• Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Richardson, K. et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh2458 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dawson, M. N. Species richness, habitable volume, and species densities in freshwater, the sea, and on land. Front. Biogeogr. 4, 105–116 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Juan-Jordá, M. J., Mosqueira, I., Freire, J. & Dulvy, N. K. The conservation and management of tunas and their relatives: setting life history research priorities. PLoS ONE 8, e70405 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guy, C. S. et al. A paradoxical knowledge gap in science for critically endangered fishes and game fishes during the sixth mass extinction. Sci. Rep. 11, 8447 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Webb, T. J. & Mindel, B. L. Global patterns of extinction risk in marine and non-marine systems. Curr. Biol. 25, 506–511 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anticamara, J. A., Watson, R., Gelchu, A. & Pauly, D. Global fishing effort (1950–2010): trends, gaps, and implications. Fish. Res. 107, 131–136 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duarte, C. M. et al. Rebuilding marine life. Nature 580, 39–51 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Hara, C. C., Frazier, M. & Halpern, B. S. At-risk marine biodiversity faces extensive, expanding, and intensifying human impacts. Science 372, 84–87 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dulvy, N. K. et al. Overfishing drives over one third of all sharks and rays toward a global extinction crisis. Curr. Biol. 31, 4773–4787.e8 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dulvy, N. K. et al. in The Global Status of Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras (eds Jabado, R. W. et al.) 77–86 (IUCN, 2024).

  • Jaureguiberry, P. et al. The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm9982 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marsh, S. M. E. et al. Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN red list of threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 36, e13844 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turner, J. A. et al. Targeting ocean conservation outcomes though threat reduction. npj Ocean Sustain. 3, 4 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nitzsche, N. M. et al. Coupled DNA barcoding and mini-barcoding approaches expose illegal trade of endangered elasmobranchs from the Southwestern Atlantic. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-025-09977-0 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Agyeman, N. A., Blanco-Fernandez, C., Steinhaussen, S. L., Garcia-Vazquez, E. & Machado-Schiaffino, G. Illegal, unreported, and unregulated fisheries threatening shark conservation in African waters revealed from high levels of shark mislabelling in Ghana. Genes https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12071002 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feitosa, L. M. et al. DNA-based identification reveals illegal trade of threatened shark species in a global elasmobranch conservation hotspot. Sci. Rep. 8, 3347 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Weigmann, S. Annotated checklist of the living sharks, batoids and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes) of the world, with a focus on biogeographical diversity. J. Fish Biol. 88, 837–1037 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • White, W. T., O’Neill, H. L. & Naylor, G. J. in Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives 3rd edn (eds Carrier, J. C. et al.) 31–57 (CRC Press, 2022).

  • Finucci, B. et al. Fishing for oil and meat drives irreversible defaunation of deepwater sharks and rays. Science 383, 1135–1141 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lucifora, L. O., Garcia, V. B. & Worm, B. Global diversity hotspots and conservation priorities for sharks. PLoS ONE 6, e19356 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davidson, L. N. K. & Dulvy, N. K. Global marine protected areas to prevent extinctions. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0040 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dulvy, N. K. et al. Challenges and priorities in shark and ray conservation. Curr. Biol. 27, R565–R572 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown, K. & Puschendorf, R. Future climate-driven habitat loss and range shift of the Critically Endangered whitefin swellshark (Cephaloscyllium albipinnum). PeerJ 13, e18787 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martins, A. P. B. et al. Analysis of the supply chain and conservation status of sharks (Elasmobranchii: superorder Selachimorpha) based on fisher knowledge. PLoS ONE 13, e0193969 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Booth, H., Squires, D. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. The neglected complexities of shark fisheries, and priorities for holistic risk-based management. Ocean Coast. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104994 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Womersley, F. C., Loveridge, A. & Sims, D. W. Four steps to curb ‘ocean roadkill’. Nature 621, 34–38 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Judah, A. B. et al. Deep-sea mining risks for sharks, rays, and chimaeras. Curr. Biol. 35, 5353–5362.e3 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feldheim, K. A., Fields, A. T., Chapman, D. D., Scharer, R. M. & Poulakis, G. R. Insights into reproduction and behavior of the smalltooth sawfish Pristis pectinata. Endanger. Species Res. 34, 463–471 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gelsleichter, J. & Walker, C. J. in Sharks and Their Relatives II 1st edn (eds Carrier, J. C. et al.) 507–554 (CRC Press, 2010).

  • Parton, K. J. et al. Investigating the presence of microplastics in demersal sharks of the North-East Atlantic. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68680-1 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dedman, S. et al. Ecological roles and importance of sharks in the Anthropocene ocean. Science 385, eadl2362 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sherman, C. S. et al. High overexploitation risk and management shortfall in highly traded requiem sharks. Conserv. Lett. 16, e12940 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sherman, C. S. et al. Guitarfishes are plucked: undermanaged in global fisheries despite declining populations and high volume of unreported international trade. Mar. Policy 155, 105753 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pacoureau, N. et al. Conservation successes and challenges for sharks and rays in Western Atlantic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2216891120 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Worm, B. et al. Global shark fishing mortality still rising despite widespread regulatory change. Science 383, 225–230 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sherley, R. B. et al. Estimating IUCN red list population reduction: JARA — a decision-support tool applied to pelagic sharks. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12688 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bachman, S. P. et al. Progress, challenges and opportunities for red listing. Biol. Conserv. 234, 45–55 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cazalis, V. et al. Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 359–370 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blasco, G. D., Ferraro, D. M., Cottrell, R. S., Halpern, B. S. & Froehlich, H. E. Substantial gaps in the current fisheries data landscape. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.612831 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pauly, D. & Zeller, D. Global Atlas of Marine Fisheries: A Critical Appraisal of Catches and Ecosystem Impacts (Island Press, 2016).

  • Cashion, M. S., Bailly, N. & Pauly, D. Official catch data underrepresent shark and ray taxa caught in Mediterranean and Black Sea fisheries. Mar. Policy 105, 1–9 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fischer, J., Erikstein, K., D’Offay, B., Barone, M. & Guggisberg, S. Review of the implementation of the International plan of action for the conservation and management of sharks. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1076. FAO https://www.fao.org/4/i3036e/i3036e00.htm (2012).

  • Okes, N. & Sant, G. An overview of major shark traders, catchers and species. TRAFFIC https://www.traffic.org/site/assets/files/12427/top-20-sharks-web-1.pdf (2019).

  • Clarke, S. C. et al. Global estimates of shark catches using trade records from commercial markets. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1115–1126 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • James, K. C., Lewison, R. L., Dillingham, P. W., Curtis, K. A. & Moore, J. E. Drivers of retention and discards of elasmobranch non-target catch. Environ. Conserv. 43, 3–12 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Worm, B. et al. Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Mar. Policy 40, 194–204 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Costello, C. et al. Status and solutions for the world’s unassessed fisheries. Science 338, 517–520 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • CITES Secretariat. Deep diving into shark catch and trade mismatches. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), Geneva, Switzerland. Animals Committee 33 Doc. 41 (Rev. 1). cites.org https://cites.org/sites/default/files/documents/E-AC33-41-R1-A5_1.pdf (2024).

  • Rousseau, Y. et al. A database of mapped global fishing activity 1950–2017. Sci. Data https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02824-6 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rousseau, Y., Watson, R. A., Blanchard, J. L. & Fulton, E. A. Evolution of global marine fishing fleets and the response of fished resources. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12238–12243 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MacNeil, M. A. et al. Hidden diversity of threatened sharks and rays in the global meat trade. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.24.650194 (2025).

