jelentette be<\/a>, hogy 72 \u00f3ra m\u00falva visszal\u00e9p abban az esetben, ha Koncz \u00c1ron, a Tisza P\u00e1rt Budapest 4-es v\u00e1laszt\u00f3ker\u00fcleti jel\u00f6ltje nem fordul vissza a jel\u00f6lts\u00e9gt\u0151l. A posztj\u00e1ban akkor azt \u00edrta,<\/p>\n\u201e72 \u00f3ra m\u00falva, p\u00e9ntek d\u00e9lben teh\u00e1t ellen\u0151rz\u00f6m, hogy megt\u00f6rt\u00e9nt-e Koncz \u00c1ron visszal\u00e9p\u00e9se, \u00e9s amennyiben nem, akkor minden tov\u00e1bbi \u00e9rtes\u00edt\u00e9s n\u00e9lk\u00fcl beny\u00fajtom a visszal\u00e9p\u00e9si nyilatkozatot.\u201d<\/p>\n
Tordai Bence n\u00e9gy \u00e9ve Budapest 4-es sz\u00e1m\u00fa, a II. ker\u00fcletet mag\u00e1ba foglal\u00f3 v\u00e1laszt\u00f3ker\u00fclet\u00e9ben lett orsz\u00e1ggy\u0171l\u00e9si k\u00e9pvisel\u0151. Akkor az ellenz\u00e9ki \u00f6sszefog\u00e1s jel\u00f6ltjek\u00e9nt, 51,89 sz\u00e1zal\u00e9kos eredm\u00e9nnyel gy\u0151zte le G\u00f3r Csab\u00e1t, a Fidesz\u2013KDNP helyi jel\u00f6ltj\u00e9t.<\/p>\n
Tordai kor\u00e1bban bejelentette, hogy a P\u00e1rbesz\u00e9db\u0151l val\u00f3 t\u00e1voz\u00e1sa<\/a> ut\u00e1n f\u00fcggetlenk\u00e9nt fog indulni a 2026-os v\u00e1laszt\u00e1son, \u00e9s t\u00f6bbsz\u00f6r is arra k\u00e9rte a Tisza P\u00e1rt jel\u00f6ltj\u00e9t, Koncz \u00c1ront, hogy l\u00e9pjen vissza az \u0151 jav\u00e1ra. A k\u00e9pvisel\u0151 a posztj\u00e1ban arra is kit\u00e9rt, hogy egy pillanatra sem felejtette el, hogy most \u201ea Fideszt\u0151l val\u00f3 megszabadul\u00e1s\u201d az els\u0151dleges c\u00e9l, \u00e9s azt \u00edrta akkor, hogy a jel\u00f6lts\u00e9g\u00e9t pedig addig tartja fent, am\u00edg az bizonyosan nem eredm\u00e9nyezheti azt, hogy a budapesti 4-es v\u00e1laszt\u00f3ker\u00fcletben fideszes egy\u00e9ni gy\u0151zelem sz\u00fclessen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u00cdg\u00e9ret\u00e9hez h\u00edven p\u00e9nteken bement \u00e9s leadta a visszal\u00e9p\u00e9s\u00e9t Tordai Bence \u2013 mondta a Telex megkeres\u00e9s\u00e9re a P\u00e1rbesz\u00e9d volt…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":51127,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[80,44,42,40,19757,43,41,10425,945,3984,948,1127],"class_list":{"0":"post-51126","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-magyarorszag","8":"tag-belfold","9":"tag-hu","10":"tag-hungarian","11":"tag-hungary","12":"tag-koncz-aron","13":"tag-magyar","14":"tag-magyarorszag","15":"tag-parbeszed","16":"tag-tisza-part","17":"tag-tordai-bence","18":"tag-valasztas-2026","19":"tag-visszalepes"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@hu\/116341156307814791","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51126","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51126"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51126\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51127"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51126"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51126"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/hu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51126"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}