• Seidl, R. et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 395–402 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ye, L., Cheng, L., Zhang, L., Lei, X. & Liu, P. Evolution of long-term global drought during past 70 years based on estimated evaporation using the generalized complementary relationship. J. Hydrol. 650, 132532 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y., Keenan, T. F. & Zhou, S. Exacerbated drought impacts on global ecosystems due to structural overshoot. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1490–1498 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anderegg, W. R. L., Kane, J. M. & Anderegg, L. D. L. Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 30–36 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Senf, C., Buras, A., Zang, C. S., Rammig, A. & Seidl, R. Excess forest mortality is consistently linked to drought across Europe. Nat. Commun. 11, 6200 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, X. et al. Temporal trade-off between gymnosperm resistance and resilience increases forest sensitivity to extreme drought. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1075–1083 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tao, S. et al. Increasing and widespread vulnerability of intact tropical rainforests to repeated droughts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116626119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mohammadi, K., Jiang, Y. & Wang, G. Flash drought early warning based on the trajectory of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2202767119 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sungmin, O. & Park, S. K.Global ecosystem responses to flash droughts are modulated by background climate and vegetation conditions. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 1–7 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, M. et al. A pronounced decline in northern vegetation resistance to flash droughts from 2001 to 2022. Nat. Commun. 16, 2984 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, X. et al. Compound droughts slow down the greening of the Earth. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 3072–3084 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yao, Y. et al. Compound hot–dry events greatly prolong the recovery time of dryland ecosystems. Natl Sci. Rev. 11, nwae274 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, L. et al. Global increase in the occurrence and impact of multiyear droughts. Science 387, 278–284 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cook, B. I. et al. Megadroughts in the common era and the Anthropocene. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 741–757 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and their implications for carbon cycle models. Science 349, 528–532 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, L. et al. Widespread decline of Congo rainforest greenness in the past decade. Nature 509, 86–90 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gunderson, L. H. Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 425–439 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Holling, C. S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 1–23 (1973).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Runge, K. et al. Monitoring terrestrial ecosystem resilience using Earth observation data: identifying consensus and limitations across metrics. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70115 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwalm, C. R. et al. Global patterns of drought recovery. Nature 548, 202–205 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Scheffer, M. et al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461, 53–59 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boulton, C. A., Lenton, T. M. & Boers, N. Pronounced loss of Amazon rainforest resilience since the early 2000s. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 271–278 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Forzieri, G., Dakos, V., McDowell, N. G., Ramdane, A. & Cescatti, A. Emerging signals of declining forest resilience under climate change. Nature 608, 534–539 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, T., Traxl, D. & Boers, N. Empirical evidence for recent global shifts in vegetation resilience. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 477–484 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, X., Wang, D., Chen, A. & Zeng, Z. Asymmetric sensitivity of boreal forest resilience to forest gain and loss. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 505–514 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Warming and disturbances affect Arctic-boreal vegetation resilience across northwestern North America. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 2265–2276 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bose, A. et al. Growth and resilience responses of Scots pine to extreme droughts across Europe depend on predrought growth conditions. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4521–4537 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vitasse, Y. et al. Contrasting resistance and resilience to extreme drought and late spring frost in five major European tree species. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3781–3792 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gazol, A. et al. Forest resilience to drought varies across biomes. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2143–2158 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Willis, K. J., Jeffers, E. S. & Tovar, C. What makes a terrestrial ecosystem resilient?. Science 359, 988–989 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flores, B. M. et al. Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system. Nature 626, 555–564 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, L. et al. Soil moisture dominates dryness stress on ecosystem production globally. Nat. Commun. 11, 4892 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, S., Song, J. & Fu, B. Soil moisture determines the recovery time of ecosystems from drought. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 3562–3574 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, H. et al. Global patterns and drivers of post-fire vegetation productivity recovery. Nat. Geosci. 17, 874–881 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, S. et al. Amazon forest biogeography predicts resilience and vulnerability to drought. Nature 631, 111–117 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bai, Y.-H. & Tang, Z. Enhanced effects of species richness on resistance and resilience of global tree growth to prolonged drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2410467121 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bazzichetto, M. et al. Biodiversity promotes resistance but dominant species shape recovery of grasslands under extreme drought. J. Ecol. 112, 1087–1100 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sachsenmaier, L. et al. Forest growth resistance and resilience to the 2018–2020 drought depend on tree diversity and mycorrhizal type. J. Ecol. 112, 1787–1803 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Albert, J. S. et al. Human impacts outpace natural processes in the Amazon. Science 379, eabo5003 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Montràs-Janer, T. et al. Anthropogenic climate and land-use change drive short- and long-term biodiversity shifts across taxa. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 739–751 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, L. et al. Planted forests in China have higher drought risk than natural forests. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70055 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, D., Wang, T., Peñuelas, J. & Piao, S. Drought resistance enhanced by tree species diversity in global forests. Nat. Geosci. 15, 800–804 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, X. et al. Enhancing ecosystem productivity and stability with increasing canopy structural complexity in global forests. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl1947 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hua, F. et al. The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches. Science 376, 839–844 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, S., Xiang, W., Ouyang, S., Hu, Y. & Peng, C. Balancing water yield and water use efficiency between planted and natural forests: a global analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17561 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, Z. et al. Natural forests exhibit higher carbon sequestration and lower water consumption than planted forests in China. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 68–77 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, H. et al. Anthropogenic disturbance exacerbates resilience loss in the Amazon rainforests. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17006 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yao, Y. et al. Declined terrestrial ecosystem resilience. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17291 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grantham, H. S. et al. Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nat. Commun. 11, 5978 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Keck, F. et al. The global human impact on biodiversity. Nature 641, 395–400 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fan, Y., Li, H. & Miguez-Macho, G. Global patterns of groundwater table depth. Science 339, 940–943 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fan, Y., Miguez-Macho, G., Jobbágy, E. G., Jackson, R. B. & Otero-Casal, C. Hydrologic regulation of plant rooting depth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10572–10577 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wieder, W. R., Boehnert, J., Bonan, G. B. & Langseth, M. Regridded Harmonized World Soil Database v1.2. ORNL DAAC https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1247 (2014).