  • White, W. T. et al. Rapid fishery assessment by market survey (RFAMS) — an improved rapid-assessment approach to characterising fish landings in developing countries. PLoS ONE 9, 11 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jabado, R. W., Al Ghais, S. M., Hamza, W., Shivji, M. S. & Henderson, A. C. Shark diversity in the Arabian/Persian Gulf higher than previously thought: insights based on species composition of shark landings in the United Arab Emirates. Mar. Biodivers. 45, 719–731 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lee, H. T., Liao, C. H. & Hsu, T. H. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding in the fish market and nearby seafood restaurants in Taiwan reveals the underestimation of fish species diversity in seafood. Biology https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10111132 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jabado, R. W. & Spaet, J. L. Elasmobranch fisheries in the Arabian Seas Region: characteristics, trade and management. Fish Fish. 18, 1096–1118 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alfaro-Shigueto, J. et al. Where small can have a large impact: structure and characterization of small-scale fisheries in Peru. Fish. Res. 106, 8–17 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Giovos, I. et al. Approaching the “real” state of elasmobranch fisheries and trade: a case study from the Mediterranean. Ocean Coast. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105743 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Doherty, P. D. et al. Artisanal fisheries catch highlights hotspot for threatened sharks and rays in the Republic of the Congo. Conserv. Sci. Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13017 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett, R. H. et al. Range extension of the critically endangered shorttail nurse shark Pseudoginglymostoma brevicaudatum (Orectolobiformes: Ginglymostomatidae) to include Mozambique, with implications for management. Mar. Biodivers. 51, 7 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bineesh, K., Beura, S., Das, M., Nashad, M. & Akhilesh, K. Description of a new species of hound shark of the genus Iago (Carcharhiniformes: Triakidae) from the northern Indian Ocean. Indian. J. Fish. 72, 18–28 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rezaie-Atagholipour, M., Jabado, R. W., Owfi, F., Hesni, M. A. & Ebert, D. A. Lost and found: rediscovery of the extinct tentacled butterfly ray Gymnura tentaculata in Iranian waters. Oryx 55, 489–490 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dulvy, N. K. et al. Ecological erosion and expanding extinction risk of sharks and rays. Science 386, eadn1477 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mull, C. G. et al. Sharkipedia: a curated open-access database of shark and ray life history traits and abundance time-series. Sci. Data 9, 559 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dudley, S. F. J. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Population status of 14 shark species caught in the protective gillnets off KwaZulu–Natal beaches, South Africa, 1978–2003. Mar. Freshw. Res. 57, 225–240 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Everett, B. I., Cliff, G., Dudley, S. F. J., Wintner, S. P. & van der Elst, R. P. Do sawfish Pristis spp. represent South Africa’s first local extirpation of marine elasmobranchs in the modern era? Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 37, 275–284 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roff, G., Brown, C. J., Priest, M. A. & Mumby, P. J. Decline of coastal apex shark populations over the past half century. Commun. Biol. 1, 223 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maunder, M. N. & Punt, A. E. A review of integrated analysis in fisheries stock assessment. Fish. Res. 142, 61–74 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hoyle, S. D. et al. Catch per unit effort modelling for stock assessment: a summary of good practices. Fish. Res. 269, 106860 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marandel, F., Lorance, P. & Trenkel, V. M. A Bayesian state-space model to estimate population biomass with catch and limited survey data: application to the thornback ray (Raja clavata) in the Bay of Biscay. Aquat. Living Resour. 29, 209 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Randon, M., Dowd, M. & Joy, R. A real-time data assimilative forecasting system for animal tracking. Ecology 103, e3718 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Brien, K. et al. Evaluation of a spatiotemporal index standardization method for coastal shark species; implications for future stock assessments. Front. Mar. Sci. 12, 1621720 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peterson, C. D. et al. Preliminary recovery of coastal sharks in the south-east United States. Fish Fish. 18, 845–859 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pacoureau, N. et al. Half a century of global decline in oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Nature 589, 567–571 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maxwell, D. & Jennings, S. Power of monitoring programmes to detect decline and recovery of rare and vulnerable fish. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 25–37 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goodman, M. C. et al. Reef shark population declines on remote Pacific reefs: inferences from multiple methods in a data-limited fishery. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 751, 97–114 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pickett, S. T. A. in Long-term Studies in Ecology 1st edn (ed. Likens, G. E.) 110–135 (Springer, 1989).

  • Jennings, S. & Polunin, N. V. C. Relationships between catch and effort in Fijian multispecies reef fisheries subject to different levels of exploitation. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2, 89–101 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jennings, S., Warr, K. J., Greenstreet, S. P. R. & Cotter, A. J. in Effects of Fishing on Non-target Species and Habitats: Biological Conservation and Socio-economic Issues (eds Kaiser, M. J. & de Groot, S. J.) 3–14 (Blackwell Science, 2000).

  • Newton, K., Côté, I. M., Pilling, G. M., Jennings, S. & Dulvy, N. K. Current and future sustainability of island coral reef fisheries. Curr. Biol. 17, 655–658 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cinner, J. E. et al. Gravity of human impacts mediates coral reef conservation gains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6116–E6125 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MacNeil, M. A. et al. Global status and conservation potential of reef sharks. Nature 583, 801–806 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Navia, A. F. & Mejía-Falla, P. A. Fishing effects on elasmobranchs from the Pacific Coast of Colombia. Univ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.SC21-1.feoe (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sherman, C. S., Heupel, M. R., Moore, S. K., Chin, A. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. When sharks are away, rays will play: effects of top predator removal in coral reef ecosystems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 641, 145–157 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Simpfendorfer, C. A. et al. Widespread diversity deficits of coral reef sharks and rays. Science 380, 1155–1160 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sigsgaard, E. E. et al. Population characteristics of a large whale shark aggregation inferred from seawater environmental DNA. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0004 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hillary, R. et al. Genetic relatedness reveals total population size of white sharks in eastern Australia and New Zealand. Sci. Rep. 8, 2661 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bonfil, R., Díaz-Jaimes, P., Palacios-Barreto, P., Mendoza Vargas, O. U. & Ricaño-Soriano, M. Improved eDNA assay evidences further refugia for critically endangered smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata) in Mexico. Front. Mar. Sci. 11, 1290661 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Le Port, A., Bakker, J., Cooper, M. K., Huerlimann, R. & Mariani, S. in Shark Research — Emerging Technologies and Applications for the Field and Laboratory 1st edn (eds Carrier, J. C. et al.) 255–283 (CRC Press, 2018).

  • Boussarie, G. et al. Environmental DNA illuminates the dark diversity of sharks. Sci. Adv. 4, eaap9661 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davenport, D. et al. Effective number of white shark (Carcharodon carcharias, Linnaeus) breeders is stable over four successive years in the population adjacent to eastern Australia and New Zealand. Ecol. Evol. 11, 186–198 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • White, E. R., Myers, M. C., Flemming, J. M. & Baum, J. K. Shifting elasmobranch community assemblage at Cocos Island—an isolated marine protected area. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12478 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ferretti, F., Curnick, D., Liu, K., Romanov, E. V. & Block, B. A. Shark baselines and the conservation role of remote coral reef ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0333 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ward-Paige, C. A., Pattengill-Semmens, C., Myers, R. A. & Lotze, H. K. Spatial and temporal trends in yellow stingray abundance: evidence from diver surveys. Environ. Biol. Fishes 90, 263–276 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ward-Paige, C. A. et al. Large-scale absence of sharks on reefs in the greater-Caribbean: a footprint of human pressures. PLoS ONE 5, e11968 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marshall, A. D. & Pierce, S. J. The use and abuse of photographic identification in sharks and rays. J. Fish Biol. 80, 1361–1379 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hussey, N. E. et al. Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348, 1255642 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McAuley, R. B., Simpfendorfer, C. A. & Hall, N. G. A method for evaluating the impacts of fishing mortality and stochastic influences on the demography of two long-lived shark stocks. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 1710–1722 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dudgeon, C. L., Pollock, K. H., Braccini, J. M., Semmens, J. M. & Barnett, A. Integrating acoustic telemetry into mark–recapture models to improve the precision of apparent survival and abundance estimates. Oecologia 178, 761–772 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Byrne, M. E. et al. Satellite telemetry reveals higher fishing mortality rates than previously estimated, suggesting overfishing of an apex marine predator. Proc. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0658 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Benson, J. F. et al. Juvenile survival, competing risks, and spatial variation in mortality risk of a marine apex predator. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 2888–2897 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ledger, S. E. H. et al. Past, present, and future of the Living Planet Index. npj Biodivers. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44185-023-00017-3 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McRae, L. et al. The utility of the Living Planet Index as a policy tool and for measuring nature recovery. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 380, 20230207 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dove, S., Böhm, M., Freeman, R., McRae, L. & Murrell, D. J. Quantifying reliability and data deficiency in global vertebrate population trends using the Living Planet Index. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 4966–4982 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ferretti, F., Osio, G. C., Jenkins, C. J., Rosenberg, A. A. & Lotze, H. K. Long-term change in a meso-predator community in response to prolonged and heterogeneous human impact. Sci. Rep. 3, 1057 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Espinoza, M., Araya-Arce, T., Chaves-Zamora, I., Chinchilla, I. & Cambra, M. Monitoring elasmobranch assemblages in a data-poor country from the Eastern Tropical Pacific using baited remote underwater video stations. Sci. Rep. 10, 17175 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Holmes, J. Global Evidence of Chondrichthyan Recovery in the Last 30 Years. BSc thesis, Univ. Bristol (2025).

