• Tang, F. H. M., Wyckhuys, K. A. G., Li, Z., Maggi, F. & Silva, V. Transboundary impacts of pesticide use in food production. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 6, 383–400 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Devi, P. I., Manjula, M. & Bhavani, R. V. Agrochemicals, environment, and human health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 47, 399–421 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tang, F. H. M., Lenzen, M., McBratney, A. & Maggi, F. Risk of pesticide pollution at the global scale. Nat. Geosci. 14, 206–210 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beketov, M. A., Kefford, B. J., Schäfer, R. B. & Liess, M. Pesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11039–11043 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mostafalou, S. & Abdollahi, M. Pesticides and human chronic diseases: evidences, mechanisms, and perspectives. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 268, 157–177 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kah, M., Tufenkji, N. & White, J. C. Nano-enabled strategies to enhance crop nutrition and protection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 532–540 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Singh, R. P., Handa, R. & Manchanda, G. Nanoparticles in sustainable agriculture: an emerging opportunity. J. Control. Release 329, 1234–1248 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bekah, D., Boyjoo, Y., Mistry Panpadoo, R., White, J. C. & Bhaw-Luximon, A. Nanostimulants and nanofertilizers for precision agriculture: transforming food production in the 21st century. Environ. Sci. Nano 12, 1740–1766 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, X., Keitel, C., Zhang, Y., Wangeci, A. N. & Dijkstra, F. A. Global meta-analysis of nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in rice, wheat and maize. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 338, 108089 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boonupara, T., Udomkun, P., Khan, E. & Kajitvichyanukul, P. Airborne pesticides from agricultural practices: a critical review of pathways, influencing factors, and human health implications. Toxics 11, 858 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, X. et al. Development strategies and prospects of nano-based smart pesticide formulation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66, 6504–6512 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arias-Estévez, M. et al. The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 123, 247–260 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liao, Y., Xu, D., Cao, Y. & Zhu, Y.-G. Advancing sustainable agriculture: enhancing crop nutrition with next-generation nanotech-based fertilizers. Nano Res. 16, 13205–13225 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chandervanshi, Y., Mandal, P. & Tewari, S. Next generation nanobioformulation: a fascinating field for smart and sustainable agriculture. Plant Nano Biol. 13, 100191 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hofmann, T. et al. Technology readiness and overcoming barriers to sustainably implement nanotechnology-enabled plant agriculture. Nat. Food 1, 416–425 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mishra, D. & Khare, P. in Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 50 (eds Singh, V. K., Singh, R. & Lichtfouse, E.) 235–257 (Springer, 2021).

  • Abdollahdokht, D. et al. Conventional agrochemicals towards nano-biopesticides: an overview on recent advances. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 9, 13 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, D. et al. Nano-enabled pesticides for sustainable agriculture and global food security. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 347–360 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, Y. et al. Closing the gap between climate regulation and food security with nano iron oxides. Nat. Sustain. 7, 758–765 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, C. et al. Nanotechnology-driven coordination of shoot–root systems enhances rice nitrogen use efficiency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2508456122 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Noruzi, M., Hadian, P., Soleimanpour, L., Ma’mani, L. & Shahbazi, K. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: an alternative to conventional phosphorus fertilizers in acidic culture media. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 10, 71 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Khodakovskaya, M. V. et al. Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators: effects on tomato growth, reproductive system, and soil microbial community. Small 9, 115–123 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, C. et al. Carbon dots improve nitrogen bioavailability to promote the growth and nutritional quality of soybeans under drought stress. ACS Nano 16, 12415–12424 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rashid, M. I. et al. Nanobiochar reduces ammonia emission, increases nutrient mineralization from vermicompost, and improves maize productivity. J. Clean. Prod. 414, 137694 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. et al. Synthesis of a pH-responsive nano-cellulose/sodium alginate/MOFs hydrogel and its application in the regulation of water and N-fertilizer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 187, 262–271 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kah, M., Kookana, R. S., Gogos, A. & Bucheli, T. D. A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 677–684 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kapoor, P. et al. Nanotechnology-enabled biofortification strategies for micronutrients enrichment of food crops: current understanding and future scope. NanoImpact 26, 100407 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao, Z. et al. Silicon nanodots increase plant resistance against herbivores by simultaneously activating physical and chemical defenses. ACS Nano 17, 3107–3118 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • El-Shetehy, M. et al. Silica nanoparticles enhance disease resistance in Arabidopsis plants. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 344–353 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • An, C. et al. Designd and synthesis of a water-based nanodelivery pesticide system for improved efficacy and safety. ACS Nano 18, 662–679 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deng, X. et al. Preparation of a smart nano-herbicide MP@HLDP with strong permeability performance improves herbicidal activity while reducing the adverse impacts. Chem. Eng. J. 508, 161045 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cao, Y. et al. Engineered nanomaterials reduce metal(loid) accumulation and enhance staple food production for sustainable agriculture. Nat. Food 5, 951–962 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, C. et al. Advanced material modulation of nutritional and phytohormone status alleviates damage from soybean sudden death syndrome. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 1033–1042 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • OECD. Important Issues on Risk Assessment of Manufactured Nanomaterials (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1787/2f6e7c61-en.

