{"id":24324,"date":"2026-05-26T19:41:43","date_gmt":"2026-05-26T19:41:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/24324\/"},"modified":"2026-05-26T19:41:43","modified_gmt":"2026-05-26T19:41:43","slug":"bayer-increased-lobbying-amid-roundup-supreme-court-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/24324\/","title":{"rendered":"Bayer Increased Lobbying Amid Roundup Supreme Court Case"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Lauren Cross<\/a>, Investigate Midwest<\/p>\n

Investigate Midwest is an independent, nonprofit newsroom. Our mission is to serve the public interest by exposing dangerous and costly practices of influential agricultural corporations and institutions through in-depth and data-driven investigative journalism. Visit us online at www.investigatemidwest.org.<\/a><\/p>\n

Bayer increased its federal lobbying spending in the first quarter of 2026 ahead of the U.S. Supreme Court hearing arguments on Monday, April 27, in a case involving Monsanto, which Bayer acquired in 2018.<\/p>\n

New federal disclosures<\/a> show Bayer reported just over $2 million in lobbying expenses from January through March, up from $1.75 million in the fourth quarter of 2025<\/a>. The increase follows a drop in spending during the second half of last year after Bayer\u2019s quarterly lobbying peaked at $2.95 million in early 2025.<\/p>\n

While 2025 filings showed the company \u201cmonitoring\u201d broad issues like pesticide regulations and biotech innovation, the new 2026 report reveals a laser-focus on specific legislation designed to provide the company with a legal shield against ongoing lawsuits.<\/p>\n

\"\"Chart: Lauren Cross, Investigate Midwest. Source: Congressional lobbying disclosure filings<\/a>Get the data<\/a>. Created with Datawrapper<\/a> <\/p>\n

Across nine quarterly filings since the start of 2024, Bayer reported spending nearly $19.7 million on lobbying, or about $2.2 million per quarter on average.<\/p>\n

The case Monsanto Co. v. Durnell could shape pesticide litigation nationwide. The main question is whether federal pesticide labeling laws can override some state lawsuits claiming companies failed to properly warn people about the risks.<\/p>\n

\u201cFailure to warn\u201d is a common argument in such liability cases<\/a>. Plaintiffs argue a company did not give clear enough warnings or safety instructions about a product.<\/p>\n

Bayer has faced years of lawsuits over Roundup, its glyphosate-based weedkiller. Plaintiffs say exposure caused non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Bayer denies those claims and says Roundup labels follow federal law.<\/p>\n

Monsanto has pointed to past Environmental Protection Agency findings that glyphosate is not likely to cause cancer. But in a recent court filing<\/a>, Food & Water Watch and other advocacy groups told the Supreme Court that the EPA review Monsanto relies on was thrown out by a court four years ago.<\/p>\n

Bayer\u2019s latest lobbying disclosure filing shows a more focused agenda on issues including\u00a0 \u201cuniformity of pesticide labeling,\u201d EPA budgetary issues, and USDA funding. The company also reported lobbying the White House and the National Economic Council, which advises the president on global economic policy.<\/p>\n

According to the filing, Bayer reported lobbying on H.R. 7567, the Farm, Food and National Security Act of 2026. The bill includes pesticide labeling requirement language, which relates directly to the arguments at the center of the Supreme Court case. If approved, such protections could help companies defend against some state-level warning-label lawsuits.<\/p>\n

Federal law requires quarterly lobbying reports that disclose lobbying activity <\/a>and total spending, but filings do not break spending down by each specific issue lobbied. However, the timing of Bayer\u2019s spending rebound comes as the company faces one of the most closely watched ag legal cases of the year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"By Lauren Cross, Investigate Midwest Investigate Midwest is an independent, nonprofit newsroom. Our mission is to serve the…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24325,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21161],"tags":[21182,19890,13658,8104,22643,22642],"class_list":["post-24324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-bayer","tag-bayer","tag-chemicals","tag-lobbying","tag-pollution","tag-roundup","tag-supreme-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24324"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24324\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24325"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}