That’s a perfectly reasonable concern.
Europe needs to stick to its strategy of generating energy from sources available within the EU. Well, maybe except for buying uranium from Canada or Australia.
Just continue to outsoarce everything outside of Europe and thiss is what you’ll get.
Retards.
Renewable + nuclear with fuel from Canada/Australia. Problem solved.
The primary focus must be as the Green Party has harped on for decades, decentralised and sustainable sources. That must account for the majority of our energy. Supplemental energy, or energy sources that can’t be obtained locally, we need to look at reliable and stable allies.
Canadian gas as a temporary solution, while focusing on long term sustainable options, might be a better plan.
How about a rule, that the EU shall not source more than 20% of its fossil fuels from one Country outside the EU?
And Push EU companies to optimize their fossil fuel output
EU fears literally everything, including their own shadow, according to western media.
Never forget that time that those asshole German politicians were laughing at Trump when he said that we were too dependent on Russia’s gas and oil. They were thinking themselves so smart yet they didn’t see the threat anywhere and failed to make us independent. Nobody’s laughing now
Come and take over UK gas fields, our Governments in London and Edinburgh don’t want them.
There’s gas pretty nearby. Qatar and Algeria both have gas. We just need to build the infra.
you can just buy it from russia you know it right?
Take it from a Canadian. We’re already dependent on the US, but we don’t need to remain as dependent as we are now. If we can help each other to build up infrastructure for processing, delivery, and storage? We’re all better off for it.
I don’t see it being a problem into 2026 and 2027. Energy analysts predict a supply glut in the next years. There will be extra supply on the market from multiple countries, next to US also Qatar and Algeria. These countries will be very eager to sell it to a massive trade block like the EU. In the meanwhile, don’t become complacent, enforce extra stimuli packages to get people off the gas, invest in industrial and commercial heat pumps, full pull on renewables to lower your gas imports towards the end of the decade.
Coal can fill a gap in electricity generation. Sad but true. Nuclear cannot be built in a short timespan and renewables have their own limitations which are not yet fully solved
Why not Canada?
You guys will promote anything that’s anti us.
EU imports 16% of its gas from the US. And no-one has pipelines running directly between them and the US like some had with the Russians so the same ports used to import from the US can be used to import from any other suppliers. The two situations are completely different.
Also I’m way more worried about the 33% we import from Norway.
17 comments
That’s a perfectly reasonable concern.
Europe needs to stick to its strategy of generating energy from sources available within the EU. Well, maybe except for buying uranium from Canada or Australia.
Just continue to outsoarce everything outside of Europe and thiss is what you’ll get.
Retards.
Renewable + nuclear with fuel from Canada/Australia. Problem solved.
The primary focus must be as the Green Party has harped on for decades, decentralised and sustainable sources. That must account for the majority of our energy. Supplemental energy, or energy sources that can’t be obtained locally, we need to look at reliable and stable allies.
Canadian gas as a temporary solution, while focusing on long term sustainable options, might be a better plan.
How about a rule, that the EU shall not source more than 20% of its fossil fuels from one Country outside the EU?
And Push EU companies to optimize their fossil fuel output
EU fears literally everything, including their own shadow, according to western media.
Never forget that time that those asshole German politicians were laughing at Trump when he said that we were too dependent on Russia’s gas and oil. They were thinking themselves so smart yet they didn’t see the threat anywhere and failed to make us independent. Nobody’s laughing now
Come and take over UK gas fields, our Governments in London and Edinburgh don’t want them.
There’s gas pretty nearby. Qatar and Algeria both have gas. We just need to build the infra.
you can just buy it from russia you know it right?
Take it from a Canadian. We’re already dependent on the US, but we don’t need to remain as dependent as we are now. If we can help each other to build up infrastructure for processing, delivery, and storage? We’re all better off for it.
I don’t see it being a problem into 2026 and 2027. Energy analysts predict a supply glut in the next years. There will be extra supply on the market from multiple countries, next to US also Qatar and Algeria. These countries will be very eager to sell it to a massive trade block like the EU. In the meanwhile, don’t become complacent, enforce extra stimuli packages to get people off the gas, invest in industrial and commercial heat pumps, full pull on renewables to lower your gas imports towards the end of the decade.
[https://energynow.com/2025/09/global-lng-market-faces-looming-supply-glut-after-years-of-scarcity/](https://energynow.com/2025/09/global-lng-market-faces-looming-supply-glut-after-years-of-scarcity/)
Coal can fill a gap in electricity generation. Sad but true. Nuclear cannot be built in a short timespan and renewables have their own limitations which are not yet fully solved
Why not Canada?
You guys will promote anything that’s anti us.
EU imports 16% of its gas from the US. And no-one has pipelines running directly between them and the US like some had with the Russians so the same ports used to import from the US can be used to import from any other suppliers. The two situations are completely different.
Also I’m way more worried about the 33% we import from Norway.