  • Carrasco Cabrera, L., Di Piazza, G., Dujardin, B., Marchese, E. & Medina Pastor, P. The 2023 European Union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA J. 23, e9398 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lombi, E., Donner, E., Dusinska, M. & Wickson, F. A one health approach to managing the applications and implications of nanotechnologies in agriculture. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 523–531 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kah, M. et al. Comprehensive framework for human health risk assessment of nanopesticides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 955–964 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mattsson, K., da Silva, V. H., Deonarine, A., Louie, S. M. & Gondikas, A. Monitoring anthropogenic particles in the environment: recent developments and remaining challenges at the forefront of analytical methods. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 56, 101513 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abbas, Q. et al. Recent advances in the detection and quantification of manufactured nanoparticles (MNPs) in complex environmental and biological matrices. J. Clean. Prod. 471, 143454 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pudhuvai, B., Koul, B., Das, R. & Shah, M. P. Nano-fertilizers (NFs) for resurgence in nutrient use efficiency (NUE): a sustainable agricultural strategy. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 11, 1 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ahmed, T., Noman, M., Gardea-Torresdey, J. L., White, J. C. & Li, B. Dynamic interplay between nano-enabled agrochemicals and the plant-associated microbiome. Trends Plant Sci. 28, 1310–1325 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Elekhtyar, N. M. & Al-Huqail, A. A. Effect of foliar application of phosphorus, zinc, and silicon nanoparticles along with mineral NPK fertilization on yield and chemical compositions of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agriculture 13, 1061 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao, Z. et al. Nano-chitosan boosts sesame plant anti-herbivore defenses and seed nutritional metabolites. Environ. Sci. Nano 11, 797–811 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, C. et al. Silica-based nanodelivery systems loaded with matrine for the brown planthopper green control and rice growth promotion. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 11, 17299–17309 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Su, Y. et al. Cost–benefit analysis of nanofertilizers and nanopesticides emphasizes the need to improve the efficiency of nanoformulations for widescale adoption. Nat. Food 3, 1020–1030 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, H. et al. Size effects of nanoenabled agrochemicals in sustainable crop production: advances, challenges, and perspectives. ACS Nano 19, 54–72 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Azzali, A. et al. A novel engineered nanoherbicide: improving performance, efficiency and sustainability of herbicide bentazon. Environ. Sci. Nano 12, 4211–4221 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kutawa, A. B. et al. Trends in nanotechnology and its potentialities to control plant pathogenic fungi: a review. Biology 10, 881 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gao, R. et al. Site-selective proteolytic cleavage of plant viruses by photoactive chiral nanoparticles. Nat. Catal. 5, 694–707 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cai, L., Liu, C., Fan, G., Liu, C. & Sun, X. Preventing viral disease by ZnONPs through directly deactivating TMV and activating plant immunity in Nicotiana benthamiana. Environ. Sci. Nano 6, 3653–3669 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, Q. et al. Nanomaterial inactivates environmental virus and enhances plant immunity for controlling tobacco mosaic virus disease. Nat. Commun. 15, 8509 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qiu, P. et al. Polyethyleneimine-coated MXene quantum dots improve cotton tolerance to Verticillium dahliae by maintaining ROS homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 14, 7392 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ogunyemi, S. O. et al. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using different plant extracts and their antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 47, 341–352 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Noman, M. et al. Bacillus altitudinis-stabilized multifarious copper nanoparticles prevent bacterial fruit blotch in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.): direct pathogen inhibition, in planta particles accumulation, and host stomatal immunity modulation. Small 19, 2207136 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, X. et al. Sustainable and biosafe approach to control potato late blight using mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 72, 23160–23172 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, X. et al. Mode of action of nanochitin whisker against Fusarium pseudograminearum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 217, 356–366 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yin, J. et al. Preparation of multifunctional nano-protectants for high-efficiency green control of anthracnose. Adv. Sci. 11, e2410585 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, S. et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles induce intracellular peroxidation damage of Phytophthora infestans: a new type of green fungicide for late blight control. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 3980–3989 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Z. et al. Enhanced control of tomato bacterial wilt using a triple-responsive nanopesticide with self-supplying reactive oxygen species. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2504824 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cai, L. et al. Antimicrobial mechanisms of g-C3N4 nanosheets against the oomycetes Phytophthora capsici: disrupting metabolism and membrane structures and inhibiting vegetative and reproductive growth. J. Hazard. Mater. 417, 126121 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Debnath, N., Mitra, S., Das, S. & Goswami, A. Synthesis of surface functionalized silica nanoparticles and their use as entomotoxic nanocides. Powder Technol. 221, 252–256 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stadler, T., Buteler, M., Weaver, D. K. & Sofie, S. Comparative toxicity of nanostructured alumina and a commercial inert dust for Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) at varying ambient humidity levels. J. Stored Prod. Res. 48, 81–90 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yasur, J. & Usha Rani, P. Lepidopteran insect susceptibility to silver nanoparticles and measurement of changes in their growth, development and physiology. Chemosphere 124, 92–102 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ayoub, H. A., Khairy, M., Elsaid, S., Rashwan, F. A. & Abdel-Hafez, H. F. Pesticidal activity of nanostructured metal oxides for generation of alternative pesticide formulations. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66, 5491–5498 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liao, H. et al. Salicylic acid functionalized chitosan nanocomposite increases bioactive components and insect resistance of Agastache rugosa. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 205, 106131 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Khandehroo, F., Moravvej, G., Farhadian, N. & Ahmadzadeh, H. Enhanced repellent and anti-nutritional activities of polymeric nanoparticles containing essential oils against red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Sci. Rep. 14, 18567 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ji, H. et al. Chitosan–silica nanocomposites induced resistance in faba bean plants against aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Environ. Sci. Nano 10, 1966–1977 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chi, Y., Zhang, G., Xiang, Y., Cai, D. & Wu, Z. Fabrication of a temperature-controlled-release herbicide using a nanocomposite. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 4969–4975 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kumar, A., Kanwar, R. & Mehta, S. K. Development of phosphatidylcholine/Tween 80 based biocompatible clove oil-in-water nanoemulsion as a green nanocarrier for controlled herbicide delivery. Environ. Pollut. 293, 118558 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kusumavathi, K. et al. Nano-herbicides a sustainable strategy for weed control. Plant Nano Biol. 11, 100132 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dong, J., Liu, X., Chen, Y., Yang, W. & Du, X. User-safe and efficient chitosan-gated porous carbon nanopesticides and nanoherbicides. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 594, 20–34 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Österberg, M., Henn, K. A., Farooq, M. & Valle-Delgado, J. J. Biobased nanomaterials — the role of interfacial interactions for advanced materials. Chem. Rev. 123, 2200–2241 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, Y. et al. Redox-responsive nanopesticides based on natural polymers for environmentally safe delivery of pesticides with enhanced foliar dispersion and washout resistance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 72, 20343–20353 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qin, Y. et al. Functionalized halloysite nanotubes as chlorpyrifos carriers with high adhesion and temperature response for controlling of beet armyworm. Appl. Clay Sci. 222, 106488 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sabry, A.-kH., Helmy, R. M. A., Sleem, R. A., Abolmaaty, S. M. & Mohamady, A. H. Impact of two nano-pesticide formulations in combating the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, and their residues in cucumber fruits, Cucumis sativusL. Sci. Rep. 15, 16552 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, Q. et al. A nanocarrier pesticide delivery system with promising benefits in the case of dinotefuran: strikingly enhanced bioactivity and reduced pesticide residue. Environ. Sci. Nano 9, 988–999 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ding, Y. et al. A mesoporous silica nanocarrier pesticide delivery system for loading acetamiprid: effectively manage aphids and reduce plant pesticide residue. Sci. Total Environ. 863, 160900 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gao, Z. et al. Increased and synergistic RNAi delivery using MOF polydopamine nanoparticles for biopesticide applications. Nat. Commun. 16, 6384 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, Q. et al. Nanoparticle-loaded dsRNA delivery system for pesticides: status and perspective. Adv. Agrochem 4, 235–248 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, L. et al. Engineered nanomaterials enhance crop drought resistance for sustainable agriculture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 73, 8715–8728 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kwaslema, D. R. & Michael, P. S. Meta-analysis of nanomaterials and plants interaction under salinity stress. Physiol. Plant. 176, e14445 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, R., Zhang, C., Zhao, Y., Huang, Y. & Liu, Z. Foliar application with nano-silicon reduced cadmium accumulation in grains by inhibiting cadmium translocation in rice plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 2361–2368 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cao, X. et al. Metalloid nanomaterials alleviate arsenic phytotoxicity and grain accumulation in rice: mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance and rhizosphere behavior. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 6049–6060 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J. et al. Transcriptomics and metabolomics reveal the mechanisms of enhanced constitutive resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by silica nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Nano 10, 2831–2848 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ahmed, T. et al. Bioengineered chitosan-iron nanocomposite controls bacterial leaf blight disease by modulating plant defense response and nutritional status of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Nano Today 45, 101547 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, P. et al. Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence to enable sustainable and precision agriculture. Nat. Plants 7, 864–876 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Agricultural nanotechnology market size and forecast. Verified Market Research https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/agricultural-nanotechnology-market/ (2025).

  • Pulizzi, F. Nano in the future of crops. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 507–507 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pandey, G. Challenges and future prospects of agri-nanotechnology for sustainable agriculture in India. Environ. Technol. Innov. 11, 299–307 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kekeli, M. A., Wang, Q. & Rui, Y. The role of nano-fertilizers in sustainable agriculture: boosting crop yields and enhancing quality. Plants 14, 554 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rehman, A. et al. Green synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles confer drought tolerance in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 212, 105384 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Read, T. L. et al. Optimising the foliar uptake of zinc oxide nanoparticles: do leaf surface properties and particle coating affect absorption? Physiol. Plant. 170, 384–397 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xie, H. et al. Sea urchin-like nanocarrier for enhancing pesticide retention and rain fastness on hydrophobic and hydrophilic crop foliage. Chem. Eng. J. 490, 151901 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, S. et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles cooperate with the phyllosphere to promote grain yield and nutritional quality of rice under heatwave stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2414822121 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Z., Yue, L., Dhankher, O. P. & Xing, B. Nano-enabled improvements of growth and nutritional quality in food plants driven by rhizosphere processes. Environ. Int. 142, 105831 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lowry, G. V., Gregory, K. B., Apte, S. C. & Lead, J. R. Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 6893–6899 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baalousha, M., Afshinnia, K. & Guo, L. Natural organic matter composition determines the molecular nature of silver nanomaterial–NOM corona. Environ. Sci. Nano 5, 868–881 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kang, M. et al. Driving role of zinc oxide nanoparticles with different sizes and hydrophobicity in metabolic response and eco-corona formation in sprouts (Vigna radiata). Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 9875–9886 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chand, N. & Prajapati, S. K. Fate and transport of silver nanoparticles in constructed wetlands. J. Clean. Prod. 489, 144719 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ahmed, B. et al. Nanoparticles in the soil–plant system: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19, 1545–1609 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Avellan, A. et al. Critical review: role of inorganic nanoparticle properties on their foliar uptake and in planta translocation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 13417–13431 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, H. & Li, Z. Nano-enabled agriculture: How do nanoparticles cross barriers in plants? Plant Commun. 