• Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. Stellar evolution with rotation. X. Wolf–Rayet star populations at solar metallicity. Astron. Astrophys. 404, 975–990 (2003).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ekström, S. et al. Grids of stellar models with rotation. I. Models from 0.8 to 120 M⊙ at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014). Astron. Astrophys. 537, A146 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levesque, E. M. Astrophysics of Red Supergiants 2514–3433 (IOP, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-1329-2

  • Van Dyk, S. D. Red supergiants as supernova progenitors. Galaxies 13, 33 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, W. et al. Identification of the red supergiant progenitor of supernova 2005cs: do the progenitors of type II-P supernovae have low mass? Astrophys. J. 641, 1060–1070 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kochanek, C. S. et al. A survey about nothing: monitoring a million supergiants for failed supernovae. Astrophys. J. 684, 1336–1342 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smartt, S. J., Eldridge, J. J., Crockett, R. M. & Maund, J. R. The death of massive stars—I. Observational constraints on the progenitors of type II-P supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 395, 1409–1437 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smartt, S. J. Observational constraints on the progenitors of core-collapse supernovae: the case for missing high-mass stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 32, e016 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kochanek, C. S. On the red supergiant problem. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 4945–4949 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fang, Q., Moriya, T. J. & Maeda, K. Red supergiant problem viewed from the nebular phase spectroscopy of type II supernovae. Astrophys. J. 986, 39 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davies, B. & Beasor, E. R. The ‘red supergiant problem’: the upper luminosity boundary of type II supernova progenitors. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 468–476 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davies, B. & Beasor, E. R. ’On the red supergiant problem’: a rebuttal, and a consensus on the upper mass cut-off for II-P progenitors. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 496, L142–L146 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beasor, E. R., Smith, N. & Jencson, J. E. The red supergiant progenitor luminosity problem. Astrophys. J. 979, 117 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Strotjohann, N. L., Ofek, E. O. & Gal-Yam, A. A Bias-corrected luminosity function for red supergiant supernova progenitor stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 964, L27 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Healy, S., Horiuchi, S. & Ashall, C. The red supergiant problem: as seen from the local group’s red supergiant populations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04386 (2024).

  • De, K. et al. The disappearance of a massive star marking the birth of a black hole in M31. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14778 (2024).

  • de Jager, C. The yellow hypergiants. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 8, 145–180 (1998).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gordon, M. S. & Humphreys, R. M. Red supergiants, yellow hypergiants, and post-RSG evolution. Galaxies 7, 92 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Humphreys, R. M. & Jones, T. J. Episodic gaseous outflows and mass loss from red supergiants. Astron. J. 163, 103 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, T. Red and yellow hypergiants. Galaxies 13, 43 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Humphreys, R. M. The complex upper HR diagram. Galaxies 7, 75 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meynet, G. et al. Impact of mass-loss on the evolution and pre-supernova properties of red supergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 575, A60 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zapartas, E. et al. The effect of mass loss in models of red supergiants in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 697, A167 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, N. Mass loss: its effect on the evolution and fate of high-mass stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 487–528 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beasor, E. R. et al. A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 5994–6006 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Antoniadis, K. et al. Establishing a mass-loss rate relation for red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 686, A88 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Decin, L., Richards, A. M. S., Marchant, P. & Sana, H. ALMA detection of CO rotational line emission in red supergiant stars of the massive young star cluster RSGC1. Determination of a new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 681, A17 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Antoniadis, K. et al. Investigating the metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rate relation of red supergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 702, A178 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Richards, A. M. S., Yates, J. A. & Cohen, R. J. Proper motions of water vapour masers and bipolar outflow from NML Cygni. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 282, 665–676 (1996).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Decin, L. et al. Probing the mass-loss history of AGB and red supergiant stars from CO rotational line profiles. I. Theoretical model—mass-loss history unravelled in VY CMa. Astron. Astrophys. 456, 549–563 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Singh, A. P., Richards, A. M. S., Humphreys, R. M., Decin, L. & Ziurys, L. M. ALMA reveals hidden morphologies in the molecular envelope of VY Canis Majoris. Astrophys. J. Lett. 954, L1 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Glatzel, W. & Kiriakidis, M. Stability of massive stars and the Humphreys/Davidson limit. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 263, 375 (1993).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Humphreys, R. M. & Davidson, K. Studies of luminous stars in nearby galaxies. III. Comments on the evolution of the most massive stars in the Milky Way and the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 232, 409–420 (1979).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McDonald, S. L. E., Davies, B. & Beasor, E. R. Red supergiants in M31: the Humphreys–Davidson limit at high metallicity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 3132–3144 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schootemeijer, A. et al. A constant upper luminosity limit of cool supergiant stars down to the extremely low metallicity of I Zw 18. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12594 (2025).