  • Mace, G. M. et al. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1424–1442 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collen, B. et al. Clarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the IUCN Red List. Biol. Lett. 12, 20150843 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fowler, S. L., Reed, T. M. & Dipper, F. A. (eds) Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management. Proc. International Seminar and Workshop (IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, 2002).

  • Fowler, S. L. et al. Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras: The Status of the Chondrichthyan Fishes (IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, 2005).

  • Cavanagh, R. D., Kyne, P. M., Fowler, S. L., Musick, J. A. & Bennett, M. B. (eds) The conservation status of Australasian chondrichthyans: report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Australia and Oceania Regional Red List Workshop. IUCN https://www.iucnssg.org/uploads/5/4/1/2/54120303/cavanagh_et_al._2003.pdf (2003).

  • Cavanagh, R. D. & Gibson, C. Overview of the Conservation Status of Cartilaginous Fishes (Chondrichthyans) in the Mediterranean Sea (IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, 2007).

  • Camhi, M. D., Valenti, S. V., Fordham, S. V., Fowler, S. L. & Gibson, C. The Conservation zRed List Workshop (IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, 2009).

  • Gibson, C., Valenti, S. V., Fowler, S. L. & Fordham, S. V. The Conservation Status of Northeast Atlantic Chondrichthyans. Report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Northeast Atlantic Red List Workshop (IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, 2008).

  • Dulvy, N. K. et al. Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. eLife 3, e00590 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Colloca, F., Carrozzi, V., Simonetti, A. & Di Lorenzo, M. Using local ecological knowledge of fishers to reconstruct abundance trends of elasmobranch populations in the Strait of Sicily. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 508 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leurs, G. et al. Reconstructing historical catch trends of threatened sharks and rays based on fisher ecological knowledge. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70059 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Last, P. et al. Rays of the World (CSIRO, 2016).

  • Ebert, D. A., Dando, M. & Fowler, S. Sharks of the World: A Complete Guide. (Princeton Univ. Press, 2021).

  • Walls, R. H. L. & Dulvy, N. K. Eliminating the dark matter of data deficiency by predicting the conservation status of Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea sharks and rays. Biol. Conserv. 246, 108459 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Winker, H., Pacoureau, N. & Sherley, R. B. JARA: ‘just another Red-List assessment’. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/672899 (2020).

  • IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. IUCN https://nc.iucnredlist.org/redlist/content/attachment_files/RedListGuidelines.pdf (2024).

  • Fernandes, P. G. et al. Coherent assessments of Europe’s marine fishes show regional divergence and megafauna loss. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0170 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Simpfendorfer, C. A. & Dulvy, N. K. Bright spots of sustainable shark fishing. Curr. Biol. 27, R97–R98 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Juan-Jordá, M. J., Murua, H., Arrizabalaga, H., Merino, G. & Dulvy, N. K. Tunas, billfishes, and sharks as sentinels of ocean health. Science 378, eabj0211 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luedtke, J. A. et al. Ongoing declines for the world’s amphibians in the face of emerging threats. Nature 622, 308–314 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Constance, J. et al. Urolophus javanicus. IUCN https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/60095/229337053 (2023).

  • Dulvy, N. K., Kyne, P. M., Finucci, B. & White, W. T. Carcharhinus obsoletus. IUCN https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/115696622/115696628 (2020).

  • Constance, J. et al. Torpedo suessii. IUCN https://apistaging.iucnredlist.org/species/161613/124515045 (2024).

  • Brooks, T. M. et al. Harnessing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to track the Aichi Targets and Sustainable Development Goals. Biodiversity 16, 157–174 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Butchart, S. et al. Measuring trends in extinction risk: a review of two decades of development and application of the Red List Index. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 380, 20230206 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Andermann, T., Faurby, S., Cooke, R., Silvestro, D. & Antonelli, A. iucn_sim: a new program to simulate future extinctions based on IUCN threat status. Ecography 44, 162–176 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taylor, M. S. & Weder, R. On the economics of extinction and possible mass extinctions. J. Econ. Perspect. 38, 237–259 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • FAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture: blue transformation in action. FAO https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/8ab20ccf-1e9d-4ae6-836c-ca770d16da01 (2024).

  • Walls, R. H. L. & Dulvy, N. K. Tracking the rising extinction risk of sharks and rays in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Rep. 11, 15397 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sherman, C. S. et al. Half a century of rising extinction risk of coral reef sharks and rays. Nat. Commun. 14, 15 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pollom, R. A. et al. Overfishing and climate change elevate extinction risk in the Sub-Equatorial Africa hotspot of endemic sharks and rays. PLoS ONE 19, e0306813 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Akçakaya, H. R. et al. Quantifying species recovery and conservation success to develop an IUCN green list of species. Conserv. Biol. 32, 1128–1138 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Akçakaya, H. R., Hoffmann, M., Milner-Gulland, E., Grace, M. K. & Long, B. A global indicator of species recovery. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70077 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Curtis, T. H. et al. Seasonal distribution and historic trends in abundance of white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias, in the Western North Atlantic Ocean. PLoS ONE 9, e99240 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Braccini, M., Molony, B. & Blay, N. Patterns in abundance and size of sharks in northwestern Australia: cause for optimism. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 77, 72–82 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huveneers, C. Orectolobus halei (Green Status assessment). IUCN https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/161709/68638176 (2021).

  • Mace, G. M. et al. Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nat. Sustain. 1, 448–451 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Convention on Biological Diversity. Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. cbd.int https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/e6d3/cd1d/daf663719a03902a9b116c34/cop-15-l-25-en.pdf (2022).

  • Booth, H., Squires, D. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. The mitigation hierarchy for sharks: a risk-based framework for reconciling trade-offs between shark conservation and fisheries objectives. Fish Fish. 21, 269–289 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mizrahi, M. I. et al. Mitigating negative livelihood impacts of no-take MPAs on small-scale fishers. Biol. Conserv. 245, 108554 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gilman, E. et al. Bycatch-neutral fisheries through a sequential mitigation hierarchy. Mar. Policy 150, 105522 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Squires, D. & Garcia, S. The least-cost biodiversity impact mitigation hierarchy with a focus on marine fisheries and bycatch issues. Conserv. Biol. 32, 989–997 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • FAO. Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. FAO https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/23312a48-cb99-4abf-b7e9-4f2f38604695/content (1995).

  • FAO. Precautionary approach to fisheries. Report No. 350/1. FAO https://www.fao.org/4/V8045E/V8045E00.htm#toc (1995).

