{"id":42870,"date":"2026-05-15T10:36:12","date_gmt":"2026-05-15T10:36:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/42870\/"},"modified":"2026-05-15T10:36:12","modified_gmt":"2026-05-15T10:36:12","slug":"predictors-of-informed-energy-policy-support-across-europe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/42870\/","title":{"rendered":"Predictors of informed energy policy support across Europe"},"content":{"rendered":"

Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (IPCC, 2022).<\/p>\n

Dahl, R. A. On Democracy (Yale Univ. Press, 1998).<\/p>\n

Fiorino, D. J. Environmental risk and democratic process: a critical review. Columbia J. Environ. Law 14, 501\u2013548 (1989).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yeganeh, A. J., McCoy, A. P. & Schenk, T. Determinants of climate change policy adoption: a meta-analysis. Urban Clim. 31, 100547 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wong-Parodi, G., Krishnamurti, T., Davis, A., Schwartz, D. & Fischhoff, B. A decision science approach for integrating social science in climate and energy solutions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 563\u2013569 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., Harring, N. & Jagers, S. C. Meta-analyses of fifteen determinants of public opinion about climate change taxes and laws. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 235\u2013240 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Drews, S. & Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M. What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Clim. Policy 16, 855\u2013876 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ejel\u00f6v, E. & Nilsson, A. Individual factors influencing acceptability for environmental policies: a review and research agenda. Sustainability 12, 2404 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., Ballew, M. T., Rosenthal, S. A. & Leiserowitz, A. Identifying the most important predictors of support for climate policy in the United States. Behav. Public Policy 5, 480\u2013502 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Clulow, Z., Ferguson, M., Ashworth, P. & Reiner, D. Comparing public attitudes towards energy technologies in Australia and the UK: the role of political ideology. Glob. Environ. Change 70, 102327 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C. & Leiserowitz, A. Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 462\u2013466 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Syropoulos, S. & Markowitz, E. M. Perceived responsibility to address climate change consistently relates to increased pro-environmental attitudes, behaviors and policy support: evidence across 23 countries. J. Environ. Psychol. 83, 101868 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sev\u00e4, I. & Kulin, J. Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Glob. Environ. Change 59, 102003 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Swim, J. K. & Geiger, N. Policy attributes, perceived impacts, and climate change policy preferences. J. Environ. Psychol. 77, 101673 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ogunbode, C. A. et al. Climate justice beliefs related to climate action and policy support around the world. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 1144\u20131150 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huber, R. A., Wicki, M. L. & Bernauer, T. Public support for environmental policy depends on beliefs concerning effectiveness, intrusiveness, and fairness. Environ. Polit. 29, 649\u2013673 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Thaller, A. et al. When perceived fairness and acceptance go hand in hand\u2014drivers of regulatory and economic policies for low-carbon mobility. PLoS Clim. 2, e0000157 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Boon-Falleur, M., Grandin, A., Baumard, N. & Chevallier, C. Leveraging social cognition to promote effective climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 332\u2013338 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Goldberg, M. H., Van Der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A. & Maibach, E. W. Perceived social consensus can reduce ideological biases on climate change. Environ. Behav. 52, 495\u2013517 (2019).<\/p>\n

Sokoloski, R., Markowitz, E. M. & Bidwell, D. Public estimates of support for offshore wind energy: false consensus, pluralistic ignorance, and partisan effects. Energy Policy 112, 45\u201355 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Smith, N. & Leiserowitz, A. The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition: the role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Anal. 34, 937\u2013948 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Todorova, B. et al. Machine learning identifies key individual and nation-level factors predicting climate-relevant beliefs and behaviors. npj Clim. Action 4, 46 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dechezlepr\u00eatre, A. et al. Fighting climate change: international attitudes toward climate policies. Am. Econ. Rev. 115, 1258\u20131300 (2025).<\/p>\n

Rhodes, E., Axsen, J. & Jaccard, M. Exploring citizen support for different types of climate policy. Ecol. Econ. 137, 56\u201369 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sev\u00e4, I. & Kulin, J. How do Europeans want to fight climate change? Comparing and explaining public support for a wide variety of policies. J. Public Policy 45, 1\u201325 (2025).<\/p>\n

