and his counterpart in Rhode Island, Attorney General Peter Neronha, followed up with their own request on Monday which reiterated the developers\u2019 claim that federal intervention risks raising costs for electric customers while upending thousands of local jobs.<\/p>\n

That includes hundreds of workers at the State Pier in New London, which serves as the on-shore staging area for Revolution Wind and a sister project, Sunrise Wind<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cDonald Trump is escalating his lawless and erratic attack on Connecticut ratepayers and workers,\u201d Tong said in a statement Tuesday. \u201cEvery day this project is stalled costs us hundreds of thousands of dollars in inflated energy bills when families are in dire need of relief. Revolution Wind was vetted and approved, and the Trump Administration has yet to disclose a shred of evidence to counter that thorough and careful process.\u201d<\/p>\n

In addition to their request for an injunction, both states on Monday sought to consolidate their lawsuit with the case brought by Revolution Wind\u2019s developers. (The states\u2019 lawsuit, originally filed in federal court in Rhode Island, has already been transferred to Washington, D.C.)<\/p>\n

In a statement responding the injunction request on Tuesday, U.S. Department of the Interior Spokesperson Matt Middleton defended the agency\u2019s actions by citing the costs of offshore wind projects as well as national security concerns.<\/p>\n

\u201cUnder President Trump, this administration is putting America First by safeguarding reliable, affordable energy and defending the safety of the American people,\u201d Middleton said. \u201cWe will not sacrifice national security or economic stability for projects that make no sense for America\u2019s future.\u201d<\/p>\n

In its Dec. 22 announcement<\/a> of the pause on offshore wind projects, the Department of Interior cited the potential for spinning turbines to create a kind of radar interference known as \u201cclutter\u201d that can hamper the military\u2019s ability to identify and track targets nearby.<\/p>\n

The Interior Department initially said that reports detailing the potential for clutter were not classified. However, agency staff did not respond to a subsequent request by the Connecticut Mirror to provide those reports.<\/p>\n

In a legal filing on Monday, attorneys for Interior\u2019s Bureau of of Ocean Energy Management said they were prepared to share relevant classified information with the court in a closed-door meeting.<\/p>\n

Critics of the Trump administration\u2019s actions have said that national security concerns, including potential radar impacts, were extensively vetted during Revolution Wind\u2019s multi-year vetting process.<\/p>\n

Lamberth, the judge who is considering both injunction requests, previously sided with the project\u2019s developers<\/a> by lifting the Trump administration\u2019s earlier stop-work order in September. At the time, Lamberth said the government had failed to provide proper justification for its decision to rescind its prior approvals for Revolution Wind.<\/p>\n

At the time of the initial stop-work order, construction of Revolution Wind was already 80% completed. During the few months work was allowed to resume, construction progressed to around 87% completion, according to the developers\u2019 legal filings.<\/p>\n

The latest pause is costing Revolution Wind roughly $1.4 million a day, according to those filings, and the developers are nearing the end of their contracts with the specially-built vessels needed to mount the massive turbines onto their foundations.<\/p>\n

If they are forced to cancel the project due to delays, Revolution Wind\u2019s developers say they will be saddled with an additional $1 billion in costs on top of their current $5 billion investment.<\/p>\n

If it is completed, Revolution Wind will be supported by power purchase agreements with electric utilities in Connecticut and Rhode Island. Its sister project, Sunrise Wind, is slated to sell its power to customers in New York.<\/p>\n

John Moritz is a reporter for the Connecticut Mirror. Copyright 2026 @ CT Mirror (ctmirror.org).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Connecticut Attorney General William Tong asked a federal judge on Monday to block the Trump administration\u2019s latest efforts…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":67389,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[285],"tags":[22757,4961,22760,2261,13522,184,853,5916,3846,2578,13712,287,6493,2006,22759,22758,3916],"class_list":["post-67388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-orsted","tag-attorney-general","tag-connecticut","tag-courant","tag-court","tag-ct-news","tag-donald-trump","tag-electricity","tag-federal-judge","tag-lawsuit","tag-local-news","tag-max-image-preview","tag-orsted","tag-power","tag-revolution-wind","tag-stop-work-order","tag-william-tong","tag-wind-energy"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@dk\/116457438313971501","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67388\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/67389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/dk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}