  • Sumaila, U. R. et al. WTO must ban harmful fisheries subsidies. Science 374, 544–544 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Gama, M. Fisheries subsidies, the WTO, and sustainability. J. Int. Econ. Law 27, 675–682 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Erdmann, M. V. et al. ReShark: an international collective effort to recover threatened sharks and rays around the world. Shark News 10, 46–59 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Pincinato, R. B. M., Gasalla, M. A., Garlock, T. & Anderson, J. L. Market incentives for shark fisheries. Mar. Policy 139, 105031 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, X. et al. Leveraging shark-fin consumer preferences to deliver sustainable fisheries. Conserv. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12842 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Choy, C., Booth, H. & Veríssimo, D. Understanding consumers to inform market interventions for Singapore’s shark fin trade. People Nat. 6, 733–748 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bailey, M., Bush, S. R., Miller, A. & Kochen, M. The role of traceability in transforming seafood governance in the global South. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 18, 25–32 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hasan, M. R., Chaplin, J. A., Spencer, P. B. & Braccini, M. Consumption of shark products: the interface of sustainability, trade (mis)labelling, human health and human rights. Fish Fish. 24, 777–795 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Juan-Jordá, M. J., Arrizabalaga, H., Dulvy, N. K. & Murua, H. Report card on ecosystem-based fisheries management in tuna regional fisheries management organizations. Fish Fish. 19, 321–339 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fordham, S. V., Lawson, J. M., Koubrak, O. & Cronin, M. R. in Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives 3rd edn (eds Carrier, J. C. et al.) 689–713 (CRC Press, 2022).

  • Cronin, M. R. et al. Policy and transparency gaps for oceanic shark and rays in high seas tuna fisheries. Fish Fish. 24, 56–70 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vincent, A. C. J., Sadovy de Mitcheson, Y. J., Fowler, S. L. & Lieberman, S. The role of CITES in the conservation of marine fishes subject to international trade. Fish Fish. 15, 563–592 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Giovos, I. et al. Conservation and management of chondrichthyans in the Mediterranean Sea: gaps, overlaps, inconsistencies, and the way forward. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 34, 1067–1099 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lawson, J. M. & Fordham, S. V. Sharks ahead: realizing the potential of the Convention on Migratory Species to conserve elasmobranchs. CMS https://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/publication/CMS-SAI-76pp-FINAL-5DEC-HIGH%20%281%29-min.pdf (2018).

  • FAO. International Plan of Action for the conservation and management of sharks. FAO https://www.fao.org/4/x3170e/x3170e03.htm (1999).

  • Gilman, E. et al. Global governance guard rails for sharks: progress towards implementing the United Nations international plan of action. Fish Fish. 25, 1–17 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davidson, L. N. K., Krawchuk, M. A. & Dulvy, N. K. Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing? Fish Fish. 17, 438–458 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koehler, L. & Lowther, J. Tracking implementation of shark-related measures and actions in the Mediterranean Region in the context of international law. Biol. Conserv. 302, 110930 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gonçalves-Neto, J. B., de Alencar Goyanna, F. A., Feitosa, C. V. & Soares, M. O. A sleeping giant: the historically neglected Brazilian fishing sector. Ocean Coast. Manag. 209, 105699 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hazin, F. H. V. & Afonso, A. S. A green strategy for shark attack mitigation off Recife, Brazil. Anim. Conserv. 17, 287–296 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wosnick, N., Giareta, E. P., Leite, R. D., Hyrycena, I. & Charvet, P. An overview on elasmobranch release as a bycatch mitigation strategy. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 80, 591–604 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koehler, L. & Lowther, J. Policy making for sharks and the role and contribution of non-governmental organisations in the fulfilment of international legal obligations. Mar. Policy 144, 105228 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fordham, S. V., Hood, A., Arnold, S. N., Kachelriess, D. & Lawson, J. M. Bridging the gaps that hinder shark conservation: an analysis of ICCAT Parties’ policies for CITES-Listed Atlantic elasmobranchs. Shark League for the Atlantic and Mediterranean https://sharkleague.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/SLAM_GAPAnalysis_FINAL-9JULY-compressed.pdf (2023).

  • CITES. Sharks and rays (Elasmobranchii spp.). CITES https://cites.org/eng/node/56062 (2023).

  • Molina, J. M. & Cooke, S. J. Trends in shark bycatch research: current status and research needs. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 22, 719–737 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dulvy, N. K., Metcalfe, J. D., Glanville, J., Pawson, M. G. & Reynolds, J. D. Fishery stability, local extinctions and shifts in community structure in skates. Conserv. Biol. 14, 283–293 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McPhie, R. P. & Campana, S. E. Reproductive characteristics and population decline of four species of skate (Rajidae) off the eastern coast of Canada. J. Fish Biol. 75, 223–246 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Curtis, T. H. & Sosebee, K. A. Landings composition of the Northeast U.S. skate, Rajidae, wing fishery and the effectiveness of prohibited species regulations. Mar. Fish. Rev. 77, 1–8 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fowler, S. & Séret, B. Shark fins in Europe: implications for reforming the EU finning ban. IUCN Shark Specialist Group https://www.iucnssg.org/uploads/5/4/1/2/54120303/2010_-_policy_information_-_shark_fins_in_europe_-_implications_for_reforming_the_eu_finning_ban_3.pdf (2010).

  • Feitosa, L. M. et al. Retention bans are beneficial but insufficient to stop shark overfishing. Fish Fish. 26, 473–487 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cortés, E., Brooks, E. N. & Shertzer, K. W. Risk assessment of cartilaginous fish populations. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 72, 1057–1068 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Furlong-Estrada, E., Galván-Magaña, F. & Tovar-Ávila, J. Use of the productivity and susceptibility analysis and a rapid management-risk assessment to evaluate the vulnerability of sharks caught off the west coast of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Fish. Res. 194, 197–208 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Braccini, M., Hesp, A. & Molony, B. Risk-based weight of evidence assessment of commercial sharks in western Australia. Ocean Coast. Manag. 205, 105501 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kiilu, B. et al. Vulnerability assessment of elasmobranch species to fisheries in coastal Kenya: implications for conservation and management policies. Mar. Policy 171, 106459 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huveneers, C., Pollard, D. A., Gordon, I., Flaherty, A. A. & Pogonoski, J. Orectolobus halei. IUCN https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/161709/68638176 (2015).

  • Haque, A. B., Cavanagh, R. D. & Spaet, J. L. Y. Fishers’ tales — impact of artisanal fisheries on threatened sharks and rays in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. Conserv. Sci. Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12704 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kulka, D. W. et al. Amblyraja radiata. IUCN https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T161542A124503504.en (2020).

  • Simpfendorfer, C., Chin, A., Rigby, C., Sherman, S. & White, W. Shark futures: a report card for Australia’s sharks and rays. Fisheries Research & Development Corporation https://www.frdc.com.au/sites/default/files/products/2013-009-DLD.pdf (2019).

  • Basurto, X. et al. Illuminating the multidimensional contributions of small-scale fisheries. Nature 637, 875–884 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett, N. J. et al. Environmental Stewardship: a conceptual review and analytical framework. Environ. Manag. 61, 597–614 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gonzalez-Pestana, A., Kouri, J. C. & Velez-Zuazo, X. Shark fisheries in the Southeast Pacific: a 61-year analysis from Peru. F1000Research 3, 164 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pérez-Jiménez, J. C. & Mendez-Loeza, I. The small-scale shark fisheries in the southern Gulf of Mexico: understanding their heterogeneity to improve their management. Fish. Res. 172, 96–104 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guzman, H. M., Cipriani, R., Vega, A. J. & Morales-Saldaña, J. M. Fisheries and conservation assessment of sharks in Pacific Panama. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 30, 315–330 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hacohen-Domené, A., Polanco-Vásquez, F., Estupiñan-Montaño, C. & Graham, R. T. Description and characterization of the artisanal elasmobranch fishery on Guatemala’s Caribbean coast. PLoS ONE 15, e0227797 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martins, T. et al. Intensive commercialization of endangered sharks and rays (Elasmobranchii) along the coastal Amazon as revealed by DNA barcode. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 769908 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Talwar, B. S. et al. Extinction risk, catches, and management of chondrichthyans in the Western Central Atlantic Ocean. Fish Fish. 23, 1150–1179 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soares, A. L. F. & Jabado, R. W. Fisher perceptions of catch and trade of sharks and rays in Angolan small-scale fisheries. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.4168 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seidu, I. et al. Fishing for survival: importance of shark fisheries for the livelihoods of coastal communities in Western Ghana. Fish. Res. 246, 106157 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cripps, G., Harris A., Humber F., Harding S. & Thomas, T. A preliminary value chain analysis of shark fisheries in Madagascar. FAO https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/4331241d-d767-4561-a38e-6a4e737b1928/content (2015).

  • Humber, F. et al. Assessing the small-scale shark fishery of Madagascar through community-based monitoring and knowledge. Fish. Res. 186, 131–143 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Temple, A. J. et al. Marine megafauna catch in southwestern Indian Ocean small-scale fisheries from landings data. Biol. Conserv. 230, 113–121 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Braulik, G., Kasuga, M. & Majubwa, G. Local ecological knowledge demonstrates shifting baselines and the large-scale decline of sawfishes (Pristidae) in Tanzania. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 42, 67–79 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kiilu, B., Kaunda-Arara, B., Oddenyo, R., Thoya, P. & Njiru, J. Spatial distribution, seasonal abundance and exploitation status of shark species in Kenyan coastal waters. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 41, 191–201 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lam, V. Y. Y. & Sadovy de Mitcheson, Y. The sharks of South East Asia — unknown, unmonitored and unmanaged. Fish Fish. 12, 51–74 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jabado, R. W. et al. Troubled waters: threats and extinction risk of the sharks, rays, and chimaeras of the Arabian Sea and adjacent waters. Fish Fish. 19, 1043–1062 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jabado, R. W., Al Ghais, S. M., Hamza, W. & Henderson, A. C. The shark fishery in the United Arab Emirates: an interview based approach to assess the status of sharks. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 25, 800–816 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Akhilesh, K. V. et al. Deep-sea fishing for chondrichthyan resources and sustainability concerns-a case study from southwest coast of India. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci. 40, 347–355 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Booth, H. et al. Elasmobranch fishing and trade in Sarawak, Malaysia, with implications for management. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 31, 3056–3071 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Booth, H. et al. A socio-psychological approach for understanding and managing bycatch in small-scale fisheries. People Nat. 5, 968–980 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clark-Shen, N. et al. Status of Southeast Asia’s marine sharks and rays. Conserv. Biol. 37, e13962 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sharikin, A. S. A. A. et al. Insights on diversity and exploitation of sharks and rays in the east coast of peninsular Malaysia. Thalassas https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-025-00906-3 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davidson, L. N. K., Jaiteh, V. F., Chin, A., Jabado, R. W. in Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives 3rd edn (eds Carrier, J. et al.) Ch. 21 (CRC Press, 2022).

  • Quinlan, J. R. et al. Using fisher-contributed secondary fins to fill critical shark-fisheries data gaps. Conserv. Biol. 35, 991–1001 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jabado, R. W. et al. The trade in sharks and their products in the United Arab Emirates. Biol. Conserv. 181, 190–198 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haque, A. B. & Spaet, J. L. Y. Trade in threatened elasmobranchs in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. Fish. Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106059 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leurs, G. et al. Opportunities and challenges in value chain analysis for sustainable management of sharks and rays. Mar. Policy 163, 106121 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gupta, T. et al. Identifying leverage points for sustainability in India’s shark supply chains. Mar. Policy 173, 106580 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gupta, T. et al. Preliminary assessment of the ecological sustainability of a data-limited small-scale shark fishery in India. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 7, e70133 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Froese, R. Keep it simple: three indicators to deal with overfishing. Fish Fish. 5, 86–91 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jaiteh, V. F. et al. Shark finning in eastern Indonesia: assessing the sustainability of a data-poor fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 74, 242–253 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prince, J. & Hordyk, A. What to do when you have almost nothing: a simple quantitative prescription for managing extremely data-poor fisheries. Fish Fish. 20, 224–238 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hordyk, A., Ono, K., Valencia, S., Loneragan, N. & Prince, J. A novel length-based empirical estimation method of spawning potential ratio (SPR), and tests of its performance, for small-scale, data-poor fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 72, 217–231 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smart, J. J. et al. Can multi-species shark longline fisheries be managed sustainably using size limits? Theoretically, yes. Realistically, no. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1847–1860 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prince, J. D. Gauntlet fisheries for elasmobranchs — the secret of sustainable shark fisheries. J. Northwest. Atl. Fish. Sci. 37, 407–416 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wiegand, J., Hunter, E. & Dulvy, N. K. Are spatial closures better than size limits for halting the decline of the North Sea thornback ray Raja clavata? Mar. Freshw. Res. 62, 722–733 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Then, A. Y., Hoenig, J. M., Hall, N. G. & Hewitt, D. A. Evaluating the predictive performance of empirical estimators of natural mortality rate using information on over 200 fish species. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 72, 82–92 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dureuil, M. & Froese, R. A natural constant predicts survival to maximum age. Commun. Biol. 4, 641 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thorson, J. T., Munch, S. B., Cope, J. M. & Gao, J. Predicting life history parameters for all fishes worldwide. Ecol. Appl. 27, 2262–2276 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Horswill, C. et al. Imputation of fisheries reference points for endangered data-poor fishes, with application to rhino rays. Fish Fish. 26, 848–865 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fujita, R. et al. in Viability and Sustainability of Small-scale Fisheries in Latin America and The Caribbean. MARE Publication Series, Vol. 19 (eds Salas, S. et al.) 177–195 (Springer, 2019).

  • Booth, H. et al. Estimating economic losses to small-scale fishers from shark conservation: a hedonic price analysis. Conserv. Sci. Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.494 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gupta, T. et al. Mitigation of elasmobranch bycatch in trawlers: a case study in Indian fisheries. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 571 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Booth, H. et al. Designing locally-appropriate conservation incentives for small-scale fishers. Biol. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109821 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alghozali, F. A. et al. Fishers’ interactions with endangered “rhinorays” in Karimunjawa National Park, and factors influencing willingness to engage in pro-conservation behavior. Conserv. Sci. Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70038 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shidqi, R. A. et al. Designing and evaluating alternative livelihoods for shark conservation: a case study on thresher sharks in Alor Island, Indonesia. Oryx 59, 19–30 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bladon, A. J., Short, K. M., Mohammed, E. Y. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Payments for ecosystem services in developing world fisheries. Fish Fish. 17, 839–859 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leduc, A. & Hussey, N. E. Evaluation of pay-for-release conservation incentives for unintentionally caught threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 33, 953–961 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wosnick, N., Da Costa De Lima Wosiak, C. & Machado Filho, O. C. Pay to conserve: what we have achieved in 10 years of compensatory releases of threatened with extinction guitarfishes. Anim. Conserv. 24, 537–539 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Booth, H. et al. Conservation impacts and hidden actions in a randomized controlled trial of a marine pay-to-release program. Sci. Adv. 11, eadr1000 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dunn, D. C., Boustany, A. M. & Halpin, P. N. Spatio-temporal management of fisheries to reduce by-catch and increase fishing selectivity. Fish Fish. 12, 110–119 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davidson, L. N. K. Shark sanctuaries: substance or spin? Science 338, 1538–1539 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pike, E. P. et al. Ocean protection quality is lagging behind quantity: applying a scientific framework to assess real marine protected area progress against the 30 by 30 target. Conserv. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13020 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boyd, C. et al. Applying the Key Biodiversity Area standard to important sites for sharks. Conserv. Lett. 18, e13117 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ward-Paige, C. A. A global overview of shark sanctuary regulations and their impact on shark fisheries. Mar. Policy 82, 87–97 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ward-Paige, C. A. & Worm, B. Global evaluation of shark sanctuaries. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 174–189 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shea, B. D., Gallagher, A. J., Bomgardner, L. K. & Ferretti, F. Quantifying longline bycatch mortality for pelagic sharks in western Pacific shark sanctuaries. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg3527 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cramp, J. E., Simpfendorfer, C. A. & Pressey, R. L. Beware silent waning of shark protection. Science 360, 723–723 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bradley, D. et al. Leveraging satellite technology to create true shark sanctuaries. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12610 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rigby, C. L., Simpfendorfer, C. A. & Cornish, A. A practical guide to the effective design and management of MPAs for sharks and rays. WWF https://sharks.panda.org/images/PDF/WWF_MPA_Guide2019.pdf (2019).