Bell, C., Rhodes, E., Long, Z. & Salemi, C. Do economic trade-offs matter in climate policy support? Survey evidence from the United Kingdom and Australia. Energy Policy 197, 114430 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Melton, N., Axsen, J. & Moawad, B. Which plug-in electric vehicle policies are best? A multi-criteria evaluation framework applied to Canada. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 64, 101411 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brosch, T. & Steg, L. Leveraging emotion for sustainable action. One Earth 4, 1693\u20131703 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brosch, T. & Sauter, D. Emotions and the climate crisis: a research agenda for an affective sustainability science. Emot. Rev. 15, 253\u2013257 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jobin, M. & Siegrist, M. We choose what we like\u2014affect as a driver of electricity portfolio choice. Energy Policy 122, 736\u2013747 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jobin, M., Visschers, V. H. M., Van Vliet, O. P. R., \u00c1rvai, J. & Siegrist, M. Affect or information? Examining drivers of public preferences of future energy portfolios in Switzerland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 52, 20\u201329 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rinscheid, A. & W\u00fcstenhagen, R. Divesting, fast and slow: affective and cognitive drivers of fading voter support for a nuclear phase-out. Ecol. Econ. 152, 51\u201361 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Spampatti, T., Hahnel, U. J. J., Trutnevyte, E. & Brosch, T. Short and long-term dominance of negative information in shaping public energy perceptions: The case of shallow geothermal systems. Energy Policy 167, 113070 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Egler, M., Rhodes, E. & Huddart, E. Affective Climate Polarization and Public Support for Just Transition Policy Bundles in Western Canada (SSRN, 2025); https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=6069747<\/a><\/p>\n

Geiger, N., Dwyer, T. & Swim, J. K. Hopium or empowering hope? A meta-analysis of hope and climate engagement. Front. Psychol. 14, 1139427 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gregersen, T., Andersen, G. & Tvinnereim, E. The strength and content of climate anger. Glob. Environ. Change 82, 102738 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Marlon, J. R. et al. How hope and doubt affect climate change mobilization. Front. Commun. 4, 20 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Myers, T. A., Roser-Renouf, C., Leiserowitz, A. & Maibach, E. Emotional signatures of climate policy support. PLoS Clim. 3, e0000381 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schneider, C. R., Zaval, L. & Markowitz, E. M. Positive emotions and climate change. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 42, 114\u2013120 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, S., Leviston, Z., Hurlstone, M., Lawrence, C. & Walker, I. Emotions predict policy support: why it matters how people feel about climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 50, 25\u201340 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Weber, E. U. & Constantino, S. M. All hearts and minds on deck: hope motivates climate action by linking the present and the future. Emot. Rev. 15, 293\u2013297 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Swim, J. K., Guerriero, J. G., Gasper, K., DeCoster, J. & Lengieza, M. L. Emotions and policy information predicting water-quality policy support. J. Environ. Psychol. 98, 102385 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zeelenberg, M., Nelissen, R. M. A., Breugelmans, S. M. & Pieters, R. On emotion specificity in decision making: why feeling is for doing. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 3, 18\u201327 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cologna, V., Berthold, A., Kreissel, A. L. & Siegrist, M. Attitudes towards technology and their relationship with pro-environmental behaviour: development and validation of the GATT scale. J. Environ. Psychol. 95, 102258 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Berthold, A., Cologna, V., Hardmeier, M. & Siegrist, M. Drop some money! The influence of income and subjective financial scarcity on pro-environmental behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 91, 102149 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sparkman, G. & Walton, G. M. Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1663\u20131674 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sparkman, G. & Walton, G. M. Witnessing change: dynamic norms help resolve diverse barriers to personal change. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 82, 238\u2013252 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kriesi, H. Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience (Lexington Books, 2005).<\/p>\n

Lutz, G. The interaction between direct and representative democracy in Switzerland. Representation 42, 45\u201357 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stadelmann-Steffen, I. Citizens as veto players: climate change policy and the constraints of direct democracy. Environ. Polit. 20, 485\u2013507 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fowler, A. & Margolis, M. The political consequences of uninformed voters. Elect. Stud. 34, 100\u2013110 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. The nature and origins of misperceptions: understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Polit. Psychol. 38, 127\u2013150 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S. & Druckman, J. N. Cognitive\u2013motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 560\u2013576 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bechtel, M. M. & Scheve, K. F. Mass support for global climate agreements depends on institutional design. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13763\u201313768 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bernauer, T. & Gampfer, R. How robust is public support for unilateral climate policy? Environ. Sci. Policy 54, 316\u2013330 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chong, D. & Druckman, J. N. Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 101, 637\u2013655 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dermont, C., Ingold, K., Kammermann, L. & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. Bringing the policy making perspective in: a political science approach to social acceptance. Energy Policy 108, 359\u2013368 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wiest, S. L., Raymond, L. & Clawson, R. A. Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 31, 187\u2013198 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Br\u00fcckmann, G., El-Ajou, W. & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. When citizens and researchers learn from a serious game\u2014an experimental analysis of information and efficacy in political opinion formation. Preprint at https:\/\/osf.io\/preprints\/socarxiv\/x5u6b_v1\/<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n

Volken, S. P., Xexakis, G. & Trutnevyte, E. Perspectives of informed citizen panel on low-carbon electricity portfolios in Switzerland and longer-term evaluation of informational materials. Environ. Sci. Technol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1021\/acs.est.8b01265<\/a> (2018).<\/p>\n