3, 14 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, P. et al. Nanoparticle charge and size control foliar delivery efficiency to plant cells and organelles. ACS Nano 14, 7970–7986 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Patel, P. et al. Humidity induced opening of stomata leads to enhanced uptake of copper nanoparticles in Triticum aestivum L. Mater. Today Proc. 43, 3191–3196 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bombo, A. B. et al. A mechanistic view of interactions of a nanoherbicide with target organism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 4453–4462 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Husted, S. et al. What is missing to advance foliar fertilization using nanotechnology? Trends Plant Sci. 28, 90–105 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Avellan, A. et al. Nanoparticle size and coating chemistry control foliar uptake pathways, translocation, and leaf-to-rhizosphere transport in wheat. ACS Nano 13, 5291–5305 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, X., Xie, H., Wang, P. & Yin, H. Nanoparticles in plants: uptake, transport and physiological activity in leaf and root. Materials 16, 3097 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eichert, T., Kurtz, A., Steiner, U. & Goldbach, H. E. Size exclusion limits and lateral heterogeneity of the stomatal foliar uptake pathway for aqueous solutes and water-suspended nanoparticles. Physiol. Plant. 134, 151–160 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arora, P. K. et al. Next-generation fertilizers: the impact of bionanofertilizers on sustainable agriculture. Microb. Cell Fact. 23, 254 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vorholt, J. A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 828–840 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Levard, C., Hotze, E. M., Lowry, G. V. & Brown, G. E. Jr. Environmental transformations of silver nanoparticles: Impact on stability and toxicity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 6900–6914 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cornelis, G., Hund-Rinke, K., Kuhlbusch, T., van den Brink, N. & Nickel, C. Fate and bioavailability of engineered nanoparticles in soils: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 2720–2764 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koman, V. B. et al. Emerging investigator series: linking nanoparticle infiltration and stomatal dynamics for plant nanobionics. Environ. Sci. Nano 9, 1236–1246 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, C., White, J. C., Zhao, J., Zhao, Q. & Xing, B. Uptake of engineered nanoparticles by food crops: characterization, mechanisms, and implications. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 9, 129–153 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, Y., Dai, W. & Luan, Y. Bio- and eco-corona related to plants: Understanding the formation and biological effects of plant protein coatings on nanoparticles. Environ. Pollut. 317, 120784 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ren, J. et al. Nano–eco interactions: a crucial principle for nanotoxicity evaluation. Environ. Sci. Nano 10, 3253–3270 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, S. et al. Nano zero-valent iron aging interacts with the soil microbial community: a microcosm study. Environ. Sci. Nano 6, 1189–1206 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zheng, T., Zhou, Q., Tao, Z. & Ouyang, S. Magnetic iron-based nanoparticles biogeochemical behavior in soil-plant system: a critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 904, 166643 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cervantes-Avilés, P., Huang, X. & Keller, A. A. Dissolution and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in root exudates and soil leachate: implications for nanoagrochemical application. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 13443–13451 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Q. et al. Interplay of metal-based nanoparticles with plant rhizosphere microenvironment: implications for nanosafety and nano-enabled sustainable agriculture. Environ. Sci. Nano 10, 372–392 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Collin, B., Tsyusko, O. V., Starnes, D. L. & Unrine, J. M. Effect of natural organic matter on dissolution and toxicity of sulfidized silver nanoparticles to Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ. Sci. Nano 3, 728–736 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, X.-D. et al. Magnetite nanoparticle coating chemistry regulates root uptake pathways and iron chlorosis in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2304306120 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, J., Schrader, S. & Tebbe, C. C. Legacy effects of earthworms on soil microbial abundance, diversity, and community dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 190, 109294 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klaminder, J. et al. Holes in the tundra: invasive earthworms alter soil structure and moisture in tundra soils. Sci. Total Environ. 859, 160125 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Baccaro, M. et al. Bioturbation of Ag2S-NPs in soil columns by earthworms. Environ. Pollut. 252, 155–162 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heinze, W. M., Mitrano, D. M., Lahive, E., Koestel, J. & Cornelis, G. Nanoplastic transport in soil via bioturbation by Lumbricus terrestris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 16423–16433 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gondikas, A. P. et al. Cysteine-induced modifications of zero-valent silver nanomaterials: Implications for particle surface chemistry, aggregation, dissolution, and silver speciation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 7037–7045 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • He, E. et al. Distinct accumulation patterns, translocation efficiencies, and impacts of nano-fertilizer and nano-pesticide in wheat through foliar versus soil application. J. Hazard. Mater. 480, 136357 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, P. et al. Characterizing the uptake, accumulation and toxicity of silver sulfide nanoparticles in plants. Environ. Sci. Nano 4, 448–460 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lv, Z. et al. Interaction of different-sized ZnO nanoparticles with maize (Zea mays): accumulation, biotransformation and phytotoxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 796, 148927 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, L. et al. Effective uptake of submicrometre plastics by crop plants via a crack-entry mode. Nat. Sustain. 3, 929–937 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwab, F. et al. Barriers, pathways and processes for uptake, translocation and accumulation of nanomaterials in plants-critical review. Nanotoxicology 10, 257–278 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lowry, G. V. et al. Towards realizing nano-enabled precision delivery in plants. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 1255–1269 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stolte Bezerra Lisboa Oliveira, L. & Ristroph, K. D. Critical review: uptake and translocation of organic nanodelivery vehicles in plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 5646–5669 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tao, X. et al. A nanoplatform for enhancing maize growth through controlled P delivery in P-deficient soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 23251–23265 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McKee, M. S. & Filser, J. Impacts of metal-based engineered nanomaterials on soil communities. Environ. Sci. Nano 3, 506–533 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, F. et al. Carbon nanomaterials affect carbon cycle-related functions of the soil microbial community and the coupling of nutrient cycles. J. Hazard. Mater. 390, 122144 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, C. et al. Promoting agricultural waste-driven denitrification and nitrogen sequestration with nano-enabled strategy. Bioresour. Technol. 401, 130746 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, J. et al. ZnO nanofertilizer reduced organic phosphorus transformation and altered microbial function in soil for sustainable agriculture. ACS Nano 19, 6942–6954 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • WFP. WFP 2026 Global Outlook: Hunger and Hope: Innovative Solutions to Address Food Insecurity (World Food Programme, 2025); https://doi.org/10.71958/wfp131186.