  • Régnier, T., Dodd, J., Benjamins, S., Gibb, F. M. & Wright, P. J. Spatial management measures benefit the critically endangered flapper skate, Dipturus intermedius. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 34, e4150 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kessel, S. T. et al. Conservation of reef manta rays (Manta alfredi) in a UNESCO World Heritage Site: large-scale island development or sustainable tourism? PLoS ONE 12, e0185419 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stewart, J. D. et al. Get them off the deck: straightforward interventions increase post-release survival rates of manta and devil rays in tuna purse seine fisheries. Biol. Conserv. 299, 110794 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rodríguez-Cabello, C. & Sánchez, F. Catch and post-release mortalities of deep-water sharks caught by bottom longlines in the Cantabrian Sea (NE Atlantic). J. Sea Res. 130, 248–255 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Talwar, B., Brooks, E., Mandelman, J. & Grubbs, R. Stress, post-release mortality, and recovery of commonly discarded deep-sea sharks caught on longlines. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 582, 147–161 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ellis, J. R., McCully Phillips, S. R. & Poisson, F. A review of capture and post-release mortality of elasmobranchs. J. Fish Biol. 90, 653–722 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heupel, M. et al. Conservation challenges of sharks with continental scale migrations. Front. Mar. Sci. 2, 12 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dwyer, R. G. et al. Individual and population benefits of marine reserves for reef sharks. Curr. Biol. 30, 480–489 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Udyawer, V. et al. Scaling of activity space in marine organisms across latitudinal gradients. Am. Nat. 201, 586–602 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goetze, J. S. et al. Directed conservation of the world’s reef sharks and rays. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 1118–1128 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MacKeracher, T., Diedrich, A. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Sharks, rays and marine protected areas: a critical evaluation of current perspectives. Fish Fish. 20, 255–267 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett, N. J., Govan, H. & Satterfield, T. Ocean grabbing. Mar. Policy 57, 61–68 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaplan, K. A. et al. Linking ecological condition to enforcement of marine protected area regulations in the greater Caribbean region. Mar. Policy 62, 186–195 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pendleton, L. H. et al. Debating the effectiveness of marine protected areas. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 75, 1156–1159 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Innes, J., Pascoe, S., Wilcox, C., Jennings, S. & Paredes, S. Mitigating undesirable impacts in the marine environment: a review of market-based management measures. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00076 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Booth, H., Arlidge, W. N. S., Squires, D. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Bycatch levies could reconcile trade-offs between blue growth and biodiversity conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 715–725 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shiffman, D., Bangley, C. & Macdonald, C. “A prized Pacific shark”: the rise and fall (and rise again…?) of the world’s first ecolabel certified sustainable shark fishery. J. Fish Biol. 103, 623–634 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bicchieri, C. Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).

  • Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 42–43 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kyne, P. M., Heupel, M. R., White, W. T. & Simpfendorfer, C. The Action Plan for Australian Sharks and Rays 2021 (National Environmental Research Program Marine Biodiversity Hub, 2021).

  • Jorgensen, S. J. et al. Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation. Endanger. Species Res. 47, 171–203 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Becerril-García, E. E. et al. Research priorities for the conservation of chondrichthyans in Latin America. Biol. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109535 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shiffman, D. S. et al. The next generation of conservation research and policy priorities for threatened and exploited chondrichthyan fishes in the United States: an expert solicitation approach. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e12629 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bond, M. E. et al. Trade regulations drive improved global shark and ray management. Mar. Policy 180, 106733 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stein, R. W. et al. Global priorities for conserving the evolutionary history of sharks, rays, and chimaeras. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 288–298 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fordham, S. V., Jabado, R. W., Kyne, P. M., Charvet, P. & Dulvy, N. K. Saving sawfish: progress and priorities. IUCN https://www.iucnssg.org/uploads/5/4/1/2/54120303/2018_-_saving_sawfish_-_progress_and_priorities_-_an_update_on_the_global_strategy_to_protect_the_world%E2%80%99s_most_threatened_marine_fishes.pdf (2018).

  • Kyne, P. et al. Global status and research priorities for rhino rays. Endanger. Species Res. 55, 129–140 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jabado, R. W. et al. in The Global Status of Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras (eds Jabado, R. W. et al.) Ch. 8 (IUCN, 2024).

  • Lawson, J. M. et al. Global extinction risk and conservation of Critically Endangered angel sharks in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 77, 12–29 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gordon, C. A. et al. Mediterranean angel sharks: regional action plan. The Shark Trust https://www.sharktrust.org/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=e8928db3-6d77-455f-93f4-ad4afd1663ac%20 (2019).

  • Gordon, C. A. et al. Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean angel shark conservation strategy. The Shark Trust https://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/publication/The-Shark-Trust_2017_Eastern-Atlantic-and-Mediterranean-Angel-Shark-Conservation-Strategy_EN.pdf (2017).

  • Giovos, I. et al. Strengthening angel shark conservation in the Northeastern Mediterranean Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 10, 269 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meyers, E. et al. in The Global Status of Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras (eds Jabado, R. W. et al.) 1939–1944 (IUCN, 2024).

  • Lawson, J. M. et al. Sympathy for the devil: a conservation strategy for devil and manta rays. PeerJ 5, e3027 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stewart, J. D. et al. Research priorities to support effective manta and devil ray conservation. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 314 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Techera, E. J. & Klein, N. International Law of Sharks: Obstacles, Options and Opportunities, Vol. 24 (Brill Nijhoff, 2017).

  • Mace, P. M., O’Criodain, C., Rice, J. C. & Sant, G. J. in Governance of Marine Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation: Interaction and Coevolution (eds Garcia, S. M. et al.) Ch. 13 (Wiley, 2014).

  • Friedman, K., Garcia, S. M. & Rice, J. Mainstreaming biodiversity in fisheries. Mar. Policy 95, 209–220 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Badhon, M. K., Uddin, M. K., Nitu, F. K. & Siddique, E. M. K. Identifying priorities for shark conservation in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 294 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kemp, P. S. et al. Future advances in UK marine fisheries policy: integrated nexus management, technological advance, and shifting public opinion. Mar. Policy 147, 105335 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • IUCN key messages for third United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC3). IUCN https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/2025-05/iucn-key-messages-for-unoc3-may-2025.pdf (2025).

  • Greenville, A. C. et al. Simultaneously operating threats cannot predict extinction risk. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12758 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fromentin, J.-M. et al. Status, challenges and pathways to the sustainable use of wild species. Glob. Environ. Change 81, 102692 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Caro, T., Rowe, Z., Berger, J., Wholey, P. & Dobson, A. An inconvenient misconception: climate change is not the principal driver of biodiversity loss. Conserv. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12868 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baillie, J. E. M. & Butcher, E. R. Priceless or worthless: the world’s most threatened species. IUCN https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2012-096.pdf (2012).

  • Baker-Médard, M. & Faber, J. Fins and (Mis) fortunes: managing shark populations for sustainability and food sovereignty. Mar. Policy 113, 103805 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Niedermüller, S. et al. The shark and ray meat network: a deep dive into a global affair. WWF https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/a4_shark_2021_low.pdf (2021).