  • Landri, C. & Pejcha, O. Driving asymmetric red supergiant winds with binary interactions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531, 3391–3405 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MacLeod, M. et al. Radial velocity and astrometric evidence for a close companion to Betelgeuse. Astrophys. J. 978, 50 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sana, H. et al. Binary interaction dominates the evolution of massive stars. Science 337, 444 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ivanova, N. et al. Common envelope evolution: where we stand and how we can move forward. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 59 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Westerlund, B. E., Olander, N. & Hedin, B. Supergiant and giant M type stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 43, 267–295 (1981).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohnaka, K., Driebe, T., Hofmann, K. H., Weigelt, G. & Wittkowski, M. Spatially resolved dusty torus toward the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 484, 371–379 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Elias, J. H., Frogel, J. A. & Schwering, P. B. W. Two supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud with thick dust shells. Astrophys. J. 302, 675 (1986).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levesque, E. M., Massey, P., Plez, B. & Olsen, K. A. G. The physical properties of the red supergiant WOH G64: the largest star known? Astron. J. 137, 4744–4752 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beasor, E. R. & Smith, N. The extreme scarcity of dust-enshrouded red supergiants: consequences for producing stripped stars via winds. Astrophys. J. 933, 41 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohnaka, K. et al. Imaging the innermost circumstellar environment of the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 691, L15 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Loon, J. T., Zijlstra, A. A., Bujarrabal, V. & Nyman, L. Å Circumstellar masers in the Magellanic Clouds. Astron. Astrophys. 368, 950–968 (2001).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marshall, J. R. et al. Asymptotic giant branch superwind speed at low metallicity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 355, 1348–1360 (2004).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soszynski, I., Udalski, A., Szymanski, M. K., others, K. & Poleski, R. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. IV. Long-period variables in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Acta Astron. 59, 239–253 (2009).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boyd, D. Spectroscopic and photometric study of the Mira stars SU Camelopardalis and RY Cephei. J. Am. Assoc. Var. Star Obs. 49, 157 (2021).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kravchenko, K. et al. Tomography of cool giant and supergiant star atmospheres. II. Signature of convection in the atmosphere of the red supergiant star μ Cep. Astron. Astrophys. 632, A28 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Solf, J. Spectral type and luminosity classification of late-type M stars from near-infrared image tube coudé spectrograms. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 34, 409–416 (1978).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Zickgraf, F.-J., de Winter, D., Houziaux, L. & Zorec, J. An improved classification of B[e]-type stars. Astron. Astrophys. 340, 117–128 (1998).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kraus, M. A census of B[e] supergiants. Galaxies 7, 83 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rayner, J. T., Cushing, M. C. & Vacca, W. D. The Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) spectral library: cool stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 185, 289–432 (2009).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Allen, D. A. A catalogue of symbiotic stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 5, 369–421 (1984).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mikołajewska, J. Symbiotic stars: continually embarrassing binaries. Baltic Astron. 16, 1–9 (2007).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cowley, A. P. The VV Cephei stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 81, 297 (1969).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wright, K. O. The system of VV Cephei derived from an analysis of the Hα line. J. R. Astron. Soc. Can. 71, 152 (1977).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liimets, T. et al. New insights into the outflows from R Aquarii. Astron. Astrophys. 612, A118 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soker, N. Close stellar binary systems by grazing envelope evolution. Astrophys. J. 800, 114 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dori, N., Bear, E. & Soker, N. Wobbling jets in common envelope evolution. Astrophys. J. 954, 143 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beristain, G., Edwards, S. & Kwan, J. Helium emission from classical T Tauri stars: dual origin in magnetospheric infall and hot wind. Astrophys. J. 551, 1037–1064 (2001).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Massey, P., Levesque, E. M., Olsen, K. A. G., Plez, B. & Skiff, B. A. HV 11423: the coolest supergiant in the SMC. Astrophys. J. 660, 301–310 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Munoz-Sanchez, G. et al. Episodic mass loss in the very luminous red supergiant [W60] B90 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 690, A99 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dessart, L. & Jacobson-Galan, W. V. A modeling perspective on the diversity of red-supergiant stars exploding within circumstellar material. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17676 (2025).

