• WWF Living Planet Report 2022 – Building a Nature-Positive Society (WWF, 2022).

  • Simkin, R. D., Seto, K. C., McDonald, R. I. & Jetz, W. Biodiversity impacts and conservation implications of urban land expansion projected to 2050. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117297119 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • CBD Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD, 2022).

  • Mattijssen, T. J. et al. Nature-inclusive urban development: lessons learned in three real estate projects in Dutch cities. Int. J. Urban Sustain. Dev. 15, 152–171 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Birkeland, J. Net-positive design and development. Landsc. Rev. 17, 83–87 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Birkeland, J. & Knight-Lenihan, S. Biodiversity offsetting and net positive design. J. Urban Des. 21, 50–66 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Birkeland, J. Net-Positive Design and Sustainable Urban Development (Routledge, 2020).

  • Thomson, G. et al. Nature-positive design and development: a case study on regenerating black cockatoo habitat in urban developments in Perth, Australia. Urban Sci. 6, 47 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garrard, G. E. et al. Biodiversity sensitive urban design. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12411 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kirk, H. et al. Building biodiversity into the urban fabric: a case study in applying Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design (BSUD). Urban For. Urban Greening 62, 127176 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, K. et al. in Contemporary Ecology Research in China (ed Li, W.) 555–624 (Springer, 2015).

  • Wu, Y. et al. Design with nature and eco-city design. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 6, 1781549 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hanson, H. I. & Olsson, J. A. Uptake and use of biodiversity offsetting in urban planning—the case of Sweden. Urban For. Urban Greening 80, 127841 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pressey, R. L. & Bottrill, M. C. Opportunism, threats, and the evolution of systematic conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1340–1345 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kiesecker, J. M., Copeland, H., Pocewicz, A. & McKenney, B. Development by design: blending landscape-level planning with the mitigation hierarchy. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 261–266 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Torres, P. H. C., Irazabal, C. & Jacobi, P. R. Urban greening in the global south: green gentrification and beyond. Front. Sustain. Cities 4, 865940 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anguelovski, I. et al. Green gentrification in European and North American cities. Nat. Commun. 13, 3816 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Quinton, J., Nesbitt, L. & Sax, D. How well do we know green gentrification? A systematic review of the methods. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 46, 960–987 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • He, S. Two waves of gentrification and emerging rights issues in Guangzhou, China. Environ. Plann. A 44, 2817–2833 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, F. State dominance in urban redevelopment: beyond gentrification in urban China. Urban Aff. Rev. 52, 631–658 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, F. Scripting Indian and Chinese urban spatial transformation: adding new narratives to gentrification and suburbanisation research. Environ. Plann. C 38, 980–997 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Apostolopoulou, E. Navigating neoliberal natures in an era of infrastructure expansion and uneven urban development. Invest. Reg. 55, 113–126 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kowarik, I. et al. Promoting urban biodiversity for the benefit of people and nature. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1, 19 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bull, J. W. & Strange, N. The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies. Nat. Sustain. 1, 790–798 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gao, S. et al. Analyzing the outcomes of China’s ecological compensation scheme for development-related biodiversity loss. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 5, e13010 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lyles-Chockley, A. Building livable places: the importance of landscape in urban land use, planning, and development. Buffalo Environ. Law J. 16, 95 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Vanclay, F., Baines, J. T. & Taylor, C. N. Principles for ethical research involving humans: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 31, 243–253 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baines, J. T., Taylor, C. N. & Vanclay, F. Social impact assessment and ethical research principles: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part II. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 31, 254–260 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vanclay, F., Esteves, A. M., Aucamp, I. & Franks, D. Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for Assessing and Managing the Social Impacts of Projects (International Association for Impact Assessment, 2015).

  • Bidaud, C. et al. The sweet and the bitter: intertwined positive and negative social impacts of a biodiversity offset. Conserv. Soc. 15, 1–13 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Griffiths, V. F., Bull, J. W., Baker, J. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. No net loss for people and biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 33, 76–87 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Griffiths, V. F. et al. Incorporating local nature-based cultural values into biodiversity No Net Loss strategies. World Dev. 128, 104858 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jones, J. P. G. et al. Net gain: seeking better outcomes for local people when mitigating biodiversity loss from development. One Earth 1, 195–201 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McGregor, A. & Sumner, A. Beyond business as usual: what might 3-D wellbeing contribute to MDG momentum?. IDS Bull. 41, 104–112 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Woodhouse, E. et al. Guiding principles for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on human well-being. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20150103 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Anand, P. Wellbeing in public policy: contributions based on Sen’s capability approach. LSE Public Policy Rev. 2, 2 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brueckner-Irwin, I., Armitage, D. & Courtenay, S. Applying a social-ecological well-being approach to enhance opportunities for marine protected area governance. Ecol. Soc. 24, 7 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Acott, T. G. et al. Coastal transformations and connections: revealing values through the community voice method. People Nat. 5, 403–414 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beauchamp, E., Clements, T. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Assessing medium-term impacts of conservation interventions on local livelihoods in Northern Cambodia. World Dev. 101, 202–218 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mbaru, E. K., Hicks, C. C., Gurney, G. G. & Cinner, J. E. Evaluating outcomes of conservation with multidimensional indicators of well-being. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1417–1425 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rigolon, A., Browning, M. H., Lee, K. & Shin, S. Access to urban green space in cities of the global south: a systematic literature review. Urban Sci. 2, 67 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, Y. & Tang, S. Examining residents’ perceptions and usage preferences of urban public green spaces through the lens of environmental justice. Sustainability 17, 2627 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qunli Development Office The 12th Five-Year Development Plan of Qunli New Town (QDO, 2010).