  • McClenachan, L., Cooper, A. B. & Dulvy, N. K. Rethinking trade-driven extinction risk in marine and terrestrial megafauna. Curr. Biol. 26, 1640–1646 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Friedrich, L. A., Jefferson, R. & Glegg, G. Public perceptions of sharks: gathering support for shark conservation. Mar. Policy 47, 1–7 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Bryhim, J. R. & Parsons, E. Increased knowledge about sharks increases public concern about their conservation. Mar. Policy 56, 43–47 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Macdonald, C., McEntee, K. & Wester, J. Values, attitudes, and media exposure: public perception of sharks and shark conservation in the USA. Biol. Conserv. 286, 110305 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gumbs, R. et al. Global conservation status of the jawed vertebrate Tree of Life. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45119-z (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guinot, G. & Condamine, F. L. Global impact and selectivity of the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction among sharks, skates, and rays. Science 379, 802–806 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Madin, E. M. et al. Multi-trophic species interactions shape seascape-scale coral reef vegetation patterns. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 102 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Torralba Sáez, M., Hofreiter, M. & Straube, N. Shark genome size evolution and its relationship with cellular, life-history, ecological, and diversity traits. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59202-4 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cooper, J. A. & Pimiento, C. The rise and fall of shark functional diversity over the last 66 million years. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13881 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M., Barnes-Mauthe, M., Al-Abdulrazzak, D., Navarro-Holm, E. & Sumaila, U. R. Global economic value of shark ecotourism: implications for conservation. Oryx 47, 381–388 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Malley, M. P., Lee-Brooks, K. & Medd, H. B. The global economic impact of manta ray watching tourism. PLoS ONE 8, e65051 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nerini, F. F. et al. Extending the sustainable development goals to 2050 — a road map. Nature 630, 555–558 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett, N. J. et al. Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conserv. Biol. 31, 56–66 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roberson, L. A., Brown, C. J., Klein, C. J., Game, E. T. & Wilcox, C. Opportunity to leverage tactics used by skilled fishers to address persistent bycatch challenges. Fish Fish. 26, 193–202 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Simpfendorfer, C. A., Heupel, M. R. & Kendal, D. Complex human-shark conflicts confound conservation action. Front. Conserv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.692767 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pepin-Neff, C. & Wynter, T. Save the sharks: reevaluating and (re)valuing feared predators. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 24, 87–94 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Robinson, D. et al. Fisher–shark interactions: a loss of support for the Maldives shark sanctuary from reef fishers whose livelihoods are affected by shark depredation. Conserv. Lett. 15, e12912 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carlson, J. K., Heupel, M. R., Young, C. N., Cramp, J. E. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Are we ready for elasmobranch conservation success? Environ. Conserv. 46, 264–266 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Giovos, I. et al. Understanding the public attitude towards sharks for improving their conservation. Mar. Policy 134, 104811 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rossbach, S. et al. A tide of change: what we can learn from stories of marine conservation success. One Earth 6, 505–518 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bennett, N. J. et al. Advancing social equity in and through marine conservation. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 711538 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lopes, P. F. et al. Unintended and overlooked consequences of exclusionary marine conservation. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 82, fsae190 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Elliott, L., Ryan, M. & Wyborn, C. Global patterns in conservation capacity development. Biol. Conserv. 221, 261–269 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Slater, H., Fisher, J., Holmes, G. & Keane, A. Mismatch between conservation higher education skills training and contemporary conservation needs. Conserv. Sci. Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13112 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Detoeuf, D. et al. Gap analysis of social science resources for conservation practice. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14463 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Berger, M. F., Caruso, V. & Peterson, E. An updated orientation to marine conservation funding flows. Mar. Policy 107, 103497 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klein, C. J. et al. Global fishing between jurisdictions with unequal fisheries management. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac97ab (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mull, C. G., Dulvy, N. K., Kindsvater, H. H., MacNeil, A. M. & Pacoureau, N. Baited switch: is global trade driving unsustainable fisheries? National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis https://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/workinggroups/morpho-baited-switch-global-trade-driving-unsustainable-fisheries (2024).

  • Balmford, A. et al. Time to fix the biodiversity leak. Science 387, 720–722 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ducatez, S. Which sharks attract research? Analyses of the distribution of research effort in sharks reveal significant non-random knowledge biases. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 29, 355–367 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Oliveira, C. D. L., Ladle, R. J. & Da Silva Batista, V. Patterns and trends in scientific production on marine elasmobranchs: research hotspots and emerging themes for conservation. J. Coast. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-023-00937-z (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seidu, I. et al. Local ecological knowledge, catch characteristics, and evidence of elasmobranch depletions in Western Ghana artisanal fisheries. Hum. Ecol. 50, 1007–1022 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McClenachan, L. et al. Global research priorities for historical ecology to inform conservation. Endanger. Species Res. 54, 285–310 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de la Hoz Schilling, C. et al. eDNA metabarcoding reveals a rich but threatened and declining elasmobranch community in West Africa’s largest marine protected area, the Banc d’Arguin. Conserv. Genet. 25, 805–821 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alvarenga, M. et al. Rapid DNA/eDNA-based ID tools for Improved chondrichthyan monitoring and management. Mol. Ecol. Resour. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.70044 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gupta, T., Karnad, D., Kottillil, S., Kottillil, S. & Gulland, E. M. Shark and ray research in India has low relevance to their conservation. Ocean Coast. Manag. 217, 106004 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Temple, A. et al. Opportunities to enhance conservation success for sharks. npj Ocean Sustain. 4, 24 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Okes, N. & Sant, G. Missing sharks: a country review of catch, trade and management recommendations for CITES-listed shark species. TRAFFIC https://www.traffic.org/site/assets/files/17372/missing_sharks_a_country_review_of_catch_trade_and_management_recommendations_for_cites-listed_shark_species_final_updated.pdf (2022).

  • Brooks, T. M. et al. Measuring terrestrial area of habitat (AOH) and its utility for the IUCN red list. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 977–986 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karp, M. A. et al. Applications of species distribution modeling and future needs to support marine resource management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 82, fsaf024 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mancini, G. et al. A standard approach for including climate change responses in IUCN red list assessments. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14227 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stewart, K. R. et al. Characterizing fishing effort and spatial extent of coastal fisheries. PLoS ONE 5, e14451 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Welch, H. et al. Unseen overlap between fishing vessels and top predators in the northeast Pacific. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl5528 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Welch, H. et al. Hot spots of unseen fishing vessels. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq2109 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Azzahra, S. A., Wijayanti, P., Septiani, N. N. & Nikmah, L. Conservation program for freshwater stingrays in the Musi River, Palembang City, South Sumatra: stakeholders analysis and priority programs. Sustinere J. Environ. Sustain. 8, 333–345 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Szyszkiewicz, O., Grant, M. I. & Hongan, Z. Home of the Giants: concern for the Mekong River’s world record breaking Giant Freshwater Whipray population. Shark News 12, 118–121 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Charvet, P. et al. in The Global Status of Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras (eds Jabado, R. W. et al.) 2021–2034 (IUCN, 2024).

  • Jabado, R. W. et al. South American inland waters: a regional compendium of Important Shark and Ray Areas. IUCN https://doi.org/10.59216/ssg.isra.2025.r13 (2025).

  • Karr, K. A. et al. Identifying pathways for climate-resilient multispecies fisheries. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 721883 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Almojil, D. Local ecological knowledge of fisheries charts decline of sharks in data-poor regions. Mar. Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104638 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flowers, K. I., Heithaus, M. R. & Papastamatiou, Y. P. Buried in the sand: uncovering the ecological roles and importance of rays. Fish Fish. 22, 105–127 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yulianto, I. et al. Practical measures for sustainable shark fisheries: lessons learned from an Indonesian targeted shark fishery. PLoS ONE 13, e0206437 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Booth, H. et al. Exploring cost-effective management measures for reducing risks to threatened sharks in a problematic longline fishery. Ocean Coast. Manag. 225, 106197 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Booth, H., Mourato, S. & Milner-Gulland, E. Investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities. Ecol. Econ. 201, 107578 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ward-Paige, C. A., Keith, D. M., Worm, B. & Lotze, H. K. Recovery potential and conservation options for elasmobranchs. J. Fish Biol. 80, 1844–1869 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Henriksen, M. et al. Novel risk assessment framework to compare shark-bite mitigation strategies. People Nat. 7, 1559–1580 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Palacios, M. D. et al. Global assessment of manta and devil ray gill plate and meat trade: conservation implications and opportunities. Environ. Biol. Fishes https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-024-01636-w (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sabbagh, S. M. & Hickey, G. M. Social factors affecting sustainable shark conservation and management in Belize. Sustainability 12, 40 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collins, C. et al. Valuable bycatch: eliciting social importance of sharks in Sri Lanka through value chain analysis. Mar. Policy 157, 105832 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karnad, D., Sutaria, D. & Jabado, R. W. Local drivers of declining shark fisheries in India. Ambio 49, 616–627 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dent, F. & Clarke, S. C. State of the global market for shark products. FAO https://www.iucnssg.org/uploads/5/4/1/2/54120303/2015_-_state_of_the_global_market_for_shark_products_5.pdf (2015).

