“There has really been not any focus at all on once projects are reserved, what’s happening then?” he asked. “One of the TSOs we’re currently negotiating a contract with, a 380kV BESS connection, told us they have not signed any grid construction agreements for BESS; so they also don’t know how it works!
“We’re really far away from standardising that process,” he continued. “It’s rally interesting to see how little defined this process actually is.”
Challenges for TSOs and DSOs
Perhaps most strikingly, this ‘tsunami’ of interest in the German BESS market put pressure on both TSOs and DSOs.
“The tsunami was not good for all of us,” explained Lars Josten, project director of Germany at Giga Storage. “It created a horror scenario on the TSO and DSO side.”
“It was all driven by a lot of promising revenue curves from developers, who didn’t understand quite how the German market is working; there’s this shocking number of over 800 TSOs and DSOs, so you want to fit your revenue model to an operating system and this turned out [to be] not good for a lot of them,” he continued.
Dennis Klink, director of grid and policy at developer Noveria Energy, meanwhile, said that broader uncertainties around aspects of the German market, like BKZ fees, created the conditions where more speculative grid applications could be made, adding to the backlog that has long been a feature of the German market.
“If you look back a couple of years, you have the situation where sub-TSOs didn’t ask for a BKZ payment; there were no criteria to hand in a grid application—at least at the TSO level—and we know of early projects where you didn’t even have to bring, let’s say, a land reservation, so it was really easy to hand in the papers saying ‘I want grid access here’,” he said.
“We also know that some people have done that very systemically, flooding the TSOs with these applications, and I think this has gone down now and it needs to go down,” he continued. “The big question is what happens in the next one to two years.”