  • Gao, S., zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Bull, J. W. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Addressing environmental misperceptions for nature recovery. Conserv. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70157 (2025).

  • Marcuse, P. Gentrification, abandonment, and displacement: connections, causes, and policy responses in New York City. Wash. Univ. J. Urban Contemp. Law 28, 195 (1985).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lopez-Morales, E. Assessing exclusionary displacement through rent gap analysis in the high-rise redevelopment of Santiago, Chile. Hous. Stud. 31, 1–20 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • UN-Habitat Cities and Nature: Planning for the Future (UN-Habitat, 2022).

  • Austin, G. & Yu, K. Constructed Wetlands and Sustainable Development (Taylor & Francis, 2016).

  • Zhu, X., Zhang, Y. & Zhao, W. Differences in environmental information acquisition from urban green—a case study of Qunli National Wetland Park in Harbin, China. Sustainability 12, 8128 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, H. The role of informal ruralization within China’s rapid urbanization. Nat. Cities 1, 205–215 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Luhmann, M. & Intelisano, S. Hedonic adaptation and the set point for subjective well-being. In Handbook of Well-being (eds Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Tay, L.) 195–219 (DEF Publishers, 2018).

  • Ordóñez, L. D., Connolly, T. & Coughlan, R. Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. J. Behav. Decis. Making 13, 329–344 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abeler, J., Falk, A., Goette, L. & Huffman, D. Reference points and effort provision. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 470–492 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, L., Ye, J., Wu, X. & Hu, F. The influence of the tri-reference points on fairness and satisfaction perception. Front. Psychol. 9, 193 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hatz, G. Can public subsidized urban renewal solve the gentrification issue? Dissecting the Viennese example. Cities 115, 103218 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pineault, J. et al. Gentrification and mental health inequities: a scoping review. Social Sci. Med. 384, 118547 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thornton, G. et al. The challenge of sustainability: incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 116–134 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Preston, P. D., Dunk, R. M., Smith, G. R. & Cavan, G. Not all brownfields are equal: a typological assessment reveals hidden green space in the city. Landscape Urban Plann. 229, 104590 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Macgregor, C. J. et al. Brownfield sites promote biodiversity at a landscape scale. Sci. Total Environ. 804, 150162 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qiu, X. et al. Declines in anthropogenic mercury emissions in the global north and China offset by the global south. Nat. Commun. 16, 1179 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B. & Hutyra, L. R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16083–16088 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ren, X. China’s new towns. City 23, 686–689 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bonino, M., Governa, F., Repellino, M. P. & Sampieri, A. The City After Chinese New Towns: Spaces and Imaginaries from Contemporary Urban China (Birkhäuser, 2019).

  • Yin, G., Liu, Y. & Chen, Y. ‘Ghost city’ or habitable city? the production and transformation of space in China’s new towns. Cities 145, 104678 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Igudia, E., Ackrill, R. & Machokoto, M. Institutional incongruence, the everyday, and the persistence of street vending in Lagos: a demand-side perspective. Environ. Plann. A 54, 1256–1276 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ackrill, R., Igudia, E., Olusanya, O. & Oyalowo, B. Street level bureaucrats, policy entrepreneurship, and discretion in enforcing bans on motorcycle taxis in Lagos, Nigeria. Eur. Policy Anal. 9, 440–464 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine, 1967).

  • Wray, N., Markovic, M. & Manderson, L. ‘Researcher saturation’: the impact of data triangulation and intensive-research practices on the researcher and qualitative research process. Qual. Health Res. 17, 1392–1402 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Small, M. L. ‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography 10, 5–38 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Reilly, M. & Parker, N. ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual. Res. 13, 190–197 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Low, J. A pragmatic definition of the concept of theoretical saturation. Sociol. Focus 52, 131–139 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gerson, K. & Damaske, S. The Science and Art of Interviewing (Oxford Univ. Press, 2020).

  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual. Res. Sport Exercise Health 13, 201–216 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al. Accounting for the impact of conservation on human well-being. Conserv. Biol. 28, 1160–1166 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Woodhouse, E., De Lange, E. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Evaluating the Impacts of Conservation Interventions on Human Wellbeing (International Institute for Environment and Development, 2016).