  • Bornatowski, H., Braga, R. R., Kalinowski, C. & Vitule, J. R. S. “Buying a pig in a poke”: the problem of elasmobranch meat consumption in southern Brazil. Ethnobiol. Lett. 6, 196–202 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ospina-Alvarez, A. et al. Ocean leadership: European Union influence on the global shark meat trade. Mar. Policy 177, 106659 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Choy, C. P. P. et al. Unraveling the trade in wedgefishes and giant guitarfishes in Singapore. Mar. Policy 136, 104914 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clarke, S. Use of shark fin trade data to estimate historic total shark removals in the Atlantic Ocean. Aquat. Living Resour. 21, 373–381 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cardeñosa, D. et al. Two thirds of species in a global shark fin trade hub are threatened with extinction: conservation potential of international trade regulations for coastal sharks. Conserv. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12910 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cardeñosa, D. et al. Small sharks, big problems: DNA analysis of small fins reveals trade regulation gaps and burgeoning trade in juvenile sharks. Sci. Adv. 10, eadq6214 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Walker, T. I. Can shark resources be harvested sustainably? A question revisited with a review of shark fisheries. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49, 553–572 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Musick, J. A. in Management Techniques for Elasmobranch Fisheries (eds Musick, J. A. & Bonfil, R.) Ch. 14 (FAO, 2005).

  • Grey, M., Blais, A.-M., Hunt, B. & Vincent, A. C. The USA’s international trade in fish leather, from a conservation perspective. Environ. Conserv. 33, 100–108 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sahubawa, L. & Pertiwiningrum, A. Increasing economic value of mondol and thorn stingray skin through the processing of commercial leather creative products. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 404, 012084 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mendes, A., Azevedo-Silva, J. & Fernandes, J. C. From sharks to yeasts: squalene in the development of vaccine adjuvants. Pharmaceuticals 15, 265 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Finucci, B., Cotton, C. F., Grubbs, D. R., Bineesh, K. & Moura, T. in Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives 3rd edn (eds Carrier, J. et al.) 603–634 (CRC Press, 2022).

  • McDavitt, M. T. in Sawfish: A Global Strategy for Conservation (eds Harrison, L. H. & Dulvy, N. K.) 72–75 (IUCN, 2014).

  • Pytka, J. M., Moore, A. B. M. & Heenan, A. Internet trade of a previously unknown wildlife product from a critically endangered marine fish. Conserv. Sci. Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12896 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huerta-Beltrán, B. L., Drymon, J. M., Jargowsky, A. E., Kyne, P. M. & Phillips, N. M. An invisible trade in imperiled guitarfishes. Conserv. Biol. 39, e70087 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vannuccini, S. Shark utilization, marketing and trade. Report No. 389. FAO https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/a8ddb977-015f-43f3-8df2-8c71192469a5/content (1999).

  • Cabanillas-Torpoco, M. et al. Status of the largetooth sawfish in Ecuador and Peru, and use of rostral teeth in cockfighting. Endanger. Species Res. 52, 247–264 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Orlov, A. M., Zinevich, L. S., Rabazanov, N. I. & Korostelev, N. B. New product adds pressure on Pacific spadenose shark Scoliodon macrorhynchos (Carcharhinidae). Ecol.Montenegrina 83, 120–130 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ryburn, S. J. et al. Sale of critically endangered sharks in the United States. Front. Mar. Sci. 12, 1604454 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chakraborty, S. et al. Prevalence of endangered shark trophies in automated detection of the online wildlife trade. Biol. Conserv. 304, 110992 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cardeñosa, D. Genetic identification of threatened shark species in pet food and beauty care products. Conserv. Genet. 20, 1383–1387 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y.-C., Liu, S.-H., Ho, H. C., Su, H.-Y. & Chang, C.-H. DNA mini-barcoding reveals the mislabeling rate of canned cat food in Taiwan. PeerJ 12, e16833 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Firchau, B., Pryor, W. & Correia, J. P. S. in The Elasmobranch Husbandry Manual: Captive Care of Sharks, Rays and their Relatives (eds Smith, M. et al.) 515–519 (Ohio Biological Survey, 2004).

  • Huveneers, C. et al. The economic value of shark-diving tourism in Australia. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 27, 665–680 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shiffman, D. S. et al. Trophy fishing for species threatened with extinction: a way forward building on a history of conservation. Mar. Policy 50, Part A, 318–322 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shiffman, D. S. Recreational shark fishing in Florida: how research and strategic science communication helped to change policy. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2, e174 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Binstock, A. L. et al. Variable post-release mortality in common shark species captured in Texas shore-based recreational fisheries. PLoS ONE 18, e0281441 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jennings, S. Reporting and advising on the effects of fishing. Fish Fish. 8, 269–276 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shiffman, D. S. et al. Inaccurate and biased global media coverage underlies public misunderstanding of shark conservation threats and solutions. iScience 23, 101205 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shiffman, D. S. & Hammerschlag, N. Preferred conservation policies of shark researchers. Conserv. Biol. 30, 805–815 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shiffman, D. S., Macdonald, C. C., Wallace, S. S. & Dulvy, N. K. The role and value of science in shark conservation advocacy. Sci. Rep. 11, 16626 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Villasante, S. et al. Social-ecological shifts, traps and collapses in small-scale fisheries: envisioning a way forward to transformative changes. Mar. Policy 136, 104933 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hilborn, R. Pretty Good Yield and exploited fishes. Mar. Policy 34, 193–196 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Froese, R. et al. Systemic failure of European fisheries management. Science 388, 826–828 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Frid, A., Wilson, K. L., Walkus, J., Forrest, R. E. & Reid, M. Re-imagining the precautionary approach to make collaborative fisheries management inclusive of Indigenous Knowledge Systems. Fish Fish. 24, 940–958 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Burkholder, D. A., Heithaus, M. R., Fourqurean, J. W., Wirsing, A. & Dill, L. M. Patterns of top-down control in a seagrass ecosystem: could a roving apex predator induce a behaviour-mediated trophic cascade? J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 1192–1202 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, J. G. et al. Behavioral responses across a mosaic of ecosystem states restructure a sea otter–urchin trophic cascade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2012493118 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McCauley, D. J. et al. Assessing the effects of large mobile predators on ecosystem connectivity. Ecol. Appl. 22, 1711–1717 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Higgs, N. D., Gates, A. R. & Jones, D. O. B. Fish food in the deep sea: revisiting the role of large food-falls. PLoS ONE 9, e96016 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Papastamatiou, Y. P., Meyer, C. G., Kosaki, R. K., Wallsgrove, N. J. & Popp, B. N. Movements and foraging of predators associated with mesophotic coral reefs and their potential for linking ecological habitats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 521, 155–170 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, J. J., Papastamatiou, Y. P., Caselle, J. E., Bradley, D. & Jacoby, D. M. Mobile marine predators: an understudied source of nutrients to coral reefs in an unfished atoll. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20172456 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leurs, G. et al. Where land meets sea: intertidal areas as key-habitats for sharks and rays. Fish Fish. 24, 407–426 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grew, M., Gaston, T. F., Griffin, A. S., Duce, S. J. & Raoult, V. Ray bioturbation rates suggest they shape estuary processes. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.411 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nauta, J. et al. Bioturbation by benthic stingrays alters the biogeomorphology of tidal flats. Ecosystems https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-024-00901-4 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fischer, M., Lewis, C. N., Hawkins, J. P. & Roberts, C. M. A functional assessment of fish as bioturbators and their vulnerability to local extinction. Mar. Environ. Res. 209, 107158 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Béné, C. et al. Contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to food security and poverty reduction: assessing the current evidence. World Dev. 79, 177–196 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Golden, C. D. et al. Nutrition: fall in fish catch threatens human health. Nature 534, 317–320 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Belhabib, D., Sumaila, U. R. & Pauly, D. Feeding the poor: contribution of West African fisheries to employment and food security. Ocean Coast. Manag. 111, 72–81 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Costello, C. et al. Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5125–5129 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Braccini, J. M., Gillanders, B. M. & Walker, T. I. Hierarchical approach to the assessment of fishing effects on non-target chondrichthyans: case study of Squalus megalops in southeastern Australia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 2456–2466 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar