{"id":60791,"date":"2026-09-03T19:08:24","date_gmt":"2026-09-03T19:08:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/60791\/"},"modified":"2026-09-03T19:08:24","modified_gmt":"2026-09-03T19:08:24","slug":"why-arent-more-tour-pros-playing-one-of-the-best-golf-balls-of-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/60791\/","title":{"rendered":"Why aren\u2019t more tour pros playing one of the best golf balls of 2024?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\t\t\t\tAre equipment deals preventing tour pros getting maximum performance from their golf ball?<\/p>\n

Being a tour pro is a pretty sweet gig. You travel around the world in your private jet. Play fantastic golf courses. Make obscene amounts of money. Sign a few autographs for your adoring fans. Maybe feature in Netflix\u2019s Full Swing<\/a>. Then return to your mansion for a week off because you only work about 22 weeks a year. And, to top it all off, not only do you not have to buy your golf equipment, you\u2019re actually paid by your equipment sponsors to use the free gear they give you.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\"Rory<\/p>\n

(Yes, yes, there\u2019s the countless hours of practice and the gym sessions and the pressure to be a good role model and the complete lack of job security which means if your results drop off it all falls apart fast\u2026 but you get my point and there aren\u2019t many golf fans who wouldn\u2019t swap their current job for life on the PGA Tour.)<\/p>\n

But that last point, regarding free equipment, does have its downsides. Being contracted to one manufacturer usually means you have to use a full bag of their equipment. Whereas amateur golfers can test as much different equipment as they fancy and choose the bits they like best from every brand, contracted tour pros are working with a much smaller selection. And those golfers sometimes miss out on a golf equipment gem because they\u2019re tied to another brand.<\/p>\n

\"More<\/p>\n

One such piece of equipment is the Wilson Staff Model (and Staff Model X) golf ball.<\/p>\n

The recent Today\u2019s Golfer Robot Golf Ball Test<\/a> showed that it might just be the best golf ball for tour pros, and yet you\u2019ll rarely see it in play on tour. Let\u2019s look at what makes the Wilson Staff Model (and Model X) golf ball so good, why tour pros are missing out by not using it, and whether it could be the best golf ball for you.<\/p>\n

\"TheWhy we use a robot to test golf balls<\/p>\n

The recent\u00a0Today\u2019s Golfer Robot Golf Ball Test<\/a>\u00a0used a $100,000 robot to test golf balls across every conceivable metric. Every ball was tested with a driver at three different swing speeds \u2013 85mph, 100mph, and 115mph \u2013 and with a 7-iron and pitching wedge.<\/p>\n

We know from years of experience that a robot is the only way to guarantee the consistency of strike required to isolate the one variable we are trying to test: the performance of the golf ball. Even the world\u2019s best golfers can\u2019t hit a ball exactly the same way, time after time, which brings in other variables. That\u2019s why every golf manufacturer uses a robot when developing golf balls and it\u2019s why we use a robot to test those golf balls head-to-head.<\/p>\n

Thanks to the robot\u2019s adjustability, it\u2019s possible to control lie angle, swing path, face angle, attack angle, impact location, hip rotation, and wrist action at swing speeds from 5 \u2013 130 MPH. There simply isn\u2019t a better swinger out there \u2013 not even among the world\u2019s best golfers.<\/p>\n

When picking the best golf balls, we use human testing \u2013 both on a launch monitor and on the course \u2013 to measure intangibles like sound and feel, but for pure data, a robot is a must-have.<\/p>\n

\"WilsonWhy is the Wilson Staff Model golf ball so good?Driver distance<\/p>\n

The 115mph element of the Robot Test is particularly relevant for tour pros because the average driver clubhead speed on the PGA Tour is 115.96mph<\/a>.<\/p>\n

At the 115mph swing speed, the two Wilson Staff Model golf balls generated the fastest ball speeds in the entire test and ranked second and third for driver carry distance. <\/p>\n

