>concerns over proposals to to intercept or infiltrate “people’s internet of things, which could technically include a person’s smart watch and home devices like smart speakers (such as an Amazon Echo or Google Nest) and doorbells”.
Bad enough they want backdoors into anything encrypted, including chat apps, VPNS, etc. But to let them have access to speakers/mics in your own home?
Remember that any backdoor for policing reasons, is a backdoor that criminals can use too.
This is replacing the 1993 Act, which was written before the internet was really a thing and covers such critical topics as telegrams. The ones without a capital ‘T’.
*they’re staring all night and they’re staring all day…*
6 comments
>concerns over proposals to to intercept or infiltrate “people’s internet of things, which could technically include a person’s smart watch and home devices like smart speakers (such as an Amazon Echo or Google Nest) and doorbells”.
Bad enough they want backdoors into anything encrypted, including chat apps, VPNS, etc. But to let them have access to speakers/mics in your own home?
Remember that any backdoor for policing reasons, is a backdoor that criminals can use too.
This is replacing the 1993 Act, which was written before the internet was really a thing and covers such critical topics as telegrams. The ones without a capital ‘T’.
*they’re staring all night and they’re staring all day…*
https://preview.redd.it/uw38kqdxz4gg1.jpeg?width=756&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ce656edbe2b944710b2445a02abfa9c986be1d9f
has anyone heard of salt typhoon?
Wtf?