  • van Dijk, M., Morley, T., Rau, M. L. & Saghai, Y. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nat. Food 2, 494–501 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lowry, G. V., Avellan, A. & Gilbertson, L. M. Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology in the agri-tech revolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 517–522 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rani, N., Sagar, N. A., Chauhan, A. & Mondal, A. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles: characterization and emerging applications in sustainable agriculture. Ind. Crops Prod. 233, 121393 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Du, W. et al. Elevated CO2 levels modify TiO2 nanoparticle effects on rice and soil microbial communities. Sci. Total Environ. 578, 408–416 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Herrera, W. et al. Meta-analysis of metal nanoparticles degrading pesticides: what parameters are relevant? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 60168–60179 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rezaei, E. E. et al. Climate change impacts on crop yields. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 4, 831–846 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, H. et al. Zno nanoparticles: improving photosynthesis, shoot development, and phyllosphere microbiome composition in tea plants. J. Nanobiotechnol. 22, 389 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, C. et al. Nitrogen-doped carbon dots increased light conversion and electron supply to improve the corn photosystem and yield. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 12317–12325 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, X., Pu, H. & Sun, D.-W. Nano light conversion agents: recent advances, future prospects and challenges in enhancing plant green cultivation. J. Clean. Prod. 426, 138919 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, H. et al. Carbon dots promote the growth and photosynthesis of mung bean sprouts. Carbon 136, 94–102 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sakoda, K., Yamori, W., Groszmann, M. & Evans, J. R. Stomatal, mesophyll conductance, and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis during induction. Plant Physiol. 185, 146–160 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Routier, C. et al. Chitosan-modified polyethyleneimine nanoparticles for enhancing the carboxylation reaction and plants’ CO2 uptake. ACS Nano 17, 3430–3441 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yue, L. et al. Silica nanomaterials promote rice tillering and yield by regulating rhizosphere processes, nitrogen uptake, and hormone pathways. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 11, 16650–16660 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J. et al. Fe-based nanomaterial-induced root nodulation is modulated by flavonoids to improve soybean (Glycine max) growth and quality. ACS Nano 16, 21047–21062 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, M. et al. Dynamic transformation of nano-MoS2 in a soil–plant system empowers its multifunctionality on soybean growth. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 1211–1222 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, J. et al. Small particles, big effects: how nanoparticles can enhance plant growth in favorable and harsh conditions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 66, 1274–1294 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheng, L. et al. Manipulation in root-associated microbiome via carbon nanosol for plant growth improvements. J. Nanobiotechnol. 22, 685 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sun, M. et al. Nanoscale Zno improves the amino acids and lipids in tomato fruits and the subsequent assimilation in a simulated human gastrointestinal tract model. ACS Nano 17, 19938–19951 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, Y. et al. Photosynthetic response mechanisms in typical C3 and C4 plants upon La2O3 nanoparticle exposure. Environ. Sci. Nano 7, 81–92 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Castillo, C. et al. In vivo transformations of positively charged nanoparticles alter the formation and function of RuBisCO photosynthetic protein corona. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 1152–1162 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Savary, S. et al. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 430–439 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • FAO. The Impact of Disasters on Agriculture and Food Security 2023: Avoiding and Reducing Losses Through Investment in Resilience (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2023); https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/cc7900en.

  • Cao, X. & Wang, Z. Application of nano-agricultural technology for biotic stress management: mechanisms, optimization, and future perspectives. Environ. Sci. Nano 9, 4336–4353 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. et al. Application of an environmentally friendly nanopesticide translocation system based on Metarhizium anisopliae: Using biodegradable chitosan nanopesticides to control Spodoptera frugiperda. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 310, 143261 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, D. et al. Preparation of a fluxapyroxad nanoformulation with strong plant uptake for efficient control of verticillium wilt in potato. J. Agric. Food Chem. 73, 7121–7130 (2025).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xiao, Z. et al. Boosting rice resilience: role of biogenic nanosilica in reducing arsenic toxicity and defending against herbivore. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 408–418 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, C. et al. Nanoselenium enhanced wheat resistance to aphids by regulating biosynthesis of DIMBOA and volatile components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 69, 14103–14114 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lv, N. et al. Binary collaboration of carboxyl-functionalized mesoporous silica microspheres and sliver nanoparticle improved imidacloprid bioactivity towards insecticide-resistance insect pests. Chem. Eng. J. 507, 160386 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Preisler, A. C. et al. Atrazine nanoencapsulation improves pre-emergence herbicidal activity against Bidens pilosa without enhancing long-term residual effect on Glycine max. Pest Manag. Sci. 76, 141–149 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chaudhry, S. & Sidhu, G. P. S. Climate change regulated abiotic stress mechanisms in plants: a comprehensive review. Plant Cell Rep. 41, 1–31 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yue, L. et al. The mechanism of manganese ferrite nanomaterials promoting drought resistance in rice. Nanomaterials 13, 1484 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, S. et al. Seed priming with reactive oxygen species-generating nanoparticles enhanced maize tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 19932–19941 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, Y. et al. Magnesium-doped carbon quantum dot nanomaterials alleviate salt stress in rice by scavenging reactive oxygen species to increase photosynthesis. ACS Nano 18, 31188–31203 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Singh, D., Sillu, D., Kumar, A. & Agnihotri, S. Dual nanozyme characteristics of iron oxide nanoparticles alleviate salinity stress and promote the growth of an agroforestry tree, Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. Environ. Sci. Nano 8, 1308–1325 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shalaby, T. A. et al. Nano-selenium, silicon and H2O2 boost growth and productivity of cucumber under combined salinity and heat stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 212, 111962 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shi, Y. et al. Nano silicon causes a shift in rhizospheric soil microbial community structure and improves nutrient uptake and assimilation in tomato plants under low temperature. Soil Tillage Res. 248, 106451 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, L. et al. Stress response and tolerance of Zea mays to CeO2 nanoparticles: cross talk among H2O2, heat shock protein, and lipid peroxidation. ACS Nano 6, 9615–9622 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cheng, B. et al. Carbon dots enhanced cold tolerance of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.): scavenging reactive oxygen species, modulating hormones and up-regulating gene expression. Environ. Sci. Nano 10, 2849–2860 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, L. et al. Nanobiotechnology-based strategies for enhanced crop stress resilience. Nat. Food 3, 829–836 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ayyaz, A. et al. Calcium nanoparticles (Ca-NPs) improve drought stress tolerance in Brassica napus by modulating the photosystem II, nutrient acquisition and antioxidant performance. NanoImpact 28, 100423 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dawood, M. G., El-Awadi, M. E. -s & Sadak, M. S. Chitosan and its nanoform regulates physiological processes and antioxidant mechanisms to improve drought stress tolerance of Vicia faba plant. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 24, 5696–5709 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kokilavani, S., Janani, B., Balasurya, S. & Khan, S. S. in Agricultural and Environmental Nanotechnology: Novel Technologies and their Ecological Impact (eds Fernandez-Luqueno, F. & Patra, J. K.) 551–582 (Springer, 2023).