  • Levesque, E. M., Massey, P., Olsen, K. A. G. & Plez, B. Late-type red supergiants: too cool for the Magellanic Clouds? Astrophys. J. 667, 202–212 (2007).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Paczyński, B. & Sienkiewicz, R. Evolution of close binaries VIII. Mass exchange on the dynamical time scale. Acta Astron. 22, 73–91 (1972).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ercolino, A., Jin, H., Langer, N. & Dessart, L. Interacting supernovae from wide massive binary systems. Astron. Astrophys. 685, A58 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clayton, M., Podsiadlowski, P., Ivanova, N. & Justham, S. Episodic mass ejections from common-envelope objects. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470, 1788–1808 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nandez, J. L. A., Ivanova, N. & Lombardi, J. C. J. Recombination energy in double white dwarf formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, L39–L43 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Valsan, V., Borges, S. V., Prust, L. & Chang, P. Envelope ejection and the transition to homologous expansion in common-envelope events. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 5365–5373 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hubble, E. & Sandage, A. The brightest variable stars in extragalactic nebulae. I. M31 and M33. Astrophys. J. 118, 353 (1953).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koumpia, E. et al. Optical and near-infrared observations of the Fried Egg Nebula. Multiple shell ejections on a 100 yr timescale from a massive yellow hypergiant. Astron. Astrophys. 635, A183 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Genderen, A. M. et al. Investigation of the pulsations, outbursts, and evolution of the yellow hypergiants: ρ Cas, HR 8752, and HR 5171A, with notes on HD 179821. Astron. Astrophys. 694, A136 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Humphreys, R. M., Jones, T. J. & Gehrz, R. D. The enigmatic object variable A in M33. Astron. J. 94, 315 (1987).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Humphreys, R. M. et al. M33’s variable A: a hypergiant star more than 35 years in eruption. Astron. J. 131, 2105–2113 (2006).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, N. et al. MagAO-X images of the inner core of VY Canis Majoris: a disk and a companion. In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts Vol. 245, 163.13 (American Astronomical Society, 2025).

  • De Beck, E., Andrews, H., Quintana-Lacaci, G. & Vlemmings, W. H. T. The circumstellar environment around the extreme Galactic red supergiant NML Cygni: dense, dusty, and asymmetric. Astron. Astrophys. 698, A179 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marchant, P. & Bodensteiner, J. The evolution of massive binary stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 62, 21–61 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Loon, J. T. & Ohnaka, K. A phoenix rises from the ashes: WOH G64 is still a red supergiant, for now. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02057 (2026).

  • Davies, B., Plez, B. & Petrault, M. Explosion imminent: the appearance of red supergiants at the point of core-collapse. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 1483–1490 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sengupta, S., Sujit, D. & Sarangi, A. Dance to demise—how massive stars may form dense circumstellar shells before explosion. Astrophys. J. 996, 18 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bronner, V. A., Laplace, E., Schneider, F. R. N. & Podsiadlowski, P. Explosions of pulsating red supergiants: a natural pathway for the diversity of type II-P/L supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 703, A61 (2025).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Laplace, E., Bronner, V. A., Schneider, F. R. N. & Podsiadlowski, P. Pulsations change the structures of massive stars before they explode: interpreting the nearby supernova SN 2023ixf. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11088 (2025).

