• Abouelmehdi, K., Beni-Hssane, A., Khaloufi, H. & Saadi, M. Big data security and privacy in healthcare: a review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 113, 73–80 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martin, K. D. & Murphy, P. E. The role of data privacy in marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 45, 135–155 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Xiong, Y. & Zhu, G. Data security and privacy in cloud computing. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 10, 190903 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turan, M. S., Barker, E., Burr, W. & Chen, L. Recommendation for Password-Based Key Derivation. NIST Special Publication No. 800-132 (NIST, 2010).

  • Herder, C., Yu, M.-D., Koushanfar, F. & Devadas, S. Physical unclonable functions and applications: a tutorial. Proc. IEEE 102, 1126–1141 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gao, Y., Al-Sarawi, S. F. & Abbott, D. Physical unclonable functions. Nat. Electron. 3, 81–91 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, M. S. et al. Revisiting silk: a lens-free optical physical unclonable function. Nat. Commun. 13, 247 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Security and Authentication. NXP http://www.nxp.com/products/security-and-authentication:SECURITY-AND-AUTHENTICATION (accessed 30 April 2026).

  • Physical Unclonable Function (PUF). Synopsys http://www.synopsys.com/designware-ip/security-ip/cryptography-ip/puf.html (accessed 30 April 2026).

  • Bahar Talukder, B. M. S., Ferdaus, F. & Rahman, M. T. Memory-based PUFs are vulnerable as well: a non-invasive attack against SRAM PUFs. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 16, 4035–4049 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shanta, A. S., Majumder, Md. B., Hasan, Md. S. & Rose, G. S. Physically Unclonable and Reconfigurable Computing System (PURCS) for hardware security applications. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 40, 405–418 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grubel, B. C. et al. Silicon photonic physical unclonable function. Opt. Express 25, 12710–12721 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bosworth, B. T. et al. Unclonable photonic keys hardened against machine learning attacks. APL Photonics 5, 010803 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boccaletti, S., Kurths, J., Osipov, G., Valladares, D. L. & Zhou, C. S. The synchronization of chaotic systems. Phys. Rep. 366, 1–101 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu, H., Alkhazragi, O., Wang, Y., Ng, T. K. & Ooi, B. S. Parallel on-chip physical random number generator based on self-chaotic dynamics of free-running broad-area VCSEL array. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 31, 1–11 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Adachihara, H., Hess, O., Abraham, E., Ru, P. & Moloney, J. V. Spatiotemporal chaos in broad-area semiconductor lasers. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 658–665 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bittner, S. et al. Suppressing spatiotemporal lasing instabilities with wave-chaotic microcavities. Science 361, 1225–1231 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, Z. et al. Prospects and applications of on-chip lasers. eLight 3, 1 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nandhakumar, N. et al. Deep learning-enhanced dynamic photonic security system using multimode VCSELs. In Proc. CLEO 2025 Technical Digest Series paper SS126_3 (Optica Publishing Group, 2025).

  • Lu, H. et al. Low-coherence semiconductor light sources: devices and applications. npj Nanophotonics 1, 9 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture techniques — QR code bar code symbology specification ISO/IEC 18004:2024 (ISO, 2024); http://www.iso.org/standard/83389.html

  • Ran, X. & Li, D. QR code digital watermarking algorithm based on two-dimensional logistic chaotic map. In Proc. Advances in 3D Image and Graphics Representation, Analysis, Computing and Information Technology (eds Kountchev, R. et al.) 349–357 (Springer, 2020).

  • Kinsner, W. Characterizing chaos through Lyapunov metrics. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C 36, 141–151 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sönmez Turan, M. et al. Recommendation for the Entropy Sources Used for Random Bit Generation, No. NIST SP 800-90B (NIST, 2018); https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/90/b/final

  • Alkhazragi, O. et al. Semiconductor emitters in entropy sources for quantum random number generation. Ann. Phys. 535, 2300289 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lin, H. et al. Micro-LED-based quantum random number generators. Opt. Express 33, 22154–22164 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alkhazragi, O. et al. Modifying the coherence of vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers using chaotic cavities. Optica 10, 191–199 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ou, X. et al. Mode control and dynamic population gratings in quantum-dot lasers. Optica 13, 469–475 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu, H., Alkhazragi, O., Ng, T. K. & Ooi, B. S. Impact of cavity geometry on chaotic emission and entropy source efficiency in VCSELs. In 2024 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC) https://doi.org/10.1109/IPC60965.2024.10799714 (IEEE, 2024).

  • Lu, H., Alkhazragi, O., Lin, H., Ng, T. K. & Ooi, B. S. Impact of cavity geometry on power, spectra, and coherence characteristics of VCSELs. In 2025 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) 1–2 (IEEE, 2025).

  • Cao, H. & Wiersig, J. Dielectric microcavities: model systems for wave chaos and non-Hermitian physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 61–111 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, N. et al. Random fractal-enabled physical unclonable functions with dynamic AI authentication. Nat. Commun. 14, 2185 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guembe, B. et al. The emerging threat of AI-driven cyber attacks: a review. Appl. Artif. Intell. 36, 2037254 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, T. et al. Adversarial attack and defense in reinforcement learning—from AI security view. Cybersecurity 2, 11 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qiu, S., Liu, Q., Zhou, S. & Wu, C. Review of artificial intelligence adversarial attack and defense technologies. Appl. Sci. 9, 909 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duan, X., Liu, J. & Zhang, E. Efficient image encryption and compression based on a VAE generative model. J. Real-Time Image Process. 16, 765–773 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, C. et al. Generative AI for secure physical layer communications: a survey. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 11, 3–26 (2025).

  • Chakraborty, A., Alam, M., Dey, V., Chattopadhyay, A. & Mukhopadhyay, D. A survey on adversarial attacks and defences. CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol. 6, 25–45 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N. & Großberger, L. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 861 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mahajan, R. et al. Co-packaged photonics for high performance computing: status, challenges and opportunities. J. Lightwave Technol. 40, 379–392 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wan, Y. et al. Integrating silicon photonics with complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor technologies. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 3, 15–31 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Papatryfonos, K. et al. Co-package technology platform for low-power and low-cost data centers. Appl. Sci. 11, 6098 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheng, H.-T., Pan, J.-S., Lin, W.-H., Yang, Y.-C. & Wu, C.-H. Zone-addressable 20 × 20 940 nm VCSEL array with a 5-bit binary number pattern. Opt. Lett. 48, 3937–3940 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lu, H., Alkhazragi, O., Lin, H., Ng, T. K. & Ooi, B. S. On-chip tamper-resistant quantum entropy source enabled by monolithic emitter–detector integration. In Proc. 2025 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 1–4 (IEEE, 2025).

  • Graham, L. A. et al. The next generation of high speed VCSELs at Finisar. In Proc. Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers XVI (eds Lei, C. & Choquette, K. D.) 13–22 (SPIE, 2012).

  • Michalzik, R. in VCSELs: Fundamentals, Technology and Applications of Vertical-cavity Surface-emitting Lasers (ed Michalzik, R.) 19–75 (Springer, 2013).

  • Chen, Z., Li, Z., Xu, B., Zhang, Y. & Guo, H. The m-least significant bits operation for quantum random number generation. J. Phys. B 52, 195501 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hart, J. D. et al. Recommendations and illustrations for the evaluation of photonic random number generators. APL Photonics 2, 090901 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rukhin, A. et al. A Statistical Test Suite for Random and Pseudorandom Number Generators for Cryptographic Applications No. NIST SP 800-22 Rev. 1 (NIST, 2010); https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/22/r1/upd1/final

  • Lu, H. et al. Optical authentication leveraging chaotic-cavity VCSEL far-field patterns with deep learning. In Proc. 2025 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC) 1–2 (IEEE, 2025).

  • Zhou, Z. et al. Physical unclonable functions based on chaotic vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers for dynamic authentication. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29432498 (2026).