Ball Speed (MPH)Launch Angle (DEG)Backspin (RPM)Height (YDS)Descent Angle (DEG)Carry Distance (YDS)Shot Area (SQ YDS)Callaway Chrome Tour X166.611.6215559.7 (Highest)32.8283.2 (1)31.2 (3)Wilson Staff Model167.1 (2)11.4207959.331.9282 (2)50.5Wilson Staff Model X167.2 (1)11.3208459.331.7281.7 (3)38.6Callaway Chrome Tour166.511.3214059.231.928154.2Seed SD 02165.811.421375932.1280.460.3Vice Pro Plus166.311.5206458.831.7280.335.4TaylorMade TP5x167 (3)11.120735931.2280.233.1Vice Pro165.811.4210358.731.8279.540Seed SD 01165.411.5212558.832.1279.530 (2)Vice Tour165.511.5207258.431.8278.952.4TaylorMade TP5164.811.7208058.332.1278.386Titleist Pro V1165.911.2206658.331.1278.129.5 (1)Titleist Pro V1x166.711.1204858.330.1277.974.6Snell Prime 4.0165.311.3211158.331.4277.863.4Snell Prime 3.0165.411.5202458.131.3277.5111.3Seed SD X1164.711.3212458.131.527741.1Kirkland Signature V3164.810.52296 (Highest)58.631.3276.645.1Callaway Chrome Soft163.911.8207957.731.9276174.8 (Largest)Snell Prime 2.0163.511.322265832275.7130.5Vice Pro Air163.611.6208257.531.6275.260.3Srixon Q-Star Tour163.611.7207757.531.6275.169.4Srixon Distance164.711.4200057.330.7274.864.5Srixon AD333162.711.4204756.530.6270.985.1TaylorMade SpeedSoft161.711.71984 (Lowest)55.830.5269.133.3AVERAGE165.211.4209558.331.5277.862.3<\/p>\n

The Callaway Chrome Tour X was the only ball that beat the two Wilson models for distance, which was one of the many reasons our Equipment Editor suggested it might well be the single best golf ball available<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"TGIron and wedge performance<\/p>\n

With a 7-iron, the Wilson Staff Model generated the highest ball speed of all 24 models tested, and both models produced a steeper descent angle than any other ball.<\/p>\n

Descent angle is the key metric that determines how fast your ball stops when it lands on the green. If you\u2019re playing tour-caliber golf courses, it\u2019s incredibly important to be able to stop the ball as quickly as possible. \u00a0<\/p>\n

Ball Speed (MPH)Launch Angle (DEG)Backspin (RPM)Height (YDS)Descent Angle (DEG)Carry Distance (YDS)Shot Area (SQ YDS)Srixon Q-Star Tour108.121.349853244.8156.5 (T1)7.2 (1)Vice Pro Air107.621.54788 (Lowest)31.844.6156.5 (T1)15.1Wilson Staff Model108.7 (1)21.1525632.145.2156.4 (3)13.3Vice Tour107.921.4496731.944.9156.317.2Seed SD 01108.5 (2)21531431.945.1155.89.5Seed SD 02108.2 (T3)21.1518831.945155.837.1Vice Pro107.721.1510331.744.7155.28.4Vice Pro Plus108.2 (T3)21537931.745.1154.99.9Snell Prime 4.0107.221.1497331.644.3154.810.5TaylorMade TP5x10820.7546831.644.8154.213.4Callaway Chrome Soft107.221.2517331.444.7154.118.5TaylorMade SpeedSoft107.221.2518531.544.7154.141.4 (Largest)Callaway Chrome Tour107.720.8538431.544.715410Snell Prime 3.0106.921514531.344.4153.524.6Srixon Distance10721530631.344.6153.138.7Srixon AD333106.921.1527631.344.7153.129TaylorMade TP5107.720.7567231.445152.916.6Titleist Pro V1107.520.7559431.244.81528.2 (3)Wilson Staff Model X108.120.3608431.345.2151.87.8 (2)Snell Prime 2.0106.520.754613144.4151.48.7Seed SD X1107.120.4577131.144.7151.315.8Titleist Pro V1x107.120.458353144.71518.3Callaway Chrome Tour X107.620.16193 (Highest)3144.9150.516.2Kirkland Signature V310619.7610930.443.9147.817.2AVERAGE107.520.9540031.444.7153.616.8<\/p>\n