  • Ercolino, A. et al. The demographics of core-collapse supernovae I. The role of binary evolution and CSM interaction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04872 (2025).

  • Van Dyk, S. D. et al. The progenitor of supernova 1993J revisited. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 114, 1322–1332 (2002).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Folatelli, G. et al. The progenitor of the type IIb SN 2008ax revisited. Astrophys. J. 811, 147 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Connor, E. & Ott, C. D. Black hole formation in failing core-collapse supernovae. Astrophys. J. 730, 70 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wright, E. L. et al. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): mission description and initial on-orbit performance. Astron. J. 140, 1868–1881 (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cutri, R. M. et al. AllWISE data release (Cutri+ 2013). VizieR Online Data Catalog II/328 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014yCat.2328….0C (2021).

  • Tonry, J. L. et al. ATLAS: a high-cadence all-sky survey system. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 130, 064505 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gaia Collaboration et al. The Gaia mission. Astron. Astrophys. 595, A1 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gaia Collaboration et al. Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 674, A1 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alcock, C. et al. The MACHO Project Large Magellanic Cloud microlensing results from the first two years and the nature of the Galactic dark halo. Astrophys. J. 486, 697–726 (1997).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mainzer, A. et al. Preliminary results from NEOWISE: an enhancement to the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer for Solar System science. Astrophys. J. 731, 53 (2011).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Udalski, A., Kubiak, M. & Szymanski, M. Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. OGLE-2—the second phase of the OGLE project. Acta Astron. 47, 319–344 (1997).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Udalski, A. et al. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. OGLE-III photometric maps of the Large Magellanic Cloud. Acta Astron. 58, 89–102 (2008).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Udalski, A., Szymański, M. K. & Szymański, G. OGLE-IV: fourth phase of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Acta Astron. 65, 1–38 (2015).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heinze, A. N. et al. A first catalog of variable stars measured by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS). Astron. J. 156, 241 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shingles, L. et al. Release of the ATLAS Forced Photometry server for public use. Transient Name Server AstroNote 7, 1–7 (2021).

  • Alcock, C. et al. Calibration of the MACHO Photometry Database. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 111, 1539–1558 (1999).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marshall, J. L. et al. The MagE spectrograph. Proc. SPIE 7014, 701454 (2008).

  • Kelson, D. D., Illingworth, G. D., van Dokkum, P. G. & Franx, M. The evolution of early-type galaxies in distant clusters. II. Internal kinematics of 55 galaxies in the z=0.33 cluster CL 1358+62. Astrophys. J. 531, 159–183 (2000).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelson, D. D. Optimal techniques in two-dimensional spectroscopy: background subtraction for the 21st century. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 115, 688–699 (2003).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dekker, H., D’Odorico, S., Kaufer, A., Delabre, B. & Kotzlowski, H. Iye, M. & Moorwood, A. F. Design, construction, and performance of UVES, the echelle spectrograph for the UT2 Kueyen Telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory. Proc. SPIE 4008, 534–545 (2000).

  • Vernet, J. et al. X-shooter, the new wide band intermediate resolution spectrograph at the ESO Very Large Telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 536, A105 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ballester, P. et al. The UVES data reduction pipeline. The Messenger 101, 31–36 (2000).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Modigliani, A. et al. Silva, D. R., Peck, A. B. & Soifer, B. T. Observatory operations: 912 strategies, processes, and systems III. Proc. SPIE 7737, 773728 (2010).

  • Smette, A. et al. Molecfit: a general tool for telluric absorption correction. I. Method and application to ESO instruments. Astron. Astrophys. 576, A77 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Houck, J. R. et al. Mather, J. C. (ed.) The infrared spectrograph on the Spitzer Space Telescope Proc. SPIE 5487, 62–76 (2004).