Kunnas, S. & Trutnevyte, E. Informed minds, opinions aligned? Informed perceptions towards solar PV locations in Switzerland. Environ. Res. Commun. 7, 075030 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Blastland, M., Freeman, A. L. J., Van Der Linden, S., Marteau, T. M. & Spiegelhalter, D. Five rules for evidence communication. Nature 587, 362\u2013364 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kerr, J. R., Schneider, C. R., Freeman, A. L. J., Marteau, T. & van der Linden, S. Transparent communication of evidence does not undermine public trust in evidence. PNAS Nexus 1, pgac280 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rahmani Azad, Z., Spampatti, T., Gluth, S., Tam, K.-P. & Hahnel, U. J. J. Sampling and processing of climate change information and disinformation across three diverse countries. Br. J. Psychol. 00, 1\u201323 (2025).<\/p>\n

Ecker, U., Roozenbeek, J. & Lewandowsky, S. Misinformation remains a threat to democracy. Nature https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-024-01587-3<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Brexit was wrong, say 57% of British voters. The Economist https:\/\/www.economist.com\/graphic-detail\/2023\/07\/19\/brexit-was-wrong-say-57-of-british-voters<\/a> (19 July 2023).<\/p>\n

Why most people regret Brexit. The Economist. https:\/\/www.economist.com\/britain\/2024\/04\/11\/why-most-people-regret-brexit<\/a> (11 April 2024).<\/p>\n

Pickering, B., Lombardi, F. & Pfenninger, S. Diversity of options to eliminate fossil fuels and reach carbon neutrality across the entire European energy system. Joule 6, 1253\u20131276 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zheng, D. et al. Strategies for climate-resilient global wind and solar power systems. Nature 643, 1263\u20131270 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wenger, A., Stauffacher, M. & Dallo, I. Public perception and acceptance of negative emission technologies\u2014framing effects in Switzerland. Clim. Change 167, 53 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cox, E., Spence, E. & Pidgeon, N. Public perceptions of carbon dioxide removal in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 744\u2013749 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lee, C.-Y., Perlaviciute, G. & Steg, L. Forest or machine? Public perceptions and acceptability of negative emissions technologies and practices across six European countries. Clim. Change 178, 188 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Trutnevyte, E. et al. Renewable Energy Outlook for Switzerland (2024); https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13097\/ARCHIVE-OUVERTE\/UNIGE:172640<\/a><\/p>\n

Xexakis, G. & Trutnevyte, E. Consensus on future EU electricity supply among citizens of France, Germany, and Poland: implications for modeling. Energy Strategy Rev. 38, 100742 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yilmaz, S. et al. Analysis of demand-side response preferences regarding electricity tariffs and direct load control: key findings from a Swiss survey. Energy 212, 118712 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yilmaz, S., Cuony, P. & Chanez, C. Prioritize your heat pump or electric vehicle? Analysing design preferences for Direct Load Control programmes in Swiss households. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 82, 102319 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bender, J., Fait, L. & Wetzel, H. Acceptance of demand-side flexibility in the residential heating sector\u2014evidence from a stated choice experiment in Germany. Energy Policy 191, 114145 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wen, C., Steadman, S., Rafaq, M. S., Vatougiou, P. & Deakin, M. Can reduction of local carbon emissions motivate participation in demand-side flexibility programs? Evidence from the United Kingdom. Appl. Energy 388, 125610 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5\u201332 (2001).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fife, D. A. & D\u2019Onofrio, J. Common, uncommon, and novel applications of random forest in psychological research. Behav. Res. Methods 55, 2447\u20132466 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Stat. Theory Relat. Fields 6, 87\u201387 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pargent, F., Schoedel, R. & Stachl, C. Best practices in supervised machine learning: a tutorial for psychologists. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 6, 1\u201335 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kysel\u00e1, E., \u0160\u010dasn\u00fd, M. & Zv\u011b\u0159inov\u00e1, I. Attitudes toward climate change mitigation policies: a review of measures and a construct of policy attitudes. Clim. Policy 19, 878\u2013892 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Freiburghaus, R., Leemann, L., Wasserfallen, F., Willi, T. & Yin, J. 20 Minuten-\/Tamedia-Abstimmungsumfrage – Eidgen\u00f6ssische Volksabstimmungen vom 9. Juni. https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/11jRBacfyXhzdXomET5TpY_dvedQNRH9S\/view<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Mousson, M. 2. SRG-Trendumfrage zur eidg. Abstimmung vom 9. Juni 2024. https:\/\/www.gfsbern.ch\/de\/news\/2-srg-trendumfrage-zur-eidg-abstimmung-vom-9-juni-2024\/<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Van Der Linden, S. The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: towards a comprehensive model. J. Environ. Psychol. 41, 112\u2013124 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bouman, T. et al. When worry about climate change leads to climate action: how values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Glob. Environ. Change 62, 102061 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y. & Leiserowitz, A. A. Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1014\u20131020 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yarkoni, T. & Westfall, J. Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: lessons from machine learning. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 1100\u20131122 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Van Valkengoed, A. M., Steg, L. & Perlaviciute, G. Development and validation of a climate change perceptions scale. J. Environ. Psychol. 76, 101652 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wilson, R. S., Zwickle, A. & Walpole, H. Developing a broadly applicable measure of risk perception. Risk Anal. 39, 777\u2013791 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Spampatti, T., Brosch, T., Trutnevyte, E. & Hahnel, U. J. J. A preregistered field study of the trust inoculation against a negative event involving geothermal energy systems. Collabra Psychol. 9, 89755 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bouman, T., Steg, L. & Kiers, H. A. L. Measuring values in environmental research: a test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire. Front. Psychol. 9, 564 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