The two Wilson balls reached that steep descent angle in slightly different ways. The Wilson Staff Model had a higher launch angle (21.1\u00b0) and medium spin (5,256 rpm), while the Wilson Staff Model X had a more penetrating launch angle (20.3\u00b0) but higher spin (6,084 rpm).<\/p>\n

Control tends to be far more important to tour pros than distance when it comes to irons, but it doesn\u2019t hurt that the Wilson Staff Model was also one of the longest golf balls with a 7-iron. Its carry distance of 156.4 yards put it just 0.1 yards behind the only two longer balls on the test.<\/p>\n

\"Hit<\/p>\n

Speaking of control, the Wilson Staff Model X ranked fourth for backspin with a pitching wedge, while the standard Staff Model generated lower spin but still delivered the fourth steepest descent angle of any ball.<\/p>\n

Ball Speed (MPH)Launch Angle (DEG)Backspin (RPM)Descent Angle (DEG)Carry Distance (YDS)L \u2013 R Dispersion (YDS)Shot Area (SQ YDS)Callaway Chrome Tour X84.828.18080 (1)47.5104.91.32 (1)Titleist Pro V1x84.327.98046 (2)47.2104.324.7Kirkland Signature V383.827.78043 (3)46.8103.41.84.1Wilson Staff Model X85.128.5798247.9105.41.93 (T2)Vice Tour84.728.4792647.7104.91.63.1 Seed SD X184.628.7769247.8105.21.64.6Titleist Pro V18428.7769147.61042.610.1Srixon Distance83.628.7763647.5103.63.911.7TaylorMade TP584.929761748.3105.71.86Snell Prime 2.08428.3761747.3104.32.612 (Largest)TaylorMade TP5x84.928.9760648.1105.738.1Callaway Chrome Tour84.928.8748147.91061.86.4TaylorMade Speedsoft84.229.2742048.1104.81.96Wilson Staff Model84.829.4732948.4105.81.73.7Srixon AD3338429.3730948104.52.810.5Seed SD 018529.4727548.5106.32.14.2Vice Pro Plus84.729.4725848.3105.82.25Seed SD 0284.829.5717548.4106.13.98.2Vice Pro84.729.3715948.3106.12.64.7Callaway Chrome Soft84.629.6704048.4106.11.93.5Snell Prime 3.083.929.4694748105.1311.7Srixon Q-Star Tour84.730681048.7106.51.13 (T2)Snell Prime 4.084.129.8668548.3105.92.47.9Vice Pro Air8430.2661448.7106.41.63.1AVERAGE84.529743548105.32.26.1<\/p>\n

The Wilson Staff Model X again launched lower (28.5\u00b0) but spun more (7,982 rpm) than the standard Wilson Staff Model, which launched at 29.4\u00b0 and spun at 7,329 rpm.<\/p>\n

Given their similarity with driver, the choice between the two really comes down to what you want with your irons and wedges \u2013 a penetrating flight with more spin from the Staff Model X or a higher launch with slightly less spin from the standard Staff Model. <\/p>\n

\"AllConsistency<\/p>\n

One other thing tour pros demand is consistency. <\/p>\n

The realities of mass manufacturing mean that minor imperfections and discrepancies exist from one ball to the next. That\u2019s why Bryson DeChambeau famously floats his balls in an Epsom salt solution to check their balance and discard any that don\u2019t meet his exacting standards. <\/p>\n

Most pros don\u2019t do that, but when the margins are so fine and the stakes so high, they do need every ball they use to be as close to identical as possible. <\/p>\n