  • Calzoletti, L. et al. REMIR: the REM infrared camera to follow up the early phases of GRBs afterglows. Nuovo Cimento C 28, 759 (2005).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gustafsson, B. et al. A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars. I. Methods and general properties. Astron. Astrophys. 486, 951–970 (2008).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Loon, J. T., Cioni, M. R. L., Zijlstra, A. A. & Loup, C. An empirical formula for the mass-loss rates of dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich asymptotic giant branch stars. Astron. Astrophys. 438, 273–289 (2005).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jian, M., Matsunaga, N., Jiang, B., Yuan, H. & Zhang, R. Exploring Be phenomena in OBA stars: A mid-infrared search. Astron. Astrophys. 682, A59 (2024).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tabernero, H. M., Dorda, R., Negueruela, I. & González-Fernández, C. An LTE effective temperature scale for red supergiants in the Magellanic clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 476, 3106–3123 (2018).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Humphreys, R. M., Weis, K., Davidson, K., Bomans, D. J. & Burggraf, B. Luminous and variable stars in M31 and M33. II. Luminous blue variables, candidate LBVs, Fe II emission line stars, and other supergiants. Astrophys. J. 790, 48 (2014).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bergemann, M., Kudritzki, R.-P., Gazak, Z., Davies, B. & Plez, B. Red supergiant stars as cosmic abundance probes. III. NLTE effects in J-band magnesium lines. Astrophys. J. 804, 113 (2015).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Accetta, K. et al. The Seventeenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys: complete release of MaNGA, MaStar, and APOGEE-2 data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 259, 35 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Wit, S. et al. Properties of luminous red supergiant stars in the Magellanic Clouds. Astron. Astrophys. 669, A86 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patrick, L. R. et al. Red supergiant stars in binary systems. I. Identification and characterization in the small magellanic cloud from the UVIT ultraviolet imaging survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 5847–5860 (2022).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Neugent, K. F., Massey, P., Skiff, B. & Meynet, G. Yellow and red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 749, 177 (2012).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mathewson, D. S. & Clarke, J. N. Supernova remnants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 180, 725–738 (1973).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Loon, J. T., Hekkert, P. T. L., Bujarrabal, V., Zijlstra, A. A. & Nyman, L.-A. Discovery of H2O maser emission from the red supergiant IRAS04553−6825 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 337, 141–144 (1998).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kravchenko, K. et al. Atmosphere of Betelgeuse before and during the Great Dimming event revealed by tomography. Astron. Astrophys. 650, L17 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kourniotis, M., Kraus, M., Maryeva, O., Borges Fernandes, M. & Maravelias, G. Revisiting the evolved hypergiants in the Magellanic Clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 4360–4376 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Humphreys, R. M., Jones, T. J. & Martin, J. C. Yellow supergiants and post-red supergiant evolution in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. J. 166, 50 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lobel, A. et al. High-resolution spectroscopy of the yellow hypergiant ρ Cassiopeiae from 1993 through the outburst of 2000–2001. Astrophys. J. 583, 923–954 (2003).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Genderen, A. M. et al. Pulsations, eruptions, and evolution of four yellow hypergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 631, A48 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nieuwenhuijzen, H. et al. The hypergiant HR 8752 evolving through the yellow evolutionary void. Astron. Astrophys. 546, A105 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oudmaijer, R. D., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Matthews, H. E., Blommaert, J. A. D. L. & Sahu, K. C. The spectral energy distribution and mass-loss history of IRC+10420. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 280, 1062–1070 (1996).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nieuwenhuijzen, H. & de Jager, C. Checking the yellow evolutionary void. Three evolutionary critical hypergiants: HD 33579, HR 8752 & IRC +10420. Astron. Astrophys. 353, 163–176 (2000).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dotter, A. MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the construction of stellar isochrones. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 222, 8 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Choi, J. et al. Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled models. Astrophys. J. 823, 102 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Munoz-Sanchez, G. et al. The dramatic transition of the extreme red supergiant WOH G64 to a yellow hypergiant. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30738671 (2025).