Sarah-May BuccieriEast Yorkshire and Lincolnshire

BBC A woman with brown curly hair wearing a blue jumper. She is sitting in a wooden workshop surrounded by various tools. She is holding a pair of silver earrings which are rectangular in shape.BBC

Emma Farley says she felt “horror” after “copies” of her work were promoted with her own photos

A jewellery designer says she feels “violated” after a fashion website listed a “copied” pair of her earrings for sale, with her own photos used to promote them

Emma Farley, 49, from Burnby, East Yorkshire, said she felt “disbelief” when she saw the jewellery being advertised on X-ZIPO, which is based in Hong Kong, for less than half the price of her originals.

“They don’t even try and hide it,” she added. “They’re using my images.”

In a message to Farley, which the BBC was copied into, X-ZIPO apologised and said the product had been removed from its online store.

Farley said she noticed what appeared to be a copied pair of her sterling silver earrings for sale on X-ZIPO after an advertisement popped up on another site.

The listing, titled “simple and compact plant flower earrings”, included pictures she had taken to advertise the earrings on her own online retail pages.

“I was in disbelief,” she said. “Then it turned to horror, as I realised this is nothing to do with me.”

Emma Farley A pair of silver earrings which are rectangular in shape and have an imprinted five-petal flower design on them. Behind the earrings is a white background with blue and pink flowers.Emma Farley

This photo of the original earrings, taken by Emma, was used to promote the copies

According to its website, X-ZIPO sells “unique fashion products from our independent designers, using high-quality materials and reliable production”.

In correspondence sent to Farley, the company said: “We sincerely apologize [sic] for the inconvenience caused. The related products have been completely removed from our store, and the corresponding posts on our social media platforms have also been deleted.”

It went on to say that the company had “absolutely no intention of misusing” Farley’s copyrighted material.

The company added: “Our store carries a large number of products sourced from multiple suppliers, and as a result, there may have been an oversight in copyright verification among the extensive range of authorized [sic] products.

“We fully respect original content and intellectual property.”

Farley said it was the second time her work had been copied and listed for sale on a larger website.

The practice had a “massive impact” on designers, not least because profits from the earrings she sold went to her wildlife charity, Little Silver Hedgehog.

“I know of other designers and makers who have gone out of business – it’s just not viable,” she added.

A woman with long brown hair is smiling and wearing a red and blue dress as she stands in an art gallery with various artworks on white shelves in front of white walls and mirrors with black frames.

Artist Eve Marshall says it feels “deflating” when artworks are copied

Eve Marshall, a 43-year-old artist from Indigo Crow Gallery in Lincoln, also had an artwork copied and sold online without her consent.

“It was very deflating, the time I spend on a piece is massive,” she said. “Then someone else takes that idea… it’s really disturbing.”

She believes the practice is common.

“Lots of cheap sites are selling knock-offs of people’s artwork,” she added. “It’s such a shame.”

A woman with purple short hair is wearing glasses and an animal print dress. She is standing in front of her colourful print-style artwork.

Mel Langton says more needs to be done to protect artists’ work

Mel Langton, who co-owns the gallery, avoids advertising her work online because she is worried about artificial intelligence “scraping” and reusing it without consent, despite her work being copyrighted.

She said the process of registering designs often put the onus on the artist rather than the copier.

“It feels like, this is my house, you can steal my things, but it’s my job to get them back,” she added.

Although copyright protection is applied automatically to original works, artists can apply for additional legal measures such as design registration, trademarks and patents.

Dids Macdonald, co-founder of the campaigning organisation Anti-Copying and Design, said protections for artists should be more accessible.

She also called on the government to introduce tougher deterrents for people who intentionally take the work of others.

“It will send a very strong message to those large organisations,” she said. “Especially the Goliaths in this world who think that they can get away with it scot-free.

“The theft of a designer’s original pieces of work is absolutely not acceptable.

“Imitation isn’t flattery if it costs you your business.”