To measure consistency, each part of the Robot Test is done 12 times, with each ball only hit once. That means a brand new Wilson Staff Model golf ball is hit with a driver at 115mph, and every piece of data is recorded. Then another brand new Wilson Staff Model is hit with a driver at 115mph, and every piece of data is recorded. The process is repeated 12 times. 12 times at 85mph, 12 times at 100mph, 12 times at 115mph, 12 times with a 7-iron, and 12 times with a pitching wedge. That\u2019s 60 brand new balls, all hit just once. Not only does it provide the cleanest data, it also allows us to see which golf ball models are most consistent ball-to-ball.<\/p>\n

Remember, the robot is as consistent as it gets, and the test is done in a controlled indoors center to remove environment variables, so any changes in performance can be attributed to inconsistencies between the balls. <\/p>\n

Both Wilson balls showed themselves to be very consistent, ranking second and joint-third of the 24 balls tested.<\/p>\n

Ball Speed RankBackspin RankCarry Distance RankAverage RankVice Pro1432.7Wilson Staff Model3343.3Vice Pro Plus10124.3Wilson Staff Model X2654.3Seed SD 0111716.3Callaway Chrome Tour9577Vice Pro Air5897.3Titleist Pro V1x41187.7Snell Prime 2.01921110.7Vice Tour6171211.7Srixon Q-Star Tour1591312.3Seed SD X11220612.7Callaway Chrome Tour X8161613.3Titleist Pro V118101414TaylorMade TP57191814.7Kirkland Signature V316121715Snell Prime 4.013131915TaylorMade TP5x17181015Seed SD 0220151516.7Callaway Chrome Soft14212118.7Snell Prime 3.022142018.7TaylorMade SpeedSoft21232222Srixon Distance23222322.7Srixon AD33324242424Everything you need to know about the Wilson Staff Model and Staff Model X golf balls <\/p>\n

Price per ball $4.16 \/ 0.21c per yard <\/p>\n

\"Wilson \"Amazon\" <\/a> Despite performing well during my 2023 robot test Wilson golf balls have barely been played on tour for decades. Thanks to introducing the new Staff Model X the company now has a more traditional two-pronged attack into the premium tour-level golf ball market.
\u00a0
See the standard Staff Model as an alternative to the Titleist Pro V1, and you\u2019ll be thinking exactly along the right lines. The 2024 model has a compression of 95 which is 8.7% softer than the Staff Model X, so expect 100 RPM less driver and 300 RPM less iron spin plus a lower more penetrating ball flight.<\/p>\n

Read our full Wilson Staff Model (2024) golf ball<\/a> review. <\/p>\n

Pros & Cons Specs <\/p>\n

Pros An impressive alternative to the Titleist Pro V1, Callaway Chrome Tour and TaylorMade TP5An accurate and consistent choice Cons The Wilson Staff Model X offers more wedge and iron spin Construction 4-Piece Cover Urethane Cost per ball $4.16 <\/p>\n

Price per ball $4.16 \/ 2.16c per yard <\/p>\n

\"The \"Amazon\" <\/a> With a compression of 104, the Staff Model X offers golfers a firmer faster feel than the 95 compression standard Staff Model ball. This model is most like the original 2020 Staff Model<\/a>, so if that used to be your favorite Wilson golf ball this is the most current model to replace it.
\u00a0
Expect a higher launch and ball flight than the standard Staff Model ball you\u2019ll also get maximum shot shape potential from this offering. See the X as an alternative to the Titleist Pro V1x, TaylorMade TP5x, and Callaway Chrome Tour X and you\u2019ll be thinking along exactly the right lines.<\/p>\n

Read our full Wilson Staff Model X (2024) golf ball<\/a> review. <\/p>\n

Pros & Cons Specs <\/p>\n

Pros A very fast golf ball optionFaster and longer than a Titleist Pro V1 and Pro V1xAn accurate and consistent golf ball choice Cons It’s a shame about the price hike for 2024 Construction 4-Piece Cover Urethane Cost per ball $4.16 <\/p>\n

READ MORE: Best golf balls<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Are equipment deals preventing tour pros getting maximum performance from their golf ball? Being a tour pro is…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":60792,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3029],"tags":[3151],"class_list":["post-60791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-wilson-golf","tag-wilson-golf"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60791"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60791\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60792"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/golf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}