  • Motellier, S., Locatelli, D. & Bera, R. Insight into the crucial role of secondary mineral phases in the transfer of gold nanoparticles through a sand column using online ICP-MS/spICP-MS monitoring. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 10714–10722 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Makselon, J., Siebers, N., Meier, F., Vereecken, H. & Klumpp, E. Role of rain intensity and soil colloids in the retention of surfactant-stabilized silver nanoparticles in soil. Environ. Pollut. 238, 1027–1034 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hamdaoui, Q. et al. Metrological characterization of an aerosol exposure chamber to explore the inhalation effects of the combination of paraquat and TiO2 nano-objects. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21, 200626 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Park, J. et al. Spatial–temporal dispersion of aerosolized nanoparticles during the use of consumer spray products and estimates of inhalation exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 7624–7638 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kim, H.-S., Ahn, J.-Y., Hwang, K.-Y., Kim, I.-K. & Hwang, I. Atmospherically stable nanoscale zero-valent iron particles formed under controlled air contact: characteristics and reactivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 1760–1766 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pourzahedi, L. et al. Life cycle considerations of nano-enabled agrochemicals: are today’s tools up to the task? Environ. Sci. Nano 5, 1057–1069 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kah, M., Weniger, A.-K. & Hofmann, T. Impacts of (nano)formulations on the fate of an insecticide in soil and consequences for environmental exposure assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 10960–10967 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, D. et al. Effects of abamectin nanocapsules on bees through host physiology, immune function, and gut microbiome. Sci. Total Environ. 930, 172738 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, M., Xu, G., Yang, X., Zeng, Y. & Yu, Y. Metal oxide nanoparticles facilitate the accumulation of bifenthrin in earthworms by causing damage to body cavity. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114629 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, X. et al. Trends, risks and opportunities in environmental nanotechnology. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 5, 572–587 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, S., Teng, Y., Luo, Y., Kuramae, E. & Ren, W. Threats to the soil microbiome from nanomaterials: a global meta and machine-learning analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 188, 109248 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, J. et al. Risk assessment of metal/bio-based nanopesticides: plant growth, soil environment, and non-target organisms. Environ. Sci. Nano 12, 2285–2296 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, C. et al. Environmental behaviors and toxic mechanisms of engineered nanomaterials in soil. Environ. Res. 242, 117820 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, H. et al. Ocean acidification enhances the embryotoxicity of CuO nanoparticles to Oryzias melastigma. J. Hazard. Mater. 453, 131361 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Demir, E. et al. Hazard assessment of the effects of acute and chronic exposure to permethrin, copper hydroxide, acephate, and validamycin nanopesticides on the physiology of Drosophila: novel insights into the cellular internalization and biological effects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 9121 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yang, Y.-M. et al. Iron nanostructure primes arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis tightly connecting maize leaf photosynthesis via a nanofilm effect. ACS Nano 18, 20324–20339 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Samarasinghe, S. V. A. C., Krishnan, K., Aitken, R. J., Naidu, R. & Megharaj, M. Chronic effects of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles to earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 5, 129–134 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dai, Y. et al. Transfer and transformation of CeO2 NPs along a terrestrial trophic food chain. Environ. Sci. Nano 7, 588–598 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Majumdar, S. et al. Cerium biomagnification in a terrestrial food chain: Influence of particle size and growth stage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 6782–6792 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, J., Sun, J., Bosker, T., Vijver, M. G. & Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. Toxicokinetics and particle number-based trophic transfer of a metallic nanoparticle mixture in a terrestrial food chain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 2792–2803 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dang, F., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, D. & Xing, B. Transfer and toxicity of silver nanoparticles in the food chain. Environ. Sci. Nano 8, 1519–1535 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Manayath, D., Travas-Sejdic, J., Leitao, E. M. & Kah, M. Environmental and human risk assessment of polymer nanocarriers: a review on current analytical challenges and promising approaches. Environ. Sci. Nano 12, 1079–1106 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, W., Li, M. & Achal, V. A comprehensive review on environmental and human health impacts of chemical pesticide usage. Emerg. Contam. 11, 100410 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • DeLoid, G. M. et al. An integrated methodology for assessing the impact of food matrix and gastrointestinal effects on the biokinetics and cellular toxicity of ingested engineered nanomaterials. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 14, 40 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Committee, E. S. et al. Guidance on risk assessment of nanomaterials to be applied in the food and feed chain: human and animal health. EFSA J. 19, e06768 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rajput, V. et al. ZnO and CuO nanoparticles: a threat to soil organisms, plants, and human health. Environ. Geochem. Health 42, 147–158 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, K. et al. New insights into occupational exposure and risk assessment of nanopesticides and conventional pesticides for agricultural workers. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 5, 128–137 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Llewellyn, S. V. et al. Understanding the impact of more realistic low-dose, prolonged engineered nanomaterial exposure on genotoxicity using 3D models of the human liver. J. Nanobiotechnol. 19, 193 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Okeke, E. S. et al. Nano-enabled agrochemicals/materials: Potential human health impact, risk assessment, management strategies and future prospects. Environ. Pollut. 295, 118722 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fu, P. P., Xia, Q., Hwang, H.-M., Ray, P. C. & Yu, H. Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: generation of reactive oxygen species. J. Food Drug Anal. 22, 64–75 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, X. et al. Metabolomic and bioenergetic responses of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells following exposure to commercial copper hydroxide nanopesticide. Environ. Sci. Nano 9, 589–605 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ren, Z. et al. Cu(OH)2 nanopesticide induced liver dysfunction in mice by targeting lipoylated tricarboxylic acid cycle proteins via ferredoxin 1. J. Hazard. Mater. 494, 138403 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • El Yamani, N. et al. Hazard identification of nanomaterials: in silico unraveling of descriptors for cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. Nano Today 46, 101581 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moreira, L., Costa, C., Pires, J., Teixeira, J. P. & Fraga, S. How can exposure to engineered nanomaterials influence our epigenetic code? A review of the mechanisms and molecular targets. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 788, 108385 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, X. et al. Nickel-based nanomaterials: a comprehensive analysis of risk assessment, toxicity mechanisms, and future strategies for health risk prevention. J. Nanobiotechnol. 23, 211 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhang, Q. et al. Exposure to alumina nanoparticles in female mice during pregnancy induces neurodevelopmental toxicity in the offspring. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 253 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Skalska, J., Dąbrowska-Bouta, B. & Strużyńska, L. Oxidative stress in rat brain but not in liver following oral administration of a low dose of nanoparticulate silver. Food Chem. Toxicol. 97, 307–315 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Poland, C. A. et al. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 423–428 (2008).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lei, C. et al. Different functional groups of carbon dots influence the formation of protein crowns and pepsin characteristic in vitro digestion. Food Chem. 440, 138224 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rajpal, V. R. et al. The nano-paradox: addressing nanotoxicity for sustainable agriculture, circular economy and SDGs. J. Nanobiotechnol. 23, 314 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goodman, A. J., Benner, B. F. & Montaño, M. D. Out of the lab and into the environment: the evolution of single particle ICP-MS over the past decade. Environ. Sci. Nano 12, 1789–1800 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yu, S., Tan, Z., Lai, Y., Li, Q. & Liu, J. Nanoparticulate pollutants in the environment: analytical methods, formation, and transformation. Eco Environ. Health 2, 61–73 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiang, C. et al. Current methods and prospects for analysis and characterization of nanomaterials in the environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 7426–7447 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • El Hadri, H. & Hackley, V. A. Investigation of cloud point extraction for the analysis of metallic nanoparticles in a soil matrix. Environ. Sci. Nano 4, 105–116 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bland, G. D. & Lowry, G. V. Multistep method to extract moderately soluble copper oxide nanoparticles from soil for quantification and characterization. Anal. Chem. 92, 9620–9628 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhou, X.-X. et al. Speciation analysis of Ag2S and ZnS nanoparticles at the ng/L level in environmental waters by cloud point extraction coupled with LC-ICPMS. Anal. Chem. 92, 4765–4770 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, J. -f et al. Cloud point extraction as an advantageous preconcentration approach for analysis of trace silver nanoparticles in environmental waters. Anal. Chem. 81, 6496–6502 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cai, W. et al. Extraction and quantification of nanoparticulate mercury in natural soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 1763–1770 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saleh, T. A. Trends in the sample preparation and analysis of nanomaterials as environmental contaminants. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 28, e00101 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Urstoeger, A., Wimmer, A., Kaegi, R., Reiter, S. & Schuster, M. Looking at silver-based nanoparticles in environmental water samples: repetitive cloud point extraction bridges gaps in electron microscopy for naturally occurring nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 12063–12071 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Steinhoff, B. et al. Investigation of the fate of silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in model wastewater effluents via selected area electron diffraction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 8681–8689 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Merrifield, R. C., Arkill, K. P., Palmer, R. E. & Lead, J. R. A high resolution study of dynamic changes of Ce2O3 and CeO2 nanoparticles in complex environmental media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 8010–8016 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Neves, V. M. et al. La2O3 nanoparticles: Study of uptake and distribution in Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng.) pedersen by LA-ICP-MS and μ-XRF. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 10827–10834 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xie, H. et al. Size characterization of nanomaterials in environmental and biological matrices through non-electron microscopic techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 835, 155399 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Flores, K. et al. Environmental applications and recent innovations in single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SP-ICP-MS). Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 56, 1–26 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meng, X. et al. The biological fate of the polymer nanocarrier material monomethoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(D,L-lactic acid) in rat. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 11, 1003–1009 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zandanel, C. et al. Biodistribution of polycyanoacrylate nanoparticles encapsulating doxorubicin by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI). J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 47, 55–61 (2018).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Loeschner, K. et al. Detection and characterization of silver nanoparticles in chicken meat by asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with detection by conventional or single particle ICP-MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 8185–8195 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • OECD. Test No. 124: Determination of the Volume Specific Surface Area of Manufactured Nanomaterials (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development., 2022); https://doi.org/10.1787/abb72f8f-en.

