![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/germany\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/b45d2b6b4fbbbbd7c3845ff6340ec12b.jpeg\")
The ASA ruled that the ads from Adidas were misleading and ordered that the three brands withdraw them. (PA Archive) <\/p>\n The ASA ruled that the ads from Adidas were misleading and ordered that the three brands withdraw them. (PA Archive) <\/p>\n
Major fashion brands Calvin Klein, Adidas, and Uniqlo have had advertisements banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for making misleading claims about the recycled content of their clothing.<\/p>\n
The ASA found that all three retailers used the word “recycled” to describe their fabric or product composition but failed to provide any information explaining these claims.<\/p>\n
Adidas stated it believed consumers would interpret its ad for “recycled running shoes” as meaning they contained materials derived from recycled sources. The company clarified it does not operate a standalone recycled running shoe range, but noted certain products across its collections might incorporate recycled materials.<\/p>\n
Calvin Klein argued it “would not be reasonable” for consumers to interpret its ad for “responsibly sourced collections \u2013 recycled, organic & more” as implying that all products in the women\u2019s tops range contained, in whole or part, recycled, organic or other “environmentally preferred” materials.<\/p>\n
Uniqlo explained its ad for women\u2019s fleece coats and jackets, mentioning “recycled materials,” was intended to mean that the polyester content was recycled.<\/p>\n
Calvin Klein said it \u2018would not be reasonable\u2019 for consumers to interpret its ad for \u2018responsibly sourced collections \u2013 recycled, organic & more\u2019 as meaning that all products in the women\u2019s tops range contained, in whole or part, recycled, organic or other \u2018environmentally preferred\u2019 materials <\/p>\n
It said the claim did not suggest that every component of the garments, such as the metal zip or the labels, were recycled, but rather the claim referred to the textile materials that made up the fabric of the main body, lining and trim.<\/p>\n
The watchdog said the ads gave the impression that the products were made entirely from recycled materials, but found that none of the three fashion giants could provide evidence that this was the case.<\/p>\n
The ASA ruled that the ads were misleading and ordered that the three brands withdraw them.<\/p>\n
The rulings form part of a wider project by the ASA investigating environmental claims in the retail fashion sector.<\/p>\n