ESS Round 8 Source Questionnaire (European Social Survey, 2016).<\/p>\n

Wong-Parodi, G. & Berlin Rubin, N. Exploring how climate change subjective attribution, personal experience with extremes, concern, and subjective knowledge relate to pro-environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions in the United States. J. Environ. Psychol. 79, 101728 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Constantino, S. M. et al. Scaling up change: a critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 23, 50\u201397 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Geiger, N., Swim, J. K. & Benson, L. Using the three-pillar model of sustainability to understand lay reactions to climate policy: a multilevel approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 126, 132\u2013141 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Henninger, M., Debelak, R., Rothacher, Y. & Strobl, C. Interpretable machine learning for psychological research: opportunities and pitfalls. Psychol. Methods 30, 271\u2013305 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bowerman, B. L. & O\u2019Connell, R. T. Linear Statistical Models: An Applied Approach (PWS-Kent Pub. Co., 1990).<\/p>\n

Hoerl, A. E. & Kennard, R. W. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12, 55\u201367 (1970).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Robinson, D., Hayes, A. & Couch, S. broom: convert statistical objects into tidy tibbles. R package version 1.0.5. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=broom<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. An R Companion to Applied Regression, Third edition (Sage, 2019); https:\/\/socialsciences.mcmaster.ca\/jfox\/Books\/Companion\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Biecek, P. DALEX: explainers for complex predictive models in R. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 19, 1\u20135 (2018).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Maksymiuk, S., Gosiewska, A. & Biecek, P. Landscape of R packages for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2009.13248<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n

L\u00fcdecke, D. et al. easystats: framework for easy statistical modeling, visualization, and reporting. CRAN https:\/\/doi.org\/10.32614\/CRAN.package.easystats<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

Clarke, E., Sherrill-Mix, S. & Dawson, C. ggbeeswarm: categorical scatter (violin point) plots. R package version 0.7.2. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=ggbeeswarm<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Kay, M. \u2018ggdist: visualizations of distributions and uncertainty in the grammar of graphics\u2019. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TVCG.2023.3327195<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Kassambara, A. ggpubr: \u2018ggplot2\u2019 based publication ready plots. R package version 0.6.0. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=ggpubr<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Friedman, J., Tibshirani, R. & Hastie, T. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1\u201322 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Simon, N., Friedman, J., Tibshirani, R. & Hastie, T. Regularization paths for Cox\u2019s proportional hazards model via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 39, 1\u201313 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tay, J. K., Narasimhan, B. & Hastie, T. Elastic net regularization paths for all generalized linear models. J. Stat. Softw. 106, 1\u201331 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S 4th edn (Springer, 2002).<\/p>\n

Lang, M. & Schratz, P. mlr3verse: easily install and load the \u2018mlr3\u2019 package family. R package version 0.2.8. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=mlr3verse<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Revelle, W. psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. R package version 2.4.3. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=psych<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Krainz, M., Trutnevyte, E. & Brosch, T. Data – Study 1. OSF https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/W782V<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n

Krainz, M., Vallaeys Mora, I. & Brosch, T. Data – Study 2. OSF https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/953BE<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Sorgato, V., Krainz, M., Brosch, T. & Trutnevyte, E. Data – Study 3. OSF https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/P2UQA<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (IPCC, 2022). Dahl, R. A. On Democracy (Yale Univ. Press, 1998).…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":42871,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3472,11092,88,810,2327,11093,15,2377,27351,9055,760],"class_list":{"0":"post-42870","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-europe","8":"tag-communication","9":"tag-economics-and-management","10":"tag-energy","11":"tag-energy-policy","12":"tag-energy-storage","13":"tag-energy-systems","14":"tag-european","15":"tag-general","16":"tag-psychology","17":"tag-renewable-and-green-energy","18":"tag-renewable-energy"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42870\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/europe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}