  • Mu, H. et al. A global record of annual terrestrial human footprint dataset from 2000 to 2018. Sci. Data 9, 176 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Camps-Valls, G. et al. A unified vegetation index for quantifying the terrestrial biosphere. Sci. Adv. 7, eabc7447 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pinzon, J. E. et al. Global Vegetation Greenness (NDVI) from AVHRR GIMMS-3G+, 1981-2022. ORNL DAAC https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2187 (2023).

  • Smith, T. & Boers, N. Reliability of vegetation resilience estimates depends on biomass density. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1799–1808 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Passel, J. et al. Critical slowing down of the Amazon forest after increased drought occurrence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2316924121 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, L. et al. Assessing vegetation resilience and vulnerability to drought events in Central Asia. J. Hydrol. 634, 131012 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kannenberg, S. A. et al. Drought legacies are dependent on water table depth, wood anatomy and drought timing across the eastern US. Ecol. Lett. 22, 119–127 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gazol, A. et al. Tree species are differently impacted by cumulative drought stress and present higher growth synchrony in dry places. Front. For. Glob. Change 3, 573346 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ratcliffe, S. et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context. Ecol. Lett. 20, 1414–1426 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Esquivel-Muelbert, A. et al. Compositional response of Amazon forests to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 39–56 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loreau, M. & Hector, A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72–76 (2001).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Veryard, R. et al. Positive effects of tree diversity on tropical forest restoration in a field-scale experiment. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf0938 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pardos, M. et al. The greater resilience of mixed forests to drought mainly depends on their composition: analysis along a climate gradient across Europe. For. Ecol. Manage. 481, 118687 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anderegg, L. D. L., Anderegg, W. R. L. & Berry, J. A. Not all droughts are created equal: translating meteorological drought into woody plant mortality. Tree Physiol. 33, 672–683 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guisset, C., Dendoncker, M., Vincke, C. & Ponette, Q. Drought timing, intensity, and consecutiveness have more influence on Douglas fir growth response than site conditions and stand density in European temperate climate. For. Ecol. Manage. 569, 122177 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, M., Wang, X., Keenan, T. F. & Piao, S. Drought timing influences the legacy of tree growth recovery. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3546–3559 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grossiord, C. Having the right neighbors: how tree species diversity modulates drought impacts on forests. New Phytol. 228, 42–49 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grossiord, C. et al. Tree diversity does not always improve resistance of forest ecosystems to drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14812–14815 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hajek, P. et al. Mutually inclusive mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 3365–3378 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Serrano-León, H. et al. Multiyear drought strengthens positive and negative functional diversity effects on tree growth response. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70394 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moi, D. A. et al. Human pressure drives biodiversity–multifunctionality relationships in large Neotropical wetlands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1279–1289 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gordon, J. D., Fagan, B., Milner, N. & Thomas, C. D. Floristic diversity and its relationships with human land use varied regionally during the Holocene. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 1459–1471 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lapola, D. M. et al. The drivers and impacts of Amazon forest degradation. Science 379, eabp8622 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mokany, K. et al. Reconciling global priorities for conserving biodiversity habitat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9906–9911 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Singh, C., van der Ent, R., Wang-Erlandsson, L. & Fetzer, I. Hydroclimatic adaptation critical to the resilience of tropical forests. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 2930–2939 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Isbell, F. et al. Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526, 574–U263 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MacDougall, A. S., McCann, K. S., Gellner, G. & Turkington, R. Diversity loss with persistent human disturbance increases vulnerability to ecosystem collapse. Nature 494, 86–89 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J. A., Baccini, A., Farina, M., Randerson, J. T. & Friedl, M. A. Disturbance suppresses the aboveground carbon sink in North American boreal forests. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 435–441 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zou, Y. et al. Fragmentation increased in over half of global forests from 2000 to 2020. Science 389, 1151–1156 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bourgoin, C. et al. Human degradation of tropical moist forests is greater than previously estimated. Nature 631, 570–576 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Otu-Larbi, F., Conte, A., Fares, S., Wild, O. & Ashworth, K. Current and future impacts of drought and ozone stress on Northern Hemisphere forests. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 6218–6234 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gessler, A., Schaub, M. & McDowell, N. G. The role of nutrients in drought-induced tree mortality and recovery. New Phytol. 214, 513–520 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Veraart, A. J. et al. Recovery rates reflect distance to a tipping point in a living system. Nature 481, 357–359 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, J. et al. Positive effects of species mixing on biodiversity of understory plant communities and soil health in forest plantations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2418090122 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hisano, M., Ghazoul, J., Chen, X. & Chen, H. Y. H. Functional diversity enhances dryland forest productivity under long-term climate change. Sci. Adv. 10, eadn4152 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liao, Z. et al. Growing biomass carbon stock in China driven by expansion and conservation of woody areas. Nat. Geosci. 17, 1127–1134 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, S. et al. Tree lifespans in a warming world: unravelling the universal trade-off between growth and lifespan in temperate forests. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70023 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yan, Y. et al. Climate-induced tree-mortality pulses are obscured by broad-scale and long-term greening. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 912–923 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hong, S. et al. Divergent responses of soil organic carbon to afforestation. Nat. Sustain. 3, 694–700 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, X., Feng, T., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y. & Wang, P. Vegetation restoration affects soil hydrological processes in typical natural and planted forests on the loess plateau. J. Hydrol. 650, 132465 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, J., Wang, W., Chen, Z., Cao, M. & Qian, H. Disentangling the dominance of atmospheric and soil water stress on vegetation productivity in global drylands. J. Hydrol. 657, 133043 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Girardin, M. P. & Terrier, A. Mitigating risks of future wildfires by management of the forest composition: an analysis of the offsetting potential through boreal Canada. Climatic Change 130, 587–601 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ren, H., Corlett, R. T., Hui, D. & Guo, Q. Rewilding artificial forests in China and the world. Innov. Life 3, 100113 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zuidema, P. A. & Lohbeck, M. What is the best type of tree to use for forest restoration?. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00802-z (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vicente-Serrano, S. M. et al. Response of vegetation to drought time-scales across global land biomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 52–57 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stocker, B. D. et al. Global patterns of water storage in the rooting zones of vegetation. Nat. Geosci. 16, 250–256 (2023).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, Y. et al. Widespread spring phenology effects on drought recovery of Northern Hemisphere ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 182–188 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S. & López-Moreno, J. I. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J. Clim. 23, 1696–1718 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, X. et al. Large live biomass carbon losses from droughts in the northern temperate ecosystems during 2016–2022. Nat. Commun. 16, 4980 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zargar, A., Sadiq, R., Naser, B. & Khan, F. I. A review of drought indices. Environ. Rev. 19, 333–349 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vicente-Serrano, S. M. et al. Performance of drought indices for ecological, agricultural, and hydrological applications. Earth Interact. 16, 1–27 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brun, P., Zimmermann, N. E., Hari, C., Pellissier, L. & Karger, D. N. Global climate-related predictors at kilometer resolution for the past and future. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 5573–5603 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4, 170122 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X. et al. GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 2753–2776 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, Y. et al. Global fire emissions database (GFED5) burned area. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7668424 (2023).

  • Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. Artifacts of GriddingMachine.jl (v0.2) for land modeling. CaltechDATA https://doi.org/10.22002/D1.2129 (2021).

  • Ellis, E. C., Antill, E. C. & Kreft, H. All Is Not Loss: Plant biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Public Libr. Sci. ONE 7, e30535 (2012).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ellis, E. C., Antill, E. C. & Kreft, H. Correction: All is not loss: plant biodiversity in the anthropocene. PLoS ONE 20, e0327912 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kreft, H. & Jetz, W. Global patterns and determinants of vascular plant diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5925–5930 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kier, G. et al. Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge. J. Biogeogr. 32, 1107–1116 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., Van Drecht, G. & De Vos, M. The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced global land-use change over the past 12,000 years. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 73–86 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A. & Janssen, P. Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. Holocene 20, 565–573 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB1022 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lonsdale, W. M. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80, 1522–1536 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lesiv, M. et al. Global forest management data for 2015 at a 100 m resolution. Sci. Data 9, 199 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pokhrel, Y. et al. Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 226–233 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 0.05Deg CMG V006 | NASA Earthdata (Earth Science Data Systems, NASA, 2025).

  • Wang, M. et al. A novel AMSR2 retrieval algorithm for global C-band vegetation optical depth and soil moisture (AMSR2 IB): parameters’ calibration, evaluation and inter-comparison. Remote Sens. Environ. 313, 114370 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, H. et al. Seasonal variations in vegetation water content retrieved from microwave remote sensing over Amazon intact forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 285, 113409 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zeng, Y. et al. Optical vegetation indices for monitoring terrestrial ecosystems globally. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 477–493 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dakos, V. et al. Slowing down as an early warning signal for abrupt climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14308–14312 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, T. & Boers, N. Global vegetation resilience linked to water availability and variability. Nat. Commun. 14, 498 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Z. et al. Vegetation resilience does not increase consistently with greening in China’s loess plateau. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 336 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794 (ACM, 2016); https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

  • Lundberg, S. M. et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 56–67 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shapley, L. S. in The Shapley Value (ed. Roth, A. E.) 31–40 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988); https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528446.003

  • Li, G. et al. Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss. Nat. Commun. 15, 8389 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23209–23215 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G. & Stuart, E. A. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Polit. Anal. 15, 199–236 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kluender, C. R., Germino, M. J. & Anthony, C. R. Propensity score matching mitigates risk of faulty inferences in observational studies of effectiveness of restoration trials. J. Appl. Ecol. 61, 1127–1137 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stuart, E. A. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat. Sci. 25, 1–21 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, T. Human pressure and biodiversity modify forest resilience after extreme multiyear droughts. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18345236 (2026).