  • McGregor, J. A. & Powu, N. Towards an economics of well-being. Camb. J. Econ. 41, 1123–1142 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Loveridge, R., Sallu, S. M., Pesha, I. J. & Marshall, A. R. Measuring human wellbeing: a protocol for selecting local indicators. Environ. Sci. Policy 114, 461–469 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Llopis, J. C. et al. Mixed impacts of protected areas and a cash crop boom on human well-being in North-Eastern Madagascar. People Nat. 5, 1786–1803 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wells, G. J. et al. Hundreds of millions of people in the tropics need both wild harvests and other forms of economic development for their well-being. One Earth 7, 311–324 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brislin, R. W. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 1, 185–216 (1970).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brislin, R. W. in Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research (eds Lonner, W. J. & Berry, J. W.) 137–164 (Sage Publications, 1986).

  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y., Turvey, S. T. & Leader-Williams, N. Knowledge and attitudes about the use of pangolin scale products in traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) within China. People Nat. 2, 903–912 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, X. et al. Leveraging shark-fin consumer preferences to deliver sustainable fisheries. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12842 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hinsley, A. et al. Understanding why consumers in China switch between wild, farmed and synthetic bear bile products. Conserv. Biol. 36, e13895 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. et al. A national transgender health survey from China assessing gender identity conversion practice, mental health, substance use and suicidality. Nat. Mental Health 1, 254–265 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gao, X. et al. The psychological, computational, and neural foundations of indebtedness. Nat. Commun. 15, 68 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, S. et al. Testing an intervention codesigned with stakeholders for altering wildlife consumption: health messaging matters. Conserv. Lett. 17, e13040 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, M. S., Bi, K., Han, X., Sun, P. & Bonanno, G. A. Emotion regulation flexibility and momentary affect in two cultures. Nat. Mental Health 2, 450–459 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cattaneo, M. D. et al. Housing, health, and happiness. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 1, 75–105 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, F., Zhang, C. & Hudson, J. Housing conditions and life satisfaction in urban China. Cities 81, 35–44 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, M., Yang, Y. & Yu, X. Living better and feeling happier: an investigation into the association between housing quality and happiness. Growth Change 51, 1224–1238 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Potapov, D., Shafranskaya, I. & Bozhya- Volya, A. Happiness and the city: an empirical study of the interaction between subjective well-being and city satisfaction. J. Place Manage. Dev. 9, 313–330 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gbadegesin, J. T. et al. Consumer’s welfare in the retail environment: implication for retail property development planning and policy. Int. J. Construct. Manage. 23, 1518–1526 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Florida, R., Mellander, C. & Rentfrow, P. J. The happiness of cities. Reg. Stud. 47, 613–627 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dang, Y. et al. How does growing city size affect residents’ happiness in urban China? A case study of the Bohai rim area. Habitat Int. 97, 102120 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Park, M. B. et al. Influence of community satisfaction with individual happiness: comparative study in semi-urban and rural areas of Tikapur, Nepal. Glob. Health Promot. 25, 22–32 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qian, H., Guo, Q., Zhou, S. & Su, Y. The happiness of Chinese cities. J. Urban Aff. 45, 1316–1333 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, W., Liu, D. & Zhang, J. Regional differences for the impacts of ecosystem services on farmers’ wellbeing: a case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Front. Environ. Sci. 12, 1352885 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Houwelingen- Snippe, J., Allouch, S. B. & van Rompay, T. J. That is a place where I would want to go’: investigating digital nature to enhance social wellbeing among older adults. Ageing Soc. 43, 2605–2628 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hakokongas, E. & Puhakka, R. Happiness from nature? Adolescents’ conceptions of the relation between happiness and nature in Finland. Leisure Sci. 45, 665–683 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S. & Ruch, W. Nine beautiful things: a self-administered online positive psychology intervention on the beauty in nature, arts, and behaviors increases happiness and ameliorates depressive symptoms. Personality Individual Differ. 94, 189–193 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Richardson, M. & McEwan, K. 30 days wild and the relationships between engagement with nature’s beauty, nature connectedness and well-being. Front. Psychol. 9, 1500 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X., Zhang, X. & Chen, X. Valuing air quality using happiness data: the case of China. Ecol. Econ. 137, 29–36 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clark, W. A., Yi, D. & Huang, Y. Subjective well-being in China’s changing society. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16799–16804 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sekulova, F. & van den Bergh, J. C. Floods and happiness: empirical evidence from Bulgaria. Ecol. Econ. 126, 51–57 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hudson, P., Botzen, W. W., Poussin, J. & Aerts, J. C. Impacts of flooding and flood preparedness on subjective well-being: a monetisation of the tangible and intangible impacts. J. Happiness Stud. 20, 665–682 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M. & Murphy, S. A. Happiness is in our nature: exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. J. Happiness Stud. 12, 303–322 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Russell, R. et al. Humans and nature: how knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 473–502 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kazemi, M. et al. Happiness in marginalized populations: a community-based study in South Central Iran. BMC Psychol. 9, 58 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, D., Qian, W. & Guo, X. Gains and losses: does farmland acquisition harm farmers’ welfare?. Land Use Policy 86, 78–90 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar