Anderson, C. B. et al. Chapter 2. Conceptualizing the diverse values of nature and their contributions to people. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6493134 (2022).
O’Brien, K. et al. IPBES Transformative Change Assessment: Summary for Policymakers. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11382230 (2024).
Muradian, R. & Gómez-Baggethun, E. Beyond ecosystem services and nature’s contributions: Is it time to leave utilitarian environmentalism behind?. Ecol. Econ. 185, 107038 (2021).
Washington, H., Piccolo, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Kopnina, H. & Alberro, H. The Trouble with Anthropocentric Hubris, with Examples from Conservation. Conservation 1, 285–298 (2021).
Abson, D. J. et al. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46, 30–39 (2017).
Ives, C. D. et al. Reconnecting with nature for sustainability. Sustain Sci. 13, 1389–1397 (2018).
Harms, P., Hofer, M. & Artmann, M. Planning cities with nature for sustainability transformations — a systematic review. Urban Transform 6, 9 (2024).
Duvall, P., Lennon, M. & Scott, M. The ‘natures’ of planning: evolving conceptualizations of nature as expressed in urban planning theory and practice. Eur. Plan. Stud. 26, 480–501 (2018).
Bush, J. & Doyon, A. Building urban resilience with nature-based solutions: How can urban planning contribute?. Cities 95, 102483 (2019).
Maller, C. Re-orienting nature-based solutions with more-than-human thinking. Cities 113, 103155 (2021).
Pineda-Pinto, M. et al. Planning Ecologically Just Cities: A Framework to Assess Ecological Injustice Hotspots for Targeted Urban Design and Planning of Nature-Based Solutions. Urban Policy Res. 40, 206–222 (2022a).
Schlosberg, D. Environmental and Ecological Justice: Theory and Practice in the United States. in The State and the Global Ecological Crisis (eds. Barry, J. & Eckersley, R.) 97–116 (The MIT Press, 2005).
Thaler, M. What If: multispecies justice as the expression of utopian desire. Environ. Politics 31, 258–276 (2022).
Joshi, N. & Kothari, A. Autonomy and pluriversal energy futures in Ladakh, India. Human Geography 19427786241303762 https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786241303762 (2024).
McPhearson, T. et al. Radical changes are needed for transformations to a good Anthropocene. npj Urban Sustain 1, 1–13 (2021).
Houston, D., Hillier, J., MacCallum, D., Steele, W. & Byrne, J. Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and ‘becoming-world’ in planning theory. Plan. Theory 17, 190–212 (2018).
Jon, I. Deciphering posthumanism: Why and how it matters to urban planning in the Anthropocene. Plan. Theory 19, 392–420 (2020).
Metzger, J. A more-than-human approach to environmental planning. in The Routledge companion to environmental planning (eds. Davoudi, S., Cowell, R., White, I. & Blanco, H.) 190–199 (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY, 2020). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179780-20.
Celermajer, D. et al. Multispecies justice: theories, challenges, and a research agenda for environmental politics. Environ. Politics 30, 119–140 (2021).
Tanasescu, M. Rethinking representation: The challenge of non-humans. Aust. J. Political Sci. 49, 40–53 (2014).
Pickering, J., Bäckstrand, K. & Schlosberg, D. Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracy-environment nexus. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 22, 1–15 (2020).
Schlosberg, D. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. (2007).
Pineda-Pinto, M., Frantzeskaki, N. & Nygaard, C. A. The potential of nature-based solutions to deliver ecologically just cities: Lessons for research and urban planning from a systematic literature review. Ambio 51, 167–182 (2022b).
Raymond, C. M. et al. Applying multispecies justice in nature-based solutions and urban sustainability planning: Tensions and prospects. npj Urban Sustain 5, 2 (2025).
Ampatzidou, C. et al. All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance. Urban Plan. 3, 34–46 (2018).
Sousa, M., Pais Antunes, A., Pinto, N. & Zagalo, N. Serious Games in Spatial Planning: Strengths, Limitations and Support Frameworks. IJSG 9, 115–133 (2022).
Flood, S., Cradock-Henry, N. A., Blackett, P. & Edwards, P. Adaptive and interactive climate futures: systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision-making. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063005 (2018).
Chen, J. C. & Martin, A. R. Role-Play Simulations as a Transformative Methodology in Environmental Education. J. Transformative Educ. 13, 85–102 (2015).
Daniau, S. The Transformative Potential of Role-Playing Games—: From Play Skills to Human Skills. Simul. Gaming 47, 423–444 (2016).
Rumore, D., Schenk, T. & Susskind, L. Role-play simulations for climate change adaptation education and engagement. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 745–750 (2016).
Gordon, S. & Thomas, I. The learning sticks’: reflections on a case study of role-playing for sustainability. Environ. Educ. Res. 24, 172–190 (2018).
Rao, D. & Stupans, I. Exploring the potential of role play in higher education: development of a typology and teacher guidelines. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 49, 427–436 (2012).
Macy, J. & Brown, M. Y. Coming Back to Life: The Updated Guide to the Work That Reconnects. (New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 2014).
Lambert, L. M. Ecological empathy: relational theory and practice. Ecosyst. People 20, 2396919 (2024).
Sachs Olsen, C. Co-Creation Beyond Humans: The Arts of Multispecies Placemaking. UP 7, (2022).
Castellazzi, E., Hakkarainen, V. & Raymond, C. M. Role-play as a catalyst for justice awareness: a relational approach to nature-based solutions with secondary school students. Ecosyst. People 20, 2430591 (2024).
Istrate, A.-L. & Hamel, P. Urban Nature Games for integrating nature-based solutions in urban planning: A review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 239, 104860 (2023).
Bolton, G. M. & Heathcote, D. So You Want to Use Role-Play? A New Approach in How to Plan. (Trentham, Stoke-on-Trent, 1999).
Baggio, J. A., Brown, K. & Hellebrandt, D. Boundary object or bridging concept? A citation network analysis of resilience. E&S 20, (2015).
Artmann, M. Human-nature resonance in times of social-ecological crisis – a relational account for sustainability transformation. Ecosystems and People 19, (2023).
Harms, P. & Ortner, S. Speaking as a river — a guide for implementing multispecies role-playing games. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14856435 (2025).
Knauß, S. Why the life of the other matters – The decolonial ethics of exteriority in Dussel, Qui-jano and Mignolo. in Civilization – Nature – Subjugation (eds. Haar, C., Kaufmann, M. & Müller, C.) 341–354 (Peter Lang D, 2021).
Knauß, S. Dekoloniale Ethik und die Grenzen der Redefreiheit. ZfPP 9, 333–350 (2023).
Mariani, I. Other Worlds. When Worldbuilding and Roleplay Feed Speculation. in Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design for Contemporary Interactive Environments (eds. Marcus, A. & Rosenzweig, E.) vol. 12201 482–495 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020).
Pereira, L. M., Hichert, T., Hamann, M., Preiser, R. & Biggs, R. Using futures methods to create transformative spaces: visions of a good Anthropocene in southern Africa. ES 23, art19 (2018).
Horcea-Milcu, A.-I. et al. Values in transformational sustainability science: four perspectives for change. Sustain Sci. 14, 1425–1437 (2019).
Wamsler, C. et al. Enabling new mindsets and transformative skills for negotiating and activating climate action: Lessons from UNFCCC conferences of the parties. Environ. Sci. Policy 112, 227–235 (2020).
Nagler, B. Rollenspiel. in Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung. Quantitative und Qualitative Methoden (eds. Kühl, Stefan., Strodtholz, Petra. & Taffertshofer, Andreas.) 124–144 (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91570-8_7.
Bush, J. & Doyon, A. Planning a just nature-based city: Listening for the voice of an urban river. Environ. Sci. Policy 143, 55–63 (2023).
Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P. & Spierenburg, M. Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach. AMBIO 43, 579–591 (2014).
Embassy of the North Sea. Route 2030 – Embassy of the North Sea. Route 2030 – Embassy of the North Sea https://www.embassyofthenorthsea.com/route-2030/ (2024).
Edwards, P. et al. Tools for adaptive governance for complex social-ecological systems: a review of role-playing-games as serious games at the community-policy interface. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 113002 (2019).
Hartt, M., Hosseini, H. & Mostafapour, M. Game On: Exploring the Effectiveness of Game-based Learning. Plan. Pract. Res. 35, 589–604 (2020).
Meligrana, J. F. & Andrew, J. S. Role-playing simulations in urban planning education: a survey of student learning expectations and outcomes. Plan. Pract. Res. 18, 95–107 (2003).
Robinson, G. M., Hardman, M. & Matley, R. J. Using games in geographical and planning-related teaching: Serious games, edutainment, board games and role-play. Soc. Sci. Humanities Open 4, 100208 (2021).
Stadler, C. & Spörrle, M. Das Rollenspiel. ZPS 7, 165–188 (2008).
Crow, M. L. & Nelson, L. P. The Effects of Using Academic Role-Playing in a Teacher Education Service-Learning Course. IJRP 26–34 https://doi.org/10.33063/ijrp.vi5.234 (2015).
Rautio, P. et al. For whom? By whom?”: critical perspectives of participation in ecological citizen science. Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 17, 765–793 (2022).
Hernandez-Santin, C., Amati, M., Bekessy, S. & Desha, C. Integrating biodiversity as a non-human stakeholder within urban development. Landsc. Urban Plan. 232, 104678 (2023).
Clarke, R. et al. More-than-human participation. interactions 26, 60–63 (2019).
Haldrup, M., Samson, K. & Laurien, T. Designing for Multispecies Commons. in (eds. Vlachokyriakos, V. et al.) 14–19 (ACM, Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3537797.3537801.
O’Sullivan, C. Role-play and research. in Research Methods in Education 606–627 (Routledge, London, 2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539-30.
Kraus, R. You Must Participate: Violating Research Ethical Principles Through Role-Play. Coll. Teach. 56, 131–136 (2008).
Schinko, T. & Bednar-Friedl, B. Fostering social learning through role-play simulations to operationalize comprehensive climate risk management: Insights from applying the RESPECT role-play in Austria. Clim. Risk Manag. 35, 100418 (2022).
Ferrero, G., Bichai, F. & Rusca, M. Experiential Learning through Role-Playing: Enhancing Stakeholder Collaboration in Water Safety Plans. Water 10, 227 (2018).
Agusdinata, D. B. & Lukosch, H. Supporting Interventions to Reduce Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Transdisciplinary Role-Playing Game Development. Simul. Gaming 50, 359–376 (2019).
Alejandro, A., Maertens, L., Cheli, Z., Fragnière, A. & Sarrasin, O. Designing role-play simulations for climate change decision-making: A step-by-step approach to facilitate cooperation between science and policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 152, 103650 (2024).
Garcia, C. A. et al. Strategy games to improve environmental policymaking. Nat. Sustain 5, 464–471 (2022).
Stahlke, I. Das Rollenspiel als Methode der qualitativen Sozialforschung. (Universität Bremen, Bremen, 2001).
Oerter, R. Psychologie des Spiels. Beltz: Weinheim, 2013.
Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005).
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology vol. 3 (2006).
Tafon, R., Saunders, F., Pikner, T. & Gilek, M. Multispecies blue justice and energy transition conflict: examining challenges and possibilities for synergy between low-carbon energy and justice for humans and nonhuman nature. Marit. Stud. 22, 1–16 (2023).
de Groot, W. T. Environmental science theory. Concepts and methods in a one-world problem-oriented paradigm. (Leiden University, 1992). https://hdl.handle.net/1887/11548.
Walsh, Z., Böhme, J. & Wamsler, C. Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education. Ambio 50, 74–84 (2021).