  • OECD. Test No. 125: Nanomaterial Particle Size and Size Distribution of Nanomaterials (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1787/af5f9bda-en.

  • OECD. Test No. 318: Dispersion Stability of Nanomaterials in Simulated Environmental Media (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264284142-en.

  • OECD. Guidance Document for the Testing of Dissolution and Dispersion Stability of Nanomaterials, and the Use of the Data for Further Environmental Testing and Assessment (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2020); https://doi.org/10.1787/f0539ec5-en.

  • OECD. A Tiered Approach for Reliable Bioaccumulation Assessment of Manufactured Nanomaterials in the Environment Whilst Minimising the Use of Vertebrate Testing (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2024); https://doi.org/10.1787/2f16cda4-en.

  • Rasmussen, K., Sayre, P., Kobe, A., Gonzalez, M. & Rauscher, H. 25 years of research and regulation: is nanotechnology safe to commercialize? Front. Toxicol. 7, 1629813 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jiao, C. et al. Dissolution and retention process of CeO2 nanoparticles in soil with dynamic redox conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 14649–14657 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gottschalk, F., Sonderer, T., Scholz, R. W. & Nowack, B. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 9216–9222 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Praetorius, A. et al. Single-particle multi-element fingerprinting (spMEF) using inductively-coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ICP-TOFMS) to identify engineered nanoparticles against the elevated natural background in soils. Environ. Sci. Nano 4, 307–314 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bland, G. D., Battifarano, M., Pradas del Real, A. E., Sarret, G. & Lowry, G. V. Distinguishing engineered TiO2 nanomaterials from natural Ti nanomaterials in soil using spICP-TOFMS and machine learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 2990–3001 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kumari, R. et al. Regulation and safety measures for nanotechnology-based agri-products. Front. Genome Ed. 5, 1200987 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Amenta, V. et al. Regulatory aspects of nanotechnology in the agri/feed/food sector in EU and non-EU countries. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 73, 463–476 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Foss Hansen, S. et al. Nanoproducts — what is actually available to European consumers? Environ. Sci. Nano 3, 169–180 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Singh, S. et al. Smart fertilizer technologies: an environmental impact assessment for sustainable agriculture. Smart Agric. Technol. 8, 100504 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guidelines for Preparing Quality Standards for Nano-Pesticide Products (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2023); http://www.tes.org.cn/archives/hangyebiaozhun/634.html.

  • Kah, M. & Gomes, C. Increasing the societal impacts of nanotechnology applications in food and agricultural systems. J. Nanopart. Res. 27, 32 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grieger, K. et al. Best practices from nano-risk analysis relevant for other emerging technologies. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 998–1001 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Handford, C. E. et al. Awareness and attitudes towards the emerging use of nanotechnology in the agri-food sector. Food Control 57, 24–34 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Channab, B.-E. et al. Recent advances in nano-fertilizers: synthesis, crop yield impact, and economic analysis. Nanoscale 16, 4484–4513 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fujimori, S. et al. A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation. Nat. Sustain. 2, 386–396 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, P. et al. Comparative environmental impact assessment of copper-based nanopesticides and conventional pesticides. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 3, 593–600 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, P., Yang, M., Hermanowicz, S. W. & Huang, Y. Efficacy-associated cost analysis of copper-based nanopesticides for tomato disease control. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2, 796–804 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Liu, P. et al. Public perceptions and willingness-to-pay for nanopesticides. Nanomaterials 12, 8 (2022).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ke, M., Zhang, K., Hicks, A. L., Wu, F. & You, J. A life cycle risk assessment of nanopesticides in freshwater. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 25, 100565 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Velicogna, J. R. et al. Soil invertebrate toxicity and bioaccumulation of nano copper oxide and copper sulphate in soils, with and without biosolids amendment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 217, 112222 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ettrup, K. et al. Development of comparative toxicity potentials of TiO2 nanoparticles for use in life cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 4027–4037 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meesters, J. A. J., Koelmans, A. A., Quik, J. T. K., Hendriks, A. J. & van de Meent, D. Multimedia modeling of engineered nanoparticles with simplebox4nano: model definition and evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 5726–5736 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Salieri, B., Hischier, R., Quik, J. T. K. & Jolliet, O. Fate modelling of nanoparticle releases in LCA: an integrative approach towards “USEtox4Nano”. J. Clean. Prod. 206, 701–712 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ma, Y. et al. A pH/cellulase dual stimuli-responsive cellulose-coated metal–organic framework for eco-friendly fungicide delivery. Chem. Eng. J. 462, 142190 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, M., Deng, G., Yu, H., Zhou, X. & Liu, M. An environmentally friendly, rainfall-resistant suspension prepared based on halloysite nanotubes for the delivery of hydrophobic pesticides. Chem. Eng. J. 503, 158168 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Juganson, K., Ivask, A., Blinova, I., Mortimer, M. & Kahru, A. NanoE-Tox: new and in-depth database concerning ecotoxicity of nanomaterials. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 6, 1788–1804 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sud, M. Managing the Biodiversity Impacts of Fertiliser and Pesticide Use: Overview and Insights from Trends and Policies Across Selected OECD Countries (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2020); https://doi.org/